NationStates Jolt Archive


New Nuclear Arms -- All Nations Advised to Look

imported_Skepticism
09-11-2003, 05:35
Official USSS Government Broadcast, both on local and international frequences

Static resolves into a picture of a simple trench system. Several hundred soldiers, along with tanks and APCs, are revealed as the camera pans from side to side. The day is clear and mind; by rippling flags and touseled hair, the wind can clearly be seen blowing right at the camera. After several seconds, the image quickly zooms several hundred meters to an opposing defense line.

This one is far more advanced, with concrete blockhouses, thick belts of razorwire, and a complex maze of trenches and deep dugouts. Thousands upon thousands of plastic dummy soldiers take up positions, along with hundreds of simply made metal mock-up artillery pieces, tanks, and infantry carriers. A voiceover begins.

"As you can see, our brave progressive forces are faced with the task of overruning this defensive line. Were these dummies and models real soldiers and arms of war, the position would be nearly impossible to take, especially with the relative meager forces we have to oppose them. Despite the advances in squad weaponry, tactics, despite the new vehicles and airplanes and artillery, the USSS troops you see simply could not force a breech in these lines. However..."

As the announcer's voice trails away, a titanic flash fills the camera, forcing one to flinch involuntarily. The image quakes and shivers, before resolving itself again. The image is one that everyone knows by heart -- an image of death and destruction:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/nature/programmes/tv/state_planet/picpops/images/prog1.jpg

Even as the mushroom cloud climbs into the sky, however, the USSS men and machines swarm out of the trench, sprinting across the gap, jumping into the "enemy" trenches and rapidly overruning the annihilated positions, the blockhouses flattened by the blast, the tank traps atomized, the deep dugouts collapsed in a heatbeat. As dust from the explosion drifts downrange, back towards the camera, the image refocuses on a simple piece of machinery, consisting of a single metal box with a single probe; a Geiger counter. It remains silent. The gauge does not move a jot.

The image rapidly shifts from one counter to another, more than a dozen in all, and none of them show any sign of radiation. The voiceover resumes.

"As you can see, we of the USSS have learned how to utilize the most destructive weapon known to mankind without also showering the earth with poison. The very aspect that has made atomic weapons unfeasible -- the decades-long radiation lingering, that polutes not countrys but continents -- has been eliminated. While we will of course not start throwing nuclear weapons around with wild abandon, let it be known to any that would disturb the soverign soil of the USSS that we shall utilize these new weapons against you, and if necessary, elsewhere as well. Any potential enemy of the USSS be warned -- we have mastered the atom, and will unleash it upon you if forced to."

Picture fades

NOTE: This is an explanation to demonstrate why this idea is not Godmodding. If I see my concept for radiationless nukes copied by anyone without permission there will be hell to pay; come up with your own ideas. This is not my nation telling your nation how to make non-nukes. This is me, personally, telling you, personally, a technological potential that I have decided the USSS will use. And no, they are not yet for sale. All you know is, somehow we (claimed to have) detonated a nuclear weapon that didn't give off radiation somehow. END NOTE

The radiationless nuclear weapon (or non-nuke) operates on a rather simple basis, but first one must understand where the radiation comes from. When an atomic weapon detonates, all of the fissile material is not turned into energy; the detonation is not 100% efficient. Also, the atomic blast itself gives off approximately 5% of its energy in a burst of hard ionizing radiation, which is the first result of the chain reaction going critical. Fallout results from not only unfissioned material but the ground which has been "baked" into radioactive byproducts by the intitial hard ionizing radiation.

The USSS weapons take a conventional, fairly small plutonium warhead (generally under 5 kilotons right now, perhaps more later) and wraps it in a layer of a special compound made of, among other things, uranium and cobalt. When the plutonium is compressed by the explosive lens at detonation, the ionizing radiation strikes this compound, transmuting it into an enormously radioative, but extremely (less than a fraction of a second) short-lived isotope. Doing so takes so much energy that, to the radiation, it might as well be lead -- it can penetrate no further. In that tiny piece of a second, the compound (code-named simply as BETA) emits enormous numbers of beta particles, which are directed by steel "mirrors" back into the plutonium, causing it to react and fission to a much further degree.

The result is nearly 100% efficiency in the reaction of the core, as well as the absorption of hard x-rays which induce radioactivity in other sources. The enormous neutron flux also "burns out" the hundreds of myriad byproducts caused by the fission itself. In short, all sources of radiation are contained before polluting the outside world.

Unfortunately, only small weapons can be made radiationless thus far, and it is likely that the limit will never increase significantly. Also, the BETA Compound is at present difficult and expensive to produce, although prices will drop as the government orders more weapons. Currently a 1-kiloton weapon costs something over a billion dollars to build, and BETA production problems may take some time to resolve.

USSS Diplomatic Jargon
Because there are no long-term effects whatsoever, and the weapons themselves will be almost all around or under a 1-kiloton yield, we have no complusions against using these weapons as we would a standard, very large bomb, such as the MOAB; for the same reasons, we hold that the use of non-nukes does not merit a traditional nuclear response, as in effect it is just a really, really big bomb, not a WMD.
09-11-2003, 05:40
OOC: Of course, Attican Scientists came up with quick ways to REMOVE radiation from 'conventional' nuclear weapons years ago, but this is still quite interesting.

OOC2: If this actually worked though, I am sure one of the nuclear powers would have it by now...
imported_Skepticism
09-11-2003, 05:43
OOC: Of course, Attican Scientists came up with quick ways to REMOVE radiation from 'conventional' nuclear weapons years ago, but this is still quite interesting.

OOC2: If this actually worked though, I am sure one of the nuclear powers would have it by now...

OOC: Well, you nations with your fancy intergalactic spaceships I would hope have radiationless nukes by whenever you are ;)

I have not seen any modern tech nation announce anything like this however, so I'd like to see the response to some degree. Should be interresting.

And I must agree that, were there some way to do it, it would have been done by now. But that is the beauty of NS.
Jangle Jangle Ridge
09-11-2003, 06:09
I have something based on that tech already. Not in a bomb form though. I use the same kind of technology for an atomic rifle and cannon. It uses the atomic reaction, coupled with a related compound of materials. It has a lithium rod in order to stop and start the reaction. However, it's extremely expensive, as size is an issue.
09-11-2003, 06:12
OOC: This is a good way to use nukes. people just think its godmodding when people go "I r n00king you wif 244034435 bombs! BANG!"
09-11-2003, 06:12
20 billion dollars?

I want one!!!
Jangle Jangle Ridge
09-11-2003, 06:17
I only use nukes as a last resort. Also, on the subject of atomic cannons, they are a very useful tool for space tech. Fast, easy purging of a planet. And, if you use my method, little planetary scarring and no radiation.
Crimmond
09-11-2003, 07:08
Lord Tian watches and looks at a report from an orbiting ship. "Good. They have it also. It won't be long before Demolishers are everywhere." he said quietly, turning back to the reports in front of him. "It's about damn time the nuclear powers started figuring it out..."
09-11-2003, 07:09
OOC: Since when is Attica futuristic???
New York and Jersey
09-11-2003, 07:17
A nuclear weapon is a nuclear weapon no matter the fancy jargon, or the circumstances of its development. Although we applaud your government for its useless spending of money. Neutron bombs are as effective, leave buildings intact, and only kill organics. Of course we're just boasting on this what we really wanted to say was this, if our nations ever come to the brink and war is declared..to put it simply: If we see a mushroom cloud, you'll see a mushroom cloud. Simple, no?

Ambassador Joseph Cortilliari
Federal Republic of New York and New Jersey
Soviet Haaregrad
09-11-2003, 07:33
OOC: Since when can you dictate what we can research? Honestly, who hasn't thought of the idea of a radiation-free nuclear weapon before? :roll:

IC:

Haaregradia congradulates you on your success in developing a radiation free nuclear device. In the days when we believed nuclear weapons were needed to ensure national security we were close to perfecting a low-radiation nuclear weapon, however that project was cancelled after nuclear weapons were removed from our budgets.
imported_Skepticism
09-11-2003, 12:27
OOC:
OOC: Since when is Attica futuristic???

I had thought that you were space-based futuristic. Aren't you?

OOC: Since when can you dictate what we can research? Honestly, who hasn't thought of the idea of a radiation-free nuclear weapon before? :roll:

IC:

Haaregradia congradulates you on your success in developing a radiation free nuclear device. In the days when we believed nuclear weapons were needed to ensure national security we were close to perfecting a low-radiation nuclear weapon, however that project was cancelled after nuclear weapons were removed from our budgets.

Everyone thinks about it, but no one RPs it. I do not want every other modern-day nation coming up tomorrow with oodles of these weapons

A nuclear weapon is a nuclear weapon no matter the fancy jargon, or the circumstances of its development. Although we applaud your government for its useless spending of money. Neutron bombs are as effective, leave buildings intact, and only kill organics. Of course we're just boasting on this what we really wanted to say was this, if our nations ever come to the brink and war is declared..to put it simply: If we see a mushroom cloud, you'll see a mushroom cloud. Simple, no?

Ambassador Joseph Cortilliari
Federal Republic of New York and New Jersey

Ah, friend, but you miss the point. The neutron bomb contaminates the area in which it is used for a long period of time, and the use itself, due in great part to the long-term radiation, generally gets the other side to pull its nukes out.

What we propose is a weapon which can be fired from an artillery shell, but explode with the force of several million pounds of TNT, and have no unfortunate diplomatic side-effects (or less, at least).
09-11-2003, 12:50
In the unlikely event that the USSS launches these weapons against us, we will not hesitate to utilise a nuclear response. No matter if these bombs do not produce fallout - their destructive power is the same.

We would like to congratulate the USSS on its development.