The Holy Dominion Completes Two Projects!
We wonder how a "submarine carrier" is able to launch and carry 3 big F/A-22 CTOL aircraft.
((Because it does ;) ))
OOC: Not only the F/A-22 is huge, but I don't see how you have a long runway inside your sub to launch CTOL aircraft.
At least, make the sub can only carry V/STOVL aircraft (harrier, F-35B JSF, etc.).
((No! I will do what I want to do. I'll modify it! :P
The sub is built mainly to launch these things anyway ))
((No! I will do what I want to do. I'll modify it! :P
The sub is built mainly to launch these things anyway ))
OOC: Still, I don't see a sub could be large enough to carry and launch 3 full-sized F/A-22s.
You could substitute it with F-35Bs instead, which are also very good.
((Well I like F-22's :) ))
As we listen in aww to these amazing projects the leader of lima Beens agrees to send 500 million.
((Well I like F-22's :) ))
OOC: You couldn't have a F/A-22 to substitute a F-14 or F/A-18 off a Nimitz, either, nor make a F/A-22 go off a VTOL carrier or Amphibious assualt ship.
((WHO CARES. Do something better with ur time lol))
((WHO CARES. Do something better with ur time lol))
OOC: I'm just trying to help you to make your sub more "Realistic" and reasonable, if you understand. Many people will not accept it if you claim that you could have F/A-22s launch off a sub.
If you don't appreciate the help, or thinking I am insulting you this way, understood. Sorry for bugging you.
/hijack.
Your kamikazee bomber seems to be pointless. In what situations would a country use it?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.weekendlazyness.com/img/battlesig.jpg (http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1849269)
No japanese or german submarine was ever long enough to support the runway required to launch a F/A-22. You at least need to have "carrier capable" F-22s. Either say thats what you have or buy them from someone.
Your kamikazee bomber seems to be pointless. In what situations would a country use it?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.weekendlazyness.com/img/battlesig.jpg (http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1849269)
Hmm... Kamikaze, old tactic.
Seems next to worthless now, with the great efficency of standoff percision strike capabilities.
((Nah it's cool Omz, I just want F-22's. And the difference between WWII Kamikaze and B52 size Kamikaze full of gas and ammo is alot :P Plus they're unmanned so no loss of life.))
((Nah it's cool Omz, I just want F-22's. And the difference between WWII Kamikaze and B52 size Kamikaze full of gas and ammo is alot :P Plus they're unmanned so no loss of life.))
OOC: A B-52 size "Kamikaze" plane like that is expensive, unefficent, and easy to shoot down.
You could dvelop a stealthy UAV fitted with explosive, much like a bigger and ground/ship attack version of the Tacit Rainbow.