Trademark Unvalid Goodbye
Trademark Unvalid Goodbye
Unum Veritas
11-10-2003, 20:12
Wait a sec....I just saw a thread with that exact plane on it, but with several replies...... :?:
I could've sworn I've seen these exact 2 in another storefront.
I know it mine and Geoforces plane i just made a diffrent storefront!
Zvarinograd
11-10-2003, 20:14
OOC:
That's modern/post-modern?
If it is...
I-M-P-O-S-S-I-B-L-E
Not even the greatest of NS aerospace corporations can manage mach 6 while still being modern-future.
Unum Veritas
11-10-2003, 20:14
Oh, I was just wondering. It was rather strange...
Unum Veritas
11-10-2003, 20:18
OOC:
That's modern/post-modern?
If it is...
I-M-P-O-S-S-I-B-L-E
Not even the greatest of NS aerospace corporations can manage mach 6 while still being modern-future.
Yeah, the fastest aircraft in the RL world only went just over Mach 3... I would consider scramjets to be futuristic technology and probably wouldn't RP with them because of their inherent advantage over RL tech...
No only if you want and it'll cost mor but normal it goes mach 3.2
Seversky
11-10-2003, 20:19
Yeah, the fastest aircraft in the RL world only went just over Mach 3
Not true. The X-15 broke Mach 6.
Zvarinograd
11-10-2003, 20:20
OOC:
True, but not practical military use, as of yet.
Unum Veritas
11-10-2003, 20:21
OOC:
That's modern/post-modern?
If it is...
I-M-P-O-S-S-I-B-L-E
Not even the greatest of NS aerospace corporations can manage mach 6 while still being modern-future.
Yeah, the fastest aircraft in the RL world only went just over Mach 3
Not true. The X-15 broke Mach 6.
According to www.globalaircraft.org the fastest aircraft on record was the XB-70 Valkyrie, which achieved a speed of Mach 3.1
Unum Veritas
11-10-2003, 20:22
Wait, never mind....I misread that. Sorry :oops:
OOC:
That's modern/post-modern?
If it is...
I-M-P-O-S-S-I-B-L-E
Not even the greatest of NS aerospace corporations can manage mach 6 while still being modern-future.
Yeah, the fastest aircraft in the RL world only went just over Mach 3
Not true. The X-15 broke Mach 6.
According to www.globalaircraft.org the fastest aircraft on record was the XB-70 Valkyrie, which achieved a speed of Mach 3.1
even sr-71 is faster :roll:
what teh fuck are you doing? we never agreed on a different store! close it down now or ill buy couple of starships and turn you into a galactic crater.
http://www.globalaircraft.org/planes/x-15_hyper.pl
That is not a cramjet plane, it's not the right shape to use them... you need a very specific pattern to control air flow, otherwise it'll blow up.
He copied GeForces plane and made it future tech... he likes to do that... he likes to have airplanes on his own remote planet, to defend himself from... well, himself.
Seversky
11-10-2003, 20:24
According to www.globalaircraft.org the fastest aircraft on record was the XB-70 Valkyrie, which achieved a speed of Mach 3.1
Then globalaircraft.org is wrong.
imported_Berserker
11-10-2003, 20:25
OOC:
That's modern/post-modern?
If it is...
I-M-P-O-S-S-I-B-L-E
Not even the greatest of NS aerospace corporations can manage mach 6 while still being modern-future.
Yeah, the fastest aircraft in the RL world only went just over Mach 3... I would consider scramjets to be futuristic technology and probably wouldn't RP with them because of their inherent advantage over RL tech...
X-15 holds the record at Mach 6.7 in a flight made in the 1960's.
According to www.globalaircraft.org the fastest aircraft on record was the XB-70 Valkyrie, which achieved a speed of Mach 3.1
Then globalaircraft.org is wrong.omg, it's right... the XB-70 is the fastest JET PLANE ever created... the X-15 was a rocketsled, it doesn't count.
Zvarinograd
11-10-2003, 20:26
OOC:
True, but not practical military use, as of yet.
OOC:
That's modern/post-modern?
If it is...
I-M-P-O-S-S-I-B-L-E
Not even the greatest of NS aerospace corporations can manage mach 6 while still being modern-future.
Yeah, the fastest aircraft in the RL world only went just over Mach 3... I would consider scramjets to be futuristic technology and probably wouldn't RP with them because of their inherent advantage over RL tech...
Cough*X-15*cough.
Cough*Mach 6.7*cough
Cough*1960's*cough
he's got a point
I've heard about mach 15 *really not sure* some plane launched from the wing of a B-52.
the x-15 reached mach 6 for all of 100 seconds
I've heard about mach 15 *really not sure* some plane launched from the wing of a B-52.
Maybe you are talking about the Hyper-X.
mach 15 is the record, I'm pretty sure...
The fastest JET record would have been broken by the Hyper-X, but it blew up because it's booster rocket exploded cuz the pegasus rocket is gay ;) Many great experiments have been trashed due to those death traps...
mach 15 is the record, I'm pretty sure...
The fastest JET record would have been broken by the Hyper-X, but it blew up because it's booster rocket exploded cuz the pegasus rocket is gay ;) Many great experiments have been trashed due to those death traps...
imported_Berserker
11-10-2003, 20:31
According to www.globalaircraft.org the fastest aircraft on record was the XB-70 Valkyrie, which achieved a speed of Mach 3.1
Then globalaircraft.org is wrong.omg, it's right... the XB-70 is the fastest JET PLANE ever created... the X-15 was a rocketsled, it doesn't count.
Nope, the SR-71 had an estimated Mach number of 3.5+ (In 1990, it set the record by crossing the US at a speed of 2,124 mph), whereas the XB-70 had a Mach number of 3.08. Two XB-70's were built, and the program was later cancelled (shortly after an incident where a wingtip vortex sucked in a NASA F-104, piloted by Joe Walker. The F-104 was hurled across the XB-70's wing, smashing one tailfin and then exploding. The Valkrie flew on for several more seconds before tumbling out of control.)
The XB-70 is the fastest BOMBER ever flown, but it is not the fastest jet aircraft.
I've heard about mach 15 *really not sure* some plane launched from the wing of a B-52.
Maybe you are talking about the Hyper-X.
possibly, my source is rather old...at least Ir ead it a long time ago.
Unum Veritas
11-10-2003, 20:35
Wait, never mind....I misread that. Sorry :oops:
Zvarinograd
11-10-2003, 20:36
OOC:
Still, my point remains unanswered. There is not a fighter, with full weapons load, that can take mach 6. LoA's technology is far beyond modern.
Definately... this plane is most certainly future tech... you'd need some sort of fusion generator to get that fast.
imported_Berserker
11-10-2003, 20:38
OOC:
Still, my point remains unanswered. There is not a fighter, with full weapons load, that can take mach 6. LoA's technology is far beyond modern.Incorrect, all of the current record holders were built using technology available as far back as the 1950's. Infact, most jets you see today, have designs dating back to the 1970's. F-15 dates back to advanced air superiority firghter studies in 1968. The F-22 dates back to the 1981 when they started the USAF Advanced Tactical Fighter competition.
changed it to mach 4 okNope. Stats say 3. something... rip the scramjets off your stats and you have a useable plane.
OOC:
Still, my point remains unanswered. There is not a fighter, with full weapons load, that can take mach 6. LoA's technology is far beyond modern.Incorrect, all of the current record holders were built using technology available as far back as the 1950's. Infact, most jets you see today, have designs dating back to the 1970's.wow... you do realize those planes held the record for about a minute, and most of those used ROCKET ENGINES.
He's talking about a fighter jet with a sustained ability to go mach 6... impossible with modern technology.
Geforce Evil Man He IsDude... wtf? why would you say that?
I recommend going here for planes not built by a crater:
http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=56577
imported_Berserker
11-10-2003, 20:46
OOC:
Still, my point remains unanswered. There is not a fighter, with full weapons load, that can take mach 6. LoA's technology is far beyond modern.Incorrect, all of the current record holders were built using technology available as far back as the 1950's. Infact, most jets you see today, have designs dating back to the 1970's.wow... you do realize those planes held the record for about a minute, and most of those used ROCKET ENGINES.
He's talking about a fighter jet with a sustained ability to go mach 6... impossible with modern technology.Well lets see, um, no. I see no rockets on the SR-71. I wonder why that is? Hmmm, oh thats right, it used two Ramjet engines. No rockets, none. And a top speed maintained for longer than a minute.
I won't even go into recent advancements in Pulse Detonation engines.
Unum Veritas
11-10-2003, 20:48
Hmmm....I've already made myself look like a fool and I don't know enough about this to involve myself in this debate anymore. I'll just stick to conventional jet engines and RL aircraft to keep myself safe.... :P
Zvarinograd
11-10-2003, 20:49
Raysia knows about pulse-detonation, hell his aerospace storefront has it.
Uhm yes, a minute, right. Weapons load? None.
imported_Berserker
11-10-2003, 20:55
As enjoyable as this may be, I most go work on a midterm exam from hell. (Aerospace engineering in the third ranked AE program in the nation is fraggin insane. If you want to keep your sanity, don't do it.)
*walks off to work*