NationStates Jolt Archive

I am not the first, nor the last, to speak against this nation.

He attacks smaller nations, godmods them, then takes them over. And insults all those bigger than him, and then ignores them so they cant attack him.

His prison bitch, dork terror, always backs him up. Its like they say, "balls always come in pairs." he is a nazi, a bad one at that.

This comment is ooc.

agree!

And i know at least 5 others personally who agree.

agree

Kinda sounds like Terristan, doesnt it :roll:


Bah, lost a frigate defending him.

Here here.

Kinda sounds like Terristan, doesnt it :roll:


Bah, lost a frigate defending him.

(OOC hey, i welcomed invasion. Dork

Well you lost a token frigate to make it look like you could RP, whereas you still had 3000 more anyway.)




AGREE

Here here.

*is mad that padmasa got 30 more posts than him*

OOC:
Welcomed the invasion, ignored anyone who shot down the UN Peacekeeper planes.


And actually losing a frigate when only 6 missiles were launched was generous.

So bumplords does not godmod by invading modern tech nations with mechs?

So bumplords does not godmod by invading modern tech nations with mechs?

A man may be in powered armor and shooting a laser rifle, but a rock can still kill him. Time difference does not equate a Godmod.

So bumplords does not godmod by invading modern tech nations with mechs?

If the country in question accepts the invasion, then godmod it is not.

So bumplords does not godmod by invading modern tech nations with mechs?

i needed something to withstand ur "bilgion mizzles with h0nning p0vvrs".

Actually, I stormed his ranks with Leopard 2s, and only killed about 5. Go figure. Also, no one has given my an example of when I godmodded.

Billion missiles???? I had 1000 men, 30 Leopard 2s, and 10 MiG-23s. Plus the fact that here is the list of nations I have invaded:

H&A: Success.
Terristan: Failure
FPC: Failure

H&A was the only nation smaller then me. Terristan and FPC both have larger populations.

So bumplords does not godmod by invading modern tech nations with mechs?

A man may be in powered armor and shooting a laser rifle, but a rock can still kill him. Time difference does not equate a Godmod.

It's possible. Let's say, for example, that I'm over 100 miles up into the air, out of the earth's atmosphere, when I start pummeling you with a massive ortillery bombardment from my ANS Hyperspace? That'd be godmodding to a lot of people, considering "WE DON'T HAVE ANYWAY TO FIRE BACK WAAHHHH HE GODMODS!!!" I do have to say this though: Anyone who gets invaded by huge forces way out of their power do have the right to ignore who's invading them. It'd be just stupid to fight anyways!

So bumplords does not godmod by invading modern tech nations with mechs?

If the country in question accepts the invasion, then godmod it is not.he fired back, and even called in more men.


AND those men got there in 5 seconds RL. another godmod.

And your mechs got there in about 10 seconds, crossing the border and ending up at the city.

Actually, I stormed his ranks with Leopard 2s, and only killed about 5. Go figure. Also, no one has given my an example of when I godmodded.

Billion missiles???? I had 1000 men, 30 Leopard 2s, and 10 MiG-23s. Plus the fact that here is the list of nations I have invaded:

H&A: Success.
Terristan: Failure
FPC: Failure

H&A was the only nation smaller then me. Terristan and FPC both have larger populations.

5 mechs? no, you killed more than that.

1000 men? you called in like 5,000 more.

you dont have a right to say YOU invaded h&a. me, wolf kingom,and arcels puppet did the work.

But my forces took the Capitol, until he decided to nuke it. Calling in 5000 more as reserve and support. Plus your mechs were slaughtering them like flies.

He attacks smaller nations, godmods them, then takes them over.

Where is your proof of that?

And your mechs got there in about 10 seconds, crossing the border and ending up at the city.

no. i rped tem taking off, and then landing.

Can't both of you just shut the hell up about it and just go to war? Jeezus crap, you're acting like babies!

They dont take off and land in 10 seconds.

---Post deleted by NationStates Moderators---

OOC:

Attican, you missed one of the invasion list:

Me.

And as to bumplords comment, here here. SOemone needs to take him out. Seeing as how his only support comes from Talaax, it shouldn't be to hard with a big enough coalition.

I think he godmods when his nation of 100 million people does this:

builds uber-powerful tanks with 2 canons and SAMs on the roof, capable of shooting down MiG-29s, shrugging off the 30mm cannon from an A-10. He claimed the armor was so thick that a Leopard 2 could only penetrate it at 100 meters, and that his uber-tank took on a platoon of Leopard 2s and destroyed them all without taking a single hit.

Builds a Mach 4 swing-wing stealth fighter that would cost billions of dollars and whines when people tell him it's not possible.

Completely seals off his coast with a giant wall that houses SAM launchers, cannons that can fire 40 miles without RAPs, and radars that can detect stealth units.

I'm sure there are other things, but those are the glaring examples, in my opinon.

I will obviously ignore bumplords in an invasion (future tech).

And McLeod, is your second comment IC or OOC?

Woah, woah, steady on kids, either have a fight about it, or just ignore each other like you've threatened, at the moment your just being dicks.
:lol: :lol:

Heh, my entire fleet is still just off his shore- minus a frigate sunk by West Warwick.

PLEASE DON'T MAKE ME MISS MY PARTS ON CRIMSON BLADE'S SPACE STATION! I don't want to have to go into orbit above a bunch of mediocore n00bs who can't shut up and get on with their lives, and have to waste perfectly good energy pummelling them with laser cannons and torpedos. NOW CAN YOU PLEASE JUST SHUT THE F*CK UP AND GO TO WAR ALREADY AND STOP ARGUING!?

They dont take off and land in 10 seconds.

what the hell, i waited for it.

you on the oter hand,

"i send in 5,000 more men" *men land*

I will obviously ignore bumplords in an invasion (future tech).

And McLeod, is your second comment IC or OOC?

Its all OOC. Hense me not writing IC anywhere after OOC.

I think he godmods when his nation of 100 million people does this:

builds uber-powerful tanks with 2 canons and SAMs on the roof, capable of shooting down MiG-29s, shrugging off the 30mm cannon from an A-10. He claimed the armor was so thick that a Leopard 2 could only penetrate it at 100 meters, and that his uber-tank took on a platoon of Leopard 2s and destroyed them all without taking a single hit.

Builds a Mach 4 swing-wing stealth fighter that would cost billions of dollars and whines when people tell him it's not possible.

Completely seals off his coast with a giant wall that houses SAM launchers, cannons that can fire 40 miles without RAPs, and radars that can detect stealth units.

I'm sure there are other things, but those are the glaring examples, in my opinon.

hell yes

OOC:

Attican, you missed one of the invasion list:

Me.

And as to bumplords comment, here here. SOemone needs to take him out. Seeing as how his only support comes from Talaax, it shouldn't be to hard with a big enough coalition.

agreed

Can't both of you just shut the hell up about it and just go to war? Jeezus crap, you're acting like babies!

*Adds Angreifer to list of 'Most Rational People On NS'*

Thank you altaran.

Can't both of you just shut the hell up about it and just go to war? Jeezus crap, you're acting like babies!

*Adds Angreifer to list of 'Most Rational People On NS'*

*steals list*

*Kicks list our of bumplord's hands (Antennas, tentacles, ect, whatever kind of creature you are)*

*gapes*

Oh yeah, and with permission from Attican, well move in 1 mechanized army.

Oh yeah, and with permission from Attican, well move in 1 mechanized army.

Sorry, did someone say something, i didn't hear anything.

builds uber-powerful tanks with 2 canons and SAMs on the roof, capable of shooting down MiG-29s, shrugging off the 30mm cannon from an A-10. He claimed the armor was so thick that a Leopard 2 could only penetrate it at 100 meters, and that his uber-tank took on a platoon of Leopard 2s and destroyed them all without taking a single hit.

With 5 years of development, and new polymers in use, and dual 140mm cannon, and a SAM pod with 3 missiles that must be within 1mi of a radar station to function, then yes, it is possible. Also, please remember the Leopard 2 was firing at a very heavy armored point.

Builds a Mach 4 swing-wing stealth fighter that would cost billions of dollars and whines when people tell him it's not possible.

It took 8 years of development, and received over a trillion dollars in investments from other nations. It also wasnt a stealth fighter. It was an assault fighter.

Completely seals off his coast with a giant wall that houses SAM launchers, cannons that can fire 40 miles without RAPs, and radars that can detect stealth units.

Which is a project in which I invested 20 billion a year, is expected to take 20 years, and is still not complete, because it is extremely difficult to build. Also, the radar doesnt have to detect it, I can use sensors to detect turbulence in the air.

Okay, seeing as he ignored futuretech, which I am, I can't declare war... however if any modern tech nations are willing to go to war I will not only finance it, but I will provide troops who will have to be armed of course. However I will want a large percentage of the spoils.

builds uber-powerful tanks with 2 canons and SAMs on the roof, capable of shooting down MiG-29s, shrugging off the 30mm cannon from an A-10. He claimed the armor was so thick that a Leopard 2 could only penetrate it at 100 meters, and that his uber-tank took on a platoon of Leopard 2s and destroyed them all without taking a single hit.

With 5 years of development, and new polymers in use, and dual 140mm cannon, and a SAM pod with 3 missiles that must be within 1mi of a radar station to function, then yes, it is possible. Also, please remember the Leopard 2 was firing at a very heavy armored point.

Builds a Mach 4 swing-wing stealth fighter that would cost billions of dollars and whines when people tell him it's not possible.

It took 8 years of development, and received over a trillion dollars in investments from other nations. It also wasnt a stealth fighter. It was an assault fighter.

Completely seals off his coast with a giant wall that houses SAM launchers, cannons that can fire 40 miles without RAPs, and radars that can detect stealth units.

Which is a project in which I invested 20 billion a year, is expected to take 20 years, and is still not complete, because it is extremely difficult to build. Also, the radar doesnt have to detect it, I can use sensors to detect turbulence in the air.

This is exactly what I mean.

You're tiny! Stop fooling yourself!

And you call yourself modern-tech..

"yeah, I just made some stuff up when it suited my needs, but you future tech people can't attack me"

You definitely said it was covered in RAM so it would be stealth, don't try and talk your way out of it.

builds uber-powerful tanks with 2 canons and SAMs on the roof, capable of shooting down MiG-29s, shrugging off the 30mm cannon from an A-10. He claimed the armor was so thick that a Leopard 2 could only penetrate it at 100 meters, and that his uber-tank took on a platoon of Leopard 2s and destroyed them all without taking a single hit.

With 5 years of development, and new polymers in use, and dual 140mm cannon, and a SAM pod with 3 missiles that must be within 1mi of a radar station to function, then yes, it is possible. Also, please remember the Leopard 2 was firing at a very heavy armored point.

Builds a Mach 4 swing-wing stealth fighter that would cost billions of dollars and whines when people tell him it's not possible.

It took 8 years of development, and received over a trillion dollars in investments from other nations. It also wasnt a stealth fighter. It was an assault fighter.

Completely seals off his coast with a giant wall that houses SAM launchers, cannons that can fire 40 miles without RAPs, and radars that can detect stealth units.

Which is a project in which I invested 20 billion a year, is expected to take 20 years, and is still not complete, because it is extremely difficult to build. Also, the radar doesnt have to detect it, I can use sensors to detect turbulence in the air.

Turbulance can be regular turbulance. It's created by the wind, dude. If you did detect turbulance, it could be from ANYTHING... even a bird.

Stealth Aircraft are extremely unaerodynamic, therefore, they generate HUGE amounts of turbulence.

Hang on; what exactly is the definition of 'future-tech'?

This mammoth tank and mach4 fighter jets and super-massive sea-fortresses sound sufficiently future to me.....

I have a tank with fold out SAM launchers, like the SA-19's. But it only has one cannon, and was designed to be a fuck off tank

This is exactly what I mean.

You're tiny! Stop fooling yourself!

And you call yourself modern-tech..

"yeah, I just made some stuff up when it suited my needs, but you future tech people can't attack me"

You definitely said it was covered in RAM so it would be stealth, don't try and talk your way out of it.

Indeed, Altaran.

The US had experimental mach 6 airplanes in the 1960's. Sorry, try again.

Stealth Aircraft are extremely unaerodynamic, therefore, they generate HUGE amounts of turbulence.

The air can also develope "HUGE" amounts of turbulance. And, no, the YF-23 and YF-22 are very aerodynamic.

Altaran - all of my stuff can be done with modern technology, even the seafortress (although its extremely extremely expensive and takes a long long time.)

Rumania - It only has SAM launchers if you plug it into my tank. Plus it only functions near a radar station. It has 2 cannon, but it also takes 2 NS days to build 1 tank.

Adding RAM doesnt make it stealth, it makes it Stealthy.

The US had experimental mach 6 airplanes in the 1960's. Sorry, try again.

The X-15 is the only one I can think of, and it was an experimental plane.

No combat aircraft goes that fast.

The US had experimental mach 6 airplanes in the 1960's. Sorry, try again.

NO. They had experimental mach 6 rockets in the 60s. Not aircraft. THere is a hell of a difference (i.e. control surfaces, designs, and the fact this has variable geometry "suicide" wings on it. Not fixed rear sweeping wings.

My fighter cant fight at Mach 4. It can only fight at around Mach 1.8. Unlike McLeods fighter that can go over Mach 4 and still fight.

I wonder how the sweep mechanism (which also has to move the wings forward, which is much harder than sweeping them back) holds up to the stresses of Mach 4 flight...

I bet the wings would snap right off and your plane would turn into a glorified lawn dart.

My fighter cant fight at Mach 4. It can only fight at around Mach 1.8. Unlike McLeods fighter that can go over Mach 4 and still fight.

Which fighter would that be attican? I can't remember building one like that.

Umm... it doesnt fly at Mach 4 with the wings extended idiot. It locks the wings at that speed.

McLeod - you tell me. you used it in the FPC campaign. Plus your ship that shoots lasers at fighters and somehow is still modern tech.

The US had experimental mach 6 airplanes in the 1960's. Sorry, try again.

The X-15 is the only one I can think of, and it was an experimental plane.

No combat aircraft goes that fast.I said it was experimental. MiG-25 goes mach 3, and the russians had a project for a mach 5 interceptor (MiG 7.01) with a mach 3 cruising speed.

No sh!t, moron...but the gears and hydraulics that sweep them are a lot less strong than the structure of a conventional wing.

Retard - get a clue before you start making this crap up.

McLeod - you tell me. you used it in the FPC campaign. Plus your ship that shoots lasers at fighters and somehow is still modern tech.

1) I never posted anything like that. I had a fighter that was in a steep dive do Mach 3.5, then slow and laucnh.

2)It has ONE laser. It doesn't have the power to destroy fighters, just burn through cockpits and fuel tanks. It is as modern tech as your mach 4 forward swept-wing fighter, huge sea-fortress, and super tank.

Fuckhead: The wing LOCKS into place in closed-wing position.

IT'S STILL A SWING WING!

And why wouldn't a sea-fortress be modern tech? Give me one reason why it wouldnt be.

REMISIA-IT WOULD ONLY STRESS THE WING THAT MUCH IF IT WAS HORRIBLY UNAERODYNAMIC, WHICH IT ISNT. IT LOCKS INTO PLACE USING 3 LOCKING SYSTEMS INSIDE THE FUSELAGE.

The US had experimental mach 6 airplanes in the 1960's. Sorry, try again.

Dark Terror, you once again demonstrate your ignorance of the United States Experimental aircraft programs.

http://www.allstar.fiu.edu/aero/images/x-15-b.jpg

Behold. The X-15. A single-pilot, Rocket-propelled, completely unmmanouverable, not-stealth research aircraft (Or one of six, if I remember correctly.) They were launched from the wings of B-52s. Pretty far from VTOL. Attican, I also hope you realize that, unless you have giant force-dampers on each AF-100 and a computer which can calculate a week's worth of PC work in a matter of, oh, say...... picoseconds, the AF-100 would tear itself apart every time it flew. The wings would come right off- and, not to mention, the pilot would die during a turn, unless you have developed some kind of thing whoch I will not mention, which I used on the F-3 Mesquetor to a small extent before it got retired. So, there are more holes in the Af-100 than you are willing to admit. Just give it up, Attican.

Lets form a coalition so we can make this Attican weasel into a crater.

And why wouldn't a sea-fortress be modern tech? Give me one reason why it wouldnt be.

REMISIA-IT WOULD ONLY STRESS THE WING THAT MUCH IF IT WAS HORRIBLY UNAERODYNAMIC, WHICH IT ISNT. IT LOCKS INTO PLACE USING 3 LOCKING SYSTEMS INSIDE THE FUSELAGE.

Since it sorrounds your entire country, you build it a ridculously fast rate, with way too little funding, and in effect, you are godmodding by saying its impossible for anyone to land troops on your country. Its like trying to make the perfect country - impossible and godmodding.

Yeah, try and see how well a forward swept wing holds up at mach 4, go ahead, try it.

LAWN DART.

Jaiklia is still ignored for declaring my casualties in the last conflict.

OOC:
I SAID IT WAS EXPERIMENTAL, AND YES I KNOW IT WAS DROPPED FROM B-52'S!


However, that was back in the 1960's.

McLeod:

1. It isnt even fucking DONE yet, so how did i BUILD IT?

2. 20 billion a year for 10 miles of coastline a year? WTF?

3. I didnt say it was impossible, I said i made it more difficult

And why wouldn't a sea-fortress be modern tech? Give me one reason why it wouldnt be.

REMISIA-IT WOULD ONLY STRESS THE WING THAT MUCH IF IT WAS HORRIBLY UNAERODYNAMIC, WHICH IT ISNT. IT LOCKS INTO PLACE USING 3 LOCKING SYSTEMS INSIDE THE FUSELAGE.

Since it sorrounds your entire country, you build it a ridculously fast rate, with way too little funding, and in effect, you are godmodding by saying its impossible for anyone to land troops on your country. Its like trying to make the perfect country - impossible and godmodding.

Well, there is one way you could get away with your madness, Attican. You have a world-class military, but the rest of your country is in the stone age. The economy is devoted 100% to the military, thus making horrible famine, and causing your economy to implode.

Jaiklia is still ignored for declaring my casualties in the last conflict.


once again you chicken out, you are PATHETIC and a CRETIN!

Attican- just be like my $150 bil Oladsky line- Big gun fortifications, SAM launchers, not stealth but brute force.

OOC:
I SAID IT WAS EXPERIMENTAL, AND YES I KNOW IT WAS DROPPED FROM B-52'S!


However, that was back in the 1960's.

So? Langley built a UAV in the 1890's.

LRR: WTF? Only 10% of my budget is military.

Dark Terror: its designed to keep aircraft from entering (to a point) and hostile landings from occuring.

Jaiklia: You cannot say "Fighters fly by happily as the attican fleet burns". That would mean you destroyed it, which i never said hapened.

McLeod:

1. It isnt even f--- DONE yet, so how did i BUILD IT?

2. 20 billion a year for 10 miles of coastline a year? WTF?

3. I didnt say it was impossible, I said i made it more difficult

1)Check your grammar. I'm right. If i had said you builT it way too fast, you would be right. Stfu.

2)Initially you claimed more than ten miles a year on 20,000,000,000, somewhere around 50 on 10,000,000,000 i seem to remember.

3) A forty foot high wall all around your country with entrances for ports (which you also claim not to have ("I have no naval facilities n00b")), guard towers with SAM systems and ridculously long ranged guns, all made from concrete about a mile out at sea right? Yeah, getting materials there would be so easy, as would having enough to reach the seafloor all teh way around unless yuo have ridiculously shallow beaches.

LRR: WTF? Only 10% of my budget is military.

Dark Terror: its designed to keep aircraft from entering (to a point) and hostile landings from occuring.

Jaiklia: You cannot say "Fighters fly by happily as the attican fleet burns". That would mean you destroyed it, which i never said hapened.
Oladsky line is like a modernized Atlantic Wall- anti-stealth radar included.

No ports, that's right...so how does he have a navy?

Jaiklia: You cannot say "Fighters fly by happily as the attican fleet burns". That would mean you destroyed it, which i never said hapened.

i actually said that there was burning in the distance, read the post next time and try to comprehend what i wrote. There was in fact no godmodding, you claimed there was and played ignorant to get away from the fact that your fleet had probably been destroyed!

LRR: WTF? Only 10% of my budget is military.

Dark Terror: its designed to keep aircraft from entering (to a point) and hostile landings from occuring.

Jaiklia: You cannot say "Fighters fly by happily as the attican fleet burns". That would mean you destroyed it, which i never said hapened.

You cannot say you captured a battleship that never existed. Attican, you are making up figures as you go along. And it is impossible to have all of that stuff, at your age, with onl a 10% military budget.

No ports, that's right...so how does he have a navy?

excellent point!

He must build ships inland and then hire a bunch of dudes to throw them over the wall.

*gives attican 2 Slava-M class cruisers*
There now he has the equivelant of abattleship.

*gives attican 2 Slava-M class cruisers*
There now he has the equivelant of abattleship.

Yet nowhere to dock, resupply, refit, or even crew them. Moron.

*gives attican 2 Slava-M class cruisers*
There now he has the equivelant of abattleship.

*gives dork terror a slap on the back*
"you are generous really aren't you"

DT, you're wayyyyy too nice to him, especially after him doing all this. So, the little peoples aren't going to go to war after all?

*notices that Attican hasn't posted a response for a while*

*gives attican 2 Slava-M class cruisers*
There now he has the equivelant of abattleship.

Yet nowhere to dock, resupply, refit, or even crew them. Moron.
Hmm... thats a problem.

Uh......

DT, you're wayyyyy too nice to him, especially after him doing all this. So, the little peoples aren't going to go to war after all?

we can't as Attica just ignores us all for some reason or another!

LRR: Do I really have to show you my military budget excel document a fifteenth time? A 10% military budget for me is $150,000,000.

McLeod: He claimed he attacked my Military seaport. My ships use civilian docks.

LRR2: Ive also claimed 10% military budget for 2 weeks, after I lowered it from 17%, since 17% was hurting my economy.

He must build ships inland and then hire a bunch of dudes to throw them over the wall.

Then he throws them back over the wall to crew, supply, and arm them, only to toss them back when they're ready.

hes making thing up as he goes along

Due to the sheer volume of holes in the story of one attican empire, the theocracy of Padmasa is moving foward with it's latest weapon. The Tactical Ignore Briefcase Bomb (TIBB). Within the next few moments, in an office building somewhere in the attican empire a discarded briefcases suddenly disappears. Whatever substance cuased the briefcase to go leaked away at an ever growing rate until the whole city had flitted into thin air. In two hours the attican empire had ceased to exist.

LRR: Do I really have to show you my military budget excel document a fifteenth time? A 10% military budget for me is $150,000,000.

McLeod: He claimed he attacked my Military seaport. My ships use civilian docks.

And how do you know he didnt just attack them? You said clearly that you had no naval facilities, and that all his missles hit beaches. You change it to suit yourself.

LRR: Do I really have to show you my military budget excel document a fifteenth time? A 10% military budget for me is $150,000,000.

McLeod: He claimed he attacked my Military seaport. My ships use civilian docks.

Civilian docks wouldn't be anywhere near deep enough to accept large military vessels.

And you can't say they are, because if they were, that wall would be preeety tall.....

Altaran - stfu you tard. 1. I said it wasnt done yet. 2. Did you read my walls post? I was going to build huge gates near ports (which would be one NS years work alone.)

LRR: Do I really have to show you my military budget excel document a fifteenth time? A 10% military budget for me is $150,000,000.

McLeod: He claimed he attacked my Military seaport. My ships use civilian docks.

Civilian docks wouldn't be anywhere near deep enough to accept large military vessels.

And you can't say they are, because if they were, that wall would be preeety tall.....

Plus they don't keep ammo and nuclear cores at civilian docks, last time I checked.

Never mind the fact that the each ship in the navy would need a place to tie up.

Altaran - stfu you tard. 1. I said it wasnt done yet. 2. Did you read my walls post? I was going to build huge gates near ports (which would be one NS years work alone.)

*chuckles*

I'm a 'tard' am I?

:lol:

Plus: Huge gates would take more than one year to build.

Add to that the fact that you said you had no ports, and that your military vessels lived at your civilian docks....

Padmasa - go fuck yourself. NooB.

Remiesia - I can keep anything I want at a civilian dock. Just because I claim it is a civilian dock desnt mean it cannot support military vehicles.

So what happens to the civvie ships when the navy comes into port?

lets just all go to war wth him

Padmasa - go f--- yourself. NooB.

Remiesia - I can keep anything I want at a civilian dock. Just because I claim it is a civilian dock desnt mean it cannot support military vehicles.

Actually it's spelled N00B, and by flaming me you are breaking the rules of ns which I could easily report you for. All I'd have to do is type one word, but then again how could I report someone who doesn't exist.

start new thread

They are either moved out, or the naval ships wait. I am well aware I need to build a military port, I just dont have the money (well, I do, im just too lazy to make a post stating I have started construction of a port.)

lets just all go to war wth him

That would be fun - he can't ignore all of us.

Just as long as DT sees the error of his ways in helping him, it could be done easily.

Actually, I CAN ignore all of you! And considering that most of you ignored me, you cant attack me. Plus, NONE of you have come up with any GOOD arguements.

Over the waters of the ocean, headed twoards the Attican Cruisers, or Former Dark Terror cruisers, 50 Tu-160 Blackjack IIs, designed to carry Shipwreck ASMs and Switchblade torpedos fly at Mach 2. Overhead, a further 76 Mirage F2s (with thrust vectoring, a second engine placed lightning-style, and a higher weapons capacity) fly fighter cover. The Emir was not going to mess up this time. The air armada is soon within the 300 mi range of the Shipwrecks, and each aircraft launches five from its bomb bay. After all the missiles are away, the flight turns to its next goal, the seawall. The 126 aircraft start their runs on the seawall, taking heavy casualties from SAMs and AAA. But still, the venerable Tu-160s manage to get a few of their number through. The 15 remaining aircraft launch thier 2 Switchblades apiece and beat it, all but two which collide with the seawall.

Padmasa - go f--- yourself. NooB.

Remiesia - I can keep anything I want at a civilian dock. Just because I claim it is a civilian dock desnt mean it cannot support military vehicles.

Except for the fact its design would make it clearly look like a military dock, just so that it could support militayr vehicles, and WW would have attacked them anyway.

IC:

A small unit of the 32nd Regiment moves through Attica, dressed entirely in civilian clothes, heading for known 'civilian facilities'

Meanwhile, inside McLeod03, a missile silo opens, and an ICBM fitted with an I.G.N.O.R.E warhead is prepped for launch.

lets just all go to war wth him

That would be fun - he can't ignore all of us.

Just as long as DT sees the error of his ways in helping him, it could be done easily.
I have an alliance with him, and I will honor it.

Attican: If I were you, I wouldn't be smart talking 20 other nations that clearly have more power than you. And trust me, if you weren't afraid of every space-faring nation ever, and ignore cannoning them, I'd drop a thick layer of mines very quickly and blow them all up, on top of your nation.

NONE of you have come up with any GOOD arguements.

HAH! I hate to break it to you but logical refutation isn't one of your strong points.

OOC: Are you attacking the seawall near the beach? Because other parts are inland. Plus, the seawall is designed to take the impact of a torpedo. Note its trangular design forces the energy of a torpedo or missile into a trangular angle, absorbing the impact.

I'm not attacking you attican.

OOC: Are you attacking the seawall near the beach? Because other parts are inland. Plus, the seawall is designed to take the impact of a torpedo. Note its trangular design forces the energy of a torpedo or missile into a trangular angle, absorbing the impact.

Hang on....the seawall isn't built yet.

:?

OOC: McLeod, if your men are coming thru the FPC border, they would have been checked for ID.

OOC: no, its not. Its only 25% complete. But he claimed to be attacking it, sooo....

200 FI Bear bombers are preparing to carpet bomb Attican cities, the largest formations ever used by FI forces, casualties rates will be present though the tide of coalition aircraft will eventually turn Attican cities to rubble.
http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/russia/bomber/tu-95-bear_p4.jpg
FI BEAR practicing high altitude formation flying

*suggests WW break off their attack on the 25% complete wall and kill some Attican children*

OOC: McLeod, if your men are coming thru the FPC border, they would have been checked for ID.

OOC: They are already inside your country, as i posted yesterday. Insertion by boat past an unfinished section of seawall, at night, by oar-powered boat. The boat was then buried, along with insertion gear, and the men took up residence inside your country.

McLeod: Oh.

I really didn't want to do this... but...

ASN HYPERSPACE, REVERT COURSE TO ATTICAN EMPIRE, AND HOVER JUST INSIDE THE ATMOSPHERE!!!

Let's see if you can figure out who I am by my tactics. 10 more frigates will be joining us very soon.

I really didn't want to do this... but...

ASN HYPERSPACE, REVERT COURSE TO ATTICAN EMPIRE, AND HOVER JUST INSIDE THE ATMOSPHERE!!!

Let's see if you can figure out who I am by my tactics. 10 more frigates will be joining us very soon.

POST IN THE DAMN WAR THREAD

OOC: Are you attacking the seawall near the beach? Because other parts are inland. Plus, the seawall is designed to take the impact of a torpedo. Note its trangular design forces the energy of a torpedo or missile into a trangular angle, absorbing the impact.

I am attacking the seawall. The Switchblade, if you do your research, is not a torpedo. And I doubt that the seawall would have withstood the impact of two of the world's largest bombers hurtling at it at Mach 1.5. I alos doubt that your new cruisers would have withstood a barrage of something like 250 missiles coming at them at Mach 2.4.

OOC: Are you attacking the seawall near the beach? Because other parts are inland. Plus, the seawall is designed to take the impact of a torpedo. Note its trangular design forces the energy of a torpedo or missile into a trangular angle, absorbing the impact.

I am attacking the seawall. The Switchblade, if you do your research, is not a torpedo. And I doubt that the seawall would have withstood the impact of two of the world's largest bombers hurtling at it at Mach 1.5. I alos doubt that your new cruisers would have withstood a barrage of something like 250 missiles coming at them at Mach 2.4.

Umm... ok...

WW: You are the one that said "switchblade torpedo". Also, my crews dont take over a ship instantly. You are attacking DTs ships still.

Also, I doubt your aircraft would have come in without being detected and without my fighters scrambling.

Umm... ok...

WW: You are the one that said "switchblade torpedo". Also, my crews dont take over a ship instantly. You are attacking DTs ships still.

Also, I doubt your aircraft would have come in without being detected and without my fighters scrambling.

this is what the war thread is for

Umm... ok...

WW: You are the one that said "switchblade torpedo". Also, my crews dont take over a ship instantly. You are attacking DTs ships still.

Also, I doubt your aircraft would have come in without being detected and without my fighters scrambling.

As you have no AWACS, and we avoided the Dark Terror ships, they would not have that hard a time. And my F2s could have made milksmeat of the AF-100. And plus, I think it is correct to say that the two cruisers are probably sunk, your seawall probably has a giant hole in it, and there is Tu-160 wreckage scattered around your coastline.

So....Is this war going ahead?

And is DT getting involved?

So....Is this war going ahead?

And is DT getting involved?
Yes, I am getting involved, and no, I will not see the error of my ways.