NationStates Jolt Archive


Raysia testing the RF-11C

18-09-2003, 21:40
(note: Most stats are just copied from the original, but some are changed... this variant is faster, heavier, requires 2 people, and has a slightly different standard armament)

Raysian Aero RF-11C "Archangel"
http://www.bateshome.com/jordan/RF-11.jpg

Specifications :
Country of Origin: Raysia
Primary Designer: Raysian Aero
Manufacturing countries: Raysia, Western Asia
Role: Multi-role fighter
Crew: 2
Wing Span: 35.84 ft (11.20 m)
Length: 53.21 ft (16.22 m)
Height: 15.39 ft (4.81 m)
Weight: 49,922 lb empty / 56,000 lb normal / 75,225 lb max. take off
Powerplant: Two Raysian-Electric RE-1799 vectored-thrust afterburning turbofans, 35,256 lb thrust each, Two Raysian Aero "Blaster" pods that store and expell compressed air for 2g boosts of accelleration for quick manuevering or takeoff. (Takes about 15 seconds to repressurize)
Maximum speed: Mach 2.97
Cruising speed: Mach 1.15
Range: 2,750 km / 1,700 miles
Service Ceiling: 69,000 ft
g limits: +13, -9 (So be careful!) Automatic Safeties prevent the plane from pulling unsafe g-forces and harming the pilot.
Airframe can stand up to 15gs
Armament: One GSh-30-1 30mm cannon on the nose, One Raysia Arms FC-216 Flak Cannon mounted on a turret above the fuselage, plus up to 20,000 lbs including R-73/R-77 AAMs, ASMs, QAAMs, bombs, rockets, drop tanks, and/or ECM pods carried on fourteen external points.

Unique Features: The turret mounted Flak Cannon with 35 ammo, Quad-rudders/tails, 3D thrust vectoring, "Blaster" pods, all are Carrier capable, and can take perform STO with fully pressurized "Blaster" jets. Radar signature easily confused for a Mig-29, and has SuperManeuverability comparable to the Su-37 or F-22. Has built in reconnaissance equipment such as a digital Camera. Missiles can fire any direction.

Computers: Advanced Autopilot to automatically land the plane on a carrier or runway in case the pilot gets knocked out or any other emergency like that, may be engaged by C&C or a wingman. The HUD is used in tandem with the "VisorScreens," which is a display projected onto the Visor of the Pilot's helmet, and uses a sort of compass in tandem with the computer that can allow him to see highlighted targets in any direction, even what used to be a blind spot beneath him or behind him. The 'VisorScreen' does not display the Altitude, pitch, and Speed like the HUD, as most pilots found this very confusing, but the 'VisorScreen' does control the Flak Cannon's direction.

Price: 45,000,000 (original RF-11 investors still get 50% discount)

http://www.bateshome.com/jordan/rsig.jpg (http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=70101)

Stay tuned for the VisorScreen Mk II
18-09-2003, 21:43
Doesnt RF mean Reconaissance Fighter?
18-09-2003, 21:45
Doesnt RF mean Reconaissance Fighter?Raysian Fighter
18-09-2003, 21:46
in reality, doesnt it mean Reconaissance fighter, like the RF-111?
18-09-2003, 21:46
in reality, doesnt it mean Reconaissance fighter, like the RF-111?
18-09-2003, 21:50
in reality, doesnt it mean Reconaissance fighter, like the RF-111?Who cares? It's just like MiG or Su or An or Tu... perhaps I should change it, I forgot about the RF-111...
18-09-2003, 21:50
Plus, OOC, OT, the AF in AF-100 doesnt stand for Attican Fighter, it stands for Attack Fighter :)
18-09-2003, 21:52
nah, now that I remember it, RF-111 was a subdesignation, the plane is really just the F-111... so I'll keep the RF designation.
18-09-2003, 21:53
Plus, OOC, OT, the AF in AF-100 doesnt stand for Attican Fighter, it stands for Attack Fighter :)*shrugs* oh well, as long as I don't double up on any designations I am fine.
United Elias
18-09-2003, 21:56
RF-111 mcuh cooler, we still use 'em

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/f-111-00000008.jpg
18-09-2003, 21:58
ROFL the RF-111 is hardly a match for the RF-11... especially considering the RF-11 is a dogfighter :)

I seriously doubt the RF-111 wold compare to even the RF-12 :P
United Elias
18-09-2003, 22:00
could carry more weapons though

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/f111_load.jpg
18-09-2003, 22:16
This isn't a bomber :) it's a fighter.