Logic
Suppose that b = a.
(1) Multiply by a, then ab = a²
(2) Subtract b², then ab−b² = a²−b²
(3) Factor, then b(a−b) = (a + b)(a−b)
(4) Divide by (a−b), then b = a+b
(5) Substitute a for b, then a = a+a
(6) a = 2a
(7) Divide by a, then 1=2
Left is right, up is down, war is peace. Two and two can be three, four, five or all of these at once if those with a monopoly on force wish it to be so.
I know that it doesn't really work, (a−b) in steps 3 and 4 is zero.
There will never be a more successful or more celebrated con artist than the politician.
Exilia and Colonies
20-05-2009, 21:20
Suppose that b = a.
(1) Multiply by a, then ab = a²
(2) Subtract b², then ab−b² = a²−b²
(3) Factor, then b(a−b) = (a + b)(a−b)
(4) Divide by ZERO, then b = a+b
(5) Substitute a for b, then a = a+a
(6) a = 2a
(7) Divide by a, then 1=2
Left is right, up is down, war is peace. Two and two can be three, four, five or all of these at once if those with a monopoly on force wish it to be so.
I know that it doesn't really work, (a−b) in steps 3 and 4 is zero.
There will never be a more successful or more celebrated con artist than the politician.
Oh shi...
Hydesland
20-05-2009, 21:20
Being poor now means that you're extremely rich, oh FUCK YEAH!
Ring of Isengard
20-05-2009, 21:21
What?
DrunkenDove
20-05-2009, 21:22
http://www.dodeca-t.com/picpile/divided_by_zero.jpg
If a=b, then (a-b) is zero. You just divided by zero. Now the world is backwards, and hamburgers eat people. I hope you're happy.
Dumb Ideologies
20-05-2009, 21:22
A=A still, right? Otherwise we'll all have to become communists.
Hydesland
20-05-2009, 21:23
I was on a boat at the time of doing these calculations, I got to step 4:
(4) Divide by (a−b)
http://www.angwinreporter.com/2006/AR04/lakeberryessa01.jpg
My boat is gone now, thanks.
Exilia and Colonies
20-05-2009, 21:23
A=A still, right? Otherwise we'll all have to become communists.
Nope. Says right at the top. A=B. Take that Rand!
Dragontide
20-05-2009, 21:23
Suppose that b = a.
(1) Multiply by a, then ab = a²
(2) Subtract b², then ab−b² = a²−b²
(3) Factor, then b(a−b) = (a + b)(a−b)
(4) Divide by (a−b), then b = a+b
(5) Substitute a for b, then a = a+a
(6) a = 2a
(7) Divide by a, then 1=2
Reminds me of credit card fine print and filing a health insurance claim.
a=a still, right? Otherwise we'll all have to become communists.
a=2a.
Holy Cheese and Shoes
20-05-2009, 21:25
a=2a.
a = eh?
Lunatic Goofballs
20-05-2009, 21:26
http://www.dodeca-t.com/picpile/divided_by_zero.jpg
If a=b, then (a-b) is zero. You just divided by zero. Now the world is backwards, and hamburgers eat people. I hope you're happy.
^this
http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg108/surilamin/Inspirational/dividebyzero.jpg
^this
http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg108/surilamin/Inspirational/dividebyzero.jpg
^this to
http://www.yodawgyo.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/xzibit-yo-dawg-i-heard-you-like-math.jpg
I cannot conceive what this thread might be about.
I cannot conceive what this thread might be about.
Precisely.
Fnordgasm 5
20-05-2009, 21:57
I cannot conceive what this thread might be about.
I think Indri may actually be Chuck Norris.
Galloism
20-05-2009, 21:58
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b383/DrkHelmet/Forum%20Pictures/bunny.jpg
I think Indri may actually be Chuck Norris.
Well I did survive for over and hour on The Drains in L4D.
TJHairball
20-05-2009, 22:08
There are so many ways to divide by zero... and they can all "prove" anything.
Lunatic Goofballs
20-05-2009, 22:12
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b383/DrkHelmet/Forum%20Pictures/bunny.jpg
http://www.boomspeed.com/looonatic/einsteinconfused.jpg
Myedvedeya
20-05-2009, 22:57
Ahh, dividing by zero... any number equals any number whatsoever, making this a false proof...
At least we still have our true mathematical weirdness, like e^(i*pi)+1=0
Galloism
20-05-2009, 23:01
http://www.boomspeed.com/looonatic/einsteinconfused.jpg
Since I have no idea what this thread is about, I'm sharing humor.
http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/keyboards_are_disgusting.png
Myedvedeya
20-05-2009, 23:02
-snip-
xkcd=cool (a much simpler mathematical equation)
Suppose that b = a.
(1) Multiply by a, then ab = a²
(2) Subtract b², then ab−b² = a²−b²
(3) Factor, then b(a−b) = (a + b)(a−b)
(4) Divide by (a−b), then b = a+b
(5) Substitute a for b, then a = a+a
(6) a = 2a
(7) Divide by a, then 1=2
The reason this doesn't work is:
(4) Divide by (a−b), then b = a+b
A=B thus a-b =0. Divide by 0. No wonder you broke the answer. What's your point?
The reason this doesn't work is:
(4) Divide by (a−b), then b = a+b
A=B thus a-b =0. Divide by 0. No wonder you broke the answer. What's your point?
You do realize that I had stated why this doesn't work in the OP, correct?
Wilgrove
21-05-2009, 03:57
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b383/DrkHelmet/Forum%20Pictures/bunny.jpg
http://www.disarm.se/data/bildunttext_nsfw/divide_by_zero2.jpg
+++ Divide by cucumber error Please reinstall the universe and reboot +++
Dragontide
21-05-2009, 04:27
This is definitely one of the all time, top funniest threads! :D
Svalbardania
21-05-2009, 04:39
http://i275.photobucket.com/albums/jj304/mitchellg00/DivideByZero.jpg?t=1242877146
Hammurab
21-05-2009, 05:55
You do realize that I had stated why this doesn't work in the OP, correct?
I don't see where.
If you understood you were dividing by zero, an undefined operation which thus makes the whole "proof" meaningless, why post it?
Those with a "monopoly" on power can ignore definitions in easily transparent and refuted ways, and be all the more unconvincing, but this makes no cogent commentary on the nature of power.
It just shows an absence of understanding the role of rigorous proof.
So, in white text, you knew it doesn't work, but then it still doesn't say anything about those in power. They can err in ways they already knew and be called on it?
Svalbardania
21-05-2009, 06:23
Oooh! I knew I'd find the appropriate pic!
http://penguingeek.files.wordpress.com/2007/08/humor-penguin-logic.jpg
The One Eyed Weasel
21-05-2009, 08:09
i cannot conceive what this thread might be about.
i didn't read the rest but it's three pages long!