NationStates Jolt Archive

"Do you know what your sin is?" That's a great line from the science-fiction / space-western "Serenity".

I sometimes think folks on the left would be more understanding of Christians if we called ourselves, "Sinners Anonymous".

Anyway, this is just a poll / topic for talking about those things we have problems with. Some folk like to think in terms of "The Seven Deadly Sins". I tend to think some of the Seven are aspects of one another.

I sometimes think folks on the left would be more understanding of Christians if we called ourselves, "Sinners Anonymous".

Frankly speaking I think us folks on the left would be more understanding of christians if you didn't call yourselves anything in particular and just kept your beliefs to your own damned selves.

"Folks on the left" and "Christians" are not mutually exclusive, unless you live in Rush Limbaugh's head.

Do I have to just choose one? Can't it be all?

Frankly speaking I think us folks on the left would be more understanding of christians if you didn't call yourselves anything in particular and just kept your beliefs to your own damned selves.

I prefer to think of us as our "saved" selves.

So, why are you so angry?

Oh I like to mix up my sins. I can't just choose one.

"Folks on the left" and "Christians" are not mutually exclusive, unless you live in Rush Limbaugh's head.

Good point. I tend to see so much more fallout from the political left. My apologies.:wink:

"Folks on the left" and "Christians" are not mutually exclusive, unless you live in Rush Limbaugh's head.

This is a horrible thing to say.

There is, at MOST, room in Rush Limbaugh's head for six, maybe seven actual people, as a matter of geometry.

Stop being ridiculous.

I prefer to think of us as our "saved" selves

I prefer to think of you as toaster strudels. Because strudel is a fun word, isn't it?

I prefer to think of us as our "saved" selves.

So, why are you so angry?

He's one of of those "unsaved" people.

Do You Know What Your Sin Is?

This sounds like part of a conversation from Gift-of-God's sex life. :tongue:

Good point. I tend to see so much more fallout from the political left. My apologies.:wink:

Well, our side doesn't have so many foaming-at-the-mouth fundamentalists. I imagine those types make liberal Christians pretty pissed off.

In a Christ-like way, of course.

He's one of of those "unsaved" people.

Now, let's not be uncharitable.

Now, let's not be uncharitable.

No, really, I asked him once.

I asked him if he'd be willing to accept human blood sacrifice of an innocent as a precondition for an all powerful being getting over his doing something wrong, and he wouldn't.

I prefer to think of us as our "saved" selves.

Saved from what exactly? Not pompous moral superiority complexes, that's for sure.

Saved from what exactly? Not pompous moral superiority complexes, that's for sure.

Hush, future cinder. The christians just want to "perfect" your Jewitude by making you Christian. You should be thankful. Stop being sinfully unthankful.

So, does a lack of one cancel out the other? Because I drink and smoke a shit ton (with a good dose of lust) but also do spectacularly well in classes and at my job.

as for the topic in question...none, really. I don't really accept the concept of "sin" as a valid descriptor for...well...anything.

But if we want to go with which one is my favorite of all, well, let it never be said I can pass up a firefly quote and just say....Hell, I'm a fan of all seven. But right now, I'm gonna have to go with wrath.

So, does a lack of one cancel out the other? Because I drink and smoke a shit ton (with a good dose of lust) but also do spectacularly well in classes and at my job.

What's the old saying, when if it ain't broke, don't fix it?

Well, our side doesn't have so many foaming-at-the-mouth fundamentalists. I imagine those types make liberal Christians pretty pissed off.

The last "foaming at the mouth" preacher I heard was Rev. Wright, the President's old pastor. Of course, there is that one guy who thinks soldiers are being killed in Iraq because of society's more relaxed views on homosexuality.

Liberal Christians, I'm certain, are sincere in their faith. Conservative Christians tend to wonder where they draw the line at regarding sins. Fundamentalist Christians? I may know some, but I think they've toned down some.

Of course, there is that one guy who thinks soldiers are being killed in Iraq because of society's more relaxed views on homosexuality.

I think you're referring to Phelps.

You know you've got a distinct sect when you have your own icon on RickRoss.com.

as for the topic in question...none, really. I don't really accept the concept of "sin" as a valid descriptor for...well...anything.

Okay, which of the choices causes you the most trouble?

I'll confess, I'm not proud of it, but I have a few troubles with them all.

This sounds like part of a conversation from Gift-of-God's sex life. :tongue:

"Which Sin should I go with today? The one with short hair, or maybe a nice ponytail?"

I'd have to go with Arrogance, with Wrath being a close second.

I'll tell you what, what I'm really worried about are the 7 Deadly Sims. You let those clowns lose on a computer game, and it just turns into chaos.

I'd have to go with Arrogance, with Wrath being a close second.

I'll tell you what, what I'm really worried about are the 7 Deadly Sims. You let those clowns lose on a computer game, and it just turns into chaos.

Especially the one that looks like a little digital Kevin Spacey.

Especially the one that looks like a little digital Kevin Spacey.

You can't really tell who he is though, because he's cut all his little digital fingerprints off. Plus, a little digital Brad Pitt shoots him in the head.

"Do you know what your sin is?" That's a great line from the science-fiction / space-western "Serenity".

I sometimes think folks on the left would be more understanding of Christians if we called ourselves, "Sinners Anonymous".

Anyway, this is just a poll / topic for talking about those things we have problems with. Some folk like to think in terms of "The Seven Deadly Sins". I tend to think some of the Seven are aspects of one another.

Arrogance, though I tend to call it Pride. It's a shallow difference, I'm sure. Pride just seems a little more encompassing than Arrogance IMO.

Frankly speaking I think us folks on the left would be more understanding of christians if you didn't call yourselves anything in particular and just kept your beliefs to your own damned selves.

I'm sorry Neo Art, I'm afraid I can't do that. I think you know what the problem is just as well as I do. This mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize it.

You can't really tell who he is though, because he's cut all his little digital fingerprints off. Plus, a little digital Brad Pitt shoots him in the head.

What's in the box? What's in the little digital box??!?!

Flaws and sins of course.

Ones I find most dangerous - Pride, Wrath, Envy and Greed..

But envy and greed can be recognized immediately or you can learn to recognize them and do whatever you need to resolve it.

Pride on the other hand can go unnoticed for long periods and have disastrous consequences. A prideful person will be downright oblivious to their actions.

Wrath .. can be similar to pride and again make the person oblivious.

What's in the box? What's in the little digital box??!?!

Dammit, I already had nightmares for months after watching that movie. Now you guys are going to make me unable to play Sims 2 for fear of what exactly the presents sims give each other contain.

You can't really tell who he is though, because he's cut all his little digital fingerprints off. Plus, a little digital Brad Pitt shoots him in the head.

And the digital Morgan Freeman lets it happen. That must be an aspect of sloth.

Dammit, I already had nightmares for months after watching that movie. Now you guys are going to make me unable to play Sims 2 for fear of what exactly the presents sims give each other contain.

You know what would help you sleep more soundly, Poli? Sleeping next to somebody softer...maybe less well educated, from a mid ranked law school instead of some Ivy League shit hole.

That would help a lot.

I've got just the pound of flesh for you...

And the digital Morgan Freeman lets it happen. That must be an aspect of sloth.

No, its the Eight Deadly Sin, Apprehension Born from Too Much Narrating.

Actually .. I wasn't thinking about wrath as anger.. I was thinking about it as going about killing in revenge. Which I guess could have a place too .. hell I dunno.

You know what would help you sleep more soundly, Poli? Sleeping next to somebody softer...maybe less well educated, from a mid ranked law school instead of some Ivy League shit hole.

That would help a lot.

I've got just the pound of flesh for you...

At the moment, I sleep next to my teddy bear. It's hard to beat that for softness. (Well, sort of next. It's sitting on a chair near the bed.)

And shutupshutupshutup about pounds of flesh. Seriously, I woke up about every third night for six months crying, "PLEASE DON'T CUT MY HEAD OFF, KEVIN SPACEY!" He was far too creepy in that movie.

I want you to know, I wish I could have lived like you do. Are you listening to me, Detective Mills? I'm trying to tell you how much I admire you...and your pretty digital wife Tracy. I visited your digital home this morning, after you left. I tried to play husband... tried to taste the life of a simple digital man, but it didn't work out. So, I took a souvenir. Do you want to know what it was...?

I want you to know, I wish I could have lived like you do. Are you listening to me, Detective Mills? I'm trying to tell you how much I admire you...and your pretty digital wife Tracy. I visited your digital home this morning, after you left. I tried to play husband... tried to taste the life of a simple digital man, but it didn't work out. So, I took a souvenir. Do you want to know what it was...?

Shut UP! *shudder*

Aww Poli gave the answer away a post above ya Hein. .. I was going to guess ... her uterus?

Well, our side doesn't have so many foaming-at-the-mouth fundamentalists. I imagine those types make liberal Christians pretty pissed off.

In a Christ-like way, of course.
Pissed off? Meh, not worth it excepting when we get lumped into the same group as them. How about tired and wondering just when hate and a holier-than-thou 'tude became a part of Jesus's message.

As for sins... given the extra poundage, probably gluttony.

I want you to know, I wish I could have lived like you do. Are you listening to me, Detective Mills? I'm trying to tell you how much I admire you...and your pretty digital wife Tracy. I visited your digital home this morning, after you left. I tried to play husband... tried to taste the life of a simple digital man, but it didn't work out. So, I took a souvenir. Do you want to know what it was...?

What freaks me out is that he remembers the detective's name.... *Shudder*

Shut UP! *shudder*
Could be worse. William Shatner did a parody a few years back where it was HIS head in the box... and it was singing!

Could be worse. William Shatner did a parody a few years back where it was HIS head in the box... and it was singing!

......okay, that's actually kinda awesome. :p

I only glutt with the internet and beer. Oh .. crap cigs would fit in that too. It's my most harmful one. Wrath as in anger coming in second.

Could be worse. William Shatner did a parody a few years back where it was HIS head in the box... and it was singing!

Oh! The Big Giant Head! :)

Shut UP! *shudder*

But I envy you your normal life, Poli. Envy is my digital sin...

Kevin Spacey was pretty creepy in that, I'm not sure whether he's creepier than Hannibal Lecter or not. Apropos of that, if John Doe's sin was Envy, what would you say Dr. Lecter's was?

......okay, that's actually kinda awesome. :p
You haven't heard William Shatner sing, have you? 7 wasn't NEARLY as tramatic as that!

Frankly speaking I think us folks on the left would be more understanding of christians if you didn't call yourselves anything in particular and just kept your beliefs to your own damned selves.

*slides Neo Art a slice of cheese cake*

"Folks on the left" and "Christians" are not mutually exclusive, unless you live in Rush Limbaugh's head.

Depends on how many people we can fit in his head. I say a family of four could fit quite nicely. Maybe a gay couple, and mixed kids.

Oh I like to mix up my sins. I can't just choose one.

Would you like your sin shaken or stirred today ma'am?

I prefer to think of you as toaster strudels. Because strudel is a fun word, isn't it?

strudel, strudel, strudel, strudel, strudel, strudel. You're right, it is a fun word to say.

Saved from what exactly? Not pompous moral superiority complexes, that's for sure.

The fiery pits of Hell of course!

As for me, I don't believe in Sin, unless it's the name of a night club, then I'm all game.

"Do you know what your sin is?" That's a great line from the science-fiction / space-western "Serenity".

I sometimes think folks on the left would be more understanding of Christians if we called ourselves, "Sinners Anonymous".

Anyway, this is just a poll / topic for talking about those things we have problems with. Some folk like to think in terms of "The Seven Deadly Sins". I tend to think some of the Seven are aspects of one another.

Why do I have to choose? Besides, I prefer to think of them, not as sins - which implies that any of them are actually evil, but as a to-do list for life.

Sloth, with arrogance salad on the side.

I don't sin.

Frankly speaking I think us folks on the left would be more understanding of christians if you didn't call yourselves anything in particular and just kept your beliefs to your own damned selves.

hehehe Funny man is funny.

As for me, I don't believe in Sin, unless it's the name of a night club, then I'm all game.

The only "nightclub" I went into which had sin in its name was shit, it played a combination of R'n'B, and pop that had been mixed, the drinks were overpriced and the majority of patrons left a lot to be desired.

I have to go for all of them, they're all thouroughly enjoyable. Some more than others, but I wouldn't want to miss a single one of them. :)

Oh I like to mix up my sins. I can't just choose one.

Variety is the spice of life after all.

Could be worse. William Shatner did a parody a few years back where it was HIS head in the box... and it was singing!

I'm not certain whether to laugh at that or run screaming to hide under my bed!

I reckon sloth is thing I have the biggest trouble with. Especially as I should be revising for an exam now...

As a kid I reckon I exhibited many of those qualities. Probably wrath most and lust least. I'm not sure I've lusted after anyone in my entire life. Some psychologist might say that it's because my parents had a messy divorce and that as a result I have little desire to form relationships with other people. I'm certainly glad I'm not wrathful anymore, hurting other people isn't much fun. :/

"Hell. I'm a fan of all seven."

I reckon sloth is thing I have the biggest trouble with. Especially as I should be revising for an exam now...

As a kid I reckon I exhibited many of those qualities. Probably wrath most and lust least. I'm not sure I've lusted after anyone in my entire life. Some psychologist might say that it's because my parents had a messy divorce and that as a result I have little desire to form relationships with other people. I'm certainly glad I'm not wrathful anymore, hurting other people isn't much fun. :/

Sloth, in reference to the seven sins isn't laziness. More of spiritual apathy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sloth_(deadly_sin)

"Do you know what your sin is?" That's a great line from the science-fiction / space-western "Serenity".

I sometimes think folks on the left would be more understanding of Christians if we called ourselves, "Sinners Anonymous".

Anyway, this is just a poll / topic for talking about those things we have problems with. Some folk like to think in terms of "The Seven Deadly Sins". I tend to think some of the Seven are aspects of one another.
Being an atheist means I don't have a problem with sin. Fuck yeah, godless debauchery.
Oh I like to mix up my sins. I can't just choose one.
Variety, spice of life, etc.
Dammit, I already had nightmares for months after watching that movie. Now you guys are going to make me unable to play Sims 2 for fear of what exactly the presents sims give each other contain.
The same thing that's in Marsellus Wallace's briefcase.
I don't sin.

Quick, cast the first stone so we can join in.

Variety, spice of life, etc.


Hey, that's my line! Get your own.

Hey, that's my line! Get your own.

*steals line*
*flees*

*steals line*
*flees*

*chases*

Not letting it go that easily!

I sometimes think folks on the left would be more understanding of Christians if we called ourselves, "Sinners Anonymous".

Sometimes I think you're incredibly stupid, because being Christian and being on the left aren't mutually exclusive.

I am a glutton. For food, and for pleasure.

The last "foaming at the mouth" preacher I heard was Rev. Wright, the President's old pastor. Of course, there is that one guy who thinks soldiers are being killed in Iraq because of society's more relaxed views on homosexuality.

Your attention is incredibly selective and convenient, then.

Sometimes I think you're incredibly stupid, because being Christian and being on the left aren't mutually exclusive.

Psst. Been said. But not as rudely.

Psst. Been said. But not as rudely.

Yeah, I realised that afterwards.

I read this (after years of using a graphing calculator) as "Do you know what your sine is?"

they're all awesome, apart from Arrogance

Greed - helps my bank account
Envy - fuels my greed
Sloth - makes for a great weekend
Lust - also makes for a great weekend
Gluttony - every night, mmmm tasty
Arrogance - not so much
Wrath - is a great album by Lamb of God

I read this (after years of using a graphing calculator) as "Do you know what your sine is?"

Opposite over hypotenuse. *nods*

I keep a list of every time I engage in a sin.

Fortunately, I recently transferred that list to electronic storage and freed up that extra bedroom. :D

I keep a list of every time I engage in a sin.

Fortunately, I recently transferred that list to electronic storage and freed up that extra bedroom. :D

IMS, a standard filing cabinet holds less data than a floppy disk. Must be one hell of a bedroom, unless you have more paper somewhere else.

IMS, a standard filing cabinet holds less data than a floppy disk. Must be one hell of a bedroom, unless you have more paper somewhere else.

That was the microfilm. :p

IMS, a standard filing cabinet holds less data than a floppy disk. Must be one hell of a bedroom, unless you have more paper somewhere else.

Or really really small handwritting

That was the microfilm. :p
Ah, that makes far more sense.
Or really really small handwritting

Tiny handwriting and shorthand.

Ah, that makes far more sense.


Tiny handwriting and shorthand.

All I can say is that I'm glad silliness isn't a sin or I'd be in real trouble. :p

I am a glutton. For food, and for pleasure.

As am I.:fluffle:

As am I.:fluffle:

That's why I like you, babe.:fluffle:

Sloth. Definitely sloth.

None of those 'sins' seem all that bad when taken in moderation. I suppose some of it preclude moderation, but I believe the implication would be to generally strike them down as being bad. Gluttony? Food is huge part of my life, I love taste, I love the experience of eating. I may be overweight and starting to shift that, but that's where exercise, not denial, comes in. Sloth? How do we even determine this? Isn't that entirely subjective? I mean someone who works a part time job, studies at university and volunteers for something might consider someone who just has a part time job to have a lot of 'idle' time but who are either of them to judge as to what is slothful?

Wrath gives me the giggles. Not only for the hypocrisy of it being a sin, but because anybody who considers wrath a bad idea is someone who hasn't had cause to need it as an ally. You ask any oppressed peoples whether wrath is a bad thing and let me hear your answer.

None of those 'sins' seem all that bad when taken in moderation.

All things in moderation, including moderation.

All things in moderation, including moderation.

Indeed. Life without excess would seem horrifically stoic and boring to me.

Despair

Anyone who didn't go for all seven is a blasphemous liar. And thus will be damned unto hell, while we, the righteous, look down upon them from up high and express our scorn and loathing.



Also we might throw things.

Your attention is incredibly selective and convenient, then.

Name some names, then.

At this point in space-time, no one has singled out "greed" and "envy" as their sins.

Just an observation.

All things in moderation, including moderation.
Indeed, the Mods would the the very first to remind us all about what belongs in Moderation.













Sorry, I just couldn't help myself.

Variety is the spice of life after all.
Insanity! Insanity is the spice of life, not variety.

I'm not certain whether to laugh at that or run screaming to hide under my bed!
Screaming and hiding sounds good.

Name some names, then.

Fred Phelps, Pat Robertson, James Dobson, Jerry Falwell, Paul Weyrich, Pat Buchanan... do you really want me to go on?

Fred Phelps, Pat Robertson, James Dobson, Jerry Falwell, Paul Weyrich, Pat Buchanan... do you really want me to go on?

Phelps, mentioned. Pat Robertson & James Dobson, a little kooky at times but foaming?!?!? Jerry Falwell, dead for two years. Paul Weyrich, dead. Pat Buchanon, not a preacher.

Is that the best you have?

Meanwhile, other than Phelps, I'd stack any of these guys against: Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Louis Farrakhan, and Michael Pfleger.

Phelps, mentioned. Pat Robertson & James Dobson, a little kooky at times but foaming?!?!? Jerry Falwell, dead for two years. Paul Weyrich, dead. Pat Buchanon, not a preacher.

Is that the best you have?

Meanwhile, other than Phelps, I'd stack any of these guys against: Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Louis Farrakhan, and Michael Pfleger.

At the end of the day, we must go forward with hope and not backward by fear and division.

The feminist agenda is not about equal rights for women. It is about a socialist, anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians

I know I get those confused all the time

I know I get those confused all the time

Well, I'm not certain I agree with all of that Robertson stuff, like witchcraft, but the guy really isn't far off. When's the last time you saw N.O.W. effectively standing up for women? Did they stand up for Paula Jones, Anita Broderick or Kathleen Willey? No. Did they stand up for the victims of O.J. Simpson, Ron Brown and Nicole Simpson? No. The one woman who did, former Los Angeles N.O.W. chapter president, Tammy Bruce, was railed and screamed at because National N.O.W. was sucking up to the greater liberal agenda.

But, yeah, Robertson was dead on in describing the modern liberal feminist agenda as politically socialist, not concerned with starting or maintaining families and pro-abortion.

The only one I can say I'm not guilty of is Arrogance.

Robertson was dead on

Well, it's pretty obvious now that you're not someone worth listening to

Well, it's pretty obvious now that you're not someone worth listening to

Oh... I'm just so very crushed. That was such a biting retort to the truths that I presented. How will I ever recover? :rolleyes:

Are you such a coward that you can't use my entire quote and keep everything in context? Seems like it.

But, yeah, Robertson was dead on in describing the modern liberal feminist agenda as politically socialist, not concerned with starting or maintaining families and pro-abortion.

I'll tackle it if Neo won't.

Link please.

Oh... I'm just so very crushed. That was such a biting retort to the truths that I presented. How will I ever recover? :rolleyes:

Are you such a coward that you can't use my entire quote and keep everything in context? Seems like it.

What "truths that you presented"? You just argued that the only real problem you have with the statement, "The feminist agenda is not about equal rights for women. It is about a socialist, anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians" is the WITCHCRAFT. That's just so colossally silly that it's hard to see any merit in debating you. It would be like arguing with someone who has seriously just alleged that the stated agenda of the Republican party is to destroy all human life. What can you really say to that beyond, "Um....no...it's not"?

But hey, you can totally point to where N.O.W. has said, "Hey women! Go murder your toddlers, make out with a chick, and stop buying things, RIGHT NOW!" and prove me wrong, if you like.

Phelps, mentioned. Pat Robertson & James Dobson, a little kooky at times but foaming?!?!?

[Planned Parenthood] "is teaching kids to fornicate, teaching people to have adultery, every kind of bestiality, homosexuality, lesbianism – everything that the Bible condemns." --Pat Robertson

"You say you're supposed to be nice to the Episcopalians and the Presbyterians and the Methodists and this, that, and the other thing. Nonsense, I don't have to be nice to the spirit of the Antichrist." --Pat Robertson

"The Islamic people, the Arabs, were the ones who captured Africans, put them in slavery, and sent them to America as slaves. Why would the people in America want to embrace the religion of slavers." --Pat Robertson

"Homosexuals are not monogamous. They want to destroy the institution of marriage. It will destroy marriage. It will destroy the Earth." --James Dobson

Jerry Falwell, dead for two years. Paul Weyrich, dead.

Yes, eventually people do die. Are they then no longer part of your history? Because if so, you're going to want to strike "Christ" off that list.

Pat Buchanon, not a preacher.

I never mentioned preachers. I side "our side" has fewer foaming-at-the-mouth fundamentalists. YOU introduced the word "preacher". If you want to admit to shifting your goalposts now, feel free.

When's the last time you saw N.O.W. effectively standing up for women?

Right now, yesterday, a year ago, five years ago... how far back do you want to go? They lobby for family planning, reproductive rights, rights of lesbians, Title IX... honestly, was that supposed to be a tough question?

Did they stand up for Paula Jones, Anita Broderick or Kathleen Willey? No. Did they stand up for the victims of O.J. Simpson, Ron Brown and Nicole Simpson? No.

Source, source and source. Source, source and source.

But, yeah, Robertson was dead on in describing the modern liberal feminist agenda as politically socialist

Buzzword alert! We're not sure what socialist is, but it's bad and feminists are it!

not concerned with starting or maintaining families and pro-abortion.

Which is why they do so much lobbying for family planning, why they're RIGHT NOW lobbying for more parental leave from jobs. Because they're not concerned with families.

I know it's a scary place, but try looking around at the world, just every once in awhile.

What "truths that you presented"? You just argued that the only real problem you have with the statement, "The feminist agenda is not about equal rights for women. It is about a socialist, anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians" is the WITCHCRAFT. That's just so colossally silly that it's hard to see any merit in debating you. It would be like arguing with someone who has seriously just alleged that the stated agenda of the Republican party is to destroy all human life. What can you really say to that beyond, "Um....no...it's not"?

But hey, you can totally point to where N.O.W. has said, "Hey women! Go murder your toddlers, make out with a chick, and stop buying things, RIGHT NOW!" and prove me wrong, if you like.

Shit. You seem to have won already.

While I was standing there waiting for You-Gi-Owe to take guard. Chivalrously refraining from any research on either side, ready to do a battle of wits with YGO, typo e typo.

Wow, do I feel silly now. Like I challenged a worm to an arm-wrestle.

Shit. You seem to have won already.

While I was standing there waiting for You-Gi-Owe to take guard. Chivalrously refraining from any research on either side, ready to do a battle of wits with YGO, typo e typo.

Wow, do I feel silly now. Like I challenged a worm to an arm-wrestle.

One of my students challenged me to an arm-wrestle. I found myself having to "fake" a lot less than I expected to lose. Beware of skinny devious six-year-olds!

My sin is greed and wraith

But, yeah, Robertson was dead on in describing the modern liberal feminist agenda as politically socialist, not concerned with starting or maintaining families and pro-abortion.

Hey, that sounds great! Where can I sign on?

I'm openly guilty of all Seven.
Especially lust, glutton, envy, pride, and sloth.

GO ME! Hell here I come! Someone save me a seat!

My sin is greed and wraith

Oh, so your sin is a Covenant tank?

Let's see

Greed not so much I am pretty content.
Envy not so much I am pretty content.
Lust at one time maybe but not so much anymore
Gluttony mostly in the drink category, again I am never sure where the line is?
Sloth either spiritual apathy or laziness, again I am never sure where the line is?
Wrath I am pretty even keel and patient, in fact I try to avoid conflict for the most part
Pride/hubris I think I am pretty down to earth but I may be deluded

I could say I am not a sinner anymore because I believe in Jesus and have asked for forgiveness but you may imply from that that I did not sin in the first place or that I am denying that I am a sinner, in which case I am a sinner and have sinned.

I went with I am not sure which I need the most help with because i would need help in this regard.

Front runner is probably sloth.

Poll should be multi-choice :(

Greed, Sloth, and Arrogance. Especially Arrogance.