NationStates Jolt Archive


2012 film - will it be absolute bollocks or epically good?

No Names Left Damn It
19-04-2009, 21:29
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VXa82AuwHU

So here's the trailer, what d'you think? Seeing as it's got water pouring over the Himalayas, I'm assuming it's not going to be factually accurate, but I hope there will be enough action to make up for this. What d'you think it will be like? And how the Hell does water even get to the Himalayas, let alone flood them?
Skallvia
19-04-2009, 21:33
I have to say, I laughed:
"how would the governments of our planet prepare 6 billion people for the end of the world?"


"they wouldnt" lol...

Looks like it could be okay though, kinda reminds me of the Day after Tomorrow
No Names Left Damn It
19-04-2009, 21:35
Looks like it could be okay though, kinda reminds me of the Day after Tomorrow

That's because Roland Emmerich's making it.
Call to power
19-04-2009, 21:35
bah I'm more scared by the concept of what I will be doing in 3 years time
Antilon
19-04-2009, 21:41
Meh. Just Hollywood cashing off the whole 2012 "end-of-the-world" hype.
Mirkana
19-04-2009, 21:48
I hate doomsday prophecies.
Risottia
19-04-2009, 21:50
So here's the trailer, what d'you think? Seeing as it's got water pouring over the Himalayas, I'm assuming it's not going to be factually accurate, but I hope there will be enough action to make up for this. What d'you think it will be like? And how the Hell does water even get to the Himalayas, let alone flood them?

Looks just like a remake of Deep Impact. Bleurgh. :p
Shadowbat
19-04-2009, 21:52
yeh its just a bunch of bullcrap irl, oh hey look a pretty rock in the sky!
Quintessence of Dust
19-04-2009, 21:53
Seeing as it's got water pouring over the Himalayas, I'm assuming it's not going to be factually accurate
Exactly what would it take to make the film 'factually accurate'? It's based on one of the most inane and ridiculous pieces of New Age bullshit I've ever encountered.

A factually accurate film would consist of footage of Mayans spinning in their graves.
Call to power
19-04-2009, 21:57
Exactly what would it take to make the film 'factually accurate'? It's based on one of the most inane and ridiculous pieces of New Age bullshit I've ever encountered.

you won't be saying that in 2012 when kowabunga becomes cool again
Shadowbat
19-04-2009, 21:59
I whis the world would end when some sort of dimensional barier breakes and we become flooded with a river made of cookies.
Skallvia
19-04-2009, 22:06
you won't be saying that in 2012 when kowabunga becomes cool again

Kowabunga isnt cool anymore? :(
Ashmoria
19-04-2009, 22:27
i dunno but im going to see that movie in the theater. i love the look of the water in the moutains in the trailer im sure its better on the big screen.
Ashmoria
19-04-2009, 22:31
ooooo it has john cusack in it. i like john cusack.
Ladamesansmerci
19-04-2009, 22:31
Bollocks. Srs 2012 conspiracists make me lol.
Lunatic Goofballs
19-04-2009, 22:32
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VXa82AuwHU

So here's the trailer, what d'you think? Seeing as it's got water pouring over the Himalayas, I'm assuming it's not going to be factually accurate, but I hope there will be enough action to make up for this. What d'you think it will be like? And how the Hell does water even get to the Himalayas, let alone flood them?

I was tossing around cataclysmic possibilities that could cause a disaster like that. Polar shift would do it I think.
Skallvia
19-04-2009, 22:33
Bollocks. Srs 2012 conspiracists make me lol.

But...http://theparallaxview.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/sexpistols.jpg
The Atlantian islands
19-04-2009, 22:43
Dude, I'm like so waxing up my board! 2012 is gonna bring some gnarly waves, bro.

*tokes*

Any dudes up for some surfing . . . or atleast a hit of this?

*offers*
Khadgar
19-04-2009, 23:01
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VXa82AuwHU

So here's the trailer, what d'you think? Seeing as it's got water pouring over the Himalayas, I'm assuming it's not going to be factually accurate, but I hope there will be enough action to make up for this. What d'you think it will be like? And how the Hell does water even get to the Himalayas, let alone flood them?

It'll be another laugh a minute as Hollywood once again proves they know absolutely nothing about physics.
Dakini
19-04-2009, 23:24
It looks incredibly stupid.
SaintB
19-04-2009, 23:27
I think it will be crap but people will flock to see it anyway.
Dakini
19-04-2009, 23:35
It'll be another laugh a minute as Hollywood once again proves they know absolutely nothing about physics.
Or mythology.
We Have No Idea
19-04-2009, 23:42
you know i think it will be goodi guess we have to just wait and see
Dakini
19-04-2009, 23:43
I was tossing around cataclysmic possibilities that could cause a disaster like that. Polar shift would do it I think.

Polar shift as in the Earth goes and does a head stand? Or polar shift as in the magnetic poles?
Gauthier
19-04-2009, 23:44
Damn, and I thought it was going to be based off of Clarke's novels.
Lunatic Goofballs
20-04-2009, 00:01
Polar shift as in the Earth goes and does a head stand? Or polar shift as in the magnetic poles?

Polar shift as in the axis of Earth's rotation changing. There is evidence that suggests it happened in the past and could happen again. It could even reverse completely. However, the most likely period of pole shift in Earth's History occurred over a very long timescale. There's no evidence to suggest it could happen suddenly or catastrophically.
The Romulan Republic
20-04-2009, 00:02
That's because Roland Emmerich's making it.

In that case, it will probably be like every other film of his I've seen, which means large scale action and special effects combined with story and characters that are average or below.

Seriously, his movies can be fun, but when the best you've done is probably something like The Day After Tomorrow or Stargate...
Farnhamia Redux
20-04-2009, 00:51
Polar shift as in the axis of Earth's rotation changing. There is evidence that suggests it happened in the past and could happen again. It could even reverse completely. However, the most likely period of pole shift in Earth's History occurred over a very long timescale. There's no evidence to suggest it could happen suddenly or catastrophically.

Well, a couple of geologists (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_shift#Recent_research) have proposed that the North Pole shifted by as much as 50 degrees back in the Precambrian Era, 800,000,000 years ago, and that it happened in less than 20,000,000 years. :eek2:

I suppose it could happen again but I'm not expecting it. Reversal of the polarity of the magnetic field, sure, that's happened lots, but the globe flopping over on its side? Not so much.
New Limacon
20-04-2009, 00:55
Polar shift as in the axis of Earth's rotation changing. There is evidence that suggests it happened in the past and could happen again. It could even reverse completely. However, the most likely period of pole shift in Earth's History occurred over a very long timescale. There's no evidence to suggest it could happen suddenly or catastrophically.
...but there's no evidence to suggest it couldn't happen suddenly or catastrophically. Isn't that right?
New Mitanni
20-04-2009, 00:57
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VXa82AuwHU

So here's the trailer, what d'you think? Seeing as it's got water pouring over the Himalayas, I'm assuming it's not going to be factually accurate, but I hope there will be enough action to make up for this. What d'you think it will be like? And how the Hell does water even get to the Himalayas, let alone flood them?

Kevin Costner already did Waterworld. No need for a rehash.
Khadgar
20-04-2009, 00:58
...but there's no evidence to suggest it couldn't happen suddenly or catastrophically. Isn't that right?

The moon tends to stabilize our axial tilt. However a catastrophic impact event could tilt it dramatically. Though if we got hit that hard safe to say we would be unconcerned.
New Limacon
20-04-2009, 01:02
The moon tends to stabilize our axial tilt. However a catastrophic impact event could tilt it dramatically. Though if we got hit that hard safe to say we would be unconcerned.
That sounded hardthink, so I'm just going to assume what I said was true.
Desperate Measures
20-04-2009, 01:05
Kevin Costner already did Waterworld. No need for a rehash.

It may be a good idea to remake all of Kevin Costner's movies with them starring anybody but Kevin Costner and then destroy the originals.
Mirkana
20-04-2009, 01:13
...but there's no evidence to suggest it couldn't happen suddenly or catastrophically. Isn't that right?

Um, there is that little thing called rotational inertia...
New Limacon
20-04-2009, 01:16
Um, there is that little thing called rotational inertia...
See #32 (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=14716838&postcount=32).
Mirkana
20-04-2009, 01:21
See #32 (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=14716838&postcount=32).

If something that big did hit us, we'd have other things to worry about, like this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTKau14cvQ4&feature=related)...
Dakini
20-04-2009, 01:38
Polar shift as in the axis of Earth's rotation changing. There is evidence that suggests it happened in the past and could happen again. It could even reverse completely. However, the most likely period of pole shift in Earth's History occurred over a very long timescale. There's no evidence to suggest it could happen suddenly or catastrophically.

I don't think I've ever heard of the rotational axis reversing. The magnetic poles, sure, but the rotational axis only wobbles, it doesn't go end over end and I don't think I've ever heard of it doing so in the past (the most change I've heard of is about 3 degrees).
New Limacon
20-04-2009, 01:39
If something that big did hit us, we'd have other things to worry about, like this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTKau14cvQ4&feature=related)...
Oh. Yes, that does not seem good. (Takes a long time to load, too. Even if an asteroid doesn't hit us, the hypothetical rock has already wasted about ten minutes of my life.)
Skallvia
20-04-2009, 01:41
The question is, will we be more this?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/7f/Tatooine.jpg/300px-Tatooine.jpg

or this?

http://mornatur.files.wordpress.com/2007/05/hoth.jpg
Fleckenstein
20-04-2009, 01:43
If something that big did hit us, we'd have other things to worry about, like this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTKau14cvQ4&feature=related)...

FUCK SCIENCE. Now I'm terrified.
New Limacon
20-04-2009, 01:46
FUCK SCIENCE. Now I'm terrified.
Hear hear. Let's burn down the observatory, so this will never happen again!
Lunatic Goofballs
20-04-2009, 01:59
...but there's no evidence to suggest it couldn't happen suddenly or catastrophically. Isn't that right?

Earth is kind of like a gyroscope. If something were to imbalance it, it could wobble. But chances are that something catastrophic enough to disrupt it entirly would probably be...well, catastrophic anyway.
Mirkana
20-04-2009, 02:04
FUCK SCIENCE. Now I'm terrified.

The only thing that made me feel better was the knowledge that this hasn't happened in a few billion years.

This is also said to be the result of two Falcon Punches colliding.
Trotskylvania
20-04-2009, 03:47
My bet is absolute bollocks.
Saige Dragon
20-04-2009, 05:13
what if this is just a jack in the box commercial.

This Youtube comment was funny so I laughed.
Delator
20-04-2009, 07:46
Considering this is coming from the guy who gave us such turds as The Day After Tomorrow, 10,000 BC, and Godzilla, I would have to say that 2012 will be just as bad, if not worse.
No Names Left Damn It
20-04-2009, 11:07
I was tossing around cataclysmic possibilities that could cause a disaster like that. Polar shift would do it I think.

Really? Because the Himalayas are literally miles above seabed.
Zombie PotatoHeads
20-04-2009, 11:24
The moon tends to stabilize our axial tilt. However a catastrophic impact event could tilt it dramatically. Though if we got hit that hard safe to say we would be unconcerned.
ohhhh....what if it wasn't us that got hit by a big 'un, but the Moon? That would make for a good disaster action movie.
Vault 10
20-04-2009, 11:56
Kevin Costner already did Waterworld. No need for a rehash.
It will be a religious version of Waterworld. Way more fearmongering and fake drama, way less coolness.
Vault 10
20-04-2009, 11:59
Polar shift as in the axis of Earth's rotation changing. There is evidence that suggests it happened in the past and could happen again. It could even reverse completely. However, the most likely period of pole shift in Earth's History occurred over a very long timescale. There's no evidence to suggest it could happen suddenly or catastrophically.
IIRC there's a theory about the polar shift only involving the crust, not the magma. Basically with the crust sliding over the magma, like a fluid bearing.
No Names Left Damn It
20-04-2009, 12:37
IIRC there's a theory about the polar shift only involving the crust, not the magma. Basically with the crust sliding over the magma, like a fluid bearing.

Crust shift theory.
Lunatic Goofballs
20-04-2009, 13:07
Really? Because the Himalayas are literally miles above seabed.

Well, yeah that is a stretch, but sudden pole shift, and especially pole reversal would have a dramatic effect on the oceans until a new equilibrium was established. I can''t think of anything else that could cause such an effect.
No Names Left Damn It
20-04-2009, 13:14
Well, yeah that is a stretch, but sudden pole shift, and especially pole reversal would have a dramatic effect on the oceans until a new equilibrium was established. I can''t think of anything else that could cause such an effect.

A massive asteroid strike in the Bay of Bengal might, but then the shockwave would reach the Himalayas first, and the wave would be travelling much faster.
Lunatic Goofballs
20-04-2009, 13:17
A massive asteroid strike in the Bay of Bengal might, but then the shockwave would reach the Himalayas first, and the wave would be travelling much faster.

The tsunami wouldn't be big enough. Getting higher than about a quarter of a mile high is implausible without the sort of impact in that video clip from a couple pages ago. In that eventuality, it won't be water flowing over the Himalayas.
No Names Left Damn It
20-04-2009, 13:20
The tsunami wouldn't be big enough. Getting higher than about a quarter of a mile high is implausible without the sort of impact in that video clip from a couple pages ago. In that eventuality, it won't be water flowing over the Himalayas.

So essentially a pole switch is the only thing that could do it? How would that happen?
Lunatic Goofballs
20-04-2009, 14:07
So essentially a pole switch is the only thing that could do it? How would that happen?

An excellent question. :tongue:
No Names Left Damn It
20-04-2009, 14:15
An excellent question. :tongue:

I don't mean how would a pole switch happen, I mean how would that cause the oceans to swell to such a massive height?
Lunatic Goofballs
20-04-2009, 14:28
I don't mean how would a pole switch happen, I mean how would that cause the oceans to swell to such a massive height?

Inertia. The earth rotates at about 1000 miles per hour at the equator. Should the earth's axis of rotation shift suddenly, the oceans would continue moving in it's original direction at incredible speed for a while. That's not the only catastrophic event either; the inertial change would probably cause earthquakes and other impressive geological events, but as the oceans are the most fluid, the effect on them will be exaggerated.
Mooseica
20-04-2009, 14:47
Immanuel Velikovsky's theories on a dynamic solar system outlined the possibility of cataclysmic events caused by close proximity planetary interaction which, among other things, could include the Earth tipping over (end over end if I recall correctly) with the oceans sloshing around and over mountain ranges and so forth.
No Names Left Damn It
20-04-2009, 14:59
Inertia. The earth rotates at about 1000 miles per hour at the equator. Should the earth's axis of rotation shift suddenly, the oceans would continue moving in it's original direction at incredible speed for a while. That's not the only catastrophic event either; the inertial change would probably cause earthquakes and other impressive geological events, but as the oceans are the most fluid, the effect on them will be exaggerated.

So in theory this could actually happen?
Blouman Empire
20-04-2009, 15:46
I don't mean how would a pole switch happen, I mean how would that cause the oceans to swell to such a massive height?

That's what I would like to know.

And hasn't the poles switched many times thoughout Earth history.
Blouman Empire
20-04-2009, 15:47
Looks like it could be okay though, kinda reminds me of the Day after Tomorrow

I was going to say it looks like it is going to be shit.

And then I read this and if it is like that movie then it is going to be shit. I am sure that it will make a lot of money.
Lunatic Goofballs
20-04-2009, 16:11
So in theory this could actually happen?

Well, the hard part to explain is sudden pole shift. If pole shift occured at all in Earth's history(and there is evidence to suggest it does from time to time), it occurred over millions of years. There's no historical precedent for a sudden pole shift. That doesn't make it impossible though. Some people crazier than I suggest that a large enough rogue planet passing near Earth could do it.
Lunatic Goofballs
20-04-2009, 16:12
That's what I would like to know.

And hasn't the poles switched many times thoughout Earth history.

That's the magnetic poles. They switch relatively frequently. I'm talking about the Earth's axis of rotation.
Blouman Empire
20-04-2009, 16:34
That's the magnetic poles. They switch relatively frequently. I'm talking about the Earth's axis of rotation.

Ah I see that is what I thought you meant.
JuNii
20-04-2009, 17:36
Awww... I thought it was going to be yet another sequel to 2001 and 2010. :(
Motokata
20-04-2009, 17:40
Yay its The Day After Tomorrow 2
DrunkenDove
20-04-2009, 17:54
A movie by the guy who directed universal soilder and wrote 10,000BC? My, how this movie will suck, let me count the ways.
Call to power
20-04-2009, 17:59
all this talk of science when clearly someone just left the tap on.
Anti-Social Darwinism
20-04-2009, 18:39
Somewhere I heard that trailers consist of the most compelling, interesting scenes in a movie. If that's so, based on the trailers, the movie sucks. I won't see it.

As for the prophecy, meh.
Mooseica
20-04-2009, 19:58
How can you all be saying that Emmerich's films are bad? Fair enough they may be absolutely, laughably appalling, but isn't that their genius? They really are so bad they're good! Surely we all loved Independence Day? Come on, you can admit it - deep down, you love it! And what's not to love about a film featuring a) oceans swamping mountain ranges and b) monks?
Getbrett
20-04-2009, 20:10
How can you all be saying that Emmerich's films are bad? Fair enough they may be absolutely, laughably appalling, but isn't that their genius? They really are so bad they're good! Surely we all loved Independence Day? Come on, you can admit it - deep down, you love it! And what's not to love about a film featuring a) oceans swamping mountain ranges and b) monks?

Exactly. He's an expert of mindless sci-fi action movies. They're not supposed to be enjoyed on an intellectual level, they appeal to a more primitive instinct.
Salothczaar
20-04-2009, 20:15
I refuse to accept that anything could cause a wave that large to propel itself across the Himalayas without first causing the complete destruction of everything else first. Silly Hollywood and their lousy science.
The Parkus Empire
20-04-2009, 20:19
That trailer sounds, and looks, awfully familiar....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6qDqdYY6-Y
Getbrett
20-04-2009, 20:31
That trailer sounds, and looks, awfully familiar....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6qDqdYY6-Y

That's an interesting tribute.
JuNii
20-04-2009, 20:41
I refuse to accept that anything could cause a wave that large to propel itself across the Himalayas without first causing the complete destruction of everything else first. Silly Hollywood and their lousy science.

how do you know it didn't? after all, for all we know, that might be the final scene... ok, second to final scene... the final scene would be a large wooden ark! :tongue:
Krytenia
20-04-2009, 20:53
Dude, I'm like so waxing up my board! 2012 is gonna bring some gnarly waves, bro.

*tokes*

Any dudes up for some surfing . . . or atleast a hit of this?

*offers*

It'll make the Olympic yachting a bitch, though.
Weskers Children
20-04-2009, 21:23
sweet a giant wave. Lets go scooba diving !
Salothczaar
22-04-2009, 23:39
how do you know it didn't? after all, for all we know, that might be the final scene... ok, second to final scene... the final scene would be a large wooden ark! :tongue:

:p

Even if it was the last or second last scene, I would at least expect some more fire and dust, a wave that large needs something incredibly huge to create it. I cant remember if it was here or another place that gave a link to how hollywood tsunamis caused by asteroids and such are unrealistic.

Now I have just realised that since it is 2012, anyone can come up with anything that could happen. There we are then, no asteroid or meteor as I was thinking, just some hippy space magicians annoyed that they couldnt arrange their world tour.
Krytenia
23-04-2009, 01:09
There we are then, no asteroid or meteor as I was thinking, just some hippy space magicians annoyed that they couldnt arrange their world tour.

Curse you, Magical Trevor!
Zombie PotatoHeads
23-04-2009, 01:59
sweet a giant wave. Lets go scooba diving !
Is that a euphanism (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=euphanism) for what Shaggy does to Scooby when Vera and the gang aren't around?
UnitedStatesOfAmerica-
23-04-2009, 03:01
Nothing will happen in 2012. We will still be driving fossil fuel vehicles. Cuba and Venezuela will still be communist. Iran and Israel will still hate each other.
People will still be partying it up, drinking and driving. People will still be working their normal jobs and attending normal classes. Nothing out of the ordinary.

Of course if you do drink and drive, you could be your own personal doomsday.