NationStates Jolt Archive


Time-Released Drugs: Now in Nano Form

Kyronea
04-01-2009, 06:55
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7808672.stm

Nano device 'times drug release'

US researchers say they have harnessed the power of gold nanoparticles to devise a better way of delivering drugs to treat diseases such as cancer.

The fledgling system could release a number of drugs in a specific part of the body at desired intervals, the MIT team wrote in the journal ACS Nano.

The device makes use of the fact that different particles melt when exposed to different levels of infrared light.

Different drugs on the particles could thus be released in a controlled way.

One of the advantages of being able to deliver drugs directly to a specific site within the body is that you can use relatively toxic drugs without fear of causing widespread damage to other, healthy tissue.

A number of trials are using nanoparticles, sometimes as small as one nanometre - or a billionth of a metre - to take drugs directly to the site of a tumour and avoid many of the side-effects associated with traditional chemotherapy.

Near-infrared light is shone on the site, penetrating the skin to reach the tumour. At the right temperature, it causes the particles to heat up and release the drugs contained within.

Spacing drugs out

But conditions such as cancer or HIV/Aids often require complex treatment with a number of drugs which have to be taken at different intervals.

The device developed by the MIT team involves two differently shaped nanoparticles which have separate melting points, meaning the drugs can be released in a controlled fashion at appropriate intervals.

"Just by controlling the infrared wavelength, we can choose the release time," said Andy Wijaya, the report's lead author.

In theory, the device could be used to deliver up to four drugs by creating four different shaped particles.

Kat Arney, of Cancer Research UK, said that nanoparticles were a "hot topic in cancer research because they can directly target tumours to deliver a payload of drugs".

"This new technique is clever because it means a number of different drugs can be released. But although it's exciting the work is still at an early stage and is not yet ready to be used in patients."

Not entirely what one pictures when one hears the title of the article, but that's what media does to you.

Anyway, this sounds incredibly useful, even for normal OTC drugs. Many benefits await here.
One-O-One
04-01-2009, 07:14
Been following stuff like this on Technology Review for ages. The only issue I have is if I can't abuse OTC stuff. :p
Wilgrove
04-01-2009, 07:17
Yea, but there's always a downside to nano-technology.

http://subtlebluntness.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/t1000rp.jpg

I heard that T-1000 was a robot made up of nano-bots.
Bouitazia
04-01-2009, 08:38
Yea, but there's always a downside to nano-technology.

-Img Snip-

I heard that T-1000 was a robot made up of nano-bots.


Down-side? ,)
Troglobites
04-01-2009, 08:44
Now we need really tiny mechanics.
Risottia
04-01-2009, 11:56
Yea, but there's always a downside to nano-technology.

I heard that T-1000 was a robot made up of nano-bots.

Also Berlusconi is called "Psiconano" (the psychodwarf).
Peisandros
04-01-2009, 12:21
Hmm, would've been interesting.. I don't think I would trust getting chemo with this nano shit though.
Yootopia
04-01-2009, 15:05
I, for one, cannot wait until the stories on the news are "Presumably Russkies take out dissenter, nobody knows how" or "Our boys grind down Taliban leadership with secret weapon".
The Infinite Dunes
04-01-2009, 16:02
I seem to remember a similar technology being researched for targeted cancer therapy. It used viruses coated in plastic or something. The idea is that the virus would be harmless in the places where the body was functioning properly, but in a tumor something would happen to cause the plastic to separate from the virus and the virus would attack the cells in the local environment (the cancerous ones). The bodies own immune system would also stop the virus from spreading outside the tumor. The technology is supposed to be great because it will target areas that cancer has spread to, but are too small be diagnosed yet.

This is probably what I read about -- http://www.bioedonline.org/picks/news.cfm?art=1731
Desperate Measures
04-01-2009, 18:23
Now we need really tiny mechanics.

Then we'll have to get really tiny chefs to feed them and of course tiny pleasure bots for their downtime. This could get out of hand.
Wilgrove
04-01-2009, 20:41
Then we'll have to get really tiny chefs to feed them and of course tiny pleasure bots for their downtime. This could get out of hand.

Well, this would bring new meaning to the term "downsizing" :p
Ifreann
04-01-2009, 20:44
Very interesting idea.
Yea, but there's always a downside to nano-technology.

http://subtlebluntness.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/t1000rp.jpg

I heard that T-1000 was a robot made up of nano-bots.
I think you'll find that fellow is an upside of nanotechnology.
Now we need really tiny mechanics.

http://www.chem.helsinki.fi/~jonas/quantum_mechanics.jpg
Skallvia
04-01-2009, 20:49
Down-side? ,)

Seriously, I Trust Skynet (http://www.skynet.com.au/)
Bouitazia
04-01-2009, 20:56
Seriously, I Trust Skynet (http://www.skynet.com.au/)

Yeah, okay, there is a slight possibility of it all going haywire, sure. ,)
But I was rather imagining us as "skynet" instead, what with being a transhumanist and all.
Skallvia
04-01-2009, 20:57
Yeah, okay, there is a slight possibility of it all going haywire, sure. ,)
But I was rather imagining us as "skynet" instead, what with being a transhumanist and all.

I thought it looked pretty friendly, lol