NationStates Jolt Archive


Winning Hearts and Minds

Hotwife
29-12-2008, 22:06
by helping old men get a hardon...

Victory through better pharmaceuticals - and giving tribal leaders what they really want - an ability to "perform".

I doubt the Taliban could compete at that level - it would probably be a violation of their religious precepts.

I think it's a great idea - especially if it gets results (in bed, in the sheep pen, or out in the field) - and it's got to be a pretty cheap bribe.

Would you have thought of this as a way to get better local cooperation?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/25/AR2008122500931_pf.html

Little Blue Pills Among the Ways CIA Wins Friends in Afghanistan

By Joby Warrick
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, December 26, 2008; A01

The Afghan chieftain looked older than his 60-odd years, and his bearded face bore the creases of a man burdened with duties as tribal patriarch and husband to four younger women. His visitor, a CIA officer, saw an opportunity, and reached into his bag for a small gift.

Four blue pills. Viagra.

"Take one of these. You'll love it," the officer said. Compliments of Uncle Sam.

The enticement worked. The officer, who described the encounter, returned four days later to an enthusiastic reception. The grinning chief offered up a bonanza of information about Taliban movements and supply routes -- followed by a request for more pills.

For U.S. intelligence officials, this is how some crucial battles in Afghanistan are fought and won. While the CIA has a long history of buying information with cash, the growing Taliban insurgency has prompted the use of novel incentives and creative bargaining to gain support in some of the country's roughest neighborhoods, according to officials directly involved in such operations.

In their efforts to win over notoriously fickle warlords and chieftains, the officials say, the agency's operatives have used a variety of personal services. These include pocketknives and tools, medicine or surgeries for ailing family members, toys and school equipment, tooth extractions, travel visas, and, occasionally, pharmaceutical enhancements for aging patriarchs with slumping libidos, the officials said.

"Whatever it takes to make friends and influence people -- whether it's building a school or handing out Viagra," said one longtime agency operative and veteran of several Afghanistan tours. Like other field officers interviewed for this article, he spoke on the condition of anonymity when describing tactics and operations that are largely classified.

Officials say these inducements are necessary in Afghanistan, a country where warlords and tribal leaders expect to be paid for their cooperation, and where, for some, switching sides can be as easy as changing tunics. If the Americans don't offer incentives, there are others who will, including Taliban commanders, drug dealers and even Iranian agents in the region.

The usual bribes of choice -- cash and weapons -- aren't always the best options, Afghanistan veterans say. Guns too often fall into the wrong hands, they say, and showy gifts such as money, jewelry and cars tend to draw unwanted attention.

"If you give an asset $1,000, he'll go out and buy the shiniest junk he can find, and it will be apparent that he has suddenly come into a lot of money from someone," said Jamie Smith, a veteran of CIA covert operations in Afghanistan and now chief executive of SCG International, a private security and intelligence company. "Even if he doesn't get killed, he becomes ineffective as an informant because everyone knows where he got it."

The key, Smith said, is to find a way to meet the informant's personal needs in a way that keeps him firmly on your side but leaves little or no visible trace.

"You're trying to bridge a gap between people living in the 18th century and people coming in from the 21st century," Smith said, "so you look for those common things in the form of material aid that motivate people everywhere."

Among the world's intelligence agencies, there's a long tradition of using sex as a motivator. Robert Baer, a retired CIA officer and author of several books on intelligence, noted that the Soviet spy service was notorious for using attractive women as bait when seeking to turn foreign diplomats into informants.

"The KGB has always used 'honey traps,' and it works," Baer said. For American officers, a more common practice was to offer medical care for potential informants and their loved ones, he said. "I remember one guy we offered an option on a heart bypass," Baer said.

For some U.S. operatives in Afghanistan, Western drugs such as Viagra were just part of a long list of enticements available for use in special cases. Two veteran officers familiar with such practices said Viagra was offered rarely, and only to older tribal officials for whom the drug would hold special appeal. While such sexual performance drugs are generally unavailable in the remote areas where the agency's teams operated, they have been sold in some Kabul street markets since at least 2003 and were known by reputation elsewhere.

"You didn't hand it out to younger guys, but it could be a silver bullet to make connections to the older ones," said one retired operative familiar with the drug's use in Afghanistan. Afghan tribal leaders often had four wives -- the maximum number allowed by the Koran -- and aging village patriarchs were easily sold on the utility of a pill that could "put them back in an authoritative position," the official said.

Both officials who described the use of Viagra declined to discuss details such as dates and locations, citing both safety and classification concerns.

The CIA declined to comment on methods used in clandestine operations. One senior U.S. intelligence official familiar with the agency's work in Afghanistan said the clandestine teams were trained to be "resourceful and agile" and to use tactics "consistent with the laws of our country."

"They learn the landscape, get to know the players, and adjust to the operating environment, no matter where it is," the official said. "They think out of the box, take risks, and do what's necessary to get the job done."

Not everyone in Afghanistan's hinterlands had heard of the drug, leading to some awkward encounters when Americans delicately attempted to explain its effects, taking care not to offend their hosts' religious sensitivities.

Such was the case with the 60-year-old chieftain who received the four pills from a U.S. operative. According to the retired operative who was there, the man was a clan leader in southern Afghanistan who had been wary of Americans -- neither supportive nor actively opposed. The man had extensive knowledge of the region and his village controlled key passages through the area. U.S. forces needed his cooperation and worked hard to win it, the retired operative said.

After a long conversation through an interpreter, the retired operator began to probe for ways to win the man's loyalty. A discussion of the man's family and many wives provided inspiration. Once it was established that the man was in good health, the pills were offered and accepted.

Four days later, when the Americans returned, the gift had worked its magic, the operative recalled.

"He came up to us beaming," the official said. "He said, 'You are a great man.' "

"And after that we could do whatever we wanted in his area."
Kryozerkia
29-12-2008, 23:00
That's actually quite ingenious.
Fassitude
29-12-2008, 23:09
"These include [...] medicine or surgeries for ailing family members[...]"

They use medicine and surgeries needed by sick people as a bargaining tool that they withhold unless their family is important or lucky enough to have something to offer the occupying military?

Reprehensible and sickening. Vile.
German Nightmare
29-12-2008, 23:10
Winning their hearts and minds? I'd rather call it winning their dicks and groins.
Rambhutan
29-12-2008, 23:10
There was already a thread on this
Trostia
29-12-2008, 23:21
"These include [...] medicine or surgeries for ailing family members[...]"

They use medicine and surgeries needed by sick people as a bargaining tool that they withhold unless their family is important or lucky enough to have something to offer the occupying military?

Reprehensible and sickening. Vile.

Indeed.
Myedvedeya
29-12-2008, 23:22
There was already a thread on this

The last thread was entirely taken over by bad puns though, so I think a new one is probably justified.
Fartsniffage
29-12-2008, 23:24
The last thread was entirely taken over by bad puns though, so I think a new one is probably justified.

Rubbish, there is no such thing as a bad pun.

Punning is a hard.
Hydesland
29-12-2008, 23:25
The last thread was entirely taken over by bad puns though

Don't be such a stiff.
No Names Left Damn It
29-12-2008, 23:27
in the sheep pen

This isn't Wales...

In all seriousness, that was genius.
Myedvedeya
29-12-2008, 23:27
Don't be such a stiff.

:).
Hydesland
29-12-2008, 23:29
"These include [...] medicine or surgeries for ailing family members[...]"

They use medicine and surgeries needed by sick people as a bargaining tool that they withhold unless their family is important or lucky enough to have something to offer the occupying military?

Reprehensible and sickening. Vile.

It's hardly unusual though, pretty much every rich country does, or has recently engaged in such an action in the past. Some see it as preferable and less harmful than other options, plus medicine and surgeries are not in abundance and can't be given to everyone, they are a scarce resource in a global sense.
Trostia
29-12-2008, 23:37
It's hardly unusual though

Neither is rape, but that's immoral as well.

, pretty much every rich country does, or has recently engaged in such an action in the past.

Switzerland, Luxembourg, Denmark, Norway, Japan, Iceland?
Hydesland
29-12-2008, 23:38
Switzerland, Luxembourg, Denmark, Norway, Japan, Iceland?

None of them would be freely giving them medicine and surgery under normal circumstances.
Trostia
29-12-2008, 23:39
None of them would be freely giving them medicine and surgery under normal circumstances.

Yeah but I'm wondering when they last invaded and conquered a foreign nation and then withheld medicine based on political affiliation.
No Names Left Damn It
29-12-2008, 23:40
Japan

World War 2?
Hydesland
29-12-2008, 23:41
Yeah but I'm wondering when they last invaded and conquered a foreign nation and then withheld medicine based on political affiliation.

Invading the nation in the first place was a separate issue, all though I seem to remember you saying that you actually think the Afghanistan invasion was justified, while the Iraq invasion wasn't, although I may be mistaken. Regardless, they're not exactly withholding medicine that they would normally be getting which seems to be what you're suggesting, even if they hadn't invaded, they wouldn't have been getting these medicines anyway.
New Limacon
29-12-2008, 23:44
Yeah but I'm wondering when they last invaded and conquered a foreign nation and then withheld medicine based on political affiliation.
All of this is based on one clause in a list, with which they went into no further detail. It didn't even say they withhold medicine; that was an assumption of Fass's.
There's plenty of reason to be upset that medical care is being used as a bargaining tool, but I don't see how we can have a reasonable discussion based on a throwaway line.
Trostia
29-12-2008, 23:46
Invading the nation in the first place was a separate issue

Not exactly. It's characteristic of the situation itself. You said that other rich nations have done this sort of thing, but they obviously can't if they aren't an occupying force in a country they've invaded.

Regardless, they're not exactly withholding medicine that they would normally be getting which seems to be what you're suggesting, even if they hadn't invaded, they wouldn't have been getting these medicines anyway.

They're withholding medicine they could (and have a moral responsibility to) give, and basing it on a political strategy that makes the likes of DK crow with joy. Sorry if I'm not compelled by your arguments that this is somehow not immoral after all.
Trostia
29-12-2008, 23:47
All of this is based on one clause in a list, with which they went into no further detail. It didn't even say they withhold medicine; that was an assumption of Fass's.
There's plenty of reason to be upset that medical care is being used as a bargaining tool, but I don't see how we can have a reasonable discussion based on a throwaway line.

Well, not if we keep throwing away that line no. ;)
Port Arcana
29-12-2008, 23:48
deja vu?

There was a thread on this about a week ago. But yeah, good for the CIA I suppose.
New Limacon
29-12-2008, 23:51
Well, not if we keep throwing away that line no. ;)
You know what I mean. :)
Hydesland
29-12-2008, 23:52
They're withholding medicine they could (and have a moral responsibility to) give, and basing it on a political strategy that makes the likes of DK crow with joy. Sorry if I'm not compelled by your arguments that this is somehow not immoral after all.

I'm not saying it's great, but I think you're making a mountain out of a molehill. Again, medicine and surgeries are a scare resource, you can't just simply give them to everyone without causing significant costs on your own side. Also, occupying force is a bit of an easy card to play, it's a little more complicated then that. The targeted tribes may not be affected at all by the US's occupation, other than perhaps trading in cocaine being a little risky. We need more information.
Baldwin for Christ
30-12-2008, 00:03
Here's a scenario:

Country "O" invades country "A".

Country "B" does not invade country "A".

Countries O and B have advanced medical techniques and/or resources.

Does Country "O" owe a duty to the residents of country A to provide these techniques, and to what extent of expense? The level of triage and expenditure they apply to their own citizens? More, because they are forcing themselves on country "A"? Or less, for some other reason?

Does country "B" owe any duty to the citizens of "A" who need medical care?

If country "O" provides medical care commensurate with what it gives its own citizens to country "A", but then allocates some of its military budget on top of that to provide additional health benefits as a commodity of trade with local authority figures, does that make it any different?

And most importantly, do you want the antidote?
Gravlen
30-12-2008, 00:48
None of them would be freely giving them medicine and surgery under normal circumstances.

Define "normal circumstances".
Fartsniffage
30-12-2008, 00:49
I seem to remember the first thread on this was a lot more light hearted.
JuNii
30-12-2008, 00:52
just waiting to see what happens the first time one of em has a priapism...
Fartsniffage
30-12-2008, 00:56
just waiting to see what happens the first time one of em has a priapism...

You think the situation is bad now?

Instead of beheading captives and videoing it the Taleban will be starting a whole new niche in gay porn.
JuNii
30-12-2008, 01:04
You think the situation is bad now?

Instead of beheading captives and videoing it the Taleban will be starting a whole new niche in gay porn.

or the beheadings will continue. they'll just opt to remove the 'other head'. :eek:

"Traitor dog!"
*Thwack!*
"Let's see the American's magic pill work now!... hey, you got nice soprano voice... "
Fartsniffage
30-12-2008, 01:06
or the beheadings will continue. they'll just opt to remove the 'other head'. :eek:

"Traitor dog!"
*Thwack!*
"Let's see the American's magic pill work now!... hey, you got nice soprano voice... "

I have a mental image of bolt-cutters.

Thank you for that.
Forsakia
30-12-2008, 18:12
You have to go to some really backstreet poker games, and don't say all in unless you really mean it.
His_Tory
30-12-2008, 18:54
They use medicine and surgeries needed by sick people as a bargaining tool that they withhold unless their family is important or lucky enough to have something to offer the occupying military?

Reprehensible and sickening. Vile.

Vile? On the contrary -- it constitutes a brilliant harnessing of evolutionary forces. Indeed, its original utilization belies its age-old nature: similar practices were employed for centuries, in applications as varied as farming and horse breeding. By selectively providing medical care, we are ensuring that a certain group of people are more likely to survive (namely, those who are willing to aid the USA in ridding Afghanistan of the execrable Taliban). Those who refuse to aid in this noble endeavor should not be entitled to medical care -- they are either under the baleful influence of the Taliban or despicable cowards who lack the courage to contribute to the liberation of their homeland. By altering the ratio between these two groups, victory can be more easily assured.
Maineiacs
30-12-2008, 21:02
Vile? On the contrary -- it constitutes a brilliant harnessing of evolutionary forces. Indeed, its original utilization belies its age-old nature: similar practices were employed for centuries, in applications as varied as farming and horse breeding. By selectively providing medical care, we are ensuring that a certain group of people are more likely to survive (namely, those who are willing to aid the USA in ridding Afghanistan of the execrable Taliban). Those who refuse to aid in this noble endeavor should not be entitled to medical care -- they are either under the baleful influence of the Taliban or despicable cowards who lack the courage to contribute to the liberation of their homeland. By altering the ratio between these two groups, victory can be more easily assured.

I sincerely hope this was sarcasm.