NationStates Jolt Archive


Internet spam down 75%

Sdaeriji
15-11-2008, 04:54
Host of Internet Spam Groups Is Cut Off

By Brian Krebs
washingtonpost.com Staff Writer
Wednesday, November 12, 2008; 7:16 PM

The volume of junk e-mail sent worldwide dropped drastically today after a Web hosting firm identified by the computer security community as a major host of organizations allegedy engaged in spam activity was taken offline, according to security firms that monitor spam distribution online.

While its gleaming, state-of-the-art, 30-story office tower in downtown San Jose, Calif., hardly looks like the staging ground for what could be called a full-scale cyber crime offensive, security experts have found that a relatively small firm at that location is home to servers that serve as a gateway for a significant portion of the world's junk e-mail.

The servers are operated by McColo Corp., which these experts say has emerged as a major U.S. hosting service for international firms and syndicates that are involved in everything from the remote management of millions of compromised computers to the sale of counterfeit pharmaceuticals and designer goods, fake security products and child pornography via email.

But the company's web site was not accessible today, when two Internet providers cut off MoColo's connectivity to the Internet, security experts said. Immediately after McColo was unplugged, security companies charted a precipitous drop in spam volumes worldwide. E-mail security firm IronPort said spam levels fell by roughly 66 percent as of Tuesday evening.

Spamcop.net, another spam watch dog, found a similar decline, from about 40 spam e-mails per second to around 10 per second.

continues.... (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/12/AR2008111200658.html)



It's also suspected that McColo hosted several child pornography sites.

It seems, further in the article, that the government had been investigating McColo for some time, and that criminal charges are likely. McColo seems to have been responsible for virtually all the botnets in the United States.

There is some concern, however, that shutting down a haven like McColo will only drive these operations in different directions, where they will be more difficult to track and eradicate. On the other hand, others believe that doing so will drive up these spammers costs to a point where it will no longer be worth doing what they do.

Any opinions on what the ultimate effect of this shutdown will be?

edit: I'd also like to know if anyone has noticed a decrease in the spam e-mail they've received in the past day or two.
Conserative Morality
15-11-2008, 05:07
I don't get spam E-mails. I have hotmail.:D
South Lorenya
15-11-2008, 05:08
Hey, good news for once!
Collectivity
15-11-2008, 05:25
Good post Sdaeriji! I hope they keep nailing those *&%^$#@ spammers.
And no I don't need viagra and no I don't want to give my bank details so that I can inherit a fortune in Nigeria!
New Manvir
15-11-2008, 05:30
Good post Sdaeriji! I hope they keep nailing those *&%^$#@ spammers.
And no I don't need viagra and no I don't want to give my bank details so that I can inherit a fortune in Nigeria!

Whatever, your loss. More Nigerian gold and Viagra for me.
Collectivity
15-11-2008, 05:32
Whatever, your loss. More Nigerian gold and Viagra for me.

Good one New Manvir! Would you like a penis enlargement with that? ;)
Ssek
15-11-2008, 05:37
So, the spammers are kid-touchers. I'm so not surprised.
Collectivity
15-11-2008, 05:40
So, the spammers are kid-touchers. I'm so not surprised.

Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that spammers take money from kid touchers and anyone else they can?
Sdaeriji
15-11-2008, 05:49
So, the spammers are kid-touchers. I'm so not surprised.

That's not quite accurate. It would be fair to say that the people at McColo are the kind of people that are willing to look the other way to almost anything if they're paid.
Ssek
15-11-2008, 05:54
Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that spammers take money from kid touchers and anyone else they can?

Well, if they're aiding and abetting kid touchers and supplying them with illegal child porn and thus assisting this whole dirty market of exploiting children for their sexual gratification, in my book they are just as bad as kid touchers themselves, and I don't see the need to make the distinction.

Plus, there's something rather child-molesty about spam. The way they just insert it, unwanted, into every orifice in the internet, trying to warp and twist the minds of the young into parting with their cash and endorsing their disgusting kid-touching industry culture!
Vault 10
15-11-2008, 05:57
Well, if they're aiding and abetting kid touchers and supplying them with illegal child porn and thus assisting this whole dirty market of exploiting children for their sexual gratification, in my book they are just as bad as kid touchers themselves, and I don't see the need to make the distinction.

Or maybe it's as simple as the company being unscrupulous about whom to host, or doesn't bother to check what its clients are doing. It takes staff and money, y'know. So it became a safe haven for those who could be kicked out by other hosters.
Sdaeriji
15-11-2008, 05:59
Or maybe it's as simple as the company being unscrupulous about whom to host, or doesn't bother to check what its clients are doing. It takes staff and money, y'know. So it became a safe haven for those who could be kicked out by other hosters.

The article does state that the administrators at McColo were well aware of the activities of their clientele based on numerous complaints they would receive. McColo would put up a facade that they were going to do something about it, but more often than not, they merely changed IPs for the offenders. The article does not go into much depth about McColo's child pornography hosting because it's still largely unsubstantiated.
Vault 10
15-11-2008, 06:08
The article does state that the administrators at McColo were well aware of the activities of their clientele based on numerous complaints they would receive. McColo would put up a facade that they were going to do something about it, but more often than not, they merely changed IPs for the offenders. The article does not go into much depth about McColo's child pornography hosting because it's still largely unsubstantiated.
Not all web hosting companies even bother to look at the list of complaint emails. Only the better ones actually act out on them. Not everything is a conspiracy, it can be just neglect. Let's save the rage for when it's proven in court.


A more important thing is, the spammers themselves still can get the same service through neglect elsewhere. This 66% drop is temporary.
SaintB
15-11-2008, 06:12
I don't get spam E-mails. I have hotmail.:D

Thats where I get all my spam. I don't get spam on GMail...
Vault 10
15-11-2008, 06:16
If you don't get spam, it only means one thing: you don't use your email long enough/often enough.


I've got an absolutely spam-ridden, to the point of nonreadability, account on Gmail. The reason? It's old, created before Gmail was in open beta, and it was used a lot.
Hotmail is even worse, just use the address a bit and it gets spammed.
Conserative Morality
15-11-2008, 06:17
Thats where I get all my spam. I don't get spam on GMail...

I have yet to get a single spam letter on Hotamil.
New Manvir
15-11-2008, 06:31
Good one New Manvir! Would you like a penis enlargement with that? ;)

Who wouldn't?! :p
SaintB
15-11-2008, 06:47
I have yet to get a single spam letter on Hotamil.

I got a lot of emails but never any letters online. This intrigues me... may I subscribe to your newsletter?
Conserative Morality
15-11-2008, 06:49
I got a lot of emails but never any letters online. This intrigues me... may I subscribe to your newsletter?

Bah. You know what I mean.
Greal
15-11-2008, 06:58
Well, I haven't got any spam for the last twelve months at my gmail account, so don't ask me. GMAIL IS AWESOME.
New Manvir
15-11-2008, 07:14
I have yet to get a single spam letter on Hotamil.

what's your email....>.> <.<
Enormous Gentiles
15-11-2008, 07:31
Bah. SPAM output is gearing up (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/15/business/15spam.html?_r=1&oref=slogin).

Don't much care for the stuff, myself.
Vault 10
15-11-2008, 10:03
I have yet to get a single spam letter on Hotamil.
I could fix it - in two months you'll be full of spam. The only issue is, I can't undo it.