NationStates Jolt Archive

Well, being suggested as a thread, here it is. Can the Antichrist burn? Well, being from Hell and born in fire, can he? Is he mortal or impervious to fire?

He's fire-proof, I'm sure.

I think a more pertinent question is, "Can the Antichrist sing?"

Can a fictional character burn? Theoretically yes if you want the antchrist to go up in flames you could ignite them.

I think a more pertinent question is, "Can the Antichrist sing?"

If he does indeed burn, he will sing. Well, not only sing, he will howl.

he comes from a hot place. I doubt he burns. :D

Any old excuse to set the AntiChrist on fire, isn't it?

"he's unholy - burn him!"

"I'm cold - burn him!"

"In the name of Science - burn him!"

Poor bugger

I think a more pertinent question is, "Can the Antichrist sing?"

I think the most crucial question is one of physics;

If the AntiChrist and Christ touch, will they annihilate each other in an explosion of pure energy? :confused:

Any old excuse to set the AntiChrist on fire, isn't it?

"he's unholy - burn him!"

"I'm cold - burn him!"

"In the name of Science - burn him!"

Poor buggerBut, would he burn if that happened? Would the fire just go around him like he was in an invisible bubble or just noncombustible, even while the flames have engulfed him?

I think the most crucial question is one of physics;

If the AntiChrist and Christ touch, will they annihilate each other in an explosion of pure energy? :confused:

I hope so. That'd probably be the birth of a new universe. *nod*

If the antichrist burns how big would the carbon footprint be?

what do we need another universe for?
we can't even travel a fraction of this one yet.

If the antichrist burns how big would the carbon footprint be?Greater than that created by all the martians driving their Hummers on Mars. What? How is Mars having "global warming" then?

Well, being suggested as a thread, here it is. Can the Antichrist burn? Well, being from Hell and born in fire, can he? Is he mortal or impervious to fire?

Anti-Christ is anyone who doesn't obey Christ. "THE" Anti-Christ, will be like anyone else, and not a fire breathing/loving/consuming beast.

Anti-Christ is anyone who doesn't obey Christ. "THE" Anti-Christ, will be like anyone else, and not a fire breathing/loving/consuming beast.Actually, the Antichrist is the son of Satan.

Can the Anti-Christ burn, it's a very interesting question really. It really needs to be answered in two parts really, possibly even three. When the Anti-Christ originally becomes known, he'll be a mere mortal, more than able to burn, get shot, be stabbed, or the what not. It's not till after they actually die that the Anti-Christ will truly be indwelt of Satan, at which point they will come back from the dead, leading many to believe the Anti-Christ really is the second coming. From that poin on, the Anti-Christ shall be impervious, truly a God among men and immortal, and won't be able to burn or die. Eventually Jesus will come back in all His glory, and the Anti-Christ will be cast into a large lake of burning sulpher, and will burn for eternity. So after the long ass exaplanation, yes, the Anti-Christ can burn. :-P

So after the long ass exaplanation, yes, the Anti-Christ can burn. :-PBut only from divine intervention? Could he just as easily burn in a house fire?

Like I said, there are three phases of existence for the Anti-Christ. Pre-Indwelling, Post-Indwelling, Eternal Damnation. During the Pre-Indwelling period, when the Anti-Christ is merely a mortal, and at that point, yes, he could die in a mere house fire, or the such. The Anti-Christ will have power granted from Satan, so it'll be unlikely his demise will be related to a house-fire, but he would be susceptible to it. During the Post-Indwelling period, no he couldn't burn, at all, a house-fire would have as much effect on him as a cold shower does on you. Then with divine intervention he'll burn again, in an existance far worse than any potentioal house-fire. Hope I've been helpful, and keep in mind these are only my interpretations, which I've gained through study of the Book of Revelation.

Nope, Obama doesn't burn, he just tans :p

During the Pre-Indwelling period, when the Anti-Christ is merely a mortal, and at that point, yes, he could die in a mere house fire, or the such.Why would he not just be born immortal? Or, why would he be born? Satan could just send him up to reek havoc throughout the world, just by being present somewhere. Why would the Antichrist ever be a mortal being?Nope, Obama doesn't burn, he just tans :pI agree fully.

Actually, the Antichrist is the son of Satan.

Is not. :p

Prove it. =P

Dumb Ideologies, I will second that notion. :p

Now to answer the thread host, I state again, this is merely my interpretation based upon study of the Book of Revelation. I came to the idea, that there were three phases during the Tribulation. That a mortal man would rise from obscurity to a position of great power, promising peace and world unity. He would eventually show his true colors, and unite the world under his forceful dictatorship. He will eventually die, and rise from the dead, feeding many's believe that he truly is the second coming of Jesus. He'll rule the world and persecute the Christians, while making all others worship him. When the world comes to it's worst, Jesus will come back, and win the war. He will then raise the dead and judge the living and the dead. Those that didn't accept Jesus as Savior will be cast into the sulpherous lake, along with the body of the Anti-Christ and his human sould, while Satan is locked away for a thousand years. Jesus will create His new 1000 Year Kingdom, and after 1000 years, Satan will be released once more. That is my interpretation.

Is not. :p

Yeah! He's the son of STALIN!:eek2:

No, not Joseph Stalin...

BILLY STALIN!
http://www.vgcats.com/othercomics/images/030418.gif

Give me some matches and lemme check.

Give me some matches and lemme check.

Do you KNOW the Antichrist personally?

Prove it. =P

You made the assertion, you prove it.

Actually, the Antichrist is the son of Satan.

That a mistake resulting from the work of a dyslexic biblical scholar. The Antichrist is actually meant to be the son of Santa, who as we all know is Karl Marx in disguise. Basically, followers of Socialism are a bunch of Santaists, and the labour movement as a whole is collectively the Antichrist.

You made the assertion, you prove it.The Bible has done that for me.

R539, you can't simply cite the Bible. If your being asked to prove an assertation, to use the Bible as your reasoning, tell what in the Bible makes you say it's undeniably true. For example, I could tell you what in the Book of Revelation led me to each of my asserations. That is what you need to do if you want to prove an asseratation based on the Bible. I couldn't technically prove mine, as I've already admitted my view is my personal interpretation. Yet you say that your view that the Anti-Christ is the Son of Satan is undeniable proof, leading me to say citing the Bible without giving specifics is an easy way out.

Possibly you would know where to find it then. I haven't read the whole Bible, just bits and parts.

The Bible has done that for me.

Which Bible? It's not the same one I've read.

If he does indeed burn, he will sing. Well, not only sing, he will howl.

"Cries and screams are music to my ears."

"Cries and screams are music to my ears."

You... you tease me with your penis pwnage!

You... you tease me with your penis pwnage!How'd we get from Satan to dicks? Besides the point that Satan is indeed a dick...

You... you tease me with your penis pwnage!

The penis is a very funny looking but useful part of the body.

The Bible has done that for me.


I'm curious as to what Bible verse proves that. I've studied Revelations in my 8th grade year in grade school, and I don't remember any sort of verse that says such a thing.

How'd we get from Satan to dicks? Besides the point that Satan is indeed a dick...

Several of us have gotten ourselves rather worked up in Sinuhue's "First Date" thread. Our minds are rather focused on rather specific matters at the moment.

How'd we get from Satan to dicks? Besides the point that Satan is indeed a dick...

We don't know that. We never hear Satan's side of the story. Maybe God is the evil one who defeated a brave freedom fighter against his tyranny, and then tricked us all into demonising him (pun intended).

I'm curious as to what Bible verse proves that. I've studied Revelations in my 8th grade year in grade school, and I don't remember any sort of verse that says such a thing.

Revelations is so weird you can interpret pretty much anything in it to mean anything.

The Antichrist will be immune to hellfire and normal fire. Holy fire would, however, burn him up like a roman candle.

IMS, certain biblical verses suggest that the "fire and brimstone" style hell would actually be cooler than one description of Heaven(which would include several moons each being a hot as our sun). Therefore, if the AntiChrist, coming from a hot place, is immune to fire and heat, then Christ, coming from a much hotter place, would logically be more immune.

I'm not sure why we should care about this, I just thought I'd put it out there.

Well, being suggested as a thread, here it is. Can the Antichrist burn? Well, being from Hell and born in fire, can he? Is he mortal or impervious to fire?

I've got a better question: Is the Antichrist truly evil, or is the Antichrist someone God chose to fulfill the role so Jesus could return and take all of the believers to Heaven?

That is, is the Antichrist, like Judas, a redeemable figure?

I don't think so...

Sucks to be him, huh? Created by God just so he can be chucked in a sulphurous pit and make Jesus look good.

The idea of an antichrist is a lie perpetuated by a false religion, so...

Sure! But only if sales of inflatable sheep are on the rise and LG is armed to the teeth with pies.

Why is it that all the threads about Jesus and god get stepped on by everyone who doesn't believe?

Why is it that all the threads about Jesus and god get stepped on by everyone who doesn't believe?

Because christianity has more holes than a swiss cheese festival?

I think the most crucial question is one of physics;

If the AntiChrist and Christ touch, will they annihilate each other in an explosion of pure energy? :confused:

The Christ to Antichrist energy to mass ratio is 1:1 for sure.

Why is it that all the threads about Jesus and god get stepped on by everyone who doesn't believe?

Here? We have a disproportionate amount of atheists and non-Christian religious folks. It's odd.

(I'm an atheist myself, actually, but I do find Christian mythology interesting at times. My question about the Antichrist being a redeemable figure is a serious one, too, because I find that an interesting concept to explore.)

The Bible has done that for me.

The one thing I always loathed, despised, detested, abominated and abhorred about some people is that, when asked why they believed something (particularly something completely irrational), they would respond "because the Bible says so." Then, when asked where the Bible says so, they can't tell me. If pressed they then mumble something about the pastor of their church telling them that the Bible says so.

So, the Bible may do it for you, it does nothing for me. And people who cite the Bible as a source, without actually having looked closely at it, do even less for me.

Personally, I think Satan's gotten a bad press. You have to admit, up until recently, JC's PR people have done a decent job. The current crop, though ...

We don't know that. We never hear Satan's side of the story.

Except for, y'know, Milton.




Seriously, R539, Chapter & Verse are handy things when asserting something about the Bible.

Why is it that all the threads about Jesus and god get stepped on by everyone who doesn't believe?

Because oddly enough those people tend to be the ones that have
a. actually read the Bible
b. bothered to research some of its claims a bit

which seems to be far more effort than a significant portion of vocal Christians have made.

I don't know. Does he weigh less than a duck?

I don't know. Does he weigh less than a duck?

Argh... beaten to it. *shakes fist*

THERE WILL BE NO ANTICHRIST TO HERALD THE APOCALYPSE! (http://www.viruscomix.com/page433.html)

I've got a better question: Is the Antichrist truly evil, or is the Antichrist someone God chose to fulfill the role so Jesus could return and take all of the believers to Heaven?

That is, is the Antichrist, like Judas, a redeemable figure?Well, is he/she? I don't think so. Judas was necessary but he killed himself, meaning he went to Hell.

Well, is he/she? I don't think so. Judas was necessary but he killed himself, meaning he went to Hell.Where does the Bible say this? Where, I ask.

Where does the Bible say this? Where, I ask.

Right here! Obviously! (Points to Genesis)
It clearly says that Judas went to staright to Hell! :p

Can he burn?Yeah!When hell freezes over!:hail:

Raises a good question, can he freeze?

I think a more pertinent question is, "Can the Antichrist sing?"
Isn't there a broadway thing about that?
Antichrist Superstar?
Oh wait, that was Marilyn Manson ... he's not much of a singer, really.

Isn't there a broadway thing about that?
Antichrist Superstar?
Oh wait, that was Marilyn Manson ... he's not much of a singer, really.

Another question, what gender is Marilyn Manson?

If the antichrist burns how big would the carbon footprint be?
:fluffle:
New thesis!

Another question, what gender is Marilyn Manson?Depends on the year, as i understand it.

But only from divine intervention? Could he just as easily burn in a house fire?Or after an impromptu gasoline dance with his model friends?

Or after an impromptu gasoline dance with his model friends?
Best movie ever.

Nope, Obama doesn't burn, he just tans :p
Name says it all, eh?

Best movie ever.
How many of us walked away from that thinking we were a mere facial tic away from having our own Magnum?
*le sigh*

So The History Channel is showing "The Antichrist" right now, as i type.
Worth a shout-out and a viewing.
So far, they haven't gotten to the part about how many people are wrong about "the number of the beast".

Also - since it's not 666, doing that little thing with Reagan and Bush seems irrelevant now. Whose names come up under the correct number?

So The History Channel is showing "The Antichrist" right now, as i type.
Worth a shout-out and a viewing.I saw that, and went to The Discovery Channel. I've seen that program like twenty times already. It, and the movie Constantine, inspired this thread.

Another question, what gender is Marilyn Manson?
Is stupid a gender? What about obnoxious?

I don't think so, but I think deranged is...

The Christ to Antichrist energy to mass ratio is 1:1 for sure.

Not funny?

pardon jamal, not bush. and definately not chaney, rumsfield and rove.

the only 'anti'christ' is fundimentalist fanatacism.

that is the real 'anti' of EVERY faith.

Actually, the Antichrist is the son of Satan.

So God and Satan are like two arguing parents, with the other saying "He's your son!" whenever the child does something bad?

So God and Satan are like two arguing parents, with the other saying "He's your son!" whenever the child does something bad?
Sort of, they get in fights at their football games...

The Christ to Antichrist energy to mass ratio is 1:1 for sure.

Not funny?

No.. not funny...

No.. not funny...

*gives SaintB a biscuit*

There there....

*gives SaintB a biscuit*

There there....

Sweet a biscuit!

Enjoy your free biscuit that may be tainted...

Enjoy your free biscuit that may be tainted...

Hmm... body of antichrist ;)

So God and Satan are like two arguing parents, with the other saying "He's your son!" whenever the child does something bad?I can imagine them both arguing. :D

I can imagine them both arguing. :D

But here's the question. Is Jesus the quaterback, linebacker, or that scrawny kid that sits on the bench wishing his two parents would shut up?

How, he was all at the same time. Satan was the water-bitch.

But here's the question. Is Jesus the quaterback, linebacker, or that scrawny kid that sits on the bench wishing his two parents would shut up?

Jesus is the ball man. The ball ! Being kicked for your sins !

So The History Channel is showing "The Antichrist" right now, as i type.
Worth a shout-out and a viewing.
So far, they haven't gotten to the part about how many people are wrong about "the number of the beast".

Also - since it's not 666, doing that little thing with Reagan and Bush seems irrelevant now. Whose names come up under the correct number?

What's the correct number?

Jesus is the ball man. The ball ! Being kicked for your sins !

I could just buy a new one if got deflated.

What's the correct number?

Brevious may be referring to the recent discovery of an early text (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44169) that has the number as 616.

Of course, there are plenty of folks out there who believe in the divinely inspired inerrancy of certain translations such as the KJV, so as far as they're concerned the correct number will still be 666, Alexandrian codices be damned.

Edit: Wikipedia's discussion of this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_the_Beast) is actually pretty good.

Brevious may be referring to the recent discovery of an early text (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44169) that has the number as 616.

Of course, there are plenty of folks out there who believe in the divinely inspired inerrancy of certain translations such as the KJV, so as far as they're concerned the correct number will still be 666, Alexandrian codices be damned.

Edit: Wikipedia's discussion of this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_the_Beast) is actually pretty good.

Oh, I'm going to read on that. I like Early Christian debates! Thanks, Trans-sama!

Enjoy your free biscuit that may be tainted...
If be a tainted biscuit, by golly, it's likely limp.

Brevious may be referring to the recent discovery of an early text (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44169) that has the number as 616.

Of course, there are plenty of folks out there who believe in the divinely inspired inerrancy of certain translations such as the KJV, so as far as they're concerned the correct number will still be 666, Alexandrian codices be damned.

Edit: Wikipedia's discussion of this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_the_Beast) is actually pretty good.Mega-*bow*
Thank you!
I appreciate very, very much that there's posters like you on here, who not only know the material but who can put it so eloquently.

If be a tainted biscuit, by golly, it's likely limp.

Don't try and turn this into a Nu Metal thread :p

Well, since scewing the polls in Californy. It should be apparent that, yes, I can burn. In fact A whole large area up there is burning right now.
And to further answer youre questions. 1. yes, I am made of flesh so put that dagger away. 2. I am NOT going to destroy the world ( just having a bit of fun)
3. What's all this 666 crap anyway. My freek'n zip code or something?

Oh, I'm going to read on that. I like Early Christian debates! Thanks, Trans-sama!

Mega-*bow*
Thank you!
I appreciate very, very much that there's posters like you on here, who not only know the material but who can put it so eloquently.

:$ Aww, yer welcome, folks! Sometimes all of my hardcore nerdiness does come in handy.

Well, since scewing the polls in Californy. It should be apparent that, yes, I can burn. In fact A whole large area up there is burning right now.
And to further answer youre questions. 1. yes, I am made of flesh so put that dagger away. 2. I am NOT going to destroy the world ( just having a bit of fun)
3. What's all this 666 crap anyway. My freek'n zip code or something?

Dude, watch out. You burned Oprah's house. Now she's going to smite you with the power of TV.

:$ Aww, yer welcome, folks! Sometimes all of my hardcore nerdiness does come in handy.



Dude, watch out. You burned Oprah's house. Now she's going to smite you with the power of TV.

HA she works for me anyway (diabolicle laughter )

HA she works for me anyway (diabolicle laughter )Oprah works for no one. NO ONE!!!

Don't try and turn this into a Nu Metal thread :pSorry, just stating the abstract. Er, obvious. Oblivious.
Hmmm ... maybe just stating what came to mind.

*Wonders if the Antichrist weighs the same as a duck*