NationStates Jolt Archive

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqrjYL5bXAY&feature=related

Is there REALLY anything I need to say? I think this pretty much explains itself.

Gullible talk show hosts FTW!

Who the hell is Oprah?

Oh please, she's a self-absorbed self-aggrandizing media monstrosity who throws a temper tantrum when foreigners don't recognize her and lavish on the reverential treatment she expects:

Paris store apologises to Oprah (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4618227.stm)

Yet another overrated American "celebrity".

You know, threads like this make me want to post a browser-breaking, high resolution picture of Alexander von Falkenhausen.

Well that makes my 8,999 penises look like crap. Bunch of jerk bastards and their too many penises, I oughta cut 'em off with a hatchet.

Some people just can't accept the fact there's a new player in town.

And he's got enough penises for each of you.

Well that makes my 8,999 penises look like crap. Bunch of jerk bastards and their too many penises, I oughta cut 'em off with a hatchet.

You need to burn the stumps or each chopped off penis grows back twice.

Beware of any guy calling himself Hydra.

"Vegita, what's his penis level?"

"IT'S OVER 9000!"

That's seriously all this deserves.

Moving on.

You need to burn the stumps or each chopped off penis grows back twice.

Beware of any guy calling himself Hydra.
If I ever find myself so desperate for money that I am forced to write and direct a superhero porn movie, the "villain" will totally be called The Hydra. Just use some dildos, superglue, creative camera angles, and . . . hey, PRESTO!

What.

What?

What the hell?

He says, he does not forgive, he does not forget. His group has over nine thousand penises and they are all raping children

I listened three times to be sure, she definatly said that he belonged to a network of Pedophiles that included 9000 penises... meaning 9,000 male members, uhh I mean 9000 members who are men. While I am certianly not a fan of Oprah I am certain that you simply misheard what she said.

Is there REALLY anything I need to say? I think this pretty much explains itself.

If you want a debate, there is.

Haha.

Internet meme 1, Oprah 0.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqrjYL5bXAY&feature=related

Is there REALLY anything I need to say? I think this pretty much explains itself.

Gullible talk show hosts FTW!

HOLY SMEG!!! GENERAL YOMI CHAN WAS RIGHT!!! (If you saw the ytmnd of her declaring war on pedos and furries you'll get what I mean)

I listened three times to be sure, she definatly said that he belonged to a network of Pedophiles that included 9000 penises... meaning 9,000 male members, uhh I mean 9000 members who are men. While I am certianly not a fan of Oprah I am certain that you simply misheard what she said.

Yeah, I don't really get it either. There are already 3698345 reasons to make fun of Oprah, this seems like... a lot of work.

I think most of us are laughing at the fact that Oprah went on air to repeat something that was most likely posted by a 4chan troll.

http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/7725/anonsealan7.jpg
There is nothing wrong with your monitor. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are now controlling the transmission. We control the horizontal, and the vertical. We can deluge you with a thousand channels or expand one single image to crystal clarity - and beyond. We can shape your vision to anything our imagination can conceive. For the next hour we will control all that you see and hear. You are about to experience the awe and mystery which reaches from the deepest inner mind to.../b/.

That was a good show. Not great but ok.

"Over 9000!!!"

LOL, Oprah got trolled and took it national

I think most of us are laughing at the fact that Oprah went on air to repeat something that was most likely posted by a 4chan troll.

And laughing at her fact checkers, who are apparently complete incompetents. A simple google search of 'over 9,000' would've told them quite a bit about the veracity of the post in question.

Of course, that doesn't matter. Most of her target audience probably thinks that the internet comes on a 5" floppy disc.

Doesn't anybody appreciate quality over quantity anymore? :(

I think most of us are laughing at the fact that Oprah went on air to repeat something that was most likely posted by a 4chan troll.

You're doing it wrong.

Does no one remember rules one and two? If not just for the sake of not letting the cancer spread?

Someone should close Oprah's pool.

heh... Oprah got trolled, hard :p

I wonder how she likes her fame now? xD

ROFLMAO!

Oh wow....they should do Dr. Phil next.

And laughing at her fact checkers, who are apparently complete incompetents. A simple google search of 'over 9,000' would've told them quite a bit about the veracity of the post in question.

Of course, that doesn't matter. Most of her target audience probably thinks that the internet comes on a 5" floppy disc.

Isn't it 5.25", though I dare say another proportion would think it is 8" floppy's over 9000 of them too.

Has anyone been on the Oprah message board to verify this?

^ Yeah, floods happened, boards were closed, cleaned and reopened. Old raid is old.

We have over 9000 penises, and they are all raping children.

You're doing it wrong.

Does no one remember rules one and two? If not just for the sake of not letting the cancer spread?

Only apply to raids. Besides, I'm pretty sure %90 of NSGers already know about the *chan's. And the remaining %10 are habitual lurkers.

Isn't it 5.25", though I dare say another proportion would think it is 8" floppy's over 9000 of them too.

I think 8" is a bit much...those things are from, like, the 70's or something, aren't they? They're totally radical, dude. Nothing that awesome would be allowed on Oprah.

What's next? A legion of demonic tentacle monsters who have specialized in ravaging NSG regulars?

is it that hard to believe that there are 9000 pedophiles out there?

lolz epic troll.4chan just pwnd Oprah

is it that hard to believe that there are 9000 pedophiles out there?

This is NSG, alot of things are hard to believe. :wink:

is it that hard to believe that there are 9000 pedophiles out there?

OVER 9,000. That means at least 9,001. Unless you count fractions of pedophiles. Which I'm all for. 18,002 halves of pedophiles. Preferably pre-separated.

I think 8" is a bit much...those things are from, like, the 70's or something, aren't they? They're totally radical, dude. Nothing that awesome would be allowed on Oprah.

The move from 8" to 5.25" as the standard size is the main reason most modern women are less satisfied with life than they used to be.

The move from 8" to 5.25" as the standard size is the main reason most modern women are less satisfied with life than they used to be.

:D Imagine what they must have been thinking when they realised that the size was reduced further to 3.5"

:D Imagine what they must have been thinking when they realised that the size was reduced further to 3.5"

On the other hand, they were happy when Hard Drive was invented.

I have over 9,000 terrorists at my command, and they're all blowing up yellow vans.

Man they are really ****ing with the media right now aren't they?

They also leaked all of the paid subscribers of O'Reilys site from a security hole.

Man, her interns must really hate her.
Oprah: 0; the Internet: over 9000

I have over 9,000 terrorists at my command, and they're all blowing up yellow vans.

I have over 9,000 dogs at my command, and they're all giving out great advice.

Who is Oprah anyway?

Who is Oprah anyway?

The Goddess of the housewives.

The Goddess of the housewives.

That would explain her staying power: she's a reincarnation of Hestia.

I really don't know what she is rambling on about. to be honest I worry the criminal charge Child porn possession on a computer seems to be the easiest way to make people disappear. charge someone with Possession of Child porn and they are instantly branded evil perverts. It seems even murderers get a more fair trial.

On the other hand, they were happy when Hard Drive was invented.

:D, good one

I really don't know what she is rambling on about. to be honest I worry the criminal charge Child porn possession on a computer seems to be the easiest way to make people disappear. charge someone with Possession of Child porn and they are instantly branded evil perverts. It seems even murderers get a more fair trial.

Except for the part where police actually look for evidence of child porn on the suspect's computer, and have to, you know, provide that evidence in court to even have a trial.

Haha, someone on the internetz told Oprah, a victim of molestation and childhood rape herself who's now risen from extreme poverty to become an outspoken advocate for the protection of children, that they were part of a big group of pedophiles! And she believed them and told other people in an effort to help spread awareness and keep kids safe! Haha, what a loser!

Except for the part where police actually look for evidence of child porn on the suspect's computer, and have to, you know, provide that evidence in court to even have a trial.

And of course the social stigma of even the accusation of being a pedophile which is about the only thing in the United States worse to be than a practicing Muslim at this point. People seem to forget or not seem affected by even solid proof of innocence when it comes to such things.

Except for the part where police actually look for evidence of child porn on the suspect's computer, and have to, you know, provide that evidence in court to even have a trial.
Easy, send them a seemingly legitimate email containing CP material. Of course, they'll delete it, but it will stay in the browser cache (if using web mail) or in the mail junk or recycler folder (if using POP3/IMAP).

Except for the part where police actually look for evidence of child porn on the suspect's computer, and have to, you know, provide that evidence in court to even have a trial.

Maybe he was referring to people being 'charged' by society. You know if someone accused them of being a pedophile and the police investigate, even if all allegations are proven to be false, people still hold reservations about that person.

Easy, send them a seemingly legitimate email containing CP material. Of course, they'll delete it, but it will stay in the browser cache (if using web mail) or in the mail junk or recycler folder (if using POP3/IMAP).

Of course sending that CP will implicate you in the long run too.

Except for the part where police actually look for evidence of child porn on the suspect's computer, and have to, you know, provide that evidence in court to even have a trial.

yes after they have seized your computer. and they have had free run of it for months before the trial. and give a determined hacker enough time and they could place it there. its not like hard evidence (in this case magazines books photos) that they can photograph it being in your house at the time of arrest.

Maybe he was referring to people being 'charged' by society. You know if someone accused them of being a pedophile and the police investigate, even if all allegations are proven to be false, people still hold reservations about that person.

that too. but with magazines and pictures they photograph the evidence in your home at the time of arrest /execution of the warrant with witnesses and such. Now they seize your computer and they go through it with a fine tooth comb. While they are going through it with a fine tooth comb it is alone with a technical for days and weeks. the technical is under pressure to provide the evidence for conviction. how easy would it be for him to put that information on your computer.

Of course sending that CP will implicate you in the long run too.

create a web email account you only access from the library send said pictures from the library. never use account visit that library again. God has no one ever taught you how to email anonymously ?

create a web email account you only access from the library send said pictures from the library. never use account visit that library again. God has no one ever taught you how to email anonymously ?

At least in the libraries around my neighborhood, using the computer requires using a library card and activities are tracked during the usage. Not so smart.

create a web email account you only access from the library send said pictures from the library. never use account visit that library again. God has no one ever taught you how to email anonymously ?

Yes, I'm sure that will hold up as extremely damning evidence in a court of law, because we've only had the internet for about 30 years now and no one really understands how it works.

has nobody ever heard of the phrase "chain of custody"? I guarantee you that if there's a sufficient gap in the chain of custody to allow evidence on a hard drive to be falsified, there's no way in hell a jury will even hear the word "computer"

has nobody ever heard of the phrase "chain of custody"? I guarantee you that if there's a sufficient gap in the chain of custody to allow evidence on a hard drive to be falsified, there's no way in hell a jury will even hear the word "computer"

Not to mention any police technician with even a shred of integrity's going to be pretty suspicious of email containing child porn dated well after the confiscation.

And of course the social stigma of even the accusation of being a pedophile which is about the only thing in the United States worse to be than a practicing Muslim at this point. People seem to forget or not seem affected by even solid proof of innocence when it comes to such things.

Trial by media where the assumption is guilty no matter was is actually proven.

Reminds me of a wonderful Brass Eye special...

yes after they have seized your computer. and they have had free run of it for months before the trial. and give a determined hacker enough time and they could place it there. its not like hard evidence (in this case magazines books photos) that they can photograph it being in your house at the time of arrest.
A determined hacker can put it on your computer, while it is in police custody? A determined hacker could break into a police station, get into the evidence lock up, put some child porn on your computer and get out without leaving any evidence of doing so?

Sure, and a determined paedophile could send themselves over the internet, through the series of tubes, to some unfortunate myspace user.
has nobody ever heard of the phrase "chain of custody"? I guarantee you that if there's a sufficient gap in the chain of custody to allow evidence on a hard drive to be falsified, there's no way in hell a jury will even hear the word "computer"
There's that too.
Not to mention any police technician with even a shred of integrity's going to be pretty suspicious of email containing child porn dated well after the confiscation.

And that. The police are going to be very careful with the evidence in a child porn case. They sure as hell don't want some child molester to get away with it on a technicality.

Of course sending that CP will implicate you in the long run too.
Law enforcement isn't bound by law as tightly as the regular Joe. It's legal for a cop to engage in otherwise criminal activity, if done as a part of an investigation. How do you think they catch drug dealers?

And to keep it off the case so the client doesn't pull in entrapment defense, it can be done as part of another investigation.


I guarantee you that if there's a sufficient gap in the chain of custody to allow evidence on a hard drive to be falsified, there's no way in hell a jury will even hear the word "computer"
Why falsify? Give the target a trojan before the search, let the trojan do the dirty work of actually downloading the CP. In the terminal phase, set it as the browser home page, flood the "favorites", put it on the desktop, then self-delete the trojan. Get in touch and send emails from the address of a known pedo soon to be arrested. Make the person actually take some part in it, click your links, at least, so that they feel it was partially their fault.

Law enforcement isn't bound by law as tightly as the regular Joe. It's legal for a cop to engage in otherwise criminal activity, if done as a part of an investigation. How do you think they catch drug dealers?

And to keep it off the case so the client doesn't pull in entrapment defense, it can be done as part of another investigation.
Send someone child porn and then arrest them for possessing child porn? No lawyer on earth is stupid enough to let that fly.
Why falsify? Give the target a trojan before the search, let the trojan do the dirty work of actually downloading the CP. In the terminal phase, set it as the browser home page, flood the "favorites", put it on the desktop, then self-delete the trojan. Get in touch and send emails from the address of a known pedo soon to be arrested. Make the person actually take some part in it, click your links, at least, so that they feel it was partially their fault.

And the defence certainly won't think to check for such things. Hell, the police will just ignore the fact that none of the websites in the favourites appear in the history. And how are you going to make them click anything? Break into their house and put a gun to their head?

And of course, if they have some halfway decent anti-virus software running this won't work at all. And if the police notice your trojan before it deletes itself then you're going down for possession of CP, distributing CP, and whatever crime it is to frame someone for CP. Maybe that obstruction of justice thing too. I don't actually know how that works, but it sounds like fucking with a police investigation might have one running afoul of it.

Send someone child porn and then arrest them for possessing child porn? No lawyer on earth is stupid enough to let that fly.
Sell someone drugs and then arrest them for buying drugs? No lawyer... oh wait.

Yes, it has to be a bit more than just sending a simple email, you have to establish a bit more.


[/QUOTE]And the defence certainly won't think to check for such things. Hell, the police will just ignore the fact that none of the websites in the favourites appear in the history.[/QUOTE]
Of course they will. If not the trojan, the victim itself will unknowingly click them.


And how are you going to make them click anything? Break into their house and put a gun to their head?
Whoa, why be so rude? Kind words and a gun can do more than either alone.
Get in touch, talk over the net, even make the victim click some very mild links, or CP concealed as "funny pictures".


And of course, if they have some halfway decent anti-virus software running this won't work at all. And if the police notice your trojan before it deletes itself then you're going down for possession of CP, distributing CP, and whatever crime it is to frame someone for CP.
You are the police. Or how else were you going to arrest the guy?


And it's no crime if you're a cop, if you're investigating pedos, you're supposed to be luring them with CP.
At worst they'll be able to use the entrapment defense. But then in any such case everyone is strongly prejudiced against the accused, which makes things smoother.

Sell someone drugs and then arrest them for buying drugs? No lawyer... oh wait.

Plant drugs on someone and then arrest them for possessing drugs?*

Fix't.

Plant drugs on someone and then arrest them for possessing drugs?*
It's a classic.


The difference is that possessing even hard drugs will end up in misdemeanor and probation (anything worse is difficult), while CP will have strong prejudice against the accused and a felony with 7-10 years in prison, as seen in Dalton case.

Haha, someone on the internetz told Oprah, a victim of molestation and childhood rape herself who's now risen from extreme poverty to become an outspoken advocate for the protection of children, that they were part of a big group of pedophiles! And she believed them and told other people in an effort to help spread awareness and keep kids safe! Haha, what a loser!

Oprah made the critical mistake of behaving like an adult woman, perhaps not realizing that on the internet it's a faux pas to act like anything other than an insecure teenage boy (i.e., mock any genuine concern or feeling that dares to raise its head.)

Oprah made the critical mistake of behaving like an adult woman, perhaps not realizing that on the internet
So adult women are banned from having a sense of humor now?



Oh. Wait a moment, what if that makes me a pedo...

Oprah made the critical mistake of behaving like an adult woman
Her "critical mistake" was not so much that she behaved like an adult woman, but that she (and her team) failed to research things before making the pronouncements that are now (rightly) being lampooned all over the Web. The Internet is many things, and nobody in the sort of public position that Oprah inhabits should be so naive as to believe everything they read.

I'd like to think that her apparent failure to realise that huge swathes of the 'net are no more than playground chatter committed to text suggests nothing more than that she is seriously out of touch, but I'm afraid I'm a bit more cynical than that. I suspect that she seized upon the idea that the message she'd received really was from an organised network of paedophiles, because it suited her agenda and the version of reality that she likes to preach to her audience. I hope that she, and any other section of the media that attempt to use this sorry affair as propaganda, are left with a huge amount of egg on their faces when the dust settles.

I'm making the assumption that adult women, as a group, are less likely to be aware of puerile internet memes and find jokes about child molestation much less funny than teenage boys are and do. And yes, I'm comfortable with my rampant stereotyping in this case.

I think most of us are laughing at the fact that Oprah went on air to repeat something that was most likely posted by a 4chan troll.
Which just makes it a double entendre. Pedobear was made at 4chan for a reason.

At least in the libraries around my neighborhood, using the computer requires using a library card and activities are tracked during the usage. Not so smart.

mine don't. I found that out during the week long power outage when i used them to access the internet for 30 minutes.

At least in the libraries around my neighborhood, using the computer requires using a library card and activities are tracked during the usage. Not so smart.
Good grief! Where do you live, so I can remember not to go there?

Not to mention any police technician with even a shred of integrity's going to be pretty suspicious of email containing child porn dated well after the confiscation.

or the tech changes the date on the computer to one month before the confiscation. puts CP on the computer from another case, then changes date back to current date. as far as the computer is concerned that CP has been there for one month.

Don't get me wrong I think CP possession should still be illegal it is just too useful for getting a sick fuck in jail, when a victim wont or is too traumatized to testify.

has nobody ever heard of the phrase "chain of custody"? I guarantee you that if there's a sufficient gap in the chain of custody to allow evidence on a hard drive to be falsified, there's no way in hell a jury will even hear the word "computer"

The current chain of custody is the problem. They don't document every single file on a computer during custody transfer. they only document a computer. Current Chain of Custody is unable to handle Data. Because it is impossible for Tech B to tell if Tech A briefly changed the date added a few files then changed the date back to current.

I suspect that she seized upon the idea that the message she'd received really was from an organised network of paedophiles, because it suited her agenda and the version of reality that she likes to preach to her audience. I hope that she, and any other section of the media that attempt to use this sorry affair as propaganda, are left with a huge amount of egg on their faces when the dust settles.

Yes, it suited her terrible agenda of telling adults the warning signs of sexual abuse and the habits of sexual predators so that they could better protect their children. That'll teach her, all right. Once Oprah ends her agenda against pedophiles, 1/5th of children will no longer be sexually abused.

Wait what!?

So Oprah magically took care off 1/5th of the child abuse going around the globe because she was fooled by a troll.

Yeah that sounds reasonable.

Her agenda might be moral or correct by your standarts but to actually fall for such an obvious troll is rather pathetic and funny. Please come down from your high horse and do realise the homourous aspect of this incident.

BTW. If adults really need to be told the warning sings of sexual abuse by Oprah, I think there is a bigger problem here.

Yes, it suited her terrible agenda of telling adults the warning signs of sexual abuse and the habits of sexual predators so that they could better protect their children. That'll teach her, all right. Once Oprah ends her agenda against pedophiles, 1/5th of children will no longer be sexually abused.

but seeing her scapegoat nonexistent organizations is funny.

or the tech changes the date on the computer to one month before the confiscation. puts CP on the computer from another case, then changes date back to current date. as far as the computer is concerned that CP has been there for one month.
Indeed. There's no way to tell whether the datestamps have been edited directly rather than by the system. Personal computers are not designed to record evidence.


Don't get me wrong I think CP possession should still be illegal it is just too useful for getting a sick fuck in jail, when a victim wont or is too traumatized to testify.
Should it? See State v. Dalton case.
It's production which is the problem - possession should only be seen as evidence to it.

Wait what!?
So Oprah magically took care off 1/5th of the child abuse going around the globe because she was fooled by a troll.
Of course, that's how it works.

Ergo: If you want to stop the rest 4/5 of children from being abused, troll Oprah!

Is she fat again?

Is she fat again? There was a time she was slim?


Either way, here's the new level of horror for Oprah to fight:

One Pedophile per Child! (http://mirror.uncyc.org/wiki/One_Pedophile_per_Child)

Wait what!?

So Oprah magically took care off 1/5th of the child abuse going around the globe because she was fooled by a troll.

Yeah that sounds reasonable.

Her agenda might be moral or correct by your standarts but to actually fall for such an obvious troll is rather pathetic and funny. Please come down from your high horse and do realise the homourous aspect of this incident.

BTW. If adults really need to be told the warning sings of sexual abuse by Oprah, I think there is a bigger problem here.

Right. First, please learn to read, because whatever you said in that second sentence--and I'm still trying to determine if it's English--is not what I said.

Second, you're entitled to find something that pathetic funny, and I'm entitled to find it just pathetic. That's another thing grown-ups do--we get to have different opinions and standards. I don't think what the 4chan troll did was particularly sinister--it didn't hurt anyone, really. I also don't think it was funny. But I spend most of my day with 5-year-olds, so I have a really intellectual sense of humor.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqrjYL5bXAY&feature=related

Is there REALLY anything I need to say? I think this pretty much explains itself.

Gullible talk show hosts FTW!

I can only begin to imagine how eager authorities are to label Anonymous as pedophiles.

That was highly amusing.

I can only begin to imagine how eager authorities are to label Anonymous as pedophiles.

Much hell will break loose.

Much hell.

Much hell will break loose.

Much hell.

And if The Church of the Couch Hopper gets this in their heads, very likely to happen.

Much hell will break loose.

Much hell.

Not really. 90% of the people who hear the accusation will believe it because 80% don't know who Anon is, and of the 10% that do, only like half of them care, and none of them know any better. And the accusation will accomplish nothing as Anonymous will remain anonymous. If Scientology couldn't do anything, I doubt anyone else can.

But it would be amusing to watch another video of exploding vans. Only this one will be full of simulated children.

"And this is what the crash would have looked like if the plane had run into a school full of bunnies, and one man survived and went home to beat his wife..."

But it would be amusing to watch another video of exploding vans. Only this one will be full of simulated children.

Only the explosion won't be of a chemical nature and the van's outside will remain intact.

Only the explosion won't be of a chemical nature and the van's outside will remain intact.

Also it won't be footage from a demonstration of a new kind of shaped charge being developed by the military as seen on the show "Futureweapons".

Which, by the way, is badly hosted.

Indeed. There's no way to tell whether the datestamps have been edited directly rather than by the system. Personal computers are not designed to record evidence.
lots of other problems too. the chain of evidence is severely fucked in regards to Data.


Should it? See State v. Dalton case.
It's production which is the problem - possession should only be seen as evidence to it.

that was with Writing and should have been covered under free speech. I like it because if it is obvious that he has raped children but said children cant or wont testify it gives police a way to get him off the streets.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqrjYL5bXAY&feature=related

Is there REALLY anything I need to say? I think this pretty much explains itself.

Gullible talk show hosts FTW!

Uh, you misunderstood her. She said he said his GROUP, not himself alone, has over 9,000 penises, i.e. there are >9,000 men in his pedophile "network".

Who the hell is Oprah?

Oh please, she's a self-absorbed self-aggrandizing media monstrosity who throws a temper tantrum when foreigners don't recognize her and lavish on the reverential treatment she expects:

Paris store apologises to Oprah (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4618227.stm)

Yet another overrated American "celebrity".

Agreed. QFT.

BTW. If adults really need to be told the warning sings of sexual abuse by Oprah, I think there is a bigger problem here.

Excellent point. QFT.

Please come down from your high horse and do realise the homourous aspect of this incident.

Uh, I think you mean "humorous".

I can only begin to imagine how eager authorities are to label Anonymous as pedophiles.
That was highly amusing.
That label has floated around them for years.



And if The Church of the Couch Hopper gets this in their heads, very likely to happen.
Couch Cult played the pedo card back in April.

It was responded with the news of the Canadian Pedo that they caught. Completely discredited.

that was with Writing and should have been covered under free speech. I like it because if it is obvious that he has raped children but said children cant or wont testify it gives police a way to get him off the streets.
Spies and agents are brought to testify, and children can't? For these cases it doesn't have to be done solemnly in a filled court.

And what to do if it's obvious he raped children, but he actually raped them with his manshaft and not with the camera, as it probably usually happens?
Wouldn't it then make sense to arrest him on the "Obviously raped children"?


There are arguments for outlawing CP, but misusing it when evidence is lacking is hardly the best one.

She never said he had over 9000 penises, she said there is a group of 9000 men, "that's 9000 penises out there raping our children".