NationStates Jolt Archive


An opinion piece from military.com

Liuzzo
22-08-2008, 04:12
This comes from a former POW and USNA classmate of John McCain. I can agree with a lot of what this man has said. John McCain should be honored for his service and I respect him very much in that regard. I do not think that this qualifies him to be President. I will not be voting for John McCain for many of the same reasons stated in the article. It's like this man spoke from my own soul.

http://www.military.com/opinion/0,15202,164859_1,00.html

Why I Will Not Vote for John McCain
Phillip Butler | March 27, 2008

As some of you might know, John McCain is a long-time acquaintance of mine that goes way back to our time together at the U.S. Naval Academy and as Prisoners of War in Vietnam. He is a man I respect and admire in some ways. But there are a number of reasons why I will not vote for him for President of the United States.

When I was a Plebe (4th classman, or freshman) at the Naval Academy in 1957-58, I was assigned to the 17th Company for my four years there. In those days we had about 3,600 midshipmen spread among 24 companies, thus about 150 midshipmen to a company. As fortune would have it, John, a First Classman (senior) and his room mate lived directly across the hall from me and my two room mates. Believe me when I say that back then I would never in a million or more years have dreamed that the crazy guy across the hall would someday be a Senator and candidate for President!

John was a wild man. He was funny, with a quick wit and he was intelligent. But he was intent on breaking every USNA regulation in our 4 inch thick USNA Regulations book. And I believe he must have come as close to his goal as any midshipman who ever attended the Academy. John had me "coming around" to his room frequently during my plebe year. And on one occasion he took me with him to escape "over the wall" in the dead of night. He had a taxi cab waiting for us that took us to a bar some 7 miles away. John had a few beers, but forbid me to drink (watching out for me I guess) and made me drink cokes. I could tell many other midshipman stories about John that year and he unbelievably managed to graduate though he spent the majority of his first class year on restriction for the stuff he did get caught doing. In fact he barely managed to graduate, standing 5th from the bottom of his 800 man graduating class. I and many others have speculated that the main reason he did graduate was because his father was an Admiral, and also his grandfather, both U.S. Naval Academy graduates.

People often ask if I was a Prisoner of War with John McCain. My answer is always "No - John McCain was a POW with me." The reason is I was there for 8 years and John got there 2 ½ years later, so he was a POW for 5 ½ years. And we have our own seniority system, based on time as a POW.

John's treatment as a POW:

1) Was he tortured for 5 years? No. He was subjected to torture and maltreatment during his first 2 years, from September of 1967 to September of 1969. After September of 1969 the Vietnamese stopped the torture and gave us increased food and rudimentary health care. Several hundred of us were captured much earlier. I got there April 20, 1965 so my bad treatment period lasted 4 1/2 years. President Ho Chi Minh died on September 9, 1969, and the new regime that replaced him and his policies was more pragmatic. They realized we were worth a lot as bargaining chips if we were alive. And they were right because eventually Americans gave up on the war and agreed to trade our POW's for their country. A damn good trade in my opinion! But my point here is that John allows the media to make him out to be THE hero POW, which he knows is absolutely not true, to further his political goals.

2) John was badly injured when he was shot down. Both arms were broken and he had other wounds from his ejection. Unfortunately this was often the case - new POW's arriving with broken bones and serious combat injuries. Many died from their wounds. Medical care was non-existent to rudimentary. Relief from pain was almost never given and often the wounds were used as an available way to torture the POW. Because John's father was the Naval Commander in the Pacific theater, he was exploited with TV interviews while wounded. These film clips have now been widely seen. But it must be known that many POW's suffered similarly, not just John. And many were similarly exploited for political propaganda.

3) John was offered, and refused, "early release." Many of us were given this offer. It meant speaking out against your country and lying about your treatment to the press. You had to "admit" that the U.S. was criminal and that our treatment was "lenient and humane." So I, like numerous others, refused the offer. This was obviously something none of us could accept. Besides, we were bound by our service regulations, Geneva Conventions and loyalties to refuse early release until all the POW's were released, with the sick and wounded going first.

4) John was awarded a Silver Star and Purple Heart for heroism and wounds in combat. This heroism has been played up in the press and in his various political campaigns. But it should be known that there were approximately 600 military POW's in Vietnam. Among all of us, decorations awarded have recently been totaled to the following: Medals of Honor - 8, Service Crosses - 42, Silver Stars - 590, Bronze Stars - 958 and Purple Hearts - 1,249. John certainly performed courageously and well. But it must be remembered that he was one hero among many - not uniquely so as his campaigns would have people believe.

John McCain served his time as a POW with great courage, loyalty and tenacity. More that 600 of us did the same. After our repatriation a census showed that 95% of us had been tortured at least once. The Vietnamese were quite democratic about it. There were many heroes in North Vietnam. I saw heroism every day there. And we motivated each other to endure and succeed far beyond what any of us thought we had in ourselves. Succeeding as a POW is a group sport, not an individual one. We all supported and encouraged each other to survive and succeed. John knows that. He was not an individual POW hero. He was a POW who surmounted the odds with the help of many comrades, as all of us did.

I furthermore believe that having been a POW is no special qualification for being President of the United States. The two jobs are not the same, and POW experience is not, in my opinion, something I would look for in a presidential candidate.

Most of us who survived that experience are now in our late 60's and 70's. Sadly, we have died and are dying off at a greater rate than our non-POW contemporaries. We experienced injuries and malnutrition that are coming home to roost. So I believe John's age (73) and survival expectation are not good for being elected to serve as our President for 4 or more years.

I can verify that John has an infamous reputation for being a hot head. He has a quick and explosive temper that many have experienced first hand. Folks, quite honestly that is not the finger I want next to that red button.

It is also disappointing to see him take on and support Bush's war in Iraq, even stating we might be there for another 100 years. For me John represents the entrenched and bankrupt policies of Washington-as-usual. The past 7 years have proven to be disastrous for our country. And I believe John's views on war, foreign policy, economics, environment, health care, education, national infrastructure and other important areas are much the same as those of the Bush administration.

I'm disappointed to see John represent himself politically in ways that are not accurate. He is not a moderate Republican. On some issues he is a maverick. But his voting record is far to the right. I fear for his nominations to our Supreme Court, and the consequent continuing loss of individual freedoms, especially regarding moral and religious issues. John is not a religious person, but he has taken every opportunity to ally himself with some really obnoxious and crazy fundamentalist ministers lately. I was also disappointed to see him cozy up to Bush because I know he hates that man. He disingenuously and famously put his arm around the guy, even after Bush had intensely disrespected him with lies and slander. So on these and many other instances, I don't see that John is the "straight talk express" he markets himself to be.

Senator John Sidney McCain, III is a remarkable man who has made enormous personal achievements. And he is a man that I am proud to call a fellow POW who "Returned With Honor." That's our POW motto. But since many of you keep asking what I think of him, I've decided to write it out. In short, I think John Sidney McCain, III is a good man, but not someone I will vote for in the upcoming election to be our President of the United States.
Integritopia
22-08-2008, 04:36
I don't know who wrote this article, but it sounds an awful lot like 'swiftboating' to me. I think we should acknowledge that McCain went through some terrible treatment and he served his country, now its time to focus on the issues.
The PeoplesFreedom
22-08-2008, 04:52
I don't know who wrote this article, but it sounds an awful lot like 'swiftboating' to me. I think we should acknowledge that McCain went through some terrible treatment and he served his country, now its time to focus on the issues.

I would have to agree. Military experience should be noted and focused on for some time, but then the issues need to be the main focus, not personal achievements for either candidate.
Ashmoria
22-08-2008, 05:09
i wouldnt call that swiftboating.

the writer never denied that john mccain did what he said he did. instead he is emphasizing that those things were not unique to mccain.
Integritopia
22-08-2008, 05:17
i wouldnt call that swiftboating.

the writer never denied that john mccain did what he said he did. instead he is emphasizing that those things were not unique to mccain.


It's still mean-spirited. In all honesty, can't we get past McCain's service and Obama's race? I think more attention should be paid to the issues.
Liuzzo
22-08-2008, 05:23
i wouldnt call that swiftboating.

the writer never denied that john mccain did what he said he did. instead he is emphasizing that those things were not unique to mccain.

Exactly. In no way did this man say McCain didn't deserve his medals. He did not say that McCain didn't serve honorably. He didn't say McCain was lying about his service. These are all things that the SwiftBoat people did. He simply brought up that these things are not qualifiers for the office he seeks. John McCain is not the only POW that was tortured. The author simply points out that these qualities are not unique to McCain. If you consider his comment about McCain graduating 5th from the bottom as an attack you should tell McCain to stop saying it himself. He pointed out that John likely graduated because of his father. This doesn't seem too far fetched. He also wanted to point out that others were given the same deal to go free. That point is not up for debate and has been substantiated by many other POWs.
Redwulf
22-08-2008, 05:26
This comes from a former POW and USNA classmate of John McCain. I can agree with a lot of what this man has said. John McCain should be honored for his service

Why? I can understand honoring those who liberated the death camps in Nazi Germany, but what did McCain do?
Integritopia
22-08-2008, 05:26
Yeah, I've heard the 'bottom fifth' point before. Obama has him beat with his Columbia/Harvard Law pedigree.
Liuzzo
22-08-2008, 05:27
It's still mean-spirited. In all honesty, can't we get past McCain's service and Obama's race? I think more attention should be paid to the issues.

If this is too mean spirited for you then you might want to take the advice that, "life's tough, wear a helmet." This was a very respectful piece. Have you seen some of the negative ads that McCain himself has been running? If you want mean you got it there. The reason this man is talking about John's service is because he trumpets it constantly. The media talks about it constantly. Hell, Hannity the other day dismissed McCain's affair because of his treatment as a POW. I don't see Obama going, "I'm so black. Can you tell see how black I am. I've been oppressed for so long. Did I mention I was I was black?" Your last sentence I totally agree with.
Liuzzo
22-08-2008, 05:29
Why? I can understand honoring those who liberated the death camps in Nazi Germany, but what did McCain do?

He served his country honorably. He went to war to war and didn't dodge service. That's enough to be respectful of.
Liuzzo
22-08-2008, 05:30
Yeah, I've heard the 'bottom fifth' point before. Obama has him beat with his Columbia/Harvard Law pedigree.

Not the bottom fifth. 5 from the bottom.
ascarybear
22-08-2008, 05:32
Why? I can understand honoring those who liberated the death camps in Nazi Germany, but what did McCain do?

He was taken prisoner while fighting for the US, and was tortured for the next several years. It doesn't mean you can be president, but it is something he should be honored for. The absolute least we can do for our soldiers who are wounded is to respect and honor them.
Integritopia
22-08-2008, 05:41
Why? I can understand honoring those who liberated the death camps in Nazi Germany, but what did McCain do?

He should be honored because he voluntarily STAYED in a POW camp after he was offered an early-release (because of his father's position in the navy). He didn't take the easy way out, he did his duty.
Redwulf
22-08-2008, 05:58
He was taken prisoner while fighting for the US, and was tortured for the next several years.

I still fail to see what this has to do with honoring or respecting the man.
Glorious Freedonia
22-08-2008, 16:26
Exactly. In no way did this man say McCain didn't deserve his medals. He did not say that McCain didn't serve honorably. He didn't say McCain was lying about his service. These are all things that the SwiftBoat people did. He simply brought up that these things are not qualifiers for the office he seeks. John McCain is not the only POW that was tortured. The author simply points out that these qualities are not unique to McCain. If you consider his comment about McCain graduating 5th from the bottom as an attack you should tell McCain to stop saying it himself. He pointed out that John likely graduated because of his father. This doesn't seem too far fetched. He also wanted to point out that others were given the same deal to go free. That point is not up for debate and has been substantiated by many other POWs.

Ummmm are you saying that Kerry should have received his decorations? It sounds like you are implying that the swiftboat vets were lying?
Worldly Federation
22-08-2008, 16:38
So it's okay to base not voting for Obama on "There are a lot of African Americans who have had to put up with hardships, poverty, and racism in this country." That's essentially what is being said about McCain here. He has never claimed being a POW as a qualification for president, only an example of his patriotism and devotion to his country.
Neo Art
22-08-2008, 16:41
It sounds like you are implying that the swiftboat vets were lying?

Several major newspapers were also skeptical of the SBVT allegations. For example, a New York Times news article stated, "on close examination, the accounts of Swift Boat Veterans for Truth prove to be riddled with inconsistencies." ABC News's The Note opined, "the Swift Boat ad and their primary charges about Kerry's medals are personal, negative, extremely suspect, or false." Regarding the medal dispute, a Los Angeles Times editorial stated, "Not limited by the conventions of our colleagues in the newsroom, we can say it outright: These charges against John Kerry are false." The editorial argued this position on the basis that "Kerry is backed by almost all those who witnessed the events in question, as well as by documentation." On August 22, 2004 The Washington Post reported: "An investigation by The Washington Post into what happened that day suggests that both sides have withheld information from the public record and provided an incomplete, and sometimes inaccurate, picture of what took place. But although Kerry's accusers have succeeded in raising doubts about his war record, they have failed to come up with sufficient evidence to prove him a liar."

The ABC television show Nightline traveled to Vietnam and interviewed Vietnamese who were involved in the battle for which Kerry was awarded the Silver Star. These witnesses disputed O'Neill's charge that there "was little or no fire" that day; they said that the fighting was fierce. SBVT supporters question whether these witnesses are reliable because they spoke "in the presence of a Communist official", but their account of enemy fire is substantially the same as that previously given by another former VC to an AP reporter and by the American witnesses, including the only SBVT member who was actually present that day, Larry Clayton Lee.

Jerome Corsi has said that a picture of Kerry's 1993 visit to Vietnam hangs in the War Remnants Museum in Ho Chi Minh City as a gesture of "honor" by the Communists "for his contribution to their victory over [the] United States", and John O'Neill has stated that Kerry "is in the North Vietnamese war museum as a hero... . one of the heroes who caused them to win the war in Vietnam".[68] The statement is also repeated in "Unfit for Command" (pp 167-174). However, Josh Gerstein of the New York Sun stated in this regard:

“ While the museum clearly honors opponents of the war from America and other countries, it is not clear that the photo of Mr. Kerry is part of that tribute. The picture of the senator hangs among a set of photos devoted to the restoration of diplomatic relations between America and Vietnam in the 1990s.
It was apparently taken as Kerry took part in a delegation President Clinton sent to Hanoi in 1993. Other photos nearby show visits during that period by former American officials who played key roles in the Vietnam War, including a Navy admiral who has since died, Elmo Zumwalt, and a defense secretary, Robert McNamara. A secretary of state during Clinton’s term, Warren Christopher, is also shown meeting Vietnamese officials

In this connection, the webpage Corsi and another anti-Kerry veteran originally published on the Kerry museum photo contained the picture of Robert McNamara's 1995 meeting with General Giap, who was misidentified as "Mao Tse-Tung".

In addition, John O'Neill said that in 1971 John Kerry "wanted to abandon ship and leave the POWs [in Vietnam]" and that "[o]n the Dick Cavett show and elsewhere, John Kerry‘s position was that we should accept the Madame Binh seven-point proposal, which called for unilateral withdrawal, setting a date after which at some future time, we‘d negotiate the return of the POWs. So we would set a date. We would withdraw and then we would begin to discuss how to bring them home". However, in the Cavett debate, Kerry actually said:

“ Now, if we were to set a date for withdrawal from Southeast Asia, we can – the Vietnamese, first of all, have said it will be settled prior to the arrival of that date, but we can set a time limit on that. If the prisoners of war aren't back prior to the arrival of that date, then I think we would have – for the first time in all of our history in Vietnam we would have a legitimate reason for taking some kind of reaction to it.

No, no implication needed. They were lying.
Khadgar
22-08-2008, 16:43
I don't know who wrote this article, but it sounds an awful lot like 'swiftboating' to me. I think we should acknowledge that McCain went through some terrible treatment and he served his country, now its time to focus on the issues.

Swiftboating is when you make knowingly false claims to discredit a person. I don't see any inaccuracies there. It's an OP Ed though, which means little.
Kyronea
22-08-2008, 17:01
I don't know who wrote this article, but it sounds an awful lot like 'swiftboating' to me. I think we should acknowledge that McCain went through some terrible treatment and he served his country, now its time to focus on the issues.

Do you not know what swiftboating is? Swiftboating is basically stating that the person is outright lying about their military experience as well as coming up with false claims about what they did do.

This was the complete opposite. This sounds like someone who's simply stating his opinion based on his own experiences and how McCain is simply playing up a few things in a mildly dishonest manner rather than stating he never did any of the things he claimed.
Lunatic Goofballs
22-08-2008, 17:09
I'm not exactly John McCain's biggest fan(I held him in much higher regard eight years ago), but the dude in that article comes off as a whiny little bitch who feels left out of the spotlight. If he feels so left out, why didn't HE become a congressman and run for President?
Ashmoria
22-08-2008, 17:12
So it's okay to base not voting for Obama on "There are a lot of African Americans who have had to put up with hardships, poverty, and racism in this country." That's essentially what is being said about McCain here. He has never claimed being a POW as a qualification for president, only an example of his patriotism and devotion to his country.
if thats the case then why did his campaign go apeshit when wesley clark said just that?
Liuzzo
22-08-2008, 21:22
He should be honored because he voluntarily STAYED in a POW camp after he was offered an early-release (because of his father's position in the navy). He didn't take the easy way out, he did his duty.

Yes, but take note that others did the same. He is not special in this regard.
Liuzzo
22-08-2008, 21:27
Ummmm are you saying that Kerry should have received his decorations? It sounds like you are implying that the swiftboat vets were lying?

I hope this is sarcasm and I will not get back into this petty conversation. We've gone over it far too many times. My short answer is yes, and I don't really like the man. Military citations are not given on pure say so. They are investigated to see if they are of merit. He earned his awards the same as anyone else, including me. The attempt to dishonor him came during a political campaign for President. Were these people sleeping the whole time he was in the senate? It was a charge of expediency and I will stop commenting on it now.
Liuzzo
22-08-2008, 21:30
I would have to agree. Military experience should be noted and focused on for some time, but then the issues need to be the main focus, not personal achievements for either candidate.

On this we can agree. But this is America...Do you think the media will really let this happen? :p
Zilam
22-08-2008, 21:43
I don't know who wrote this article, but it sounds an awful lot like 'swiftboating' to me. I think we should acknowledge that McCain went through some terrible treatment and he served his country, now its time to focus on the issues.

Oh yes, the awful treatment! I wonder if he every thought of the awful treatment he cause innocent people when he was bombing them indiscriminately high up in the sky. I have no sorrow for him, nor respect. Why does failing your job (being shot down) make him a hero? Why does it make him ready to serve? I don't want someone who fails his jobs! And I don't want someone who touts his service record like Rudy 9/11 did with that tragedy.

"You cheated on your wife!" But I am a POW!

"You are an elitist!" POW POW POW!

"Your ideas suck" But I am the maverick POW!

UGH... McCain shouldn't even be offered the position, according to vietnam vets against McCain, which might be swift boating, they have documentation that he gave up info to the NV, meaning he disobeyed his oath towards this country and the military.

http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/cin_declassified_landing.htm

If that is indeed true, and I'll be honest and say that I am not sure if it is, then why should I give any respect or credit to Mr. McCain. Why should I honor his "service"? Even if its not true, why should I honor him as a hero? Again, he killed many innocent people in that illegal war, from a plane. How is that heroic? How is blindly following orders a noble thing? A hero is one who is willing to sacrifice themselves for the bettering of the status of other people. Killing indiscriminately then, doesn't register on my hero scale at all.