NationStates Jolt Archive


The Official Communist Party

Ralishuland
21-08-2008, 11:24
This is a Nationstates General party devoted to overthrowing the bourgeois dictatorship of the capitalist entity 'Jolt' and their petitebourgeois servants the Mods in these forums.

Manifesto:

1. All Mods will be elected by The Party according to the principles of democratic centralism.
2. NSG shall be nationalized.
3. International Incidents shall be collectivized.
4. The forums shall set up 'gulag' restricted areas so that recalcitrant defective liberal emos (ie the majority of all posters) can be 'rehabilitated'.

Workers of the world, unite!
Adunabar
21-08-2008, 11:26
Hey Andaras.
Neu Leonstein
21-08-2008, 11:29
I want to join. Sounds like a fantastic idea.
Blouman Empire
21-08-2008, 11:36
Well I now know this guy isn't AP I have seen a couple of his posts and there has been no reference to the bourgeois.

I enjoyed reading the manifesto that was quite funny especially the bit "recalcitrant defective liberal emos (ie the majority of all posters)" I nearly split my sides, that bit alone is sigworthy.
Adunabar
21-08-2008, 11:46
Well I now know this guy isn't AP I have seen a couple of his posts and there has been no reference to the bourgeois.

I enjoyed reading the manifesto that was quite funny especially the bit "recalcitrant defective liberal emos (ie the majority of all posters)" I nearly split my sides, that bit alone is sigworthy.

He has mentioned bourgeois, actually, and petite bourgeois.
Bokkiwokki
21-08-2008, 12:02
национальный государственный генералы всех воображаемых стран толчка, соединяйтесь! (or something along those lines... :D)
Ralishuland
21-08-2008, 12:03
He has mentioned bourgeois, actually, and petite bourgeois.

How about you go and cry about it to your Toff mommy and daddy Adunabar.
Ralishuland
21-08-2008, 12:05
национальный государственный генералы всех воображаемых стран толчка, соединяйтесь! (or something along those lines... :D)

I have no time for your liberal petty 'leftism'.
Lapse
21-08-2008, 12:07
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v219/time_lapse/umpsmear1.jpg

Yes, communism does promote anarchy.. shut up.
Ralishuland
21-08-2008, 12:11
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v219/time_lapse/umpsmear1.jpg

Yes, communism does promote anarchy.. shut up.
No, anarchism proposes an 'abolition' of the state, Communism is the theory that the 'state' (meaning bureaucracy, law, all morality and convention etc) 'withers away', which is COMPLETELY different.
Lapse
21-08-2008, 12:13
No, anarchism proposes an 'abolition' of the state, Communism is the theory that the 'state' (meaning bureaucracy, law, all morality and convention etc) 'withers away', which is COMPLETELY different.

Shut up. It's propoganda. It doesn't have to be true. And I couldn't be bothered making a new one.
Blouman Empire
21-08-2008, 12:16
He has mentioned bourgeois, actually, and petite bourgeois.

I know I just saw it in the morals and laws thread damn.
Adunabar
21-08-2008, 12:17
How about you go and cry about it to your Toff mommy and daddy Adunabar.

HAHAHAHAHAHA. You know nothing about my family. Oh yeah my dad was so rich yeah, most people who had a welder for a dad and then went on to be a roofer were so posh. How stupid of me. Shut the fuck up.
Bokkiwokki
21-08-2008, 12:21
I have no time for your liberal petty 'leftism'.

Apparently you do, you even took the time to answer! :p
Ralishuland
21-08-2008, 12:22
Shut up. It's propoganda. It doesn't have to be true. And I couldn't be bothered making a new one.
I'd prefer it if it had rich people being executed.
Adunabar
21-08-2008, 12:27
I'd prefer it if it had rich people being executed.

Rich people like you, Andaras, people who can afford to go to University?
Neu Leonstein
21-08-2008, 12:39
Rich people like you, Andaras, people who can afford to go to University?
Hey leave our party alone. If you don't like it, join a different one. We can sort the rest out on the campaign trail.

:soap:
Lapse
21-08-2008, 12:41
I'd prefer it if it had rich people being executed.

Here is the problem:
In a non-corrupt capitalist society, those that are rich are those that put the effort in. In a perfect society everyone would have the same opportunities, and it would be their choice from there. For example, 2 people going to uni, If one goes out partying every night whilsty the other studies to become the best whatever that they can, who should make more money?

The theory of communism is good, but in practise, because humans are lazy arseholes, nothing is going to get done.

Even look at the world. It is a global economy based on the capitalist system. Not because the UN decided it should be, but rather because some countries are more efficient at producing things than others. Which is why America, Australia, Japan are all very rich per capita, whilst many third world countries do not have the system in place (and thus they are third world).

Now, You look at a country such as Australia (just because I know our system) whereby you have a capitalist society incorporating some less-capitalist elements. There is a welfare scheme so that people can survive with doing the minimal, it would not be easy though. Those that are rich do get taxed more, but they still recieve a good proportion of their earnings (once you start earning more than it is expected you will need to survive, it can go up to about 45%). Our health care & education systems are designed so that everyone has access to it, but if you (or your parents) put in the effort, you can get better/quicker health care.
Cosmopoles
21-08-2008, 12:48
I used to have a Che t-shirt, so I'll join your party.
Tagmatium
21-08-2008, 13:29
I've always have a soft-spot for propagandistic and indoctrinated rantings, I'm in if more of that happens.
Belschaft
21-08-2008, 15:01
I've always have a soft-spot for propagandistic and indoctrinated rantings, I'm in if more of that happens.

WHAT? You like propoganda and pointless rants? Why aren't you joing the SSA? The propoganda in this thread is ours.
Dumb Ideologies
21-08-2008, 15:02
May I ask if the founder of this party is willing to stand by his promise, made recently on another thread, to leave NSG? I don't think voters would willingly vote for a party that so obviously doesn't keep its promises.

EDIT: It appears the decision has been taken away from him. Oh, shame.