NationStates Jolt Archive

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/11/clinton-aide-if-affair-pushed-edwards-out-she-would-have-won/


Wah wah wah, bitch bitch bitch, moan moan moan. See if he had been taken out, and if his voters had supported us, with this percentage or higher, then we would of, in theory, won!

I'm waiting for the "revelation" that it was a media conspiracy to keep the Edwards affair quiet to sink Hillary's chances, because they all secretly want to swallow Obama's big manly tool, which Hillary is not at all jealous of.

its a silly thing to claim. its just as likely that revelation of (and obsession with) edward's affair would bring up memories of how hillary dealth with her all too often cheating husband and would turn more women against her.

As I recall, Edward's wife was championing him during the primaries, saying that he understood "women's issues".

Well, well, well...

As for Hillary supporters claiming that Edwards sank their boat, Hillary wasn't polling too well in Iowa as I recall. I doubt that all Edwards supporters would have voted for Hillary.

This is more of the "I lost, and it's not my fault. It's a conspiracy, man."

Same thing we heard when Gore and Kerry lost, and I imagine we'll hear this from Hillary supporters until the day the world ends.

""I believe we would have won Iowa, and Clinton today would therefore have been the nominee," Howard Wolfson told ABCNews.com in an interview released Monday,"

Yes, and Hillary's nomination would have given McSame the Whitew House on a silver platter.

""i Believe We Would Have Won Iowa, And Clinton Today Would Therefore Have Been The Nominee," Howard Wolfson Told Abcnews.com In An Interview Released Monday,"

Yes, And Hillary's Nomination Would Have Given Mcsame The Whitew House On A Silver Platter.

It's A Conspiracy, Man!

This sort of thing is more fitting for a child who lost a football game to say than it is for a presidential candidate.

This is more fitting for a child who lost a football game than it is for a presidential candidate.

If you don't believe, you must be part of the conspiracy, man!

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/11/clinton-aide-if-affair-pushed-edwards-out-she-would-have-won/


Wah wah wah, bitch bitch bitch, moan moan moan. See if he had been taken out, and if his voters had supported us, with this percentage or higher, then we would of, in theory, won!

I'm waiting for the "revelation" that it was a media conspiracy to keep the Edwards affair quiet to sink Hillary's chances, because they all secretly want to swallow Obama's big manly tool, which Hillary is not at all jealous of.

I agree with you.

And conversely, if someone had put two in the back of that unperson of a hag's head (or thrown water at her, or driven a stake through her heart, depending on what she actually is), Obama would have won more easily, and might have gained or suffered losses in the general election due to the assassination. Just sayin', if we wanna play hypotheticals, let's, but let's include a scenario in which Hillary gets two in the back of the head, not the least of which caused by HER own suggestions about Obama getting assassinated.

Conversely, if someone had put two in the back of her head, Obama would have won more easily, and might have gained or suffered losses in the general election due to the assassination. Just sayin', if we wanna play hypotheticals, let's, but let's include a scenarion in which Hillary gets two in the back of the head, not the least of which caused by HER own suggestions about Obama getting assassinated.

So, hypotheticall, if Obama is assassinated during the convention, who would you think did it:

A. Hillary supporter
B. McCain supporter
C. Ron Paul supporter (joke vote)

If he was assassinated after the convention, but before the election was decided, who would you think did it?

A. Hillary supporter
B. McCain supporter
C. Rabid Evangelical Christian Nutjob (RECN)

If he were assassinated after he was sworn in?

A. Hillary supporter
B. McCain supporter
C. White supremacist

""I believe we would have won Iowa, and Clinton today would therefore have been the nominee," Howard Wolfson told ABCNews.com in an interview released Monday,"

Yes, and Hillary's nomination would have given McSame the Whitew House on a silver platter.

It's A Conspiracy, Man!

ohmygod it IS a conspiracy.

but not to deny hillary the whitehouse. thats too obvious.

noooo its george bush's conspiracy to humiliate john mccain ONE MORE TIME by having him lose big to a black man.

i bet dick cheney thought it up.

ohmygod it IS a conspiracy.

but not to deny hillary the whitehouse. thats too obvious.

noooo its george bush's conspiracy to humiliate john mccain ONE MORE TIME by having him lose big to a black man.

i bet dick cheney thought it up.
Too bad for Cheney that Obama's not gay.

Ah, but wait, there may be scandals yet to come. ;)

So, hypotheticall, if Obama is assassinated during the convention, who would you think did it:

A. Hillary supporter
B. McCain supporter
C. Ron Paul supporter (joke vote)

If he was assassinated after the convention, but before the election was decided, who would you think did it?

A. Hillary supporter
B. McCain supporter
C. Rabid Evangelical Christian Nutjob (RECN)

If he were assassinated after he was sworn in?

A. Hillary supporter
B. McCain supporter
C. White supremacist

A, B, C, in that order. Though C and B in the last two tend to overlap (Not that Bs are all Cs, but Cs tend to be Bs). Also, A gets possible in the third question if the hag somehow slithers her way into the ticket.

A, B, C, in that order. Though C and B in the last two tend to overlap (Not that Bs are all Cs, but Cs tend to be Bs). Also, A gets possible in the third question if the hag somehow slithers her way into the ticket.

I concur.

A, B, C, in that order. Though C and B in the last two tend to overlap (Not that Bs are all Cs, but Cs tend to be Bs). Also, A gets possible in the third question if the hag somehow slithers her way into the ticket.

I'm inclined to thing RECN or white supremacist for all of them (even though I didn't have that as an option).

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/08/07/politics/main4329138.shtml

A, B, C, in that order. Though C and B in the last two tend to overlap (Not that Bs are all Cs, but Cs tend to be Bs). Also, A gets possible in the third question if the hag somehow slithers her way into the ticket.

You haven't seen Ron Paul supporters like I have...:D

I'm inclined to thing RECN or white supremacist for all of them (even though I didn't have that as an option).

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/08/07/politics/main4329138.shtml

If you look even here at how some of that unperson's supporters behaved, you'd get my point in question 1.

As for 2 and 3, as I said, B and C tend to overlap. Or, better put: "C tends to be contained in B".

So, hypotheticall, if Obama is assassinated during the convention, who would you think did it:

A. Hillary supporter
B. McCain supporter
C. Ron Paul supporter (joke vote)

If he was assassinated after the convention, but before the election was decided, who would you think did it?

A. Hillary supporter
B. McCain supporter
C. Rabid Evangelical Christian Nutjob (RECN)

If he were assassinated after he was sworn in?

A. Hillary supporter
B. McCain supporter
C. White supremacist

D. Right-wing Rabid Evangelical Christian "True American" Loser (I'm kidding, and only did this because I like fucking with acronyms. Check the acronym of this if you only use the capital letters. Counting the D. :D)

D. Right-wing Rabid Evangelical Christian "True American" Loser (I'm kidding, and only did this because I like fucking with acronyms. Check the acronym of this if you only use the capital letters. Counting the D. :D)

Dr. Rectal?

Dr. Rectal?

Yeah.

...I didn't say it was funny, but it did amuse me to no end. Just shows the quality of my sense of humor I guess.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/11/clinton-aide-if-affair-pushed-edwards-out-she-would-have-won/

Wah wah wah, bitch bitch bitch, moan moan moan. See if he had been taken out, and if his voters had supported us, with this percentage or higher, then we would of, in theory, won!

I'm waiting for the "revelation" that it was a media conspiracy to keep the Edwards affair quiet to sink Hillary's chances, because they all secretly want to swallow Obama's big manly tool, which Hillary is not at all jealous of.

A conspiracy is a plot that is hidden. The media's love of Obama is there for all to see. The actual reason this wasn't reported is because Edwards is a Democrat and a liberal and the media doesn't need to be coerced into hiding Democrat dirt.

Some were afraid this Edwards stupidity would be used by the evil VRWC against Obama but, as I said, Hillary is far more likely to gain mileage from this as she has from all of the other low attacks attributed to the VRWC.

I can't wait until Denver!

A conspiracy is a plot that is hidden. The media's love of Obama is there for all to see. The actual reason this wasn't reported is because Edwards is a Democrat and a liberal and the media doesn't need to be coerced into hiding Democrat dirt.

Clearly the complete lack of media coverage is what enabled all of us to readily and quickly find out about it. I can't believe that no news outlets carried this story.

Literally. I can't believe that.

Snip.

I have yet to see a post of yours that has a decent point.

If you look even here at how some of that unperson's supporters behaved, you'd get my point in question 1.

As for 2 and 3, as I said, B and C tend to overlap. Or, better put: "C tends to be contained in B".

I don't believe a white supremacist would like the fact that McCain has raised a Bangladeshi girl with severe health problems adopted from Mother Theresa's orphanage. Not to mention helping another get adopted by friends. I mean, a white person helping those icky brown people survive? And imagine you are the one who cries foul on blanket statements.

What why the continued "unperson" stuff? Whether you aim it at Hillary or McCain it makes you sound erratic and unhinged. Are these people so awful that they deserve to be called an unperson?

Clearly the complete lack of media coverage is what enabled all of us to readily and quickly find out about it. I can't believe that no news outlets carried this story.

Literally. I can't believe that.

Pretty sure I first heard about it on CNN.

I have yet to see a post of yours that has a decent point.

I'm half convinced he's FreedomAndGlory.

Dr. Rectal?

So Obama will be killed by a proctologist? What an ass.

Clearly the complete lack of media coverage is what enabled all of us to readily and quickly find out about it. I can't believe that no news outlets carried this story.

Literally. I can't believe that.

The NE story has been out there since at least December 2007. Believe it.

Clearly the complete lack of media coverage is what enabled all of us to readily and quickly find out about it. I can't believe that no news outlets carried this story.

Literally. I can't believe that.
its gossip that they would only know about from the enquirer.

until edwards, the woman or someone with a reason to know the truth comes forward there is no reason to report gossip.

anyone interested couldnt miss seeing the headlines in the checkout line anyway.

I have yet to see a post of yours that has a decent point.

Quite understandable considering your lack of intellectual... capacity.

I don't believe a white supremacist would like the fact that McCain has raised a Bangladeshi girl with severe health problems adopted from Mother Theresa's orphanage. Not to mention helping another get adopted by friends. I mean, a white person helping those icky brown people survive? And imagine you are the one who cries foul on blanket statements.

What why the continued "unperson" stuff? Whether you aim it at Hillary or McCain it makes you sound erratic and unhinged. Are these people so awful that they deserve to be called an unperson?

He'd still support McCain over Obama. Also, I didn't say that Republicans are white supremacists. I said white supremacists tend to be Republicans. I took pains to make sure that point got across. And, sadly, it did not.

As for the "unperson" stuff, it's the strongest insult I can think of regarding someone without getting modded. It has the added benefit of denying that McCain or Hillary are people, though, yes.

Quite understandable considering your lack of intellectual... capacity.

Yeah, I'd not cry foul over the intellectual capacity of someone you just misinterpreted even after they took pains to get their point across.

He'd still support McCain over Obama. Also, I didn't say that Republicans are white supremacists. I said white supremacists tend to be Republicans. I took pains to make sure that point got across. And, sadly, it did not.

You obviously don't know the history of the Democrat party. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Republican. In his era, almost all black Americans were Republicans and almost all racists were Democrats. From its founding in 1854 as the anti-slavery party until today, the Republican Party has championed freedom and civil rights for blacks. What party still has a member of the KKK in it? Considering that the Hillary and Obama were beating the crap out of each other with race and gender I would say the Democrats have discovered their roots.

You took pains to get a point across all right and, sadly, it was an idiotic, uninformed one.

As for the "unperson" stuff, it's the strongest insult I can think of regarding someone without getting modded. It has the added benefit of denying that McCain or Hillary are people, though, yes.

Do you actually hate McCain and Hillary?

You obviously don't know the history of the Democrat party. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Republican. In his era, almost all black Americans were Republicans and almost all racists were Democrats. From its founding in 1854 as the anti-slavery party until today, the Republican Party has championed freedom and civil rights for blacks. What party still has a member of the KKK in it? Considering that the Hillary and Obama were beating the crap out of each other with race and gender I would say the Democrats have discovered their roots.

You took pains to get a point across all right and, sadly, it was an idiotic, uninformed one.



Do you actually hate McCain and Hillary?

Robert Byrd is the KKK member, and despite his protestations to the contrary, he's still a member.

And if the media had caught onto Bill's affairs before the 1996 election, Bob Dole would have won the presidency, and Hillary's political career would be set back 20 years. Hypotheticals are fun.

You obviously don't know the history of the Democrat party. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Republican. In his era, almost all black Americans were Republicans and almost all racists were Democrats. From its founding in 1854 as the anti-slavery party until today, the Republican Party has championed freedom and civil rights for blacks. What party still has a member of the KKK in it?

Thanks captain obvious, yet I must ask... this has any relevance to anything today at all in any way... how?

Snip.

1- Things changed. QED the "God With Us" Republican Party of today, the "we should be allowed to be racist" Republican Party of today, and so on.

2- That depends on your definition of "hate". I'd not kill them if given the opportunity, but I'd not mind one bit if something were to befall them. And I'd not dislike Hillary for merely running against Obama; I hate her for the way she did so and the way her supporters, obeying her, played victims, even in this forum - the "2" by my name has to do with that.

You obviously don't know the history of the Democrat party. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Republican. In his era, almost all black Americans were Republicans and almost all racists were Democrats. From its founding in 1854 as the anti-slavery party until today, the Republican Party has championed freedom and civil rights for blacks. What party still has a member of the KKK in it? Considering that the Hillary and Obama were beating the crap out of each other with race and gender I would say the Democrats have discovered their roots.

You took pains to get a point across all right and, sadly, it was an idiotic, uninformed one.



Er... much has changed in the past half century, buddy. Much.

Robert Byrd is the KKK member, and despite his protestations to the contrary, he's still a member.

He is? How would YOU know that?

You obviously don't know the history of the Democrat party. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Republican. In his era, almost all black Americans were Republicans and almost all racists were Democrats. From its founding in 1854 as the anti-slavery party until today, the Republican Party has championed freedom and civil rights for blacks. What party still has a member of the KKK in it? Considering that the Hillary and Obama were beating the crap out of each other with race and gender I would say the Democrats have discovered their roots.

That Republican party is no more, my friend. Do not be afraid to abandon the party for in truth, it abandoned us first.