NationStates Jolt Archive

Lets say you had a boyfriend or girlfriend, and he or she wants to do something sexual with your breasts during sex. Would you be offended? Why or why not?

every part of your lover's body is sexual when you are making love.

There are people that don't love tits? I don't habeeb it.

every part of your lover's body is sexual when you are making love.

This. And even if I didn't find a body part sexual--feet, for instance, would be the least sexual part for me, though I know plenty of people are crazy for them--why would I be offended if they turned my partner on?

I'm not sure what you're talking about. Who doesn't view breasts as sexual? In what context do they make this assertion?

Mouths aren't sexual but people like kissing and oral sex.

Lets say you had a boyfriend or girlfriend, and he or she wants to do something sexual with your breasts during sex. Would you be offended? Why or why not?

I don't have breasts. I have nipples. They have very little usage outside of being licked/tweaked/bitten/younameit by sexual partners, so, no, I don't get offended. On the contrary, I encourage it.

I'm not sure what you're talking about. Who doesn't view breasts as sexual? In what context do they make this assertion?

I think there's confusion between "Breasts are not dirty things that need to be covered up" and "Breasts have nothing to do with sexual attraction or sexual pleasure."

Hi everybody...*looks around awkwardly*
My name is Bouitazia and I have a confession to make;
I don't like tits/view them as sexual.

And before anyone goes "impossible, there is something else at play here".
I am not homosexual, nor am I a pedophile..
I just don't like them in that way.
And they are rather a turn of the bigger they are.
Smaller ones are okay. Those that fit in my hand kinda,sorta.

*Ends this embarrassing speech, and walks blushing all the way to the chair*

Mouths aren't sexual

Ahahahahahaha. :p

As others have said, though - everything is sexual if it's part of your sexual partner. Some things are still more so than others, of course, but I can't imagine objecting to a partner playing with any part of me.

I think there's confusion between "Breasts are not dirty things that need to be covered up" and "Breasts have nothing to do with sexual attraction or sexual pleasure."

Well, if our standard for covering is "body parts we do sexual things with", we should hardly stop with breasts.

Me, I'm much more puzzled by people who seem to think bare male chests aren't "sexual."

Hi everybody...*looks around awkwardly*
My name is Bouitazia and I have a confession to make;
I don't like tits/view them as sexual.

And before anyone goes "impossible, there is something else at play here".
I am not homosexual, nor am I a pedophile..
I just don't like them in that way.
And they are rather a turn of the bigger they are.
Smaller ones are okay. Those that fit in my hand kinda,sorta.

*Ends this embarrassing speech, and walks blushing all the way to the chair*

are you SURE youre not gay?

Ahahahahahaha. :p

As others have said, though - everything is sexual if it's part of your sexual partner. Some things are still more so than others, of course, but I can't imagine objecting to a partner playing with any part of me.

Even your spleen? I think I'd be pretty annoyed about my lover playing with my spleen.

Even your spleen? I think I'd be pretty annoyed about my lover playing with my spleen.

Then she isn't doing it right. :p

why would we be offended?

If the part of my shoulderblade that sticks out on my back turns my partner on, then she can go to town. I'm not going to be picky about what turns on my partner, as long as it's me. I'd be more offended if she thought my body was a turn off (I'd understand, but it would make being naked with her a little more difficult).

And I agree with another poster, I think this question comes from some 'confusion'...

They say the brain is the most important sexual organ, so does anyone mind if I fuck with their head?

I'd be more offended if she thought my body was a turn off (I'd understand, but it would make being naked with her a little more difficult).

Not at all. I suggest the following options:

1) Wear bag on head
2) Turn off lights
3) Purchase large amounts of alcohol

Use your best judgment and experimentation to determine the best combination for your personal hideousness.

Then she isn't doing it right. :p

roflmao

Me? I <3 ( . )( . )!

Not at all. I suggest the following options:

1) Wear bag on head
2) Turn off lights
3) Purchase large amounts of alcohol

Use your best judgment and experimentation to determine the best combination for your personal hideousness.

I find chloroform more effective than alcohol.

are you SURE youre not gay?

Well, I´m pretty positive..not 100% sure..but I don't think so.
And, ehm...I don't like sports or cars either.
Wait. That didn't help my case much. never mind.

Even your spleen? I think I'd be pretty annoyed about my lover playing with my spleen.

Okay, amended version: I can't imagine objecting to my partner playing with any part of me that they can actually play with without killing me. And if my partner can manage to play with my spleen without killing me, I'd be cool with that. :p

I wouldn´t be offended. If it gives me or him pleasure, why wouldn´t I like it? Besides, the body is a beautiful vessel.

Well, if our standard for covering is "body parts we do sexual things with", we should hardly stop with breasts.

Indeed.

Me, I'm much more puzzled by people who seem to think bare male chests aren't "sexual."

Me too. And the ones who seem to think that men can't get sexual pleasure from nipple play.


are you SURE youre not gay?
Well, I´m pretty positive..not 100% sure..but I don't think so.
And, ehm...I don't like sports or cars either.
Wait. That didn't help my case much. never mind.

LOL

So you're not a boob man. I'm sure you're not the only one (even among heterosexual men). =)

I wouldn´t be offended. If it gives me or him pleasure, why wouldn´t I like it? Besides, the body is a beautiful vessel.
Here's how I think we got here (to the question), and I have no idea why I quoted you for this, but lets just roll with it-

"Seriously, stop staring at my breasts."

"If you're going to put them out there, they're going to get stared at."

"It's not like I can put them in my pocket, jackass. They're attached."

"I'm just saying, if you flaunt your sexuality, expect people to stare."

"What, you want me to wear a tent? They stick out. They're part of my body, they're not 'my sexuality.'"

"Well, if they're not sexual, does it bother you when your boyfriend plays with them?"

And here we are.

Just a guess.

EDIT: AAaaaaand I'd be wrong. Apparently it's a partner discussion to another thread...I hate that...

They say the brain is the most important sexual organ, so does anyone mind if I fuck with their head?

lol

Well, I´m pretty positive..not 100% sure..but I don't think so.
And, ehm...I don't like sports or cars either.
Wait. That didn't help my case much. never mind.

there is a world of difference between not liking sports cars and not liking breasts

have you ever had your hands on the breast of a girl you were crazy about?

Lets say you had a boyfriend or girlfriend, and he or she wants to do something sexual with your breasts during sex. Would you be offended? Why or why not?

hmm, well idk if i exactly qualify i find almost all of the body to be fairly sexual. However, boobs don't really rank that high.

Now, my boobs.. I don't think I'd be offended so much as not interested. I've had a girl try in the past and its just not my thing- bothers me more than anything else.

there is a world of difference between not liking sports cars and not liking breasts

have you ever had your hands on the breast of a girl you were crazy about?

Just to clear it up, I did not mean sports cars.
I meant sports and cars..the two traditional stereotypical guy things.

And yes, I have.
But since I have the preferences I have, they have not been bigger than my hand.

Just to clear it up, I did not mean sports cars.
I meant sports and cars..the two traditional stereotypical guy things.

And yes, I have.
But since I have the preferences I have, they have not been bigger than my hand.

Ah, the Weird Science standard...

I like my ladyfriend's breasts. She likes them too, judging by her reaction to being caressed in said region.

Well, if our standard for covering is "body parts we do sexual things with", we should hardly stop with breasts.

Me, I'm much more puzzled by people who seem to think bare male chests aren't "sexual."

Oh, if you knew what we women thought in our heads when they go by... Perks of living in a surfing town. ;)

If the part of my shoulderblade that sticks out on my back turns my partner on, then she can go to town.

I love that part on guys. The whole shoulder/scapula/clavicle region. Yes.

Well, I´m pretty positive..not 100% sure..but I don't think so.
And, ehm...I don't like sports or cars either.
Wait. That didn't help my case much. never mind.

I don't like cars, but I like sports. And boobs. I'm a girl, so I don't know what that says about your sexuality. :P

I like my ladyfriend's breasts. She likes them too, judging by her reaction to being caressed in said region.

Breasts are fun for everyone. *nods* Except the commenter above you, I guess.

Hi everybody...*looks around awkwardly*
My name is Bouitazia and I have a confession to make;
I don't like tits/view them as sexual.

And before anyone goes "impossible, there is something else at play here".
I am not homosexual, nor am I a pedophile..
I just don't like them in that way.
And they are rather a turn of the bigger they are.
Smaller ones are okay. Those that fit in my hand kinda,sorta.

*Ends this embarrassing speech, and walks blushing all the way to the chair*

In the same way...

My name is Shayamalan and I have a confession to make;
I don't like butts/asses/view them as sexual.

And before anyone goes "impossible, there is something else at play here".
I am not homosexual, nor am I a pedophile..
I just don't like them in that way.
And they are rather a turn of the bigger they are.
Smaller ones are okay. Those that fit in my hand kinda,sorta.

*Ends this embarrassing speech, and walks blushing all the way to the chair*

They say the brain is the most important sexual organ, so does anyone mind if I fuck with their head?

LOL, no Maineiac, go right ahead...

every part of your lover's body is sexual when you are making love with the obvious exceptions of snot, finger and toe nail clippings, and belly button lint.


Much better.


To me, if breasts are not being presented in a sexual fashion like say breastfeeding or changing clothes than its nothing but during sex you bet you by golly jee willickers mr that those breasticles are sexual, so is pretty much anything else that she wants to use like that. No I wouldn't be offended.

In the same way...

My name is Shayamalan and I have a confession to make;
I don't like butts/asses/view them as sexual.


Thats just wrong... nothing better than a nice ass. :(

Just to clear it up, I did not mean sports cars.
I meant sports and cars..the two traditional stereotypical guy things.

And yes, I have.
But since I have the preferences I have, they have not been bigger than my hand.

not liking sports, or cars or huge breasts... meaningless.

putting your hand on the breast of the girl that you are crazy about and not getting a thrill...odd.

In the same way...

My name is Shayamalan and I have a confession to make;
I don't like butts/asses/view them as sexual.



oh come on.

there is no reason to go ga-ga every time you see a girl (or guy) with a shapely ass in tight jeans. thats a personal preference thing.

but, if its a person you are crazy about and you DONT enjoy running your hand over their naked butt, are you SURE you are crazy about them?

not liking sports, or cars or huge breasts... meaningless.

putting your hand on the breast of the girl that you are crazy about and not getting a thrill...odd.

Hell, if I don't get a charge out of just touching them period...

Thats just wrong... nothing better than a nice ass. :(

Not really an ass man. I'm a sucker for a pretty pair of eyes.

I think this thread calls for this picture.

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a353/tuebor/epicboobs.jpg

putting your hand on the breast of the girl that you are crazy about and not getting a thrill...odd.

A slight thrill then, but not because of the breasts, but because of her.
And her maybe liking it.

I agree with Shayamalan regarding asses/butts also.
Although I view them as sexual, that is the only difference in comparison to my view on breasts.

every part of your lover's body is sexual when you are making love.

^^^
This.

Earlobes are fun.

Well, if our standard for covering is "body parts we do sexual things with", we should hardly stop with breasts.

Me, I'm much more puzzled by people who seem to think bare male chests aren't "sexual."

Or that they aren't as sexual as bare female chests -- and that one's ok to bare, but the other isn't.

every part of your lover's body is sexual when you are making love.
The armpit? The t'ain't?
o.9

My name is Shayamalan and I have a confession to make;
I don't like butts/asses/view them as sexual.
In many cases of sexuality, they're the ANCHOR. Can't see how that doesn't make them sexual.

The armpit? The t'ain't?
o.9

yes.

I find that in men, their necks, hands, buttocks, wide shoulders, their waists and the way they move are sexually attractive to me.

yes.What you say is very interesting. I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
http://www.websmileys.com/sm/cool/cool29.gif

I find that in men, their necks, hands, buttocks, wide shoulders, their waists and the way they move are sexually attractive to me.

D'rat, i'm short on almost all counts.

I think this thread calls for this picture.

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a353/tuebor/epicboobs.jpg

this pic is really getting on my nerves. NO. big tits will not turn any woman lesbian. the bigger they are they more we understand what a problem that is.

D'rat, i'm short on almost all counts.

o.O

this pic is really getting on my nerves. NO. big tits will not turn any woman lesbian. the bigger they are they more we understand what a problem that is.

LIES! :mad:

this pic is really getting on my nerves. NO. big tits will not turn any woman lesbian. the bigger they are they more we understand what a problem that is.

Nobody ACTUALLY thinks that big tits will turn women lesbian. The real message of that picture is that people like breasts. Also, if something silly like that gets on your nerves how can you stand the Internet, especially NSG?

I knew a girl who had to get breast reduction surgery because they were causing her severe back problems. The poor girl missed a fair bit of her senior year of high school getting the surgery and dealing with the damage the weight had caused her back.

LIES! :mad:
There, there .... think of it as akin to if men had huge, swelling testicles, protruding from their trousers, and how quickly it would turn other men gay. I think Adam Sandler covered this in his "Memory Lane" skit.

I find that in men, their necks, hands, buttocks, wide shoulders, their waists and the way they move are sexually attractive to me.

D'rat, i'm short on almost all counts.

I have long fingers.:D

I have long fingers.:D

<_<
How long?

>_< And the innuendos continue. Frick!

Maine, don´t answer that.
*sighs*

I have long fingers.:D

I can touch the tip of my nose with my tongue.

Nobody ACTUALLY thinks that big tits will turn women lesbian. The real message of that picture is that people like breasts. Also, if something silly like that gets on your nerves how can you stand the Internet, especially NSG?

I knew a girl who had to get breast reduction surgery because they were causing her severe back problems. The poor girl missed a fair bit of her senior year of high school getting the surgery and dealing with the damage the weight had caused her back.

its on my nerves because its at the top of the page so there it is every time i click on this stupid thread. and every time i see it i think "no, thats not true"

its on my nerves because its at the top of the page so there it is every time i click on this stupid thread. and every time i see it i think "no, thats not true"

But a few posts back you quoted with the pic IN. Now it's getting on MY nerves! :p

its on my nerves because its at the top of the page so there it is every time i click on this stupid thread. and every time i see it i think "no, thats not true"

As in, you automatically think that whenever you see something inaccurate?

I can touch the tip of my nose with my tongue.

Since when was gurning sexy?

*takes dentures out*
*sticks tongue up own nostril*

Iz sexy now?

But a few posts back you quoted with the pic IN. Now it's getting on MY nerves! :p

yeah but if you have jolt set to "40 posts per page" (like all the cool kids do) its still on the page where it was first posted so its not as bad as adding to an additional page.

or, to be more adult, sorry. ill go back and edit it out.

As in, you automatically think that whenever you see something inaccurate?

no, i specifically meant that pic.

but now that you mention it, it does get on my nerves when someone has posted something very stupid at the top of a page and i see it every time i click on the page (yes, i am too stupid myself to always click on the "last unread post" button). i try to leave it alone but sometimes it has to be commented on.

yeah but if you have jolt set to "40 posts per page" (like all the cool kids do) its still on the page where it was first posted so its not as bad as adding to an additional page.

I did have it set that way once, but I changed it back because I refresh pages a lot.

And Jolt ignores me annoyingly often nowdays. I don't think it's denial of service between here and there, so the next most likely explanation is that I flog their server more than my share, and NS is the slum tenant of Jolt so they're ignoring me. Default (minimum) length pages is the simplest way to keep my load on the server down, the inconvenience amounts to two tabs instead of one.

I'm probably over-reading the facts, and Jolt just sucks. :p

EDIT: in re the post above this: you could delete a post of your own from earlier, bumping the one which annoys you back a page. Except, then it would be on the bottom of a page which isn't so great either.

I did have it set that way once, but I changed it back because I refresh pages a lot.

And Jolt ignores me annoyingly often nowdays. I don't think it's denial of service between here and there, so the next most likely explanation is that I flog their server more than my share, and NS is the slum tenant of Jolt so they're ignoring me. Default (minimum) length pages is the simplest way to keep my load on the server down, the inconvenience amounts to two tabs instead of one.

I'm probably over-reading the facts, and Jolt just sucks. :p

jolt has been very hinky lately. did you read the announcement on server upgrades?

jolt has been very hinky lately. did you read the announcement on server upgrades?

The last time I wred a server announcement, I had an attack of paranoia.

Basically, Jolt is as Jolt was, albeit with a slightly different management structure. There will be small changes and new features over the coming months, but all of them are good and all of them aimed at pleasing you guys. We’re particularly excited about the upcoming NationStates 2, and there’ll be more content like that in the future, too.

See what I mean? Shutting NH up might well qualify as "pleasing you guys." :p

The last time I wred a server announcement, I had an attack of paranoia.



See what I mean? Shutting NH up might well qualify as "pleasing you guys." :p

whoa, that WOULD be an improvement!

there was another one that has been removed about doing stuff that was going to require forum outages (like the ones in the past couple of days) that was going to continue to either the end of this month or the end of next month.

Hi everybody...*looks around awkwardly*
My name is Bouitazia and I have a confession to make;
I don't like tits/view them as sexual.

And before anyone goes "impossible, there is something else at play here".
I am not homosexual, nor am I a pedophile..
I just don't like them in that way.
And they are rather a turn of the bigger they are.
Smaller ones are okay. Those that fit in my hand kinda,sorta.

*Ends this embarrassing speech, and walks blushing all the way to the chair*

Umm, yeah. Me too.

Although, I I am pansexual, so the "i'm not a homosexual" doesn't really apply to me, because i have been known to partake in homosexuality.

o.O

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2158/2337598700_53f1b40c7a.jpg?v=0
+
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/05/29/bionic-monkeys-2/
More or less.

<_<
How long?
Long enough that when he picks his nose, he can use one finger to go right through one nostril, the sinus cavity, and back out the other nostril, to scratch out like a pipe cleaner.

I'm confused. I don't view breast as sexual nor do I have them. I have no idea how to answer this question. Maybe?

whoa, that WOULD be an improvement!

there was another one that has been removed about doing stuff that was going to require forum outages (like the ones in the past couple of days) that was going to continue to either the end of this month or the end of next month.

Hey! I just noticed.

In the "new" edit box (top of page instead of inline) we can add a smiley for the whole post, while editing it!

That's excellent. I often want to put a "thumbs-up" or something to show the tenor of my whole post, but forget when first writing it up and posting.

The feature I most want is to be able to click on a post and see all the replies. It would really save me the effort of "hitting a post for six" to know that some other poster had already hit it out of the grounds and we were using a new ball. (Little cricket analogy there...)

Long enough that when he picks his nose, he can use one finger to go right through one nostril, the sinus cavity, and back out the other nostril, to scratch out like a pipe cleaner.

That's more than disturbing. Now I will have nightmares of long fingers wiggling at me for the rest of my life.:(

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2158/2337598700_53f1b40c7a.jpg?v=0
+
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/05/29/bionic-monkeys-2/
More or less.

I see...

3)Get them to consume large amounts of alcohol

Fixed. Works every time

Well, if our standard for covering is "body parts we do sexual things with", we should hardly stop with breasts.

So that's why Muslim women are covered from head to toe. Those randy little devils

Me, I'm much more puzzled by people who seem to think bare male chests aren't "sexual."

Well, it is a good question and I think they are its just that women like tho see them and don't mind showing their man's chest off to everyone where as men are a bit more jealous and like to show them off just not everything. That or a breast is more sexual because they are covered up and so enhance the excitement of seeing a naked one. Just throwing a few ideas out there.

Umm, yeah. Me too.

Although, I am pansexual, so the "i'm not a homosexual" doesn't really apply to me, because i have been known to partake in homosexuality.

A pansexual huh?

So, not so much with the breasts, but you get hot for ... hooves? And horns?

Lets say you had a boyfriend or girlfriend, and he or she wants to do something sexual with your breasts during sex. Would you be offended? Why or why not?

Nah. I know they're pretty, so he gets to play if he wants to. But only limited amounts of time, because I personally get no thrill out of it and turn to demanding things I like, too, rather soon.

Now, as for *his* chest.. there's something we both enjoy.

That's more than disturbing. Now I will have nightmares of long fingers wiggling at me for the rest of my life.:(

Wiggling AT you? :D