NationStates Jolt Archive


Time to fly!

Londim
30-06-2008, 23:53
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7481940.stm



Personal flying machines will be a reality, home computer and electric car pioneer Sir Clive Sinclair has said.

He told BBC Radio 4's PM programme that soon it would be "economically and technically possible" to create flying cars for individuals.

Sir Clive is best-known for the Spectrum computer and his failed electric car effort, the C5.

"I'm sure it will happen and I am sure it will change the world dramatically," he predicted.

Despite his pioneering work in the field of computers, Sir Clive told BBC Radio 4 he was not an internet user.

Clive Sinclair holding one of his firms products - a TV set which can receive up to 13 channels on a two-inch screen. For a programme in the BBC World Service series, 'The Young Idea', Gordon Snell (
Sir Clive pioneered many electronics fields - including portable TVs

"I don't use it myself directly," he said, explaining that as an inventor he tried to avoid "mechanical and technical things around me so they don't blur the mind".

He said the internet was "just wonderful and quite amazing" and its growth was not something he had predicted back in the 1980s.

"It has totally surprised me. I utterly failed to foresee that."

The celebrated inventor is not working on developing flying car technology currently but said he would "love to be involved" with any effort.

As a pioneer in personal transport, he said "flying cars were technically entirely possible".

"It would need to be automatically controlled because we can't all learn to fly.

"The vehicle would take off from your home and fly to wherever you want to go."

Sir Clive said personal flying machines would have to be electric powered, because petrol engines were not reliable enough.

But, he admitted, his 1980s venture into electric cars "didn't achieve the success I expected".

He said: "We did sell quite a few thousand. Looking back I can see why [we didn't have success].

Sinclair C5
His C5 electric car is considered a failure but ahead of its time

"It was a bit daunting to go into traffic."

The rising cost of oil, combined with environmental concerns, have made alternative energy-powered cars a goal once more.

"Long before the C5, and ever since, I have strongly believed in electric vehicles. I am glad to say it s all happening at long last."

Sir Clive produced an electric powered bicycle, called the Zike, in 1992, but it too failed to capture the public's imagination.

His latest project is the A-Bike, a lightweight, foldable bicycle. But, he said, he still harboured hopes of returning to the electric car field.

"The thing is - to do an electric car is obviously a huge investment. I'd need huge success in the electric bike field," he said.

All I can think of is the massive prank usage of these vehicles. Also do you believe flying cars will be available soon?
Ashmoria
30-06-2008, 23:59
no i dont but with GPS guidance and a central brain i can see where his vision of pilotless air cars might be able to work.
Call to power
01-07-2008, 00:04
I'm not sure a trust a flying vauxhall cavalier

Sir Clive told BBC Radio 4 he was not an internet user.

so this is where my life went wrong...
Gauthier
01-07-2008, 00:05
no i dont but with GPS guidance and a central brain i can see where his vision of pilotless air cars might be able to work.

Flying cars with GPS Guidance and computerized brain today, Aerial HKs tomorrow.
Ashmoria
01-07-2008, 00:47
Flying cars with GPS Guidance and computerized brain today, Aerial HKs tomorrow.

from your lips to god's ear!

...

from your fingers to god's eye?

what is an aerial HK?
Nobel Hobos
01-07-2008, 01:13
My first computer was a Sinclair ZX80. It worked OK until I moved to where the AC power was 50Hz instead of 60. Sure, it was a very cheap computer, but running the system clock off the AC is that extra step into "really quite crap." I sent it in for service, and the Sinclair affiliate wanted more than the purchase price to send it back, unfixed.

So if mr Sinclair thinks I'm going to fly as a passenger in a drone he invented, he's wrong.

He is right though, that the next step in personal transport has to involve taking fallible humans away from the controls.
South Lizasauria
01-07-2008, 01:20
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7481940.stm



All I can think of is the massive prank usage of these vehicles. Also do you believe flying cars will be available soon?

My sister told me once that we had the technology but decided that they were too dangerous due to fuel inefficiency. Also on top of plummeting upon complete expenditure of fuel drunk drivers in flying cars would definitely cause more damage than those who drive the land cars we are so used to.
Wilgrove
01-07-2008, 03:41
God...99% of people can't even drive in this damn country (USA), do we really want to add a third dimension?
Kyronea
01-07-2008, 03:53
God...99% of people can't even drive in this damn country (USA), do we really want to add a third dimension?

Refusing to get out of your way when you tailgate them does not count as being incapable of driving.
Wilgrove
01-07-2008, 03:56
Refusing to get out of your way when you tailgate them does not count as being incapable of driving.

Yea, but having them tailgate you is, or how about when they don't let you in so you either have to go slower than traffic and get behind them, or speed up to get in front of them. Keep in mind that the other lane is clear for them to move into. Or how about when you try to change lane, the traffic in the lane you're trying to get over on speeds up as soon as you turn your turn signal on.

Trust me, the general population does not need their own personal flying cars.
Kyronea
01-07-2008, 04:05
Yea, but having them tailgate you is, or how about when they don't let you in so you either have to go slower than traffic and get behind them, or speed up to get in front of them. Keep in mind that the other lane is clear for them to move into. Or how about when you try to change lane, the traffic in the lane you're trying to get over on speeds up as soon as you turn your turn signal on.

Trust me, the general population does not need their own personal flying cars.

No, none of that qualifies as being unable to drive. All of that qualifies as a lack of courtesy, which is completely different.

That said, flying vehicles aren't really all that practical.
Gauthier
01-07-2008, 04:29
from your lips to god's ear!

...

from your fingers to god's eye?

what is an aerial HK?

http://www.movieprop.com/tvandmovie/terminator/t3hk2.jpg
Megaloria
01-07-2008, 05:07
Bllllllblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblbl!

Jet-SON!
Barringtonia
01-07-2008, 05:18
God...99% of people can't even drive in this damn country (USA), do we really want to add a third dimension?

Actually, I speak on behalf of all deers when I ask that you remain in the air and not on the road.
Nobel Hobos
01-07-2008, 07:05
Personally, I like to be able to look up into the sky and see some little part of nature that hasn't been concreted over and adorned with some monument to human ego. I think jet transport should be taxed into a fraction of what is current, and small-load air transport (helicopters for commuting, for instance) should be outright banned.

Making air transport silent would be a step towards "personal aircars" being acceptable, but given that speed is the primary advantage of air travel I don't think that is very practical. And the issue of people invading the privacy of privately-owned land by flying over it would remain.

Perhaps we could just cede ownership of all airspace above private property to the property owner (up to say 5,000 metres,) and allow them to set whatever price they want for the use of it, with the only limitation being that the price be stable so that commuters can plan their route.

But just as with the history of the automobile, the rich will get to do whatever they damn well please and the poor will get to breath the smoke.
Callisdrun
01-07-2008, 09:09
I'm against any such thing. People are already a mix of incompetent buffoons and complete assholes when operating vehicles that only move horizontally. Why should they get another dimension of movement to play with?
Wilgrove
01-07-2008, 18:58
I'm against any such thing. People are already a mix of incompetent buffoons and complete assholes when operating vehicles that only move horizontally. Why should they get another dimension of movement to play with?

SEE! Someone gets it!
Rambhutan
01-07-2008, 19:01
Is he just sticking some wings on his old C5s and making plane noises?