UnitedStatesOfAmerica-
13-06-2008, 07:16
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25121770/
Sounds like SCOTUS favors the foriegn nations.
"The court agreed with a separate administration argument that nations including Iraq have criminal jurisdiction over those within their borders."
"Arrested in 2004 by U.S. soldiers at his home in Baghdad, Omar was to have been transferred to Iraqi courts for trial, but a U.S. district court blocked the move."
SCOTUS told teh district court they overstepped their jurisdiction.
On the other hand, it also said, in the same case, that when it comes to detainees at any prison, base, or embassy that is under US military or civilian control, whether in the US or in a forieng country, US laws of legal procedures do apply.
Thoughts???
Sounds like SCOTUS favors the foriegn nations.
"The court agreed with a separate administration argument that nations including Iraq have criminal jurisdiction over those within their borders."
"Arrested in 2004 by U.S. soldiers at his home in Baghdad, Omar was to have been transferred to Iraqi courts for trial, but a U.S. district court blocked the move."
SCOTUS told teh district court they overstepped their jurisdiction.
On the other hand, it also said, in the same case, that when it comes to detainees at any prison, base, or embassy that is under US military or civilian control, whether in the US or in a forieng country, US laws of legal procedures do apply.
Thoughts???