NationStates Jolt Archive

This is basically a thread about, why they are so damn attractive. I have several theories on the matter.

One is that our society makes them taboo, therefore we see them as a forbidden fruit, and only like them because they are hidden and off limits.

Second is that when men were babies, breasts out ment food time, which gets us excited.

Third is that we are programmed from day one to beleive that guys love breasts, so we act exactly how we're told. My proof of this one is a similar story for when i was a kid and i watched all the kids shows with kids saying they didn't like broccoli, so i assumed i didn't like it.

Fourth, the theory that in the stone age, bigger breasts meant better capabilities at taking care of children, thus being a better mate.

Any thoughts/suggestions/theorys of your own?

Second is that when men were babies, breasts out ment food time, which gets us excited.

No, it's actually because we all had crushes on our mothers. :rolleyes:

Freud? Is that you?

No pics! I'll rectify this situation!












http://www.avolites.org.uk/jokes/images/haha1.jpg

I seem to remember a study a lot of years back that breast are attractive to men, because the roundness reminds us of buttocks which, in turn are a sign of fertility in women, or somesuch, like I said it was, shit more than ten years ago.

http://www.bu.edu/mih/images/Freud.jpg
Tell me about your mother.


Also, tits or gtfo

I seem to remember a study a lot of years back that breast are attractive to men, because the roundness reminds us of buttocks which, in turn are a sign of fertility in women, or somesuch, like I said it was, shit more than ten years ago.

I have also read something similar along the lines - as humans started (uniquely compared to animals) having sex fron vs. front, women had to develop something looking like sexy buttocks.

And almighty wiki knows another theory:

"One theory is based around the fact that, unlike nearly all other primates, human females do not display clear, physical signs of ovulation. This could have plausibly resulted in human males evolving to respond to more subtle signs of ovulation. During ovulation, the increased estrogen present in the female body results in a slight swelling of the breasts, which then males could have evolved to find attractive. In response, there would be evolutionary pressures that would favor females with more swollen breasts who would, in a manner of speaking, appear to males to be the most likely to be ovulating.

Some zoologists (notably Desmond Morris) believe that the shape of female breasts evolved as a frontal counterpart to that of the buttocks, the reason being that whilst other primates mate in the rear-entry position, humans, because of their upright posture, are more likely to successfully copulate by mating face to face, the so-called missionary position. A secondary sexual characteristic on a woman’s chest would have encouraged this in more primitive incarnations of the human race, and a face on encounter may have helped found a relationship between partners beyond merely a sexual one."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breast

Women have shapely breasts while men do not. I find the shape of hips found on women attractive as well. Pretty much anything that differentiates a female from a male is of particular note.

Perhaps a simplistic explanation, but I find that simple answers are often correct. Of course, I could be completely wrong. It's not an issue I worry about much.

the shape of the breast are designed to be a visual sexual stimulant.
they evolved after we began to walk up right, and the previous visual sexual stimulant the buttocks, was not long as in our face so much.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Booby

They are indeed most glorious in full view. *nod*

men find breasts attractive because women have them.

when a man has manboobs no man finds his breasts attractive. (ok maybe the occasional gay guy but thats gotta be rare).

http://www.bu.edu/mih/images/Freud.jpg
Tell me about your mother.


Also, tits or gtfo

Your word is my command...

http://premium.uploadit.org/Daredevil22/boobs.gif

No, it's actually because we all had crushes on our mothers. :rolleyes:

Oedipus Complex? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oedipus_complex)

Oedipus Complex? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oedipus_complex)

Shouldnt women be into boobs too? After all they wanted to fuck good old mom too. They have penis envy because they couldn't penetrate her. Apparently they never hear of oral sex or scissoring. Poor girls.

Shouldnt women be into boobs too? After all they wanted to fuck good old mom too. They have penis envy because they couldn't penetrate her. Apparently they never hear of oral sex or scissoring. Poor girls.
Freud = fail

I think women's breasts are attractive because they are curvy. That's my theory.

I think the more pressing concern is...


Why do Women find the Penis attractive? Thats just Bloody Crazy, lol

I think the more pressing concern is...


Why do Women find the Penis attractive? Thats just Bloody Crazy, lol
Given that most men don't? Who knows? Ladies, why do you find penises attractive (for those of you who do)?

An inadequacy about my "theory" (which was more of a joke) is that the penis is not particularly curvy, except the glans, maybe. But it's mostly linear.

http://images.ebaumsworld.com/2006/07/moobs1.jpg

lol ownt.

http://images.ebaumsworld.com/2006/07/moobs1.jpg

lol ownt.

HOW DID YOU GET MY PICTURE!!!!

STALKER!!!!!

I think the more pressing concern is...


Why do Women find the Penis attractive? Thats just Bloody Crazy, lol

uh

women dont see the penis in the same sort of context that a man "sees" a woman's breasts. not that you SEE a woman's breasts when she is out in public, you just see their outline in clothing. a man walking down the street with an obvious bulge in his pants is not more attractive than one without.

lol@ thread. you guys are fucked up.:D

No, it's actually because we all had crushes on our mothers. :rolleyes:

I read a master's thesis once about how breastfeeding was the original intercourse experience for humans, and how bottle fed babies are sexually stunted because they didn't get socialized properly about physical intimacy. It was.....disturbing. (I was nursing at the time so that added to my :eek: )

Freud = fail

I think women's breasts are attractive because they are curvy. That's my theory.

Snakes are curvy too ... I think you mean convex?

uh

women dont see the penis in the same sort of context that a man "sees" a woman's breasts. not that you SEE a woman's breasts when she is out in public, you just see their outline in clothing. a man walking down the street with an obvious bulge in his pants is not more attractive than one without.
Yeah, the penis actually has to be attached to someone I like, otherwise a pork sword is a pork sword is a pork sword.

Yeah, the penis actually has to be attached to someone I like, otherwise a pork sword is a pork sword is a pork sword.

and in most circumstances when you see an actual penis its attached to someone you are already attracted to. so its a bonus rather than a primary attractor.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Booby

They are indeed most glorious in full view. *nod*

I like Peruvian Boobies. :)

I think the more pressing concern is...


Why do Women find the Penis attractive? Thats just Bloody Crazy, lol

I am a straight guy, and I find my penis attractive.

:cool:

It's odd that you're even comparing breasts with penises.

It's odd that you're even comparing breasts with penises.

Well, they both dangle...

AFAIK, humans are the only species that find breasts attractive.

AFAIK, humans are the only species that find breasts attractive.

How would you know that?

I dont think you can just go out and ask animals if they find breasts attractive...I mean, i dont think they speak the same language...

This is basically a thread about, why they are so damn attractive. I have several theories on the matter.

One is that our society makes them taboo, therefore we see them as a forbidden fruit, and only like them because they are hidden and off limits.

I don't think that this is neccesarily the reason why people find breasts attractive. While something being hidden does make it seem more special, I think that even if we were naked all of the time, the female form - including her breasts - would still be considered attractive.

Second is that when men were babies, breasts out ment food time, which gets us excited.

Again, I don't think this is the reason. However, I think fertility has a lot to do with it.

Third is that we are programmed from day one to beleive that guys love breasts, so we act exactly how we're told. My proof of this one is a similar story for when i was a kid and i watched all the kids shows with kids saying they didn't like broccoli, so i assumed i didn't like it.

No, I think this is the reason why men like BIG BREASTS. The media tells men they should like skinny girls and girls with huge breasts, in the same way the media constructed the ideal of the "blonde bombshell": Men are told they're suppose to like that, and therefore (some) men think that's atractive.

Fourth, the theory that in the stone age, bigger breasts meant better capabilities at taking care of children, thus being a better mate.

I don't think it's anything to do with the stone age, but throughout history breasts have often been seen as a sign of fertility: they provide milk for children therefore providing life, and a curvacious woman (who would have medium/large breasts rather than being flat-chested) is therefore seen as a fertile woman who would be an ideal partner. If you look through the history of the "fashionable" female form, sometimes (I think during the impressionist or reneissance period, but I may be wrong) women with medium-small breasts and shapely buttocks and thighs were seen as attractive; and then in later years the perfect body shifted from the 1950s hourglass ideal through the 1960s - when a very boyish form was promoted as femminism rose because women were stepping away from their gender and fertility.

Any thoughts/suggestions/theorys of your own?

I think men like breasts because:

They are aesthetically pleasing.
They are a sign of fertility.
They are soft and curvy and symbolise the opposite of a man's hard, linear physique.

I think the more pressing concern is...


Why do Women find the Penis attractive? Thats just Bloody Crazy, lol

Women don't find penises attractive in the same way men find breasts attractive, but they are sexy in a sense, because they're strong/hard/straight - the exact opposite of a woman's body - and they're fulfilling.

Well, they both dangle...

Boobs that dangle aren't sexy, in my eyes anyway.

Boobies are soft and fun to touch.


Really. Thats why I like em.

If you think about it, breasts are simply bags of fat w/ nipples attached. Forgive me if I don't drool.

If you think about it, breasts are simply bags of fat w/ nipples attached. Forgive me if I don't drool.

You dont drool over that...

Shapely bags of fat with Nipples are all I live for, lol...

Well, unless they lie and its not a bag of fat and is instead a bag of Silicon, then i feel like its a bad rick roll, lol....

Because they are boobs.

Soooo jiggly. Sooo jiggly. Hypnotizing. zzzzzzzzzt! Dammit! I just drooled on my laptop!

If you think about it, breasts are simply bags of fat w/ nipples attached. Forgive me if I don't drool.

Why do you hate women so much?
Every thread I see you in, it seems to be something negative about women.

Wasn't mummy good to you?

Why do you hate women so much?
Every thread I see you in, it seems to be something negative about women.

Wasn't mummy good to you?

Dopn't mind him Amor, he's gay.

Anyway, to me, I think b reasts are attractive because they're intrinsically female. My ladyfriend's breasts aren't even large or anything, but they fit her form so well, they just go with her curvey fiigure.

I mean, a penis isn't really all thatr attractige to a woman, in compariosn to h ow attractive breasts are to a man, at least according to my sister. But mainly it'sn intrinsically male.

I think, as fare as heterosexals are concerned, that we're attracted to what differentiates the opposite sex from ourselves, they ways in which they stand out, what makes them an obvious candidate ftor a mate as opposed to just a frieond.

Sorry for typosd, am druponk.

Why do you hate women so much?
Every thread I see you in, it seems to be something negative about women.

Wasn't mummy good to you?

I love my mum, and as I've said before, I don't hate women. I'm sure they can be productive members of society and the like. I just don't find bags of fat attractive.

Anyway, to me, I think b reasts are attractive because they're intrinsically female. My ladyfriend's breasts aren't even large or anything, but they fit her form so well, they just go with her curvey fiigure.

I mean, a penis isn't really all thatr attractige to a woman, in compariosn to h ow attractive breasts are to a man, at least according to my sister. But it'sn intrinsically male.



Is it the other way around? Men can grow breasts, yet women can not grow penises. So what is intrinsically representative of the sexes is the opposite of what you stated.

Dopn't mind him Amor, he's gay.

Anyway, to me, I think b reasts are attractive because they're intrinsically female. My ladyfriend's breasts aren't even large or anything, but they fit her form so well, they just go with her curvey fiigure.

I mean, a penis isn't really all thatr attractige to a woman, in compariosn to h ow attractive breasts are to a man, at least according to my sister. But mainly it'sn intrinsically male.

I think, as fare as heterosexals are concerned, that we're attracted to what differentiates the opposite sex from ourselves, they ways in which they stand out, what makes them an obvious candidate ftor a mate as opposed to just a frieond.

Sorry for typosd, am druponk.

Lol, are you hungover now?

I know he's gay, but he just constantly seems to dislike women. I know plenty of gay people, and that still like women. But yes, the polar opposites thing is a lot to do with it.

I love my mum, and as I've said before, I don't hate women. I'm sure they can be productive members of society and the like. I just don't find bags of fat attractive.

You don't always seem to give the impression that you appreciate women as productive members of society. And, breasts aren't just bags of fat.

Wiki:
The breasts are modified sudoriferous (sweat) glands, producing milk in females, and in some rare cases, males.[2] Each breast has one nipple surrounded by the areola. The areola is colored from pink to dark brown and has several sebaceous glands. In females, the larger mammary glands within the breast produce the milk. They are distributed throughout the breast, with two-thirds of the tissue found within 30 mm of the base of the nipple.[3] These are drained to the nipple by between 4 and 18 lactiferous ducts, where each duct has its own opening. The network formed by these ducts is complex, like the tangled roots of a tree. It is not always arranged radially, and branches close to the nipple. The ducts near the nipple do not act as milk reservoirs; Ramsay et al. have shown that conventionally described lactiferous sinuses do not, in fact, exist.

The remainder of the breast is composed of connective tissue (collagen and elastin), adipose tissue (fat), and Cooper's ligaments. The ratio of glands to adipose tissues rises from 1:1 in nonlactating women to 2:1 in lactating women.[3]

The breasts sit over the pectoralis major muscle and usually extend from the level of the 2nd rib to the level of the 6th rib anteriorly. The superior lateral quadrant of the breast extends diagonally upwards towards the axillae and is known as the tail of Spence. A thin layer of mammary tissue extends from the clavicle above to the seventh or eighth ribs below and from the midline to the edge of the latissimus dorsi posteriorly. (For further explanation, see anatomical terms of location.)

The arterial blood supply to the breasts is derived from the internal thoracic artery (formerly called the internal mammary artery), lateral thoracic artery, thoracoacromial artery, and posterior intercostal arteries. The venous drainage of the breast is mainly to the axillary vein, but there is some drainage to the internal thoracic vein and the intercostal veins. Both sexes have a large concentration of blood vessels and nerves in their nipples. The nipples of both females and males can become erect in response to sexual stimuli,[4] and also to cold.

The breast is innervated by the anterior and lateral cutaneous branches of the fourth through sixth intercostal nerves. The nipple is supplied by the T4 dermatome.

Is it the other way around? Men can grow breasts, yet women can not grow penises. So what is intrinsically representative of the sexes is the opposite of what you stated.

Men cannot grow breasts. Man can put on weight and thus give the illusion of having breasts, but it is in fact excess fat, not breast tissue.

[QUOTE] And, breasts aren't just bags of fat.

Yes, thank you. And vaginas aren't simply hairy, mutant venus flytraps. My point is they are as attractive as bags of fat and hairy flytraps, respectively.


Men cannot grow breasts. Man can put on weight and thus give the illusion of having breasts, but it is in fact excess fat, not breast tissue.

And yet women can not do anything to grow the illusion of a penis.

no pics; no care.

Men cannot grow breasts. Man can put on weight and thus give the illusion of having breasts, but it is in fact excess fat, not breast tissue.Then explain how some men can lactate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gynecomastia
Gynecomastia, or gynaecomastia, pronounced /ˌgaɪnəkoʊˈmæstiə/ is the development of abnormally large mammary glands in males resulting in breast enlargement, which can sometimes cause secretion of milk.

And if you think that's just a case of spontaneous generation of breast tissue, rather than the growth of existing tissue.
http://www.medicinenet.com/male_breast_cancer/article.htm
Men possess a small amount of nonfunctioning breast tissue (breast tissue that cannot produce milk) that is concentrated in the area directly behind the nipple on the chest wall. Like breast cancer in women, cancer of the male breast is the uncontrolled growth of the cells of this breast tissue.

http://www.bu.edu/mih/images/Freud.jpg
Tell me about your mother.


Also, tits or gtfo

How very bourgeois of you.

Why do you hate women so much?
Every thread I see you in, it seems to be something negative about women.

Wasn't mummy good to you?

Reducing a thread about one body part to its basic level (only inaccurate by leaving the word "mostly" out of his "bag of fat" analogy) is somehow hateful to women? The whole thread was perched on that precipice already. I don't think hate is the motivator there.

Yes, thank you. And vaginas aren't simply hairy, mutant venus flytraps. My point is they are as attractive as bags of fat and hairy flytraps, respectively.

Uh...what now? Even if you're gay, you can't believe that. "Attractive" doesn't necessarily mandate "sexually attractive". Gay male and straight female artists paint female nudes for a reason.

And yet women can not do anything to grow the illusion of a penis.

No, and God bless them, too.

Uh...what now? Even if you're gay, you can't believe that. "Attractive" doesn't necessarily mandate "sexually attractive". Gay male and straight female artists paint female nudes for a reason.




I didn't realise the statue of David was a sculpture of a female......

I didn't realise the statue of David was a sculpture of a female......

:confused:

I didn't realise the statue of David was a sculpture of a female......I think you might also not have realized there was no `only' in that sentence. Intangelon didn't claim that nothing but female nudes were painted and sculpted. In fact, sculptures weren't even mentioned.

Breast aka booby --- this thread needs a few booby pics.

Here is a red footed booby
http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o18/tzor/Red.jpg

Here is a blue footed booby
http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o18/tzor/booby.jpg

:eek: BOOBYS! :eek:

But seriously the breast is the most "public" private part of the female body. Generally ignored or shunned until the invention of the bra when it finally got the support it deserved. Unfortunately the same invention also lead to situations of breast envy and attempt at enlargement.

If you think about it, breasts are simply bags of fat w/ nipples attached. Forgive me if I don't drool.
Yes, you're gay, we get it.

How very bourgeois of you.



Reducing a thread about one body part to its basic level (only inaccurate by leaving the word "mostly" out of his "bag of fat" analogy) is somehow hateful to women? The whole thread was perched on that precipice already. I don't think hate is the motivator there.

No, it's based on a lot of his posts.

Then explain how some men can lactate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gynecomastia


And if you think that's just a case of spontaneous generation of breast tissue, rather than the growth of existing tissue.
http://www.medicinenet.com/male_breast_cancer/article.htm

Interesting.



And yet women can not do anything to grow the illusion of a penis.

Thank god.

And yet women can not do anything to grow the illusion of a penis.
Thank god.

They can buy something though... :D

No, it's based on a lot of his posts.

Yeah, they're mostly flamebait so it's hard to tell, but Soviestan really doesn't seem to like women.

We should just be sorry for him, really.

EDIT: I mean that. It doesn't matter one whit to me whether Soviestan is gay or not (and gynophobia is akin to homophobia, it may come mixed with the corresponding -philia) but I am rather sorry for anyone who has to go through life being physically repelled by half the people in the world. It must be ... limiting.

[QUOTE=Amor Pulchritudo;13695247]



Yes, thank you. And vaginas aren't simply hairy, mutant venus flytraps. My point is they are as attractive as bags of fat and hairy flytraps, respectively.




And yet women can not do anything to grow the illusion of a penis.

No, they are not mutant flytraps. The fact that I still have a penis is proof of that. And as for it being unattractive, I do prefer shaved to be fair, but still, its wet and hot and comfortable. What more do you need?

Yes, thank you. And vaginas aren't simply hairy, mutant venus flytraps. My point is they are as attractive as bags of fat and hairy flytraps, respectively.
Oh boy. Gynophobic flamebait from Soviestan. Surprise, surprise. Every time I think of taking your amusing statement out of my sig, you remind me of the reason I keep it there.

Seriously, were you beaten or sexually abused by your mother? Not to pry, but I really am asking honestly, not just making fun of you. I know you're gay and not attracted sexually females, but you're the only gay dude I've ever seen who hates woman that much.




And yet women can not do anything to grow the illusion of a penis.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clitoris_enlargement

No, they are not mutant flytraps. The fact that I still have a penis is proof of that. And as for it being unattractive, I do prefer shaved to be fair, but still, its wet and hot and comfortable. What more do you need?

I actually prefer the vulva and pubic region to be somewhat furry. Looks more adult that way. Bald vulvas gross me out, because they look... pre-pubescent.

Anyway, I find female genitalia to be fascinating to look at. Of course, I'm a heterosexual man, so that's no surprise.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clitoris_enlargement

I learn so much in this place.

I learn so much in this place.

A clitoris that's already big can become enlarged with male hormones to the point that it is the size of a small penis. Science.

A clitoris that's already big can become enlarged with male hormones to the point that it is the size of a small penis. Science.

Nice. (I'm using that in the shocked/sarcastic kind of way)

The "swollen breasts as a sign of ovulation" theory makes the most sense to me. The "breasts as buttocks on the front" doesn't make as much sense, because of their position.

a man walking down the street with an obvious bulge in his pants is not more attractive than one without.Says you. ;)

Says you. ;)

However, a woman walking down the street with an obvious bulge in her pants is definitely not attractive at all, even if she does have big boobs.

(See previous discussion about an enlarged clitoris)

The "swollen breasts as a sign of ovulation" theory makes the most sense to me. The "breasts as buttocks on the front" doesn't make as much sense, because of their position.

thats too subtle a sign. breasts are an indicator that a girl has passed into adulthood and thus is fair game for mating. maybe.



Says you. ;)


hey i dont pretend to understand gay men but the question was why WOMEN find penises attractive. the simple answer is "they dont". at least not in the same way that men find breasts attractive.

However, a woman walking down the street with an obvious bulge in her pants is definitely not attractive at all, even if she does have big boobs.

(See previous discussion about an enlarged clitoris)That would be an interesting experiment to test out - see if the love of breasts outweighs the dislike of bulges in pants.

thats too subtle a sign. breasts are an indicator that a girl has passed into adulthood and thus is fair game for mating. maybe.It could be. However, there is some correlation between attractiveness and larger breasts (for some men), but that could just be social programming saying larger breasts are better.
(A girl becoming a woman might not have larger breasts, which is why I brought that up.)

hey i dont pretend to understand gay men but the question was why WOMEN find penises attractive. the simple answer is "they dont". at least not in the same way that men find breasts attractive.Heh, I know.

That would be an interesting experiment to test out - see if the love of breasts outweighs the dislike of bulges in pants.

Go for it.

PLease stop using nationstates to talk about boobs!
Why not find an adult chat room or something?

Go for it.*calls Pamela Anderson and has her wear her Baywatch bikini and walk around in public with a roll of dimes in the bottom part*

*calls Pamela Anderson and has her wear her Baywatch bikini and walk around in public with a roll of dimes in the bottom part*

Can't you find someone attractive to do it? Pamela Anderson is just... well, she looks like a blow up doll, and is about that intelligent.

PLease stop using nationstates to talk about boobs!
Why not find an adult chat room or something?

You didn't have to click on the link you know...

Can't you find someone attractive to do it? Pamela Anderson is just... well, she looks like a blow up doll, and is about that intelligent.Well, she is known for her breasts. Who do you suggest?

Well, she is known for her breasts. Who do you suggest?

Thinking.

How about Salma Hayek?

Well, she is known for her breasts. Who do you suggest?

Well, if you want a celeb...
http://www.buddytv.com/articles/hot-list-jennifer-hewitt-1.jpg
Although this is a good suggestion as well:
Thinking.

How about Salma Hayek?
I'd go with...
http://www.jonholato.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/ewa-sonnet-seductive.jpg

That would be an interesting experiment to test out - see if the love of breasts outweighs the dislike of bulges in pants.

im sure it would be disconcerting but id recommend that if a man come across such a woman and find her interested in sex with him that he give her a try. i bet it would be an experience he would never forget. (supposing she is a natural woman and not a tranny-in-process)(not that there is anything wrong with sex with a tranny, its just a different circumstance)



It could be. However, there is some correlation between attractiveness and larger breasts (for some men), but that could just be social programming saying larger breasts are better.
(A girl becoming a woman might not have larger breasts, which is why I brought that up.)


to be a tiny bit cynical--especiallly since there is nothing inherently better about big breasts over small breasts--id say that its that visual thing that men have in their brains. the bigger the breasts are the more men notice them.

a few (22) years back i took a boat trip out to see puffins on the maine coast. they were just starting to try to get the birds to settle on some of the smaller islands again. to get the puffins to want to stop on a particular island they had put up HUGE puffin cutouts as a sign of "this is a great place to raise a family". they worked. even though they were far bigger than any puffin could ever be.

men are puffins.

men are puffins.

:D

im sure it would be disconcerting but id recommend that if a man come across such a woman and find her interested in sex with him that he give her a try. i bet it would be an experience he would never forget. (supposing she is a natural woman and not a tranny-in-process)(not that there is anything wrong with sex with a tranny, its just a different circumstance)You're probably right.

to be a tiny bit cynical--especiallly since there is nothing inherently better about big breasts over small breasts--id say that its that visual thing that men have in their brains. the bigger the breasts are the more men notice them.

a few (22) years back i took a boat trip out to see puffins on the maine coast. they were just starting to try to get the birds to settle on some of the smaller islands again. to get the puffins to want to stop on a particular island they had put up HUGE puffin cutouts as a sign of "this is a great place to raise a family". they worked. even though they were far bigger than any puffin could ever be.

men are puffins.Lol. That's hilarious, and probably accurate as an analogy.

to be a tiny bit cynical--especiallly since there is nothing inherently better about big breasts over small breasts--id say that its that visual thing that men have in their brains. the bigger the breasts are the more men notice them.

I realize you're probably not serious, but this idea that all men choose who to mate with based on "noticing" that they have breasts and must therefore be female ... is a bit insulting.

I realize you're probably not serious, but this idea that all men choose who to mate with based on "noticing" that they have breasts and must therefore be female ... is a bit insulting.

hey its a thread on why men like breasts.

they dont like them for their literary value.

hey its a thread on why men like breasts.

they dont like them for their literary value.

I don't know about that, you can write more on big breast than you can on small ones...
;)

I don't know about that, you can write more on big breast than you can on small ones...
;)

lol.

i wonder if thats why hemmingway wrote the way he did.

hey its a thread on why men like breasts.

Now that you point it out, I really wonder why I clicked on this silly thread in the first place.

Breasts are a very minor factor in whether I'm attracted to a woman or not. I was bound to be offended by one or other of the generalizations about men which the OP pretty much invited.

You can have it, I'm outa here.

All this breast talk has gotten me flustered......"glances at girlfriend lustily"

I'll be right back

Yeah, they're mostly flamebait so it's hard to tell, but Soviestan really doesn't seem to like women.

We should just be sorry for him, really.

EDIT: I mean that. It doesn't matter one whit to me whether Soviestan is gay or not (and gynophobia is akin to homophobia, it may come mixed with the corresponding -philia) but I am rather sorry for anyone who has to go through life being physically repelled by half the people in the world. It must be ... limiting.

I would feel sorry for him, but I think women are better off if he keeps as far away from them as possible. :p



No, they are not mutant flytraps. The fact that I still have a penis is proof of that. And as for it being unattractive, I do prefer shaved to be fair, but still, its wet and hot and comfortable. What more do you need?

Soviestan said that, not me.

Shaved is better, though, I agree.

MOst likely we like breasts because they are the most noticeable difference between males and females.


My problem with women is the same problem I have with chicken; I don't know whether I like legs or breasts more...

My problem with women is the same problem I have with chicken; I don't know whether I like legs or breasts more...

LOL

lol.

i wonder if thats why hemmingway wrote the way he did.

Why? He was writing on breasts? Did he have any paper?

:p

lol.

i wonder if thats why hemmingway wrote the way he did.

Dickens would be more accurate. But then, he was getting paid by the word. Or was he getting paid by the square inch of breast!? Who knows.

Also, no one likes puffins. Blue footed boobies are where it's at.

Also also, bigger, supple breasts imply a healthy woman and an ample supply of milk for potential children of that mother. Same as why men are attracted to women with symmetrical faces and bodies.

Oh, also, it's less the size of the boobs and more the ratio of boobs to hips size.

Also also also:
http://www.breakitdownblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/boobs.jpg

hmm..i laugh, but shake my head as well at generalizations...and such...
i mean it is insanely hard to talk about this maturely, it was insanely appeasing to read this thread but i agree with some of what has been said,
but, (im not sure whether or not) you people have mentioned nerve sensitivities and endings in the breasts, penis, and clitoris, among other places, which cause sexual arousal, excitement...so forth.. i will leave it at that.. any input?

call me gay or whatever, but the size of breasts does not really matter to me in the least, im usually only get (really) attracted to a woman after i get to know them, call me gay or whatever idc

hmm..i laugh, but shake my head as well at generalizations...and such...
i mean it is insanely hard to talk about this maturely, it was insanely appeasing to read this thread but i agree with some of what has been said,
but, (im not sure whether or not) you people have mentioned nerve sensitivities and endings in the breasts, penis, and clitoris, among other places, which cause sexual arousal, excitement...so forth.. i will leave it at that.. any input?

call me gay or whatever, but the size of breasts does not really matter to me in the least, im usually only get (really) attracted to a woman after i get to know them, call me gay or whatever idc

Dude, you are so totally gay.

RhynoDD;13701856']
Also also also:
http://www.breakitdownblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/boobs.jpg

hooray for pictures! this thread suddenly becomes interesting ;)

i just like boobs. i couldn't say why...