NationStates Jolt Archive

Seeing as the incompetent mods deleted the last one I'll ask this question again: Why dont conservatives working in adoption agencies who dont like gays adopting just go find a job that would be more fitting to their faith?

maybe the benefits are better at the job they are in.

C'mon. If you're going to go for insulting Mods, at least be somewhat creative. There are plenty of good options.

Tyrannically overscrupulous wannabe royalty, perhaps. Or humourlessly pretentious forum enforcers.

Mix it up and make it interesting.

Incompetent? That's the best you've got? Kinda churlish, really.

C'mon. If you're going to go for insulting Mods, at least be somewhat creative. There are plenty of good options.

Tyrannically overscrupulous wannabe royalty, perhaps. Or humourlessly pretentious forum enforcers.

Mix it up and make it interesting.Bourgeois reactionist capitialisticly imperialist oppressors! :D

C'mon. If you're going to go for insulting Mods, at least be somewhat creative. There are plenty of good options.

Tyrannically overscrupulous wannabe royalty, perhaps. Or humourlessly pretentious forum enforcers.

Mix it up and make it interesting.

I'm sure we could have some sort of random generator that would pair an adverb with an adjective.

Or we could have an official list, to pick from at leisure

outrageously domineering
nefariously autocratic
obscenely power-bloated

The possibilities are endless! :D

Totalitarian Nazi Commie Islamo-Fasci-tyranno-luni-dictatorial Black-shirt Schutzstaffel stormtrooper Mussolini Francisco Franco dickhead bastards!

That's a long insult...

They are a bunch of yeasty, rump-fed canker-blossoms. A group of gnarling, shag-eared nut-hooks. I'd even go so far to say that they are churlish clay-brained jack-a-napes.


Yay for Shakespearean insults.

Ante-diluvian enforcers of a banal, synergistic doctrine!!!

ANd they have stinky faces!

Draconian!

That's the word I forgot.

Seeing as the incompetent mods deleted the last one I'll ask this question again: Why dont conservatives working in adoption agencies who dont like gays adopting just go find a job that would be more fitting to their faith?

What makes you so sure its these "conservatives'" faith that makes them not "like gays?" Stereotype much? And if anything the mods are more "incompetent" for letting this sorry excuse of a thread exist than for deleting the last. :p

You need to refer to the experts...

Vaklavia: (shouting) What do you want?
Mod: Well I was told outside ...
Vaklavia: Don't give me that you snotty-faced heap of parrot droppings!
Mod: What!?
Vaklavia: Shut your festering gob you tit! Your type makes me puke! You vacuous toffee-nosed malodorous pervert!

<_<

How about "and I want him brought right here, with a big ribbon on his head. And, I want to look him strait in the eye and tell him: what a cheap, lyiny, no good, rotten, four-flushing, low-life, snake-licking, dirt-eating, inbred, overstuffed, ignorant, bloodsucking, dog-kissing, brainless, dickless, hopeless, heartless, fat-assed, bug-eyed, stiff-legged, spotty-lipped, worm-headed sack of monkey bleep he is! Hallelujah! Holy bleep! Where's the Tylenol?"

http://www.moviewavs.com/php/sounds/?id=gog&media=WAVS&type=Movies&movie=National_Lampoons_Christmas_Vacation&quote=myboss.txt&file=myboss.wav

Best rant ever!

They are a bunch of yeasty, rump-fed canker-blossoms. A group of gnarling, shag-eared nut-hooks. I'd even go so far to say that they are churlish clay-brained jack-a-napes.


Yay for Shakespearean insults.

ah, but do you bite your thumb at them?

Rolling squid;13585547']ah, but do you bite your thumb at them?

I do bite my thumb sir, but not at them.

Rolling squid;13585547']ah, but do you bite your thumb at them?

I do, my friend. I do.


of course, few historical insults are as colorful as "nappy-headed hos"

I do bite my thumb sir, but not at them.

do you quarrel sir?

They are a bunch of yeasty, rump-fed canker-blossoms. A group of gnarling, shag-eared nut-hooks. I'd even go so far to say that they are churlish clay-brained jack-a-napes.


Yay for Shakespearean insults.

Yea, verily -- thou art the non pareil. :)

Rolling squid;13585643']do you quarrel sir?

Quarrel sir! No, sir.

But if you do, sir, I am for you. I serve as good a man as you.

But if you do, sir, I am for you. I serve as good a man as you.

We few, we happy few, we band of brothers.
For he today that sheds his blood with me
Shall be my brother; be he ne'er so vile,
This day shall gentle his condition.
And gentlemen in the real world, now a-bed,
Shall think themselves accursed they were not here;
And hold their manhoods cheap, whiles any speaks
That fought with us upon NSG

But if you do, sir, I am for you. I serve as good a man as you.

Though you bite so sharp at reasons, you are so empty of them.

Ooh, here's a good one. Shakespeare's 'your mom' insult. Thy mother's name is ominous to children. Ominous to children! Oh snaps.

What a piece of work is a man, how noble in reason, how
infinite in faculties, in form and moving how express and
admirable, in action how like an angel, in apprehension how like
a god! the beauty of the world, the paragon of animals—and yet,
to me, what is this quintessence of dust?

Quarrel sir! No, sir.

but you do bite your thumb.

But if you do, sir, I am for you. I serve as good a man as you.

No better.


Shakespeare spamming with an English teacher......thank Gore for the interwebs

How dare you distract us from the true task of the thread, which is to insult the mods, those dastardly defenders of psychic transrelational gender modes!

How dare you distract us from the true task of the thread, which is to insult the mods, those dastardly defenders of psychic transrelational gender modes!

Fishmongers, the whole lot of them!

Op vs. Mods: http://www.guzer.com/videos/family_guy_bully.php

:D

C'mon. If you're going to go for insulting Mods, at least be somewhat creative. There are plenty of good options.

Tyrannically overscrupulous wannabe royalty, perhaps. Or humourlessly pretentious forum enforcers.

Mix it up and make it interesting.

You are a dreadfully unseemly lout and a vacuous, simple-minded tasteless amalgam of dross, drivel and malarkey.

C'mon. If you're going to go for insulting Mods, at least be somewhat creative. There are plenty of good options.

Tyrannically overscrupulous wannabe royalty, perhaps. Or humourlessly pretentious forum enforcers.

Mix it up and make it interesting.
Ah, the de Bergerac defense! Touche! (yes, I know I don't know how to do an accent grave).
edit to add: just read the rest of the thread, and ponder why you went off on somebody's Bacon instead of Rostand?