NationStates Jolt Archive


The Car of Tomorrow

Wilgrove
14-03-2008, 04:16
So the 2008 season is the season where the Car of Tomorrow (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Car_of_Tomorrow) are racing full time on the Nascar racing circuit. The car boost safety feature that was the head of seven years of reasearch after the death of Dale Earnhardt Sr.

The driver's seat has been moved four inches to the right, the roll cage has been shifted three inches to the rear, and the car is two inches taller and four inches wider.[2] Larger crumple zones are built into the car on both sides, ensuring even more protection. The splitter is a piece of fiber reinforced plastic (FRP) used on the bottom front of the car to produce downforce, replacing the valence. The car's exhaust runs through the body, and exits on the right side, which diverts heat away from the driver.[2] The fuel cell is stronger, and has a smaller capacity (17¾ gallons, down from 22 gallons, which as of 2007 has become standard in all cars).

The car is also less aerodynamic with the windshield being higher, detached spoiler, also the front of the car is more box-like and a lower grill. The COT has now become standards for all cars, which means the only difference between a Ford and a Chevy on the racing circuit is the sticker and decals.

So, for those of us who watches these races, what do you think of the Car of Tomorrow? Do you like it, hate it, or indifference? As for me, I don't know, I liked the difference in body style between the cars, which made the races interesting, and used to spark discussion on whether or not it really made a difference if a driver drove a Chevy or Ford. Also, I think part of the reason Nascar implemented the COTs (beside better safety feature) is to make the races more tight and more competitive. I'll give the COTs a season to see if it's any better than the old car style.
Tongass
14-03-2008, 05:33
I guess I don't get the whole point of Nascar in the first place. Stock car racing with of cars that aren't exactly stock. It mixes the crappy parts or all kinds of other sports.

edit- so my point is - on what standards are we supposed to be judging the COT?
Wilgrove
14-03-2008, 06:46
I guess I don't get the whole point of Nascar in the first place. Stock car racing with of cars that aren't exactly stock. It mixes the crappy parts or all kinds of other sports.

edit- so my point is - on what standards are we supposed to be judging the COT?

The way they used to race before they introduced the COT, and I guess whether or not you want a close race or not. Personally I like seeing the different style of cars mixed in with different set ups that they have running on the car. The chance to see which body style works best with a certain set up of the car is something I like looking into.
Cannot think of a name
14-03-2008, 06:55
They tried to reduce the instance of 'the big one' by reducing draft so that the cars wouldn't bunch up on the super speedways. Watching the last race that seems to be the case, the cars were spread way the hell out.

It's a balance though, because in my mind the only strength NASCAR had was close racing where any one of ten to fifteen cars could win it and the finishes more often than not came down to the wire. If the COT prevents that, it's hard to find a reason for me to watch NASCAR, and as it is it's only if I can't find any other racing going on.

However, tube frame silhouette racers running pushrod V8s? Sounds like the Car of Twenty Years Ago...
Cameroi
14-03-2008, 08:26
the only REAL "car of tomarow" is the perry people mover. that narrowgauge tram thing that runs on energy stored in a big flywheel.

=^^=
.../\...
Lunatic Goofballs
14-03-2008, 08:49
Less crashes. The only thing I liked about NASCAR was the crashes. :(

Maybe they can make the cars explode on contact instead. :)
Posi
14-03-2008, 10:33
Redneck.

Now that I got that out of the way, I think the Car of Tomorrow kinda missing its point if the Chevy team is still driving Chevy's.
Longhaul
14-03-2008, 14:29
Dammit, boooo to your misleading thread title... I want my flying car! :(

Btw Wilgrove... are you aware that almost all your OPs open with the word "so"? (just curious).
Philosopy
14-03-2008, 14:33
Dammit, boooo to your misleading thread title... I want my flying car! :(

Cars today are already built with flying technology, they just don't want to tell them about us because of the great oil price conspiracy. Take your car to a high cliff, though, and drive off at high speed, and you'll start to fly. Trust me. :)

Btw Wilgrove... are you aware that almost all your OPs open with the word "so"? (just curious).

So they do. :p

I am indifference
Greetings, indifference.