NationStates Jolt Archive

Okay, this one came to thought from watching South Park last night. Yes, I´m sorry, it´s probably stupid for some of you but there was nothing better on! Lol.

The cure of Aids.
When Discovered, should it be used to everyone?
For me, it shouldn´t. Maybe to those who were born with this disease, but not to those who have been unfaithful. I´d be a true hypocrite if I say that you should wait until marriage because.. come on, >_>. ANYWHO, I guess to gays it could be allowed too, but it´s their fault also that they go around too much, just like everyone else.

But..this is just me, thinking. Sorry if it came out too short, I got a writer´s block and suddenly I started thinking henta-- er.. Cartoons <////<

What the hell is this?

Seriously, I've read this like five times and I think it's basically "Hi, if you have AIDS you deserve it except you probably don't maybe, also I like South Park and hentai ^______^"

No offense guy, but what exactly are you trying to say here? Am I right or wrong?

When Discovered, should it be used to everyone?

Of course not. Using a cure on everyone would be a tremendous waste of resources (if it were a vaccine that'd be different). We shouldn't use a cure for HIV on everyone. Just those who have HIV.

For me, it shouldn´t. Maybe to those who were born with this disease, but not to those who have been unfaithful. I´d be a true hypocrite if I say that you should wait until marriage because.. come on, >_>. ANYWHO, I guess to gays it could be allowed too, but it´s their fault also that they go around too much, just like everyone else.

....riiiiight. Tell you what, of those seven voices, ONE of them must have a good idea. Find that one and listen to it.

Why should someone whose been 'unfaithful' and sleeping around - hetrosexual or homosexual - be unworthy of a cure for any sexually transmitted disease?

yes how dare they be victims of circumstance! why they should just be left to die horrifically because you can actually deserve that :rolleyes:

are you not getting any at the moment or something?

What the hell is this?
The phrase 'brain fart' springs to mind.

The phrase 'brain fart' springs to mind.

oh is that why this thread smells like that?

oh is that why this thread smells like that?
Nah, that's because I just went.

Some people don't deserve to get the cure, they did get the disease out of their own stupidity.

However, we have to cure them for the sake of everybody who could pottentially get`AIDs from these people.

Some people don't deserve to get the cure, they did get the disease out of their own stupidity.

However, we have to cure them for the sake of everybody who could pottentially get`AIDs from these people.

I love it when people who talk about idiots make such huge mistakes. Pray tell, how do you "get" AIDS (and spell it right damn it) from anybody? Are you under the impression that somebody can give you AIDS?

Some people don't deserve to get the cure, they did get the disease out of their own stupidity.

Since when was it necessary not to get a disease because of your own stupidity before you could be treated? Are we going to let people who smoke die of lung cancer? Let people with diabetes II die because they ate to much sugar? Let people who had a car accident die because they drove to fast? Or only people who got AIDS because obviously if you get something because you had SEX (:o) you deserve to die a horrible death...

Are you under the impression that somebody can give you AIDS?

you get it from staring lustfully at attractive men/women and thus making a pact with the devil!

yes, God has aids and if your not careful he will impregnate you too!

you get it from staring lustfully at attractive men/women and thus making a pact with the devil!



Source?


;):p

Some people don't deserve to get the cure, they did get the disease out of their own stupidity.
When I was little, I went too close to someone with the Chicken Pox. Now I have recurring shingles which requires expensive antiviral drugs to treat (acyclovir). Tell me, why should I be any more worthy of a cure for a disease I caught than anybody else?

The cure of Aids.
When Discovered, should it be used to everyone?
No. it should only be used on those with AIDS.

Why would you give the cure to someone who doesn't have the disease?

Source?

I was going to find you an image to experiment with but I'm not sure I want too

plus Sawyer (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/e8/SawyerABC.jpg) (who women say is attractive) is ugly what the hell is wrong with women?!

Of course not. Using a cure on everyone would be a tremendous waste of resources (if it were a vaccine that'd be different). We shouldn't use a cure for HIV on everyone. Just those who have HIV.

This makes a lot of sense. Lets do this when we find the cure for HIV.

I have the cure for the common cold, but I'm sure as hell not giving it to anyone who went outside in winter without a hat. Or touched a doorknob. Those bastards deserved what they got.

Okay, this one came to thought from watching South Park last night. Yes, I´m sorry, it´s probably stupid for some of you but there was nothing better on! Lol.

The cure of Aids.
When Discovered, should it be used to everyone?
For me, it shouldn´t. Maybe to those who were born with this disease, but not to those who have been unfaithful. I´d be a true hypocrite if I say that you should wait until marriage because.. come on, >_>. ANYWHO, I guess to gays it could be allowed too, but it´s their fault also that they go around too much, just like everyone else.

But..this is just me, thinking. Sorry if it came out too short, I got a writer´s block and suddenly I started thinking henta-- er.. Cartoons <////<

why in the world would you have a morals test for medical treatment?

why in the world would you have a morals test for medical treatment?

Morality is a genetic thing. If we deny the immoral the right to medical care the immorality gene will die off and we'll live in a glorious moral utopia.

Morality is a genetic thing. If we deny the immoral the right to medical care the immorality gene will die off and we'll live in a glorious moral utopia.

damn. why didnt i think of that?

Okay, this one came to thought from watching South Park last night. Yes, I´m sorry, it´s probably stupid for some of you but there was nothing better on! Lol.

The cure of Aids.
When Discovered, should it be used to everyone?
For me, it shouldn´t. Maybe to those who were born with this disease, but not to those who have been unfaithful. I´d be a true hypocrite if I say that you should wait until marriage because.. come on, >_>. ANYWHO, I guess to gays it could be allowed too, but it´s their fault also that they go around too much, just like everyone else.

But..this is just me, thinking. Sorry if it came out too short, I got a writer´s block and suddenly I started thinking henta-- er.. Cartoons <////<

And the stupid will inherit the earth. So what you going to do with it?

And the stupid will inherit the earth. So what you going to do with it?

now that was an Unnecessary thing to post. :p

damn. why didnt i think of that?

You must be one of the filthy immoral heathens.

You must be one of the filthy immoral heathens.

at least i dont have aids?

at least i dont have aids?

... :confused: why the question mark?

at least i dont have aids?

Not yet, but if you ever get it you won't be getting any cure. That'll teach you not to get aids again.

... :confused: why the question mark?

it reads better that way

Not yet, but if you ever get it you won't be getting any cure. That'll teach you not to get aids again.

as long as it improve the morality of the gene pool who am i to complain about not getting aids?

you're a moron

Okay, this one came to thought from watching South Park last night. Yes, I´m sorry, it´s probably stupid for some of you but there was nothing better on! Lol.

The cure of Aids.
When Discovered, should it be used to everyone?
For me, it shouldn´t. Maybe to those who were born with this disease, but not to those who have been unfaithful. I´d be a true hypocrite if I say that you should wait until marriage because.. come on, >_>. ANYWHO, I guess to gays it could be allowed too, but it´s their fault also that they go around too much, just like everyone else.

But..this is just me, thinking. Sorry if it came out too short, I got a writer´s block and suddenly I started thinking henta-- er.. Cartoons <////<

Okay, this one came to thought from watching South Park last night. Yes, I´m sorry, it´s probably stupid for some of you but there was nothing better on! Lol.

The cure of Aids.
When Discovered, should it be used to everyone?
For me, it shouldn´t. Maybe to those who were born with this disease, but not to those who have been unfaithful. I´d be a true hypocrite if I say that you should wait until marriage because.. come on, >_>. ANYWHO, I guess to gays it could be allowed too, but it´s their fault also that they go around too much, just like everyone else.

But..this is just me, thinking. Sorry if it came out too short, I got a writer´s block and suddenly I started thinking henta-- er.. Cartoons <////<

Delusional psychopath...

Okay, this one came to thought from watching South Park last night. Yes, I´m sorry, it´s probably stupid for some of you but there was nothing better on! Lol.

The cure of Aids.
When Discovered, should it be used to everyone?
For me, it shouldn´t. Maybe to those who were born with this disease, but not to those who have been unfaithful. I´d be a true hypocrite if I say that you should wait until marriage because.. come on, >_>. ANYWHO, I guess to gays it could be allowed too, but it´s their fault also that they go around too much, just like everyone else.

But..this is just me, thinking. Sorry if it came out too short, I got a writer´s block and suddenly I started thinking henta-- er.. Cartoons <////<

You fail at life.

Although the noob does have a really terrible idea, flaming it won't achieve anything.

But....but.... without HIV, what's gonna stop people from engaging in sin like promiscuity and drug use?

Hell, that's why the Vatican developed it in the first place! [/conspiracy theory] :p

Okay, this one came to thought from watching South Park last night. Yes, I´m sorry, it´s probably stupid for some of you but there was nothing better on! Lol.

The cure of Aids.
When Discovered, should it be used to everyone?
For me, it shouldn´t. Maybe to those who were born with this disease, but not to those who have been unfaithful. I´d be a true hypocrite if I say that you should wait until marriage because.. come on, >_>. ANYWHO, I guess to gays it could be allowed too, but it´s their fault also that they go around too much, just like everyone else.

But..this is just me, thinking. Sorry if it came out too short, I got a writer´s block and suddenly I started thinking henta-- er.. Cartoons <////<

Wow...even I find this repulsive.

Of course not. Using a cure on everyone would be a tremendous waste of resources (if it were a vaccine that'd be different). We shouldn't use a cure for HIV on everyone. Just those who have HIV.

Oh, so it's not okay to discriminate against teh gheys, but it's okay to discriminate against people who don't have HIV? I guess you'd deny antibiotics to people who don't have bacterial infections, too!

plus Sawyer (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/e8/SawyerABC.jpg) (who women say is attractive) is ugly what the hell is wrong with women?!

Hey now! I know this forum is free to debate opinions on homosexuality and abortion and religion in the schools and stuff, but there are some things that are SACRED, dammit!

it reads better that way
i think it reads better this way?

But....but.... without HIV, what's gonna stop people from engaging in sin like promiscuity and drug use?

Hell, that's why the Vatican developed it in the first place! [/conspiracy theory] :p

They're working on anti-sin bombs. Works kind of like matter and anti-matter. When anti-sin touches sin, there's a huge release of energy. No more sinner :).

it reads better that way

oh, for a minute there, I though you were still awaiting the results of the test. [/jking] :p

But....but.... without HIV, what's gonna stop people from engaging in sin like promiscuity and drug use?

Hell, that's why the Vatican developed it in the first place! [/conspiracy theory] :p

Goooooooooo LG!!!:D

yes how dare they be victims of circumstance! why they should just be left to die horrifically because you can actually deserve that :rolleyes:

are you not getting any at the moment or something?

well he is thinking of "cartoons" right now, so I doubt it.

But....but.... without HIV, what's gonna stop people from engaging in sin like promiscuity and drug use?

Hell, that's why the Vatican developed it in the first place! [/conspiracy theory] :p

We all know that it was YOU, LG that created t3h AIDS...and you're planning on weaponizing it into pie form aren't you, AREN'T YOU!...unless...LG IS THE POPE!



As an aside...would it even be possible to weaponize AIDS?

Okay, this one came to thought from watching South Park last night. Yes, I´m sorry, it´s probably stupid for some of you but there was nothing better on! Lol.

The cure of Aids.
When Discovered, should it be used to everyone?
For me, it shouldn´t. Maybe to those who were born with this disease, but not to those who have been unfaithful. I´d be a true hypocrite if I say that you should wait until marriage because.. come on, >_>. ANYWHO, I guess to gays it could be allowed too, but it´s their fault also that they go around too much, just like everyone else.

But..this is just me, thinking. Sorry if it came out too short, I got a writer´s block and suddenly I started thinking henta-- er.. Cartoons <////<

This is what happens when you watch South Park and AIDS...
http://content.ytmnd.com/content/2/1/2/2126422d3ee368934d8e86a8d5d1fe6e.jpg

No. it should only be used on those with AIDS.

Why would you give the cure to someone who doesn't have the disease?

Obviously, unless it was a vaccine in which it would be given to everyone and hopefully AIDS would be wiped out(almost) like smallpox or pollio.

You can't leave people to a horrible death because they were a bit dumb. Besides that if somebody sleeps around a bit and uses all the necessary precautions and then gets HIV/AIDs then why shouldn't they have access to a cure, again it's this unhealthy attitude to sex. Sex is not a shameful, evil or dirty thing. If I want an open relationship or lots of threesomes I should be allowed to especially if there was a cure for AIDs, the only reason not to is STDs and ugly people...obviously, but if they were removed (preferably STDs over ugly people lol) then hey sexual revolution here we come.

The primary cure should be focused on pre-emptive vaccinations, and vaccinations which target the HIV virus. Get it before it mutates; stop it in its tracks. Once we can protect the majority, then with what we know, we can save the minority.

No one should be excluded or denied it, but priority should be given to protect those who may potentially get it and those who contracted it but haven't had it develop into AIDS.

The OP has certainly been ignorant with their first post, but he/she doesn't deserve these many attacks. At the very least, I know you people are capable of being polite.

And besides, OP right, everybody knows that teh gays are worse than the terrorists, cause my congress women sez so!

We all know that it was YOU, LG that created t3h AIDS...and you're planning on weaponizing it into pie form aren't you, AREN'T YOU!

Silly. I want MORE promiscuity, not less.

Now if a disease ever rears it's ugly head that can only be cured by complete sexual exhaustion... ...that happens to be weaponized in pie form...

...but perhaps I've said to much. Nevermind.

:)

Okay, this one came to thought from watching South Park last night. Yes, I´m sorry, it´s probably stupid for some of you but there was nothing better on! Lol.

The cure of Aids.
When Discovered, should it be used to everyone?
For me, it shouldn´t. Maybe to those who were born with this disease, but not to those who have been unfaithful. I´d be a true hypocrite if I say that you should wait until marriage because.. come on, >_>. ANYWHO, I guess to gays it could be allowed too, but it´s their fault also that they go around too much, just like everyone else.

But..this is just me, thinking. Sorry if it came out too short, I got a writer´s block and suddenly I started thinking henta-- er.. Cartoons <////<

so...in other words... you smoke crack?

so...in other words... you smoke crack?

Well, he is crazy, granted... but going as far as saying he's smokes crack? Nah. He just always has a natural high.:D

anyone afflicted with a disease should get the cure,if available.

Regardless of their behavior.

If a cure exists,any victims should get it and deal with thier behavior seprately.

No. it should only be used on those with AIDS.

Why would you give the cure to someone who doesn't have the disease?

Who knows what sort of hallucinogenic effects it might have? ;)

Obviously, unless it was a vaccine in which it would be given to everyone and hopefully AIDS would be wiped out(almost) like smallpox or pollio.
yep. but the OP didn't mention vaccine... only a cure.

and I wonder if the OP ever took into account those who contract AIDS via tainted blood transfusion...

guess not...

Who knows what sort of hallucinogenic effects it might have? ;)

well, 'THEY' wouldn't be giving the drug... but others would be taking it... biiig difference. :p

yep. but the OP didn't mention vaccine... only a cure.

and I wonder if the OP ever took into account those who contract AIDS via tainted blood transfusion...

guess not...



well, 'THEY' wouldn't be giving the drug... but others would be taking it... biiig difference. :p

You are aware that the OP concocted this thread from watching a South Park episode, right? An episode where Cartman contracts AIDS and infects Kyle. And the only cure for it is to inject large amounts of pure money into the bloodstream in order to cure the virus. You do know that, eventhough he raises a valid question: Must we give the cure to everyone?, his backbone is nevertheless, a South Park episode? How serious can you that this?:rolleyes:

You are aware that the OP concocted this thread from watching a South Park episode, right? An episode where Cartman contracts AIDS and infects Kyle. And the only cure for it is to inject large amounts of pure money into the bloodstream in order to cure the virus. You do know that, eventhough he raises a valid question: Must we give the cure to everyone?, his backbone is nevertheless, a South Park episode? How serious can you that this?:rolleyes:

yes I do know that, even tho I did miss that episode of South Park. :p

Well, he is crazy, granted... but going as far as saying he's smokes crack? Nah. He just always has a natural high.:D

I see.


To be random here, you know what would suck? Let's say the word "life" became a new name for an illegal drug. So, one day, you get pulled over by the cops and they ask you if are using any drugs. You reply, "I'm only high on life, officer." They immediately book you for illegal drug usage.

yes I do know that, even tho I did miss that episode of South Park. :p

I couldn't watch it either.:p But I did listened to it from my office room at home while Seven Moons watched it.:D

I see.


To be random here, you know what would suck? Let's say the word "life" became a new name for an illegal drug. So, one day, you get pulled over by the cops and they ask you if are using any drugs. You reply, "I'm only high on life, officer." They immediately book you for illegal drug usage.

That would suck, yeah, but it would be hilarious.:D

The cure should be used on anybody who has AIDS. However, judgmental homophobic assholes should only be permitted to receive their treatments from gay doctors or nurses.

However, judgmental homophobic assholes should only be permitted to receive their treatments from gay doctors or nurses.

LMAO!!

@OP

...did you miss the point of the South Park episode?