NationStates Jolt Archive

http://christianparty.net/intro.htm

Among other things, these guys want to:
Repeal the 19th Amendment
Exile all blacks to Africa

Now, if we could just get them to have a fight to the death with WBC...

But until then, I recommend that we all sign the guestbook as our nation names, with NSG as our homepage. Show them that they are the enemies of NationStates General!

http://christianparty.net/intro.htm

Among other things, these guys want to:
Repeal the 19th Amendment
Exile all blacks to Africa

Now, if we could just get them to have a fight to the death with WBC...
THUNDERDOME!!!!

Two nuts go in, one nut comes out

But until then, I recommend that we all sign the guestbook as our nation names, with NSG as our homepage. Show them that they are the enemies of NationStates General!
I don't think that's a good idea.

On the other hand, that site is HILARIOUS! It's like the Grand Central Station of every Crazy Train currently running. There's a lot of good material for us to work with there.

NEW: Christian Party World Wide Web Site wins the coveted Moran Award!!

"Next we have the Moran Award. This is the site that is so 'moranic' and extremist that you just have to view it for yourself. The winner of this one is:
http://christianparty.net/intro.htm"

This there on the front page says parody to me.

It's a parody, if not a particularly funny one.

We are NSG
We are...well, legion's stretching it I suppose, a gaggle?
We do not...

...oh look, shiny things

This there on the front page says parody to me.No, they're actually for real.

This there on the front page says parody to me.
Read deeper. It could be a parody site, but if it is, it's an elaborate one, and they forgot the punchline. These loons compile Holocaust denial, racism, gay hatred, misogyny, anti-Semitism, and all the related conspiracy theories into one big package. That alone makes it seem like they are heading towards parody, but there's nothing that hints at an actual joke, and they went to an awful lot of trouble to compile their insane "proofs."

These guys are indeed a joke, but I have a feeling there's a chance they don't know it.

Burn thew witches! No feminism! Blacklist the feminazis..... sorry they brainwashed me, i tryed to contact them and call em idiots but this occured.

http://www.bombshock.com/fronts/spiral.gif

Then they handed me Shiny things (http://www.dansdata.com/images/phototute/screwsgrey260.jpg).

I tried to sign their guestbook as the Dark Republic of Mirkana, but their verification system is screwy.

Not that I expected a bunch of nutjobs to be able to run a decent website.

If you check their comments, you'll notice that most of them are not nice.

Anyway, we don't need numbers. We have LG.

Read deeper. It could be a parody site, but if it is, it's an elaborate one, and they forgot the punchline. These loons compile Holocaust denial, racism, gay hatred, misogyny, anti-Semitism, and all the related conspiracy theories into one big package. That alone makes it seem like they are heading towards parody, but there's nothing that hints at an actual joke, and they went to an awful lot of trouble to compile their insane "proofs."

These guys are indeed a joke, but I have a feeling there's a chance they don't know it.To be fair, it isn't really holocaust denial, seeing as the claim the holocaust was both an elaborate excuse for moving Jews into concentration camps so they wouldn't be killed by allied bombing as well as that no Jews were sent to the concentration camps, but instead innocent Christians were killed. Technically not denying that it happened, merely who did what to whom.

"NEW: Christian Party World Wide Web Site wins the coveted Moran Award!!

"Next we have the Moran Award. This is the site that is so 'moranic' and extremist that you just have to view it for yourself. The winner of this one is:
http://christianparty.net/intro.htm""


The fact that they have this linking to their own page surely means it is a joke.

WTF ??

http://christianparty.net/forum/yaf_postst55_Comments-from-those-who-completed-the-Black-Exile-Poll.aspx
http://christianparty.net/forum/yaf_postst45_the-smartest-jew-in-the-whole-wide-worldnever-even-passed-algebra.aspx

ONE 19 months ago my son and I were ripped apart by the feminazis/Gestapo-like witch-hunters at the Child "Protective" Services here in Ventura COunty, CA. Since then I have spent $30,000+ to merely right the mistaken idea that I molested my own son, which he and I have vehemently denied from the get-go. I have filed bankruptcy as a result of this - this, from having owned three homes in my life. My ex, who has been described as having "paranoid ideations", is somewhat of a lunatic, though probably not certifiable. All she had to do was say it happened, and my son and I have had to pay for his little peccadillo. There was a law signed by our governor in August, leveling a removal-of-custody from a parent who falsely accuses another of abuse. I don't know if it's retroactive or not, but when it comes into law on january 1 you bet your bottom dollar I'm going to be on it like ugly on an ape. I was judged guilty from the beginning even though there were gaping holes in the prossecutions stories. I was not allowed to even talk with my son on the phone for 10 months, not see him for one (and then under constant supervision), and forced to pay over $600/month in support monies to (obviously) my ex on an income of $1800/month. If any of this is helpful, so be it. If you need any more help, except monetarily, please let me know. Good, good luck in your endeavors.




lolz.

The Bible is unequivocal about the role of the father in the family, the role of the family in society, and the responsibility of children to families and society. It describes in every way the responsibility of a Christian in society, the role of a wife and mother, the meaning of the Ten Commandments, and the tyranny of anti-Christian courts.



God warned us 2 millennia ago not to take our cause before "infidels", not to practice "idolatry" (feminism), not to worship the goddess of sex, not to commit murder and adultery, that feminism is blasphemy and generally how to create a society which fears and worships God.

Super lolz.

Our Christian Forefathers relied heavily on the ability of the Holy Bible to maintain social order while the Constitution focused on restricting the raw power of government.


Ahhh...I love it when people show a complete lack of knowledge of both history and the founding fathers. Uber lolz.

It's a parody, if not a particularly funny one.

Agreed.

This there on the front page says parody to me.

:sniper: i will kill all your enemys i think you rock as a country owner :)

*Throws a shoe at Laerod for that unnecessary, misleading, and pain-in-the-ass sidebar* No, they are Holocaust deniers.
Didn't finish reading the comments, didja? :p
Or maybe they got rid of it...
Anyway, when I first stumbled on these nutcases, one of the comments on the whole "Christian Holocaust" thing called them deniers, to which the woman that wrote the article gave a riled response about how they're not denying it happened, but that they and their relatives are the real victims.

Give me a P-A-R-O-D-Y!

What does it spell?

WTF! You woke me up for this? GTFO! :p

I don't think it's parody. There's too much hate here.

The clincher is when they try to attack the Talmud and bring a list of purportedly real Talmudic quotes, ones I have seen elsewhere. Given that nearly all of the quotes go against everything I know about Judaism, they are probably falsified or mistranslated then taken out of context.

It COULD be a parody, but it isn't a good one.

I really don't see how it can be a parody. Much of it is in breathtakingly poor taste (which I admit is not conclusive - satire can be pretty edgy) but also, more importantly, it's boring. If it's supposed to be funny, why does it go into such minute detail to prop up its ludicrous claims?

[Following a quick bit of research]
Sad to tell, the Fathers Manifesto appears to be a real organisation, run by a bloke (apparently) called John Knight, based in California.

Oh for fucks sake, I really don't want to know. I fear I might punch a random innocent person in the face if I continue looking through that site.

Reading that thread, I am thinking about something. What's exactly a hispanic?

http://christianparty.net/intro.htm

Among other things, these guys want to:
Repeal the 19th Amendment
Exile all blacks to Africa

Now, if we could just get them to have a fight to the death with WBC...

But until then, I recommend that we all sign the guestbook as our nation names, with NSG as our homepage. Show them that they are the enemies of NationStates General!

I looked at that site and left with the impression that this was a gag site.

Poe's Law: a person parodying a religious extremist is indistinguishable from a genuine religious extremist.

But until then, I recommend that we all sign the guestbook as our nation names, with NSG as our homepage. Show them that they are the enemies of NationStates General!
NYPA. Sorry. Though it's definitely very silly.

We are NSG
We are...well, legion's stretching it I suppose, a gaggle?
We do not...

...oh look, shiny things

:fluffle:

Reading that thread, I am thinking about something. What's exactly a hispanic?

Term used to describe people of Spanish descent, usually those people in Mexico, South and Central America, and some Caribbean islands. Used in the same way "White" would be used to describe Caucasion people.

You'd be considered hispanic.

This is just sad. And by sad, I mean pathetic.

Term used to describe people of Spanish descent, usually those people in Mexico, South and Central America, and some Caribbean islands. Used in the same way "White" would be used to describe Caucasion people.

You'd be considered hispanic.

Even although my skin is more white than several whites I know?

So race sometimes go around skin color, and sometimes it is about language? Or nationality?

Well, spanish colonists placed it simple, it was by skin color only.

You people and your complexes...

Well, that kind of people and their complexes.

Reading that thread, I am thinking about something. What's exactly a hispanic?
Someone who speaks Spanish and is foreign to the US is usually enough to be considered Hispanic, especially if they look slightly tanned.

Even although my skin is more white than several whites I know?

So race sometimes go around skin color, and sometimes it is about language? Or nationality?

Well, spanish colonists placed it simple, it was by skin color only.

You people and your complexes...

Well, that kind of people and their complexes.

Yeah, it's confusing. Despite my pasty-Irish white skin, I've once been called an Indian(as in, American Indian/Native American/whatever term you want to use) by someone when they found out I had a couple Cherokee ancestors.

Really, though, from what I can tell nowadays the terms are tossed around simply as useful identifiers and nothing more.

But generally it is more about skin colour than anything else. Though nationality can sometimes factor in, you'll note that Americans will often use terms like Hispanic to refer to people not from the nations commonly considered Hispanic by nationality, such as those from Venezuala, or Chile. (I think I heard about a Spaniard being called Hispanic at least once, which I thought was kind of funny.)

Yeah, it's confusing. Despite my pasty-Irish white skin, I've once been called an Indian(as in, American Indian/Native American/whatever term you want to use) by someone when they found out I had a couple Cherokee ancestors.

Really, though, from what I can tell nowadays the terms are tossed around simply as useful identifiers and nothing more.

But generally it is more about skin colour than anything else. Though nationality can sometimes factor in, you'll note that Americans will often use terms like Hispanic to refer to people not from the nations commonly considered Hispanic by nationality, such as those from Venezuela, or Chile. (I think I heard about a Spaniard being called Hispanic at least once, which I thought was kind of funny.)


Yet I would understand if the term was of common use as a useful identifier and nothing more. Yet the other day I saw specific stadistics of the Federal Goverment of the US, and they used the term "hispanic" too. How can a term so vague be used officially?

I am more or less european white, and I am an spanish-venezuelan. Should I ever move to the US, would I be classified as a hispanic?

Which are the "people not from the nations commonly considered Hispanic by nationality"? Mexicans, Puertorricans, Dominicans?

Because people identify as it. If you check the box marked "Hispanic" on the census, you're considered Hispanic.

Point taken. I understand it now clearly.

On another note, what are the chances of someone coming along to defend these people and their beliefs?

Yet I would understand if the term was of common use as a useful identifier and nothing more. Yet the other day I saw specific stadistics of the Federal Goverment of the US, and they used the term "hispanic" too. How can a term so vague be used officially?

Because people identify as it. If you check the box marked "Hispanic" on the census, you're considered Hispanic.

"DC 101.2 x 585 = 592 AIDS deaths per year

x / 480,000 = 126 per 100k, x = 605 AIDS deaths per year in DC

Blacks = 384k

Hispanics = 35k

X = AIDS rate Hispanics

2X = AIDS rate of blacks

0.35X + (3.84 x 2X) = 592

8.03X = 592

X = 74

2X = 148

600,000 x 82% = 492,000 blacks

600,000 x 10% = 60,000 Hispanics, x 60 per 100k = 36 AIDS deaths per year for Hispanics

(605 - 36) / 492,000 = 115.7 AIDS deaths per year for blacks

6,000 blacks in North Dakota x 115.7 AIDS deaths per 100k = 7 AIDS deaths"


:mad:

Poe's Law: a person parodying a religious extremist is indistinguishable from a genuine religious extremist.

What has the world come to when we people cannot make this distinction?

Maybe it's the political party of the Landover Baptist Church?

that can't be real, surely?


please say its not.....