Who would win?
Alversia
02-01-2008, 19:55
Basically, I'm wondering which one of three supermen would win a straight fight. No weapons, just skill and intuition. Who do you think?
Boonytopia
02-01-2008, 23:32
Bond for me.
Lunatic Goofballs
02-01-2008, 23:34
Basically, I'm wondering which one of three supermen would win a straight fight. No weapons, just skill and intuition. Who do you think?
John McClane. Why? Because he has something the other don't have: AN infinite supply of nature-defying luck. :)
Alversia
02-01-2008, 23:34
John McClane. Why? Because he has something the other don't have: AN infinite supply of nature-defying luck. :)
And there was me thinking Jason Bourne could just beat them using Skill
The Parkus Empire
02-01-2008, 23:36
John McClane. Why? Because he has something the other don't have: AN infinite supply of nature-defying luck. :)
In contrasts to Bond's supply of gadgets he does not stand a snowball's chance in hell.
In contrasts to Bond's supply of gadgets he does not stand a snowball's chance in hell.No weapons though. I'm sure gadgets count.
However, Bond is still probably going to win.
Lunatic Goofballs
02-01-2008, 23:43
And there was me thinking Jason Bourne could just beat them using Skill
Luck > Skill.
*nod*
Luck > Skill.
*nod*Yes, but Bond has both luck and skill. Luck + Skill > Luck alone.
Mad hatters in jeans
03-01-2008, 00:05
I choose to pick none of them because none of them are supermen, i mean where's superman? he'd win it first time, not that i'm into guys who wear their pants ontop of their trousers.
And John Mclane's an idiot, Bond is also an idiot but he has sex in every film, Bourne isn't quite an idiot but he's getting there.
New new nebraska
03-01-2008, 00:06
Ohhh tough one. Big Die Hard fan, John McClain is awesome, but so i Jaso Bourne. James Bond would lose terribly to both of them. Dunno. But its between McClain and Bourne.
Lunatic Goofballs
03-01-2008, 00:08
Yes, but Bond has both luck and skill. Luck + Skill > Luck alone.
Bond has some luck and some skill, true. But he doesn't have as much luck as McClane.
Luck*Luck > Luck*Skill.
Bond has some luck and some skill, true. But he doesn't have as much luck as McClane.
Luck*Luck > Luck*Skill.No, but he has the skill to help himself out when his luck runs out.
I suppose in the end, the winner will be determined by whomever writes the script. ;)
Alversia
03-01-2008, 00:18
Or the ending which would appeal to the most people to bring in the maximum profit for the film, hence you end up with beefy guys who do really dumb stuff and the ending seems inevitable from the first gunshot.
John McClane then
Mad hatters in jeans
03-01-2008, 00:19
No, but he has the skill to help himself out when his luck runs out.
I suppose in the end, the winner will be determined by whomever writes the script. ;)
Or the ending which would appeal to the most people to bring in the maximum profit for the film, hence you end up with beefy guys who do really dumb stuff and the ending seems inevitable from the first gunshot.
Hurdegaryp
03-01-2008, 01:27
James Bond is forever, it's that simple.
New Manvir
03-01-2008, 01:28
Lieutenant Frank Drebin (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naked_Gun)
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B00004U5SB.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
Lieutenant Frank Drebin (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naked_Gun)
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B00004U5SB.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
Winner!
Sel Appa
03-01-2008, 02:13
MacGyver
MacGyver
Thomas Magnum is superior.
Conserative Morality
03-01-2008, 03:21
Chuck Norris.
[NS]Click Stand
03-01-2008, 03:28
MacGyver
Without his random household appliances he is useless. The battle could swing however if both sides got a toaster.