NationStates Jolt Archive


Fijian children banned from entering New Zealand

Ariddia
20-12-2007, 16:33
Ten Fijian children have been banned from entering New Zealand for a Scout Jamboree in Christchurch, Pacific radio NiuFM reports.

They are the latest victims in an often erratic ban imposed by the government as part of its smart sanctions on Fiji's military regime.

Christchurch is this week hosting a regional Scout Jamboree including a 47-strong Fiji delegation.

Their leader, Ratu Meli Saukoro Yabakivou, told NiuFM that another 10 children were affected by the sanctions which ban people who have family in the military from coming to New Zealand.

Ratu Meli says it's unfortunate the children, aged from 10 to 13, have to pay for their parents or relatives affiliations with the military.

[...] Under the sanctions New Zealand banned a football goalkeeper whose girlfriend's father was in the military and two netballers. The Fiji Rugby Sevens side were denied transit visas enroute to Dubai, but the same group will be allowed to play in the Wellington Sevens next month.


(link (http://www.stuff.co.nz/4330923a11.html))


Green Foreign Affairs Spokesperson Keith Locke has expressed surprise at reports that our High Commission in Suva had tried to stop 10 Fijian boy-scouts from entering the country to attend a Scout Jamboree in Christchurch.

New Zealand Government sanctions ban members of Fiji's military Government and their families from entering the country.

Mr Locke says the government should "act with more common sense in its application of the ban".

"While the Green Party supports the travel restrictions on members of the military government, I don't think it was envisaged they would penalise kids as young as 10, in a larger scout group, not travelling with their parents.

"There is already a waver system embodied in the sanctions. Last month the Fijian Education Minister Netani Sukanaivalu was recently granted a waiver to attend a Pacific education conference in Auckland.

"Surely the young scouts are much more deserving of consideration that a Minister in the military Government. It seems small-minded to suggest that young school children should be held responsible for the actions of their parents.

"I suggest the Government apply a bit more fairness, and in the spirit of Christmas let the children come here and take part in the jamboree."


(link (http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA0712/S00483.htm))
Imperio Mexicano
20-12-2007, 16:39
Punishing children for actions of a military regime they have nothing to do with. :confused:

On an unrelated note, your threads are always interesting, Ariddia. It's good to see there are some people who are interested in, and care about, what happens in the developing world.
Corneliu 2
20-12-2007, 16:40
My opinion of NZ is going downwards.
Vaklavia
20-12-2007, 17:38
LOL @ Kiwis
Call to power
20-12-2007, 18:04
children capable of lighting fires is a rather scary situation to have I'd say :eek:

however I propose Fiji fight these sanctions with sanctions of there own!
Ariddia
20-12-2007, 20:43
Punishing children for actions of a military regime they have nothing to do with. :confused:

On an unrelated note, your threads are always interesting, Ariddia. It's good to see there are some people who are interested in, and care about, what happens in the developing world.

Thank you.

And yes, a strict application of New Zealand's policy has hit a rather absurd result...
Alexandrian Ptolemais
20-12-2007, 20:56
Punishing children for actions of a military regime they have nothing to do with. :confused:

On an unrelated note, your threads are always interesting, Ariddia. It's good to see there are some people who are interested in, and care about, what happens in the developing world.

Developing world; developing world. Are you suggesting that New Zealand is in the developing world?

Because if you are, you are completely and utterly wrong. We are in the developed world.
Imperio Mexicano
20-12-2007, 22:45
Developing world; developing world. Are you suggesting that New Zealand is in the developing world?

Because if you are, you are completely and utterly wrong. We are in the developed world.

New Zealand is very much in the developed world.

Fiji, on the other hand...
[NS]Rolling squid
20-12-2007, 22:53
*slaps new zeland* wow, this reminds me of this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bureaucracy_%28computer_game%29) a bit too much. One more example of thoughtless legislation.
The Novus
20-12-2007, 23:18
Excuse the idiocy, but why are they protesting about Fiji with the sanctions?
Skgorria
20-12-2007, 23:24
Erratic bans are the best :D :mp5:
The Novus
20-12-2007, 23:32
*shakes fist at Skgorria*
Jeruselem
20-12-2007, 23:33
Speaking of NZ - earthquake!
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/12/21/2124652.htm
Kryozerkia
20-12-2007, 23:36
Proof that sanctions only affect the lower downs, while those in power don't feel the burn.
Ariddia
21-12-2007, 02:01
Excuse the idiocy, but why are they protesting about Fiji with the sanctions?

Fiji had a military coup back in December 2006 (for various complex reasons which I can't really sum up without giving you a full background on Fijian history). The new military leader, Commodore Bainimarama, has promised democratic elections for 2009. New Zealand wants to keep the pressure on him quite strongly.

There was another controversy not too long ago, when Fiji's football (soccer) team was due to play in New Zealand for the World Cup 2010 qualifiers. New Zealand banned the Fijian goalkeeper from entering the country, because his fiancée's father was in the military. Fiji demanded that he be allowed in, or that the match be moved to a neutral venue; NZ refused. FIFA ruled in Fiji's favour, and I think the match was eventually played in Australia.
Jeruselem
21-12-2007, 02:03
Poor kids, paying for the sins of their politicians.
Thumbless Pete Crabbe
21-12-2007, 02:08
Ugh. What's with these threads about some obscure issue in some pacific island? I can see one thread, but it's getting silly.
Kryozerkia
21-12-2007, 02:09
Ugh. What's with these threads about some obscure issue in some pacific island? I can see one thread, but it's getting silly.

It's a nice change from the plethora of America threads.
Nire and Nire
21-12-2007, 03:47
Ugh. What's with these threads about some obscure issue in some pacific island? I can see one thread, but it's getting silly.

given the current crusade of some in the west for democracy and all that it stands for, how is a military coup and one nation's response to it an 'obscure issue'? Is Pakistan some obscure issue in Southern Asia? Is Iraq some 'obscure issue' in the Middle East? Human rights are human rights, regardless of which sphere of influence you believe in