NationStates Jolt Archive

http://www.howmanyfiveyearoldscouldyoutakeinafight.com/

How many can you take on?

27

29 kids

Gosh you're awesome, guys! I can only beat 25!

23

Im a substitute teacher. The answer is about 30 every period.

You know the best part about twenty three year olds? There's twenty of them.

(it had to be done)

28, though the test didn't take into account that the Irish fight better when we're drunk.

28, though the test didn't take into account that the Irish fight better when we're drunk.

I'm part Irish, whats the science behind that? :D I may need this info someday.

Forty five year olds would fall to my staff before I fall to the horde.

34 :D

Anyone need a babysitter?

22 I chose that I'd bite if needed and it wouldn't bother me to throw kids or pile drive them lol

I wonder how many Mike Tyson can take on.

17, lol.

23.

Only 22... I really need to get back in shape.

27. But I'd like to point out that as a force of Chaos, I'd more likely train them to be my army. *nod* Oh, and forget all that 'no groin kicks' stuff. :p

18, technically. However, I'm a peacemaker, not a fighter. So I suppose I'd somehow attempt to reason with the children who suddenly have the will to attack me, and only kick them away if they kicked me first.

11

24, but this is because the quiz fails to ask about experience in fighting little children. For one, I had younger siblings and I used to work in a children's and youth center. :D

You could take on 30 five year old kids in a fight.


Hell yeah!

The real question is how many Goofball-trained five year olds could you beat?

:D

20. Given that I'm 13, though, that's pretty good.

The real question is how many Goofball-trained five year olds could you beat?

:DAs many as I can throw and as many as get knocked down by my five-year-old missiles :p

29 on the quiz, in real life I'm an elementary school teacher in a school of 1,500. :p

As many as I can throw and as many as get knocked down by my five-year-old missiles :p

Heh. I suspect that synchronized attack patterns and gymnastics lessons might make that harder than you might think. ;)

Heh. I suspect that synchronized attack patterns and gymnastics lessons might make that harder than you might think. ;)That brings us to the problem of their weight. I've been swarmed by oodles of 10-year olds and all its done is slow me down. If your Kindergarden Legion of Doom is going to pack enough weight to stop me, they won't be agile enough to get out of the way when one of their compatriots is hurtling towards them :D

20

The real question is how many Goofball-trained five year olds could you beat?

:D

Distract them with tacos and/or mud and flee.

Distract them with tacos and/or mud and flee.

If you run, you'll just die tired. ;)

31 with all of the dirty tricks

Twenty-two.

That brings us to the problem of their weight. I've been swarmed by oodles of 10-year olds and all its done is slow me down. If your Kindergarden Legion of Doom is going to pack enough weight to stop me, they won't be agile enough to get out of the way when one of their compatriots is hurtling towards them :D

WHo are you trying to convince; me or yourself? ;)

23

If you run, you'll just die tired. ;)

Tired and dirty :)

WHo are you trying to convince; me or yourself? ;)You. :)
I know that I can handle swarm tactics; I used to get paid to do that.

30 of the little bastards.

39 ;)

You. :)
I know that I can handle swarm tactics; I used to get paid to do that.

Not swarm tactics. Co-ordinated assaults. I'm betting that as several kid are vaulted at you by their cohorts, several others barreling into the backs of your knees from behind will bring you down to their level. From there, I think it's just a matter of time. Remember, my kids aim for the crotch. ;)

33

25.

Not swarm tactics. Co-ordinated assaults. I'm betting that as several kid are vaulted at you by their cohorts, several others barreling into the backs of your knees from behind will bring you down to their level. From there, I think it's just a matter of time. Remember, my kids aim for the crotch. ;)While I doubt that 5-year-olds will have the mental ability to follow detailed orders such as that one, I've had all of that before. And they'd have to get close to me first. Considering that I've got the arms of someone that's 6'2", that is no easy feat =D

31. A good number for a prospective teacher in a country with an average class size of something in the mid-twenties.

26...

502.



Well, that's the number the gives me.

And it says 'bad gateway'

:p

Only 22... I really need to get back in shape.

Same here.

39, apparently. I should be a teacher.

33!

Child <<:mp5:

20, because i wouldn't hesitate to fight dirty.

25

link is not working...I keep getting this...

Until the traffic dies down this page has been temporarily disabled, please check back in an hour or two

Way to go Zilam. You managed to shut down their site.

http://www.howmanyfiveyearoldscouldyoutakeinafight.com/

How many can you take on?

"So I listened to my katra and now *vreep* I'm dominating the dojo. I'm class champion."

The real question is how many Goofball-trained five year olds could you beat?

:D
As I have no fear of mud, the same number as any other type - 37

(good luck training 37 five year olds, much harder than beating them in a fight)

28, but I fight dirty.
And by that, I mean I'm not opposed to fleeing into a swamp and then shoving the little brats under the muck and holding them there until they quit squirming.

XVIII apples

I can take on 28 five year old kids in a fight.

33!

Child <<:mp5:

Reall? You didn't read the rules did you?

There are no weapons or foreign objects
Also, I don't think a tiny forum emoticon would really make a good weapon.

Also, I don't think a tiny forum emoticon would really make a good weapon.You'd be surprised...:D

I took on close to 30 kindergarteners of sugar high in grade four and lived to tell the tale

26.

You'd be surprised...:D

Well, it is an easy way to annoy forum-goers, but in a real fight?

Well, it is an easy way to annoy forum-goers, but in a real fight?Never underestimate the power of a well-placed emoticon in mortal combat.

29

36

10.......

29

You could take on 31 five year old kids in a fight.

i can take 27 5 year olds in a fight. Im so awsome!

It says I could whip 30 before I am killed.

23

8 kids. I"m a wimp. lol.

28. Oh well, nice to know that I would be able to survive for a while if I was attacked by crazy zombie-kids. :p

I could beat down 30 five year olds. And I'm under 15.

"You could take on 32 five year old kids in a fight."

Not bad for someone who's 5'3", mind you I do have to resist the urge to smack the blighters upside the head almost every time I see them.

I call shennanigans on this test. I did the test and scored a 29. My 14 yr old nephew did the test and he could do 31. Im 6-4 265 lbs and i could sooooooo kick my nephews ass and probably two of him at once too ;)

I got 24. Though I really don't see the point of beating up kids. Why do people want to do that. REALLY.

30, I think that is pretty good

Only 24...
I better watch my back.
<.<

>.>

17, That's alot....for me I guess.

:)

21. Because I wouldn't be afraid to do anything to the little buggers.

Not swarm tactics. Co-ordinated assaults. I'm betting that as several kid are vaulted at you by their cohorts, several others barreling into the backs of your knees from behind will bring you down to their level. From there, I think it's just a matter of time. Remember, my kids aim for the crotch. ;)

Children tend to have an aversion to cleanliness. Furthermore, LG trained kids will probably maximize that aversion to a high point.

Thereby, if LG can have his personal army, which ignore crotch protection, which is against the rules, I would motion for the use of high pressure water sprays with liquid soap solutions.

Threat neutralized. ^^

Hmmm 25.

Zergling rushes requires napalm throwing Firebats to handle.

:)

":)" is not a number.

27

29 five year olds would fall by the time I was overrun....

25

I can take on 19 five-year-olds in a fight!

According to the test, 23, but it's obvious that the makers of the test (and many people in this thread) have never taught kindergarten. If they were truly fearless and swarmed you en masse, I have trouble believing anyone could fight off more than 10. And that's being generous.

I get the feeling that this test might not be entirely scientifically accurate...

21.

This should really become the new international standard for personal toughness.

30

Hrrrrawwwrrr!

I can take on 25, mostly due to my martial arts expertise and complete lack of moral qualms about clubbing these 5 years-old with each other and military experience against the zerg.

I can take on 26 due to being tall, experience against the Zerg, long reach, and no compunction to using little Susie as a club.

*cough*
ANSWER BELOW:
14

*cries in corner while being chased by hornets and biting flies*

I once made a thread on this.. my very first thread on NSG too btw.. It garnered exactly 100 replies :p

I can take 36 of the little monsters-and here I thought I'd never be a good teacher.
<a href="http://www.justsayhi.com/bb/fight5" style="display: block; background: url(http://assets.justsayhi.com/badges/640/117/fight5.4nnzk8xva5.jpg) no-repeat; width: 296px; height: 84px; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 42px; color: #fff; text-decoration: none; text-align: center; padding-top: 145px;">36</a><p><small>Looking for <a href="http://www.cashadvance1500.com">payday loan</a>?</small></p>

39 kids. :p

You could take on 27 five year old kids in a fight.

27

30

You could take on 27 five year old kids in a fight.