NationStates Jolt Archive


Lamest Conspiracy Theory

Wilgrove
26-11-2007, 06:53
So, what do you guys think is the Lamest Conspiracy Theory? For me, it would have to be that 9/11 was an inside job. I mean let's not forget how many people you'd have to keep quiet to pull this off, but the simple fact that these nut case don't even grasp the simple laws of physics is astounding. They actually believe that a 127,520lb aircraft with full tanks of gas slamming into the towers and the Pentagon at 500mph wasn't enough to bring down the towers, or knock the hole in the Pentagon. They needed to use explosive and a cruise missile.

So, what's the lamest Conspiracy Theory you guys ever heard?
Kyronea
26-11-2007, 06:55
I have a couple of possible insults to make towards certain members but I won't make them.

The lamest conspiracy theory is the idea that Ron Paul is somehow something new rather than being the same stupid isolationist racist shit.
Ordo Drakul
26-11-2007, 07:00
Probably that the Cathar Massacre was to keep the tomb of Jesus hidden so the Church could continue to cash in on the myth of the Resurrection.
Or the twentieth century alien/government conspiracy New Agers always bring up.
Wilgrove
26-11-2007, 07:02
Probably that the Cathar Massacre was to keep the tomb of Jesus hidden so the Church could continue to cash in on the myth of the Resurrection.
Or the twentieth century alien/government conspiracy New Agers always bring up.

I thought it was the Freemason/Illuminati that was the 20th Century conspiracy.
United Anarcho-Project
26-11-2007, 07:29
Reptilian Humanoids have infiltrated the first worlds governments.

That is the dumbest, stupidest, conspiracy theory -ever.
Zilam
26-11-2007, 07:35
I have a couple of possible insults to make towards certain members but I won't make them.

The lamest conspiracy theory is the idea that Ron Paul is somehow something new rather than being the same stupid isolationist racist shit.

Is it possible to have a win in the second post of a thread? I think you have just earned that :)
Dryks Legacy
26-11-2007, 07:44
I mean let's not forget how many people you'd have to keep quiet to pull this off, but the simple fact that these nut case don't even grasp the simple laws of physics is astounding.

It's not Physics it's Structural Analysis, and it's not simple it's actually rather complicated.
Wilgrove
26-11-2007, 07:50
It's not Physics it's Structural Analysis.

There are those who say that Flight 93 never really crashed, that they dug a hole and put aircraft parts in it. When asked why they think this, they explain how the hole look "funny", sufficient to say, they do not know what happens when one object slams into an immovable bigger object at full force as Flight 93 did.
Agerias
26-11-2007, 07:50
In before all the people who say religion.
Jinos
26-11-2007, 07:51
Reptilian Humanoids have infiltrated the first worlds governments.

That is the dumbest, stupidest, conspiracy theory -ever.


No sir, I believe that the conspiracy theory that the Earth is flat, the government faked the moon landings, and satalites are a myth is far more sillier.

The Earth is flat conspiracy theory is in a leauge of its own.
Dryks Legacy
26-11-2007, 07:51
There are those who say that Flight 93 never really crashed, that they dug a hole and put aircraft parts in it. When asked why they think this, they explain how the hole look "funny", sufficient to say, they do not know what happens when one object slams into an immovable bigger object at full force as Flight 93 did.

Those people are idiots, but I can understand it if someone doesn't quite understand the various things that caused the collapse itself. I just glanced through the Wikipedia article, it's pretty interesting. Personally I think having a skyscrapers entire skeleton around the outside and through the middle is a bad idea, even if it eliminates the need for columns scattered through the office space.

EDIT: But anyone that thinks that smashing a large, heavy, explosive object into a tower is going to end well... needs to do some research.
Eureka Australis
26-11-2007, 07:56
So, what do you guys think is the Lamest Conspiracy Theory? For me, it would have to be that 9/11 was an inside job. I mean let's not forget how many people you'd have to keep quiet to pull this off, but the simple fact that these nut case don't even grasp the simple laws of physics is astounding. They actually believe that a 127,520lb aircraft with full tanks of gas slamming into the towers and the Pentagon at 500mph wasn't enough to bring down the towers, or knock the hole in the Pentagon. They needed to use explosive and a cruise missile.

So, what's the lamest Conspiracy Theory you guys ever heard?

Well I disagree with the specific 9/11 conspiracy theory you just talked about, that one is totally implausible and lame. But the other argument is that 9/11 was in fact done by Islamic extremists yet somewhere up the terrorist chain of command it was ordered by the CIA or some vested interest in US commercial/political circles who wanted to create hysteria and war etc.

The reasoning for this is that Bin Laden was essentially hired by the CIA in Afghanistan to lead the Mudjahadeen against the Soviets, and was given weapons and support, so the logic is if the CIA could hire him for that why couldn't they hire him to hit the two towers, the hijackers themselves wouldn't have known and you have just been used. I think that is a plausible theory, I mean their is no doubt whatsoever certain 'vested interests' benefited massively from the 'war on terror'.
Hammurab
26-11-2007, 07:57
The Nazis actually won WWII and control the planet from Berlin, where Helmut "Lipzlick" Goering is the Reichsfuhrer.

This fact is hidden by the Jewish Media, who are just being sore losers.
Wilgrove
26-11-2007, 07:58
Those people are idiots, but I can understand it if someone doesn't quite understand the various things that caused the collapse itself. I just glanced through the Wikipedia article, it's pretty interesting. Personally I think having a skyscrapers entire skeleton around the outside and through the middle is a bad idea, even if it eliminates the need for columns scattered through the office space.

EDIT: But anyone that thinks that smashing a large, heavy, explosive object into a tower is going to end well... needs to do some research.

You know, I went to the Loose Change website and posted on their forum about stuff I knew about the flight characteristic of the aircraft involved, including their stress points in pulling off some of the high G maneuvers as well as why it was possible to do the attacks using the airliners.

I got banned when I wouldn't provide my full name and Private Pilot ID #.
Jinos
26-11-2007, 07:59
The Nazis actually won WWII and control the planet from Berlin, where Helmut "Lipzlick" Goering is the Reichsfuhrer.

This fact is hidden by the Jewish Media, who are just being sore losers.

Wow, that's pretty impressive. Did you make that one up or are they really out there? :p
Hammurab
26-11-2007, 08:10
Wow, that's pretty impressive. Did you make that one up or are they really out there? :p

Laugh if you want, but we have been living under German National Socialism for over half a century.

I asked a cop one time and he disclosed the entire thing. He was out of uniform and left his badge in his van and the meth had messed up his teeth so I couldn't understand everything he said, but here are the basics:

Hiter never attacked Russia. The Molotov-Ribbentrop pact remains in effect, and Saint Petersburg actually kindly hosts the Semi-Dodeca-annual Schprockets Interpretive Dance Festival, such is the love between Germany and Russia.

Hitler did not commit suicide. He died of hysterical protrate inflamation in 1967 at a State Dinner with Kennedy and UN Chairman Castro.

The Holocaust did not occur. The missing millions of Jews voluntarily took a lesser role in existence because they were so ashamed of their penchant for profit speculation.

D-Day failed, miserably. Hitler was so not high, that he personally signalled the armored counter attack that pushed the Allies into the ocean, and taunted them, and then acted like they could go ahead and come ashore, but then counterattacked them again.

The Messerschmitt 252 is still the most advanced aircraft.

The BMW 3 series will totally, totally get you laid.

A prominent swastika appears on every currency in the world, and if people looked, they'd know that.

Stormfront is cooler than Nationstates, and you can meet girls there.

Now you know.
Wilgrove
26-11-2007, 08:15
Laugh if you want, but we have been living under German National Socialism for over half a century.

I asked a cop one time and he disclosed the entire thing. He was out of uniform and left his badge in his van and the meth had messed up his teeth so I couldn't understand everything he said, but here are the basics:

Hiter never attacked Russia. The Molotov-Ribbentrop pact remains in effect, and Saint Petersburg actually kindly hosts the Semi-Dodeca-annual Schprockets Interpretive Dance Festival, such is the love between Germany and Russia.

Hitler did not commit suicide. He died of hysterical protrate inflamation in 1967 at a State Dinner with Kennedy and UN Chairman Castro.

The Holocaust did not occur. The missing millions of Jews voluntarily took a lesser role in existence because they were so ashamed of their penchant for profit speculation.

D-Day failed, miserably. Hitler was so not high, that he personally signalled the armored counter attack that pushed the Allies into the ocean, and taunted them, and then acted like they could go ahead and come ashore, but then counterattacked them again.

The Messerschmitt 252 is still the most advanced aircraft.

The BMW 3 series will totally, totally get you laid.

A prominent swastika appears on every currency in the world, and if people looked, they'd know that.

Stormfront is cooler than Nationstates, and you can meet girls there.

Now you know.

These people live in their own little world, don't they?
Hammurab
26-11-2007, 08:18
These people live in their own little world, don't they?

Yeah, mein schotzi, its called EARTH.

Or, as it was renamed, Hitler 3, in the Hitler System, Hitler Cluster of the Hitler Spiral Arm of the Nascar Galaxy. (Sponsorship is a reality, even under the blanket of German Nationalist Socialism).
Creepy Lurker
26-11-2007, 08:19
The BMW 3 series will totally, totally get you laid.


The BMW M3 will get you laid.

This makes all the other statements true by association
Hammurab
26-11-2007, 08:21
The BMW M3 will get you laid.

This makes all the other statements true by association

That's what I've been telling people. S'like, if you enjoyed "Fight Club", you have to admit that Gigli is a good movie, because they're both on Netflix.
Wilgrove
26-11-2007, 08:22
The BMW M3 will get you laid.

This makes all the other statements true by association

Hell any BMW will get you laid. BMW is associated with having lots of cash.
Hammurab
26-11-2007, 08:23
Hell any BMW will get you laid. BMW is associated with having lots of cash.

Beware the BMW Isetta.

You can screw in it, but you will get Isetta Coitalcontortional Syndrome, which, despite ample funding by the Health Ministry, continue to result in limping white people.
Third Spanish States
26-11-2007, 08:29
Nothing will ever beat this folks

http://www.timecube.com/


You are a slave - to academic induced inculcated belief - an insidious entity, an evil which corrupts human mental ability to accept creation knowledge, as demonstrated in Cubicism.

Humans exist as CUBICS, not entities, for the 4 corner stages of rotating human metamorphosis do not occur at the same time for the individual - except for family Cube. You are educated stupid, indoctrinated evil, and can't even acknowledge that a mother and baby are the same age - on opposite corners of a Cubic Creation Principle - for Truth in Opposites contradict a god entity. Evil educators suppressCubic Creation and preach evil singularity to dumb students - dispossessing students of ratiocinate mind. WORD students serve Nature best if dead.

Academic free speech is a damn lie. Try to discuss & debate Nature's Time Cube and your evil teachers will not allow you. Ignorance of Time Cube dooms humans, inflicting their own created "word hell".
Educators are actually "evil word gods", teaching commercial plunder of Nature. The damn bastards suppress free speech, by denying Time Cube debate discussion. Students MUST DEMAND free speech - for the greatest of all human discoveries: Nature's Harmonic Simultaneous 4 Day Rotating Creation Principle of Cubicism. Educated stupid, you can't know Truth.
Wilgrove
26-11-2007, 08:33
Nothing will ever beat this folks

http://www.timecube.com/

Sometimes I wonder if people come up with these conspiracy to see how many people they could get to believe said conspiracy.
HSH Prince Eric
26-11-2007, 08:40
All the accusations and stories about Skull & Bones have always struck me as being very lame.

It's a glorified elitist fraternity.
Murderous maniacs
26-11-2007, 08:43
Nothing will ever beat this folks

http://www.timecube.com/
on a previous occasion, out of interest, i read the entirety of the first page of that site.
by the end of it my head hurt and the only thing that could make it worse was discovering thet there are more pages, which i did
Hammurab
26-11-2007, 10:34
on a previous occasion, out of interest, i read the entirety of the first page of that site.
by the end of it my head hurt and the only thing that could make it worse was discovering thet there are more pages, which i did

I read over it, and part of my brain ate itself to make the timecube stop.
BackwoodsSquatches
26-11-2007, 10:37
Yeah, mein schotzi, its called EARTH.

Or, as it was renamed, Hitler 3, in the Hitler System, Hitler Cluster of the Hitler Spiral Arm of the Nascar Galaxy.



*Blows cola from nose*

*dies laughing*
HC Eredivisie
26-11-2007, 10:41
Belgium, it's not like anyone would willingly make up such a country.
Laerod
26-11-2007, 10:42
That the UN is attempting to force peaceloving America to ban gun-ownership always irked me.
Hammurab
26-11-2007, 10:44
*Blows cola from nose*

*dies laughing*

You must not die on this thread; if you die on nationstates, you should die on a religious thread, an "ask a..." thread, or one of those threads where a government agent is pretending to be an underage Elf to get Lunatic Goofballs to go to Chris Hanson's house.

Its tradition.
South Lizasauria
26-11-2007, 10:45
The lamest one by far is holocaust denial. There's proof proiving that one false. And it was started by an antisemite, warmongering bastard.
Hammurab
26-11-2007, 10:46
That the UN is attempting to force peaceloving America to ban gun-ownership always irked me.

Yep...they should take that black-helicopter, blue helmet, fascist horseshit up to Canada where the Ebil Dgews have already outlowed the use of towed howizters on waterfowl.

Wake up, America. The UN wants your Maadi Griffin.
Laerod
26-11-2007, 10:48
Stormfront is cooler than Nationstates, and you can meet girls there.Now that isn't lame at all, it's hilarious =D
Laerod
26-11-2007, 10:49
The lamest one by far is holocaust denial. There's proof proiving that one false. And it was started by an antisemite, warmongering bastard.I wouldn't call it lame. Lame is reserved for eyerolling and thoughts of "not this again...", and not strong urges to throw rocks.
Lunatic Goofballs
26-11-2007, 10:51
...or one of those threads where a government agent is pretending to be an underage Elf to get Lunatic Goofballs to go to Chris Hanson's house.

I still have the bite marks. :(
South Lizasauria
26-11-2007, 10:51
I wouldn't call it lame. Lame is reserved for eyerolling and thoughts of "not this again...", and not strong urges to throw rocks.

Isn't the holocaust denial both though?
Laerod
26-11-2007, 10:52
Isn't the holocaust denial both though?It irritates me enough to forget to roll my eyes.
Hammurab
26-11-2007, 10:52
The lamest one by far is holocaust denial. There's proof proiving that one false. And it was started by an antisemite, warmongering bastard.

See, you are easily fooled.

The millions of Jews and others were never killed. They are hiding. In suburban Bialystock. Behind a tree.

I'll tell you something, don't believe everything you read. Or of which there are documents and photographs. And bodies. And witnesses from all over the world who saw it. Or survivors who were there. Or testimony of perpetrators who admitted to what was done. Or the camps themselves.

All of that can be faked.

And if you don't like the Fuhrer, move out of Hitlerstan and go live at Elliot Gould's house in American History X.
Hammurab
26-11-2007, 10:55
Now that isn't lame at all, it's hilarious =D

Why? Lots of fertile white girls on Stormfront, and their ideology urges them to procreate with good white stock.

Have a baby for your race.

In the next war, your skin will be your uniform.

And if you get some Lowenbrau into her, she might not notice that you're half-filipino and half jewish, until after you give her the three knuckle shuffle in the back of an 89 Hyundai in a park in Seattle with some truly shitty "Oy" music that you told her was really cool and you're glad she brought it and would she like to take her sweater off.
Hammurab
26-11-2007, 10:57
I still have the bite marks. :(

LG, I'm sorry to inform you that being bitten by an elf doesn't make you immortal.

And the reason its not healing is that the e-meter is not really a medical device.

And I strongly suspect you wrote www.timecube.com or at least explained it to the dude.
BackwoodsSquatches
26-11-2007, 10:59
And if you get some Lowenbrau into her, she might not notice that you're half-filipino and half jewish, until after you give her the three knuckle shuffle in the back of an 89 Hyundai in a park in Seattle with some truly shitty "Oy" music that you told her was really cool and you're glad she brought it and would she like to take her sweater off.


*adds to personal collection of quotes*.
Laerod
26-11-2007, 11:00
Why? Lots of fertile white girls on Stormfront, and their ideology urges them to procreate with good white stock.

Have a baby for your race.

In the next war, your skin will be your uniform.

And if you get some Lowenbrau into her, she might not notice that you're half-filipino and half jewish, until after you give her the three knuckle shuffle in the back of an 89 Hyundai in a park in Seattle with some truly shitty "Oy" music that you told her was really cool and you're glad she brought it and would she like to take her sweater off.Löwenbräu? Bah! Beck's is where the real stuff is.
BackwoodsSquatches
26-11-2007, 11:01
Löwenbräu? Bah! Beck's is where the real stuff is.

Skinheads cant afford Becks, are you kidding?

http://www.simply70s.com/otherimages/exp/52006s.jpg

Thats more like it.
Lunatic Goofballs
26-11-2007, 11:02
And I strongly suspect you wrote www.timecube.com or at least explained it to the dude.

I swear, I thought he was an insurance salesman. :p
Hammurab
26-11-2007, 11:05
Löwenbräu? Bah! Beck's is where the real stuff is.

Okay, I'll see your umlauts and raise you a Schlitz reference...

C'mon, 'the fuck do we care what shit she wants to sip while I expound on the tenets of white pride, give her Pabst Blue Ribbon as long as her SS lightning bolt tatoo between her shoulder blades is left glistening with my mixed race humpsweat by the time the last can hits the grass outside.
Hammurab
26-11-2007, 11:07
Skinheads cant afford Becks, are you kidding?

http://www.simply70s.com/otherimages/exp/52006s.jpg

Thats more like it.

Aw, BS you fuckin' beat me to the Schlitz reference, man, now I look slow on the draw...

See, I don't mind losing that stuff to LG, 'cause he lives time backwards, like Merlin or the people from that planet where Mork from Ork is from...I think it was Ork.
Laerod
26-11-2007, 11:07
Skinheads cant afford Becks, are you kidding?

http://www.simply70s.com/otherimages/exp/52006s.jpg

Thats more like it.The... fuck? :confused:
BackwoodsSquatches
26-11-2007, 11:08
The... fuck? :confused:

Ok...in germany, are you?

First, drink this:

http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/910/50427444.JPG

Then, after it runs it's way through your bodily system, piss the contents into the Schlitz bottle, chill and serve.
Laerod
26-11-2007, 11:08
Okay, I'll see your umlauts and raise you a Schlitz reference...

C'mon, 'the fuck do we care what shit she wants to sip while I expound on the tenets of white pride, give her Pabst Blue Ribbon as long as her SS lightning bolt tatoo between her shoulder blades is left glistening with my mixed race humpsweat by the time the last can hits the grass outside.

Here's what I have to say about sleeping with Nazis. (http://www.rechtsweg-ausgeschlossen.de/pics/kein_sex_mit_nazis.jpg)
BackwoodsSquatches
26-11-2007, 11:10
Aw, BS you fuckin' beat me to the Schlitz reference, man, now I look slow on the draw....

Sadly, Im well aquainted with that baboon piss of a liquid.

I think I puked up Jesus one time....
Naturality
26-11-2007, 11:11
So, what do you guys think is the Lamest Conspiracy Theory? For me, it would have to be that 9/11 was an inside job. I mean let's not forget how many people you'd have to keep quiet to pull this off, but the simple fact that these nut case don't even grasp the simple laws of physics is astounding. They actually believe that a 127,520lb aircraft with full tanks of gas slamming into the towers and the Pentagon at 500mph wasn't enough to bring down the towers, or knock the hole in the Pentagon. They needed to use explosive and a cruise missile.

So, what's the lamest Conspiracy Theory you guys ever heard?

no way in heck that is the lamest..

From the ones I am familiar with .. it would be faked moon landings.

And there are physicists on both sides of that 9/11 argument. And IMO anyone that thinks it wasn't .. isn't possible, or even more so, that powerful people wouldn't do such a thing bewilders me. And that people just do not understand .. it's 'hidden' in front of their eyes. And I also don't read about the 9/11 shit anymore because the whole thing disgusts me. Again and again ... I try to make myself forget, deny or plain out not think about these sorts of things, all these things. But it's there. What's my sig now? Couple weeks from now it will be gone .. that's me trying to forget about things like that. Same way when I use to have all sorts of 9/11 links in my sig and the countless bookmarks in my browser.. that if I wanted to .. I couldn't find again if I wanted to. Whatever. I envy you.
Lunatic Goofballs
26-11-2007, 11:12
Skinheads cant afford Becks, are you kidding?

http://www.simply70s.com/otherimages/exp/52006s.jpg

Thats more like it.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4613098879161356376&q=schmitt%27s+gay&total=145&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

:)
Hammurab
26-11-2007, 11:17
Here's what I have to say about sleeping with Nazis. (http://www.rechtsweg-ausgeschlossen.de/pics/kein_sex_mit_nazis.jpg)

http://timecube.com/index6.html

Schtupping a whitepower chick is hardly out of bounds, unless you are also white and a racist. That's just asking for recessive traits, and then you end up with Corky from "Life Goes On", but he loves McDonald's and hates Jews.

Now, for a black guy, having a white racist girl is fine, and you can get your forty acres and a mule by telling her to brush her teeth before you'll kiss her goodnight.
Ifreann
26-11-2007, 11:19
People claiming that kangaroos really exist. What kind of person really believes in kangaroos anyway?
Hammurab
26-11-2007, 11:20
Sadly, Im well aquainted with that baboon piss of a liquid.

I think I puked up Jesus one time....

Even Jesus would trade Schlitz to some teenagers for the back fender of a 93 Civic DX.

Water into wine, easy. Schlitz into urine, not on jew life.
Dryks Legacy
26-11-2007, 11:39
People claiming that kangaroos really exist. What kind of person really believes in kangaroos anyway?

All 21+ million people that live in my country for starters.

EDIT: Also there's lots of evidence, many times more than the evidence for your existence.
Rogue Protoss
26-11-2007, 11:44
Why? Lots of fertile white girls on Stormfront, and their ideology urges them to procreate with good white stock.

Have a baby for your race.

In the next war, your skin will be your uniform.

And if you get some Lowenbrau into her, she might not notice that you're half-filipino and half jewish, until after you give her the three knuckle shuffle in the back of an 89 Hyundai in a park in Seattle with some truly shitty "Oy" music that you told her was really cool and you're glad she brought it and would she like to take her sweater off.

can you actually meet girls in stormfront?
Rogue Protoss
26-11-2007, 11:44
heres one i actually heard , the marines)(US) are actually a group of satanist baby killers that feast on human flesh.
2 an army of monkey ninjas control the world and are waiting until armaggedon to get their freak on
3 guys only go to cheerleading cheer offs to watch the girls cheer
4 thefrench know how to fight and are waiting until the minkey ninjas drop their guard.
5 osama bin laden is gay
6 micheal jackson issn't a pedophile
7 the US has a Mad program for the middle east one WMD goes of in the US the arab and muslim countries get nuked, along with russia, china and mexico.
8 bush is actually a democrat and his stupid policies are aimed to help the democrats.
9 hillary clintion is a trans
10 so is the pope
Hammurab
26-11-2007, 11:45
All 21+ million people that live in my country for starters.

21 Million People don't live in your country.

Evil snotbrain educators have manufactured synthorganic ambulatory humanoid thespids to parade in front of you as store clerks, co-workers, and that couple that constantly fight at the bar but won't just break up already for christ sake.

You are the only authentic human in your country, and the Kangaroos are targeting devices for weapons as yet unbudgeted.

A guy I know over in T-division claims that in the "many worlds" premise of physics, this could be true somewhere.

Consider this: Have you ever SEEN a kangaroo? You have? I see. Lots of times? Oh.

Then what the fuck am I thinking of, ostriches?
Hammurab
26-11-2007, 11:55
can you actually meet girls in stormfront?

Oh, yeah, but its like any other internet venue. When it comes to "Sex: Female, Location: USA", a certain percentage, perhaps not majorative but clearly substantive, will be guys. Weird pockmarked guys in bathrobes trying to get cybersex however, long as they don't have to pay for it. Don't talk to those guys. And don't be that guy.

Quite a few more are old, and not the bowflex body type old, or what you fuckin' college kids think of as old, I mean like turkey waddle necks and boobs that look like somebody hung two undercooked pancakes on a towelrack and named it Marge.

Another subset, not huge, but not negligible, will already have boyfriends and aren't looking to hook up. And their boyfriends can shoot a 2 inch group at 50 feet without warming up.

But the grail is out there: A girl whose about 19 to 20, grew up in a profoundly maladaptive home, internalized deeply racist philosophy in a desperate attempt to forge an identity not crafted by any real personal impetus.

And to her, hooking up with some mutt cholo like you or me is like having an affair without having to get married.
Naturality
26-11-2007, 11:57
Oh, yeah, but its like any other internet venue. When it comes to "Sex: Female, Location: USA", a certain percentage, perhaps not majorative but clearly substantive, will be guys. Weird pockmarked guys in bathrobes trying to get cybersex however, long as they don't have to pay for it. Don't talk to those guys. And don't be that guy.

Quite a few more are old, and not the bowflex body type old, or what you fuckin' college kids think of as old, I mean like turkey waddle necks and boobs that look like somebody hung two undercooked pancakes on a towelrack and named it Marge.

Another subset, not huge, but not negligible, will already have boyfriends and aren't looking to hook up. And their boyfriends can shoot a 2 inch group at 50 feet without warming up.

But the grail is out there: A girl whose about 19 to 20, grew up in a profoundly maladaptive home, internalized deeply racist philosophy in a desperate attempt to forge an identity not crafted by any real personal impetus.

And to her, hooking up with some mutt cholo like you or me is like having an affair without having to get married.

Wow you should post this stuff on their opposing views section lol It would ruffle some feathers
Vaklavia
26-11-2007, 12:04
So, what do you guys think is the Lamest Conspiracy Theory? For me, it would have to be that 9/11 was an inside job. I mean let's not forget how many people you'd have to keep quiet to pull this off,

I'm really siock to deat of this arguement. The amount of people who would be in on it would not be as many as you would think


but the simple fact that these nut case don't even grasp the simple laws of physics is astounding.

Please dont flame.


They actually believe that a 127,520lb aircraft with full tanks of gas slamming into the towers and the Pentagon at 500mph wasn't enough to bring down the towers, or knock the hole in the Pentagon. They needed to use explosive and a cruise missile.

Yes, two towers that were built to withstand an airplane crashing into it and a the missile theory is unpopular even amoung the Truth Movement. Most just think it was a Global Hawk.

So, what's the lamest Conspiracy Theory you guys ever heard?


That airplanes can vanish in to thin air when they crash. (like the one in Shanksville on 9/11.) That two bulding could collapse because of fire when no other building has before or since. That Building 7 collapsed into its own footprint ala conrolled demolition despite never being hit by a plane.

Snd that people think that the goverment that lied about Iraq having WMD's, lied about Saddam being linked to 9/11, was telling the truth about 9/11.
Hammurab
26-11-2007, 12:09
Wow you should post this stuff on their opposing views section lol It would ruffle some feathers

Then they wouldn't let me troll their board looking for some white trash, blue eyed blonde who's still clean enough to get past Vegas hotel security on the way up to bagpiping me in front of the minibar while I figure out how to mute TNT's showing of "The Big Lebowski" so she won't be offended that she doesn't have my undivided attention.

Racists are like any other fucked up, lost person. They want to find another fucked up lost person to make even the most sordid, hollow intimate connection with, because after you both get your cookie for the night, the fact that you let her be in charge of the thermostat while you both watch the last half "The Big Lebowski" is more respect then she got from any other man she's known in her life.
Dryks Legacy
26-11-2007, 12:09
Consider this: Have you ever SEEN a kangaroo? You have? I see. Lots of times? Oh.

I wouldn't say lots of times, less than thirty I guess... like most people I don't live in the country.
Hammurab
26-11-2007, 12:17
I wouldn't say lots of times, less than thirty I guess... like most people I don't live in the country.

Okay, I'll tell you something about kangaroos. That pocket has mucous membranes. Lots.

This serves as an unparallelled vector for the absorbsion of powdered narcotics.

Kangaroos were engineered from less pocketous marsupials as a means of developing the necessary genomic subset to grow giant cloned snorting orificies for powerful government officials, entertainment figures, and the researchers cousin Lenny who probably does have a problem, yeah, but you don't know what Lenny went through when he was younger, and frankly, we're all just lucky he's not on the watertower with a bolt action and a worn paperback copy of "Tales of a Fourth Grade Nothing".

Don't judge people you don't know.
Ifreann
26-11-2007, 12:19
All 21+ million people that live in my country for starters.

EDIT: Also there's lots of evidence, many times more than the evidence for your existence.
Don't be silly. It's all just a ploy by the Australian government to draw in tourists.
can you actually meet girls in stormfront?
No. There are no girls on the internet. You can meet racist guys who like to pretend to be girls on stromfront. Or racist traps.
That airplanes can vanish in to thin air when they crash. (like the one in Shanksville on 9/11.) That two bulding could collapse because of fire when no other building has before or since. That Building 7 collapsed into its own footprint ala conrolled demolition despite never being hit by a plane.

Snd that people think that the goverment that lied about Iraq having WMD's, lied about Saddam being linked to 9/11, was telling the truth about 9/11.

Lets not have this turn into a debate abut who/what did 9/11.
Vaklavia
26-11-2007, 12:26
Lets not have this turn into a debate abut who/what did 9/11.



Fine what ever. Enjoy your worship of the US Government.
Hammurab
26-11-2007, 12:28
Don't be silly. It's all just a ploy by the Australian government to draw in tourists.

No. There are no girls on the internet. You can meet racist guys who like to pretend to be girls on stromfront. Or racist traps.


Lets not have this turn into a debate abut who/what did 9/11.

Okay, A), the ploy by the Australian government to bring in tourists is slightly horsefaced but still very pretty women who love like jackhammers, drink like Serbians, and have barcodes behind the left ear.

B), There are so girls on the internet! They send pictures!! And they go to a lot of trouble to have really nice pictures, with their hair all done up and sometimes products in the background, like cars or sometimes parts of cars.

and C) Pissy as the dude is, he's kind of more on topic than the rest of us, its a conspiracy thread. Unless...unless you're trying to shut him up...but why? You've played your hand too early, timecubist.
Cameroi
26-11-2007, 12:32
i would have to consider the lamest theory: that that no one ever networks with each other for less then licit objectives.

=^^=
.../\...
Hammurab
26-11-2007, 12:32
Fine what ever. Enjoy your worship of the US Government.

Ha, yeah, bow to the all seeing eye and ignore the fact that power corrupts, that the worlds largest military budget, with expansive undisclosed expenditure, most certainly couldn't help but produce cabals of savvy, ruthless people whose ambition...

wait, what?
Domici
26-11-2007, 12:55
So, what do you guys think is the Lamest Conspiracy Theory? For me, it would have to be that 9/11 was an inside job. I mean let's not forget how many people you'd have to keep quiet to pull this off, but the simple fact that these nut case don't even grasp the simple laws of physics is astounding. They actually believe that a 127,520lb aircraft with full tanks of gas slamming into the towers and the Pentagon at 500mph wasn't enough to bring down the towers, or knock the hole in the Pentagon. They needed to use explosive and a cruise missile.

So, what's the lamest Conspiracy Theory you guys ever heard?

That global warming is a hoax perpetrated by a handful of environmental groups and the solar power lobby for the purpose of making money.
Domici
26-11-2007, 13:03
That airplanes can vanish in to thin air when they crash. (like the one in Shanksville on 9/11.) That two bulding could collapse because of fire when no other building has before or since. That Building 7 collapsed into its own footprint ala conrolled demolition despite never being hit by a plane.

Snd that people think that the goverment that lied about Iraq having WMD's, lied about Saddam being linked to 9/11, was telling the truth about 9/11.

Um, buildings collapse from fire all the time.

If you collapse two 1400 foot steel buildings next to a smaller third building, that third building is going to take some damage. There's nothing weird about it having to come down too. (and what are you saying, that the first two were brought down on purpose, but the last one came down by accident and they're lying about both?)

I certainly don't think they're telling the truth about 9/11. But all they're trying to cover up is that they were so incompetent in stopping it, and so happy that it happened. But why would they be so slick in successfully hiding this when they can't seem to hide anything else.
Gataway_Driver
26-11-2007, 13:10
Diana being killed by MI5 on the orders of the royal family so she couldn't have a child where the father was a muslim.

Where we all know the truth that it was the joint operation by the Daily Mail and the Daily Express so they can have something to put on their front page for the past 11 years
Ifreann
26-11-2007, 13:21
Fine what ever. Enjoy your worship of the US Government.
If you want a thread on 9/11 then go ahead and make one. But this is a thread about conspiracy theories.
Okay, A), the ploy by the Australian government to bring in tourists is slightly horsefaced but still very pretty women who love like jackhammers, drink like Serbians, and have barcodes behind the left ear.
They can have more than one ploy!

B), There are so girls on the internet! They send pictures!! And they go to a lot of trouble to have really nice pictures, with their hair all done up and sometimes products in the background, like cars or sometimes parts of cars.
Girls in ads aren't real.

and C) Pissy as the dude is, he's kind of more on topic than the rest of us, its a conspiracy thread. Unless...unless you're trying to shut him up...but why? You've played your hand too early, timecubist.

I don't have hands, I have a series of cubes!
Peisandros
26-11-2007, 13:49
and C) Pissy as the dude is, he's kind of more on topic than the rest of us, its a conspiracy thread. Unless...unless you're trying to shut him up...but why? You've played your hand too early, timecubist.

Heh, hilliarous. Perhaps winner.

As for lame conspiracy theories, I was never really a fan of the 9/11 conspiracy. The whole missle thing was the lame part of it.
Keriona
26-11-2007, 13:59
I shot JFK. Want proof?


:D :sniper:


...there's a picture.
Cypresaria
26-11-2007, 19:12
Diana being killed by MI5 on the orders of the royal family so she couldn't have a child where the father was a muslim.

Where we all know the truth that it was the joint operation by the Daily Mail and the Daily Express so they can have something to put on their front page for the past 11 years


Thats actually only partially true

They also killed her to ensure that the Sun/Mirror/daily sport would NOT be able to have a picture of Diana on their front pages for the past 10 years.... well not unless they went and dug her up......

El-presidente Boris

But there again, perhaps the daily sport would stoop that low!
Wilgrove
26-11-2007, 19:13
That airplanes can vanish in to thin air when they crash. (like the one in Shanksville on 9/11.)

Umm, actual photos from Shanksville would like to differ with you.

One of the Black Boxes.
http://english.people.com.cn/200604/14/images/911a.jpg

An engine found at the crash site at Shanksville.

http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200604/14/images/911.jpg

Part of a fuselage

http://stj911.org/evidence/docs/P200061_1.jpg

An overview of the crater, here you can see bits and pieces of the aircraft.

http://911review.org/_webimages/93_crater.jpg

What 9/11 deniers pretty much refused to believe is that when an aircraft is going 500mph in pretty much a nose dive, into the earth, which is basically a wall at this point, it's not going to come out in one piece. The fact that they even recovered part of an engine (a huge part) is astounding.

Here's the dirty secret about aircrafts and the way they are constructed. They are basically soda cans with ribs. That's all they are. They are soda cans that have support structures that are also made out of the same metal as they make soda cans. Aircrafts are really not that strong, they aren't meant to be. They are meant to be light and flexible so that they can fly. The drawback of being light and flexible is a weaker structure that'll easily break.


That two bulding could collapse because of fire when no other building has before or since.

Are you forgetting that a Boeing 757 slammed into the tower at full speed, carrying full tanks of gas? The 9/11 deniers are right that the Twin Towers aren't brought down by fire alone, the aircraft slamming into the tower helped.

That Building 7 collapsed into its own footprint ala conrolled demolition despite never being hit by a plane.

One of the south corners of Building 7 was heavily damaged by falling debries of the two twin towers. If you take any structure and knock one corner out, it's going to fall on that corner, why because it'll be unbalanced and it can't stand on three corners alone, it needs that fourth. Without the force, bye bye building.

Snd that people think that the goverment that lied about Iraq having WMD's, lied about Saddam being linked to 9/11, was telling the truth about 9/11.

What's sad is that the 9/11 people are now saying that the strike against the Twin Towers didn't even happen, it was Hollywood "magic" done by CNN, Fox, MSNBC, etc. They live in their own little world.

I'm really siock to deat of this arguement. The amount of people who would be in on it would not be as many as you would think

Here's the list I come up with so far.

United Airlines
American Airlines
CIA
FBI
NSTB
FAA
The owners of WTC
The people who was "hired" to plant explosive (if that was true)
The White House
Afghanistan
Saudi Arabia
Osama Bin Laden
The Laden Family
Air Traffic Controllers who watched the flight. Remember one of the theory is that the aircraft that crashed in Shanksville wasn't Flight 93 but a Delta flight.

I'm sure I'm missing a few, but that's just some of the people they would've had to keep quiet.

Yes, two towers that were built to withstand an airplane crashing into it and a the missile theory is unpopular even amoung the Truth Movement. Most just think it was a Global Hawk.

Actually the Twin Towers were to withstand a hit from a Boeing 707, which is smaller than a Boeing 757/767 that was on approach to JFK or La Guardia and already used up most of it's fuel and wasn't going at 500mph, but rather around 200mph or 180mph. We're basically talking about an aircraft that's on approach to a New York airport and got lost in the fog. The Towers were never meant to withstand a Boeing 757/767 slamming into the towers at full speed with full tanks of gas.

Oh, you should know that I am an aviation expert, so don't try to act like you know more about airplanes than me, it's just not going to happen.
Mirkana
26-11-2007, 20:43
The one that claims that the Windsor family and other world leaders are actually reptilian humanoids bent on world domination. That one is lame.

The one that worries me is the one that the Jews are plotting world domination. The big issue is that I cannot credibly attack said theory, because I would be part of said conspiracy.
Vaklavia
26-11-2007, 21:23
What 9/11 deniers pretty much refused to believe is that when an aircraft is going 500mph in pretty much a nose dive, into the earth, which is basically a wall at this point, it's not going to come out in one piece. The fact that they even recovered part of an engine (a huge part) is astounding.

Here's the dirty secret about aircrafts and the way they are constructed. They are basically soda cans with ribs. That's all they are. They are soda cans that have support structures that are also made out of the same metal as they make soda cans. Aircrafts are really not that strong, they aren't meant to be. They are meant to be light and flexible so that they can fly. The drawback of being light and flexible is a weaker structure that'll easily break.

Planes dont evaporate into thin air when they crash. You can show me peices of charred metal all you want but I've seen plane crashes and that was no plane crash.




Are you forgetting that a Boeing 757 slammed into the tower at full speed, carrying full tanks of gas? The 9/11 deniers are right that the Twin Towers aren't brought down by fire alone, the aircraft slamming into the tower helped.

9/11 Deniers? Pathetic snipes and name calling is not going to help you in this debate. The WTC was built to withstand an aircraft crashing into it. It had a central core of concrete columns that were moulded around steel bars.
IF the building collapse happened the way you say it did then we would have seen tall metal poles gutting out of the rubble.



One of the south corners of Building 7 was heavily damaged by falling debries of the two twin towers. If you take any structure and knock one corner out, it's going to fall on that corner, why because it'll be unbalanced and it can't stand on three corners alone, it needs that fourth. Without the force, bye bye building.

Into it's own foot print? No sale.



What's sad is that the 9/11 people are now saying that the strike against the Twin Towers didn't even happen, it was Hollywood "magic" done by CNN, Fox, MSNBC, etc. They live in their own little world.

As do you, I have never seen anyone in the Truth Movement lend credence to such a theory.



Here's the list I come up with so far.

United Airlines

Wouldnt need to know.

American Airlines

Wouldnt need to know.

CIA

Agree.

FBI

Agree

NSTB

Easy to manipulate.

FAA

Easy to manipulate.

The owners of WTC

You mean Larry Silverstien? The guy who is on record as saying that he gave the order to 'pull' i.e demolish the building. Who, by the way, stood to gain a lot of insurance from an attack such as 9/11.

The people who was "hired" to plant explosive (if that was true)

Yes.

The White House

No shit.

Afghanistan

No.

Saudi Arabia

Possibly.

Osama Bin Laden

Not really.

The Laden Family

Most likely, yes.

Air Traffic Controllers who watched the flight. Remember one of the theory is that the aircraft that crashed in Shanksville wasn't Flight 93 but a Delta flight.

Flight 93 did dissapear off the radar screen for a short while.

I'm sure I'm missing a few, but that's just some of the people they would've had to keep quiet.

Like I said, it's not as many people as you think.


<snip>


A plane is a plane be it lost in fog or otherwise.



Oh, you should know that I am an aviation expert, so don't try to act like you know more about airplanes than me, it's just not going to happen.

I never predended that.
Dyakovo
26-11-2007, 21:24
CIA, FBI, NSTB, FAA


And you actually believe that it would be easy to convince everyone in those organizations to lie; and to keep them quiet for 6 years?
Jayate
26-11-2007, 21:40
So, what's the lamest Conspiracy Theory you guys ever heard?

The Illuminati killed Prabhupada.
Markeliopia
26-11-2007, 21:49
The Jews are encouraging race mixing so the white race will disappear and they can take over

Also the white race are decedents of Abel, the Jews are decedents of Cain (Jews are the children of Satan) and everyone else are from "the beasts of the field", basically animals. They were made before Adam
The Parkus Empire
26-11-2007, 21:55
So, what's the lamest Conspiracy Theory you guys ever heard?

Zionist letters, or whatever they're called.
Markeliopia
26-11-2007, 22:33
Zionist letters, or whatever they're called.

Protocols of Zion
Rubiconic Crossings
26-11-2007, 22:36
Nothing will ever beat this folks

http://www.timecube.com/

Yes. Well. Some people should never have found out about the innertubewebnets...
Ancient Borea
26-11-2007, 22:49
So, what do you guys think is the Lamest Conspiracy Theory? For me, it would have to be that 9/11 was an inside job. I mean let's not forget how many people you'd have to keep quiet to pull this off, but the simple fact that these nut case don't even grasp the simple laws of physics is astounding. They actually believe that a 127,520lb aircraft with full tanks of gas slamming into the towers and the Pentagon at 500mph wasn't enough to bring down the towers, or knock the hole in the Pentagon. They needed to use explosive and a cruise missile.

So, what's the lamest Conspiracy Theory you guys ever heard?

Read up on science yourself, moron.

Read the point it takes for steel to become malable, the temperature at which gas burns, and while you're at it, look at similar events in which a building burnt and didn't fall, or even that a plane of comparable size rammed into it.

Then take into consideration,

Owner of the towers taking record-breaking insurance policies,
Fact that Norad HAPPENED to stand down on that day,
Lack of large wings, tails, ect, near the perfectly circular hole in the pentagon,
Fact that Bush talked about seeing the second crash just after it happened before it was publicly broadcasted,
and more. How can you deny that something is up with this?

Sure, first glimpse will tell you that of course a fully-fueled plane can take down a tower, but it's physically impossible. They'd love for you to think that, but open your eyes.

Okay, disproved. If you want to continue, PM me. If you don't PM me, I'll know what you're trying to say is utter bullshit, and that you don't believe it yourself. Maybe if you're stubborn enough to keep trying with me, I'll see you in my inbox.
Sel Appa
26-11-2007, 23:36
So, what do you guys think is the Lamest Conspiracy Theory? For me, it would have to be that 9/11 was an inside job. I mean let's not forget how many people you'd have to keep quiet to pull this off, but the simple fact that these nut case don't even grasp the simple laws of physics is astounding. They actually believe that a 127,520lb aircraft with full tanks of gas slamming into the towers and the Pentagon at 500mph wasn't enough to bring down the towers, or knock the hole in the Pentagon. They needed to use explosive and a cruise missile.

So, what's the lamest Conspiracy Theory you guys ever heard?

You stole mine. :upyours:

This forum requires that you wait 30 seconds between posts. Please try again in 1 seconds.
Rubiconic Crossings
26-11-2007, 23:51
Read up on science yourself, moron.

Read the point it takes for steel to become malable, the temperature at which gas burns, and while you're at it, look at similar events in which a building burnt and didn't fall, or even that a plane of comparable size rammed into it.

Then take into consideration,

Owner of the towers taking record-breaking insurance policies,
Fact that Norad HAPPENED to stand down on that day,
Lack of large wings, tails, ect, near the perfectly circular hole in the pentagon,
Fact that Bush talked about seeing the second crash just after it happened before it was publicly broadcasted,
and more. How can you deny that something is up with this?

Sure, first glimpse will tell you that of course a fully-fueled plane can take down a tower, but it's physically impossible. They'd love for you to think that, but open your eyes.

Okay, disproved. If you want to continue, PM me. If you don't PM me, I'll know what you're trying to say is utter bullshit, and that you don't believe it yourself. Maybe if you're stubborn enough to keep trying with me, I'll see you in my inbox.

Here....just to help you along to happy land...

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2007/09/12/king.mystery.plane.CNN
Zarakon
26-11-2007, 23:55
Penis melting zionist robot combs.

No, seriously. Look it up. There was quite a scare in...I think it was Sudan.
Rubiconic Crossings
26-11-2007, 23:57
Penis melting zionist robot combs.

No, seriously. Look it up. There was quite a scare in...I think it was Sudan.

Oh yeah! I remember that! LOL

Yeah thats a good one...
Vaklavia
27-11-2007, 12:20
I accept your concession of defeat, Wilgrove. :)
Vaklavia
27-11-2007, 12:25
Here....just to help you along to happy land...

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2007/09/12/king.mystery.plane.CNN



Please dont spam threads.
Ifreann
27-11-2007, 13:07
Planes dont evaporate into thin air when they crash. You can show me peices of charred metal all you want but I've seen plane crashes and that was no plane crash.
No, planes break into small pieces of charred metal.

9/11 Deniers? Pathetic snipes and name calling is not going to help you in this debate. The WTC was built to withstand an aircraft crashing into it. It had a central core of concrete columns that were moulded around steel bars.
IF the building collapse happened the way you say it did then we would have seen tall metal poles gutting out of the rubble.
I'm pretty sure that it came out before the 11th Sept. that the twin towers were, in fact, very vulnerable to an aircraft crashing into them.



Into it's own foot print? No sale.
Great arguement here. Really fantastic. I'm totally convinced that Building 7 was intentionall demolished by agents of the US Government. :rolleyes:


As do you,
"NO U!"
I have never seen anyone in the Truth Movement lend credence to such a theory.
You call yourselves the Truth Movement? Cute.


Wouldnt need to know.
Would need to be kept quiet about why their plane vanished off the face of the earth.

Wouldnt need to know.
Ditto.

CIA

Agree.

FBI

Agree

NSTB

Easy to manipulate.

FAA

Easy to manipulate.

The owners of WTC

You mean Larry Silverstien? The guy who is on record as saying that he gave the order to 'pull' i.e demolish the building. Who, by the way, stood to gain a lot of insurance from an attack such as 9/11.

The people who was "hired" to plant explosive (if that was true)

Yes.

The White House

No shit.
Which all adds up to thousands and thousands of people who have to be kept quiet about the whole thing.

Not really.
So why did he take credit for it if he never did it?

Flight 93 did dissapear off the radar screen for a short while.
Wow. Well this proves that it never crashed at all.

Like I said, it's not as many people as you think.
It's thousands of people! Thousands of people in high level positions that have to be kept ignorant of kept quiet.
I accept your concession of defeat, Wilgrove. :)
He made no such concession.
Vaklavia
27-11-2007, 13:28
No, planes break into small pieces of charred metal.

No, they dont.


I'm pretty sure that it came out before the 11th Sept. that the twin towers were, in fact, very vulnerable to an aircraft crashing into them.

Source?




Great arguement here. Really fantastic. I'm totally convinced that Building 7 was intentionall demolished by agents of the US Government. :rolleyes:

Nice debate tatic there.:rolleyes:

"NO U!"

More immature sniping. Keep 'em coming!

You call yourselves the Truth Movement? Cute.

Ad homin


Would need to be kept quiet about why their plane vanished off the face of the earth.

It wouldnt have appeared to have vanished.



<snip>

Which all adds up to thousands and thousands of people who have to be kept quiet about the whole thing.



So why did he take credit for it if he never did it?


He didnt take credit for it.

Wow. Well this proves that it never crashed at all.

No it doesnt. Learn to read.


It's thousands of people! Thousands of people in high level positions that have to be kept ignorant of kept quiet.

No, its a small group of people manipulating thousans of people. Big diffrence.

He made no such concession.


He hasnt replied to my points. He has, therefore conceded.
Bottle
27-11-2007, 13:38
The lamest conspiracy theory is the idea that Ron Paul is somehow something new rather than being the same stupid isolationist racist shit.
/agree
Ifreann
27-11-2007, 13:41
No, they dont.
So what do they do?

Source?
Is not being forthcoming, unfortunately. Though this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collapse_of_the_World_Trade_Center#Ongoing_investigations) seems relevant.

Nice debate tatic there.
:)

More immature sniping. Keep 'em coming!
I think you missed the point. Oh well.

Ad homin
Learn what an Ad Hominem is before you accuse me of making one.


It wouldnt have appeared to have vanished.
What would it have appeared to have done?

He didnt take credit for it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collapse_of_the_World_Trade_Center#Remarks_by_Osama_bin_Laden

No it doesnt. Learn to read.
I was being sarcastic.


No, its a small group of people manipulating thousans of people. Big diffrence.
Thousands of people who have to be kept ignorant. And another thing. Loose Change. Why wasn't the kid behind that killed? If the government can conspire to kill 300 people then it can easily conspire to kill one kid.

He hasnt replied to my points. He has, therefore conceded.

He hasn't replied to your points YET. He, like almost everyone else here, has a life apart from NSG. Other things to do, other demands on his time.
Pezalia
27-11-2007, 13:47
Dulce tunnels
Nazca lines being made for ancient astronauts
The Illumanati, CIA, Jewish bankers, the Masons and everyone else contributing to the New World Order.

Of course there's no new world order... :D

*waits for black helicopters*
American Storm
27-11-2007, 13:47
Well here is the thing:

You must be really stupid to think that Bush could plan 9/11. He was a C-student in Yale. He only went to that university because his dad had the money. If he can't cover up Abu Gharib and the other republican scandals from his administration, there is no way he can cover up 9/11 this good. The media would have been all over him and he would have been impeached from day one. And guess what? The media isn't on his side.
Ancient Borea
27-11-2007, 20:53
Well here is the thing:

You must be really stupid to think that Bush could plan 9/11. He was a C-student in Yale. He only went to that university because his dad had the money. If he can't cover up Abu Gharib and the other republican scandals from his administration, there is no way he can cover up 9/11 this good. The media would have been all over him and he would have been impeached from day one. And guess what? The media isn't on his side.

Beside the secret funding, and the fact that it obviously wasn't just him doing it, uh...?
Cypresaria
28-11-2007, 01:36
Anyways I've just found out the most hugest conspiracy ever!... this makes 9-11 look like storm in a teacup


Every woman on the planet is conspiring not to have sex with me

It must be true.... whenever I go on a date and wonder about afterwards she always claims to be washing her hair, or got work to do or taking out a restraining order


El-Presidente Boris

<<wondering if he should comb his hair and use aftershave:p
Wilgrove
28-11-2007, 02:15
I accept your concession of defeat, Wilgrove. :)

Oh please. I just simply not going to try anymore. I can come up with thousands of links to aviation related website, websites on building constructions, on building demolishes and how they are actually done, I can even post links to the Cockpit tape reocrder and Data recorder to the four aircraft lost and yet you would still stick your fingers in your ear and go

"la la la la la la la la la, I can't hear you la la la la la la la."

I have studied aviation since I was 10, and I know what is capable and what isn't of a jet aircraft such as the Boeing 757s and 767s, and I know what buildings were meant to withstand when it comes from aircrafts crashing into them, but you won't listen. You'll just go "la la la la...." So why even bother?
Wilgrove
28-11-2007, 02:28
Read up on science yourself, moron.

So which consipracy blog would you like me to read?


Read the point it takes for steel to become malable, the temperature at which gas burns, and while you're at it, look at similar events in which a building burnt and didn't fall, or even that a plane of comparable size rammed into it.

Actually steel do not need to melt, in only needs to be weaken. Jet A fuel burns at 825° C, however steel can loose half of it's strength at 648 ° C. Considering that these aircrafts were filled with enough fuel to do a flight across the country, I'd say there was more than enough fuel on board to melt the steel more than just 648 ° C.

Owner of the towers taking record-breaking insurance policies,

It's actually costing him more to build new towers on the site where the old one collapses, and his insurance barely covered what the cost of operating the WTC's. So he actually lost money on the whole deal if it was an insurance scam.

Fact that Norad HAPPENED to stand down on that day,

Actually they did not, NORAD was first contacted soon after it became clear that American Flight 11 was hijacked by Boston Control, and the Control Centers involved and NORAD have been in communication since then.

NORAD Timeline (http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/911timeline.htm)

NORAD did scramble jets, but they were unarmed. They couldn't do anything. NORAD was not prepared for this. This is the first time in history we've ever been attacked like this.

Lack of large wings, tails, ect, near the perfectly circular hole in the pentagon,

Because wings, tails, etc. are not as strong as the fuselage. My bet is that they disintegrated when they went through the rings of the Pentagon and got torn up. Like I told the other guy, aircrafts are not that strong, they aren't meant to be. This isn't a cartoon, you're not going to see a hole that has wings and tails on it.

Fact that Bush talked about seeing the second crash just after it happened before it was publicly broadcasted,

Source?

Sure, first glimpse will tell you that of course a fully-fueled plane can take down a tower, but it's physically impossible. They'd love for you to think that, but open your eyes.

and how is it physically impossible? Because like I said, the steel in the towers already lost 50% of their strength, the weight of the floors above the damaged area kept on pushing down on the steel, and that includes people, office equipment, etc. It was only a matter of time before they collapsed.

Let me ask you something, if it wasn't as bad as you say it was, if the fire wasn't that bad (as the 9/11 deniers like you to believe) then why did people jump? I mean could you imagine the horror that was going on inside that towers where suicide would actually be a viable option?
Wilgrove
28-11-2007, 02:36
As for the United Flight 93 and Delta switch. One of the 9/11 deniers on here say that ATC lost track of it for a moment. Yea, man I'm sorry but in the air, if you are on an IFR Flight Plan (Instrument Flight Rules), you are required by law to be in contact with ATC from the moment you push back from the gate to the moment you arrive at the gate. That even applies to the small airplanes that I fly. A turn around time for a Boeing 757/767 can be anywhere from half a hour to an hour. A turn around time is the amount of time it takes from an aircraft to arrive at the gate and then depart again. So to say that they lost radar contact momentarily would be false since it would take a half an hour to an hour for an aircraft of this size to land, deboard, and take off again. and it would've been in Radar contact with ATC the whole time.
Candistan
28-11-2007, 02:37
David Icke claiming that George W. Bush, the British Royals and Boxcar Willie are all 7-foot tall, blood-drinking lizard men who rule the world from subterranean cities. Wiki David Icke and see for yourself.
Chumblywumbly
28-11-2007, 02:45
David Icke claiming that George W. Bush, the British Royals and Boxcar Willie are all 7-foot tall, blood-drinking lizard men who rule the world from subterranean cities.
David Icke is indeed a very strange man.

With an even stranger taste in shell-suits.
Bann-ed
28-11-2007, 02:55
Racism.
[NS]Click Stand
28-11-2007, 02:56
Racism.

I dunno, I've seen a lot of racists. It would have to be a pretty big cover-up with tons of government agents pretending to be prejudiced.
Bann-ed
28-11-2007, 03:01
Click Stand;13248362']I dunno, I've seen a lot of racists. It would have to be a pretty big cover-up with tons of government agents pretending to be prejudiced.

Moreso the conspiracy that Racism is a conspiracy, is the lamest conspiracy theory.
Vaklavia
28-11-2007, 13:01
Thousands of people who have to be kept ignorant. And another thing. Loose Change. Why wasn't the kid behind that killed? If the government can conspire to kill 300 people then it can easily conspire to kill one kid.

- Ifreann


If Dylan Avery was killed then it would draw unwanted attention. And would martyrise him in the eyes of the Truth Movement.
Vaklavia
28-11-2007, 13:04
Oh please. I just simply not going to try anymore. I can come up with thousands of links to aviation related website, websites on building constructions, on building demolishes and how they are actually done, I can even post links to the Cockpit tape reocrder and Data recorder to the four aircraft lost and yet you would still stick your fingers in your ear and go

"la la la la la la la la la, I can't hear you la la la la la la la."

I have studied aviation since I was 10, and I know what is capable and what isn't of a jet aircraft such as the Boeing 757s and 767s, and I know what buildings were meant to withstand when it comes from aircrafts crashing into them, but you won't listen. You'll just go "la la la la...." So why even bother?



So your saying that you can refute me, but you dont want to because you are afraid I wont listen? That isnt how I operate.
Ifreann
28-11-2007, 13:17
Let me ask you something, if it wasn't as bad as you say it was, if the fire wasn't that bad (as the 9/11 deniers like you to believe) then why did people jump? I mean could you imagine the horror that was going on inside that towers where suicide would actually be a viable option?
Obviously they were thrown out of the windows by the eilte CIA lizardmen, who then used their stealth camoflague and lizard powers to climb down the towers and escape before they collapsed.
If Dylan Avery was killed then it would draw unwanted attention.
Some nobody dies in a car crash or a break in gone wrong? Pffft, wouldn't even make national news.
And would martyrise him in the eyes of the Truth Movement.
Before the Truth Movement even heard of him?
Vaklavia
02-12-2007, 11:53
Obviously they were thrown out of the windows by the eilte CIA lizardmen, who then used their stealth camoflague and lizard powers to climb down the towers and escape before they collapsed.




Go fuck your mom.
Cypresaria
02-12-2007, 14:11
Obviously they were thrown out of the windows by the eilte CIA lizardmen, who then used their stealth camoflague and lizard powers to climb down the towers and escape before they collapsed.



Wow That explains those puffs of dust that came from the building as they collapsed, the lizardmen breaking the windows and running down the side of the building faster than the building could come down

It all makes sense now

El_presidente Boris

Nurse.... its time for my medication again!
[NS]I BEFRIEND CHESTNUTS
02-12-2007, 15:50
There's a conspiracy theory that the Nazis fled and the Third Reich still exists in a massive subterranean base in the Antarctic. I think I even heard one once of them having a base on the moon.
Dinaverg
02-12-2007, 16:14
Go fuck your mom.

But how do I know she isn't part of the conspiracy!
SaintB
02-12-2007, 16:18
Here's a dumb one.. a large portion of Pakastani's especially in Islamabad are claiming that there is no Osama Bin Ladin. He is a made up character by the United States so they could invade other nations with impunity.

Sorry, he's a very real person but I will not get into the rest.

And then there's the Illuminati one... Read this people... the Illuminati were a group of enlightend scientific minds who met in secret with each other to describe many of the most imprtant scientific discoveries of thier time (Gravity, the world is not the center of the universe, etc.) They were not a satanic cult, in fact most were Catholic, they simply realized that the predominantly simple minded folk of blind faith were afraid of thier ideas and hence them... if it had not been for the Illuminati much of today's common knowledge may have been completly lost to us and we'd still be marching on crusades... oh wait... we are still going on crusades...

Anyway.. the Illuminati were formed to shed light on the secrets of scientific discovery. They do not exist any longer, and in fact they completed all thier stated goals.
SaintB
02-12-2007, 16:21
Go fuck your mom.

He has admitted defeat, good job all of you with common sense :)
Vaklavia
03-12-2007, 15:17
He has admitted defeat, good job all of you with common sense :)

You wish, God-boy.
Andaluciae
03-12-2007, 15:49
You wish, God-boy.

You see, usually debating actually involves, you know, debating, and not telling your opponents to go fuck themselves."

Oh, and Ifreann is right, if the government wanted to kill Avery with little suspicion, they could do it no problem.
Ifreann
03-12-2007, 15:57
Go fuck your mom.
I can't right now, she's rather far away.
You wish, God-boy.
You don't seem to be trying to refute any arguements or make some of your own. It sure looks like admitting defeat. But it could be that you just haven't done those things yet. Feel free to post something relevant when you get the time :)
Oh, and Ifreann is right, if the government wanted to kill Avery with little suspicion, they could do it no problem.

Incidentally, it's Maddox's arguement, not mine. Though it makes perfect sense. I mean, you've just killed about 3000 people, what's one or two more?
Andaluciae
03-12-2007, 16:11
Incidentally, it's Maddox's arguement, not mine. Though it makes perfect sense. I mean, you've just killed about 3000 people, what's one or two more?

True.

Not to mention their proven abilities at cover-ups, if it happens to be the case.
High Borders
03-12-2007, 16:13
What bugs me about conspiracy theorists is when they can't accept that it is rational to believe something other than what they believe.

I'm not familiar with too many conspiracy theories, but it seems likely to me that some of them might involve events that are physically possible and secrets hidden by a relatively small number of people. I can live with people believing all sorts of things -- let's face it, we all get our information from the media, not directly, and it's not entirely impossible to suppose that the *media* have their own agenda ... quite the reverse, I think, although their agenda may simply be to make the news look interesting and important.

But the ultimate fallacy of the conspiracy theorist is that there is only one "right" way to perceive a sequence of events; unless they have personal knowledge and evidence of a cover-up, in which case it seems to me that they are not a conspiracy theorist at all, but a whistle-blower.
Copiosa Scotia
03-12-2007, 16:22
The lamest conspiracy theory ever has to be that guys are only after sex. I would get so much more sex if not for this conspiracy theory.
Aliasistan
03-12-2007, 16:31
Biggest Conspiracy:


Gravity.
R0cka
03-12-2007, 18:25
Oh, and Ifreann is right, if the government wanted to kill Avery with little suspicion, they could do it no problem.

Personally I'd set up Avery so it looked like he was killed by a male prostitute in a public bathroom while trying to solicit sex.
Greater Trostia
03-12-2007, 19:06
He hasnt replied to my points. He has, therefore conceded.

When your opponents finally tire of addressing your not-that-rational rebuttals, you proclaim victory due to simple endurance. It seems that proclaiming to "win" is what you're mostly concerned here with, rather than the rational exchange of ideas. OK, but let me tell you that no one reading this thread is going to say, "Aha! Vaklavia says he won! Therefore his argument is superior."
OceanDrive2
03-12-2007, 19:18
So, what do you guys think is the Lamest Conspiracy Theory? Lately:
#1 President Chavez will cheat to win the referendum proposing to remove term limits.

#2 Removing term limits is undemocratic. Germany France and many others are undemocratic because they dont have -like US- term limits. :rolleyes:
GeeDub 43
03-12-2007, 19:23
I think the worst conspiracy theory is the one that tricks people from another continent into fighting for other countries "Freedom" or "liberty". American's got fooled several times in the 20th century for that crap.

'course, the newest one is that "brown skinned towelheads" want to kill us white folk because we believe in freedom and liberty. Same old schpiel, just another target group for the hate.

I say shoot the Americans that got us involved in all that shit (or just shoot their kids if the perpetrators are already dead), then see who else wants some action.
Fall of Empire
03-12-2007, 19:28
The lamest conspiracy theory?
The government trying to cover up anything larger than their fucking ginormous debt.
Yootopia
03-12-2007, 20:02
Any Lizard.
Alanath
03-12-2007, 20:07
Scientology is probably the lamest conspiracy ever. It's a religion based around paying to be a part of it, and Hubbard even said that the best way to make money is to start a religion.

But as far as conspiracies go, the Roswell one is probably the best. The USAF started the rumor of UFOs and then denied it in order to protect the secret aircraft they were developing, so that people would get so focused on the
"aliens".
Ardchoille
03-12-2007, 22:16
Vaklavia, you're flaming. Stop, now.

Listen to what other posters are telling you. When a person has to resort to personal attacks, it's usually a sign that they're stymied. Step back from the computer awhile and then make your points without heat.
Ardchoille
03-12-2007, 22:20
Read up on science yourself, moron. <snip>.


Ancient Borea, knock it off. Insults aren't arguments.
Satura
03-12-2007, 22:24
I'd have to go with the whole 'Aliens helped build the pyramids" scenario. What a way to undermine ancient civilations. Although I do like a fun little alien conspiracy theory here and there.
The Grand World Order
04-12-2007, 02:41
Honestly, I don't believe the Conspiracy Theory, and I don't really care much. Not only that, I have heard a recorded audio confession of the maker of LC right after he made the video. He said it was for kicks, and that he didn't actually believe it.

And even if the government did do it, what can you do? Protest? Like that will work. And besides, everything happens for a reason.
Wilgrove
04-12-2007, 02:58
Honestly, I don't believe the Conspiracy Theory, and I don't really care much. Not only that, I have heard a recorded audio confession of the maker of LC right after he made the video. He said it was for kicks, and that he didn't actually believe it.

And even if the government did do it, what can you do? Protest? Like that will work. And besides, everything happens for a reason.

Yea, I heard that it was originally supposed to be a fake documentary, and somewhere along the line, it turned into a "real" one.
Bann-ed
04-12-2007, 04:19
The Constitution.
CthulhuFhtagn
04-12-2007, 04:45
Oh, and Ifreann is right, if the government wanted to kill Avery with little suspicion, they could do it no problem.

Hell, I could do it.
Marrakech II
04-12-2007, 06:52
can you actually meet girls in stormfront?

:D
Greater Trostia
04-12-2007, 08:12
David Icke is a great source for conspiracy theories. He kind of combines and uses every damned one. The transdimensional reptilian shapeshifters are the most famous, but he also goes into things like how the US is really a Corporation run by the UK Royal Family. That's an annoying one to me (unlike the reptilians which is just entertaining) because it's the whole, paranoid anti-capitalist blame-business meme taken to its extreme. Ugh.
The Resurgent Dream
04-12-2007, 08:16
Is it possible to have a win in the second post of a thread? I think you have just earned that :)

That's not an actual conspiracy theory though. It's just a theory.
Electronic Church
04-12-2007, 09:46
this must be the lamest one:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=VjgidAICoQI

the world is growing like a balloon! but the scientists are keeping their mouth shut!

ohhhhh the conspiracy!
Vaklavia
06-12-2007, 15:15
Yea, I heard that it was originally supposed to be a fake documentary, and somewhere along the line, it turned into a "real" one.


Do you have a source for your claim? Or did you pull it out your ass like most Conspiracy Deniers do?
Ifreann
06-12-2007, 15:27
Do you have a source for your claim? Or did you pull it out your ass like most Conspiracy Deniers do?

As opposed to conspiracy theorists, who thoroughly examine all evidence available to them before coming to the conclusion that the offical story is wrong. :rolleyes:
Vaklavia
06-12-2007, 16:12
As opposed to conspiracy theorists, who thoroughly examine all evidence available to them before coming to the conclusion that the offical story is wrong. :rolleyes:


Please dont flame or I'll report you.




Former Italian President and the man who revealed the existence of Operation Gladio Francesco Cossiga has gone public on 9/11, telling Italy's most respected newspaper that the attacks were run by the CIA and Mossad and that this was common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies.

Cossiga was elected President of the Italian Senate in July 1983 before winning a landslide 1985 election to become President of the country in 1985.

Cossiga gained respect from opposition parties as one of a rare breed - an honest politician - and led the country for seven years until April 1992.

Cossiga's tendency to be outspoken upset the Italian political establishment and he was forced to resign after revealing the existence of, and his part in setting up, Operation Gladio - a rogue intelligence network under NATO auspices that carried out bombings across Europe in the 60's, 70's and 80's.

Gladio's specialty was to carry out what they coined "false flag operations," terror attacks that were blamed on their domestic and geopolitical opposition.

Cossiga's revelations contributed to an Italian parliamentary investigation of Gladio in 2000, during which evidence was unearthed that the attacks were being overseen by the U.S. intelligence apparatus.

In March 2001, Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra stated, in sworn testimony, "You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force ... the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security."

Cossiga's new revelations appeared last week in Italy's oldest and most widely read newspaper, Corriere della Sera. Below appears a rough translation.

"[Bin Laden supposedly confessed] to the Qaeda September [attack] to the two towers in New York [claiming to be] the author of the attack of the 11, while all the [intelligence services] of America and Europe ... now know well that the disastrous attack has been planned and realized from the CIA American and the Mossad with the aid of the Zionist world in order to put under accusation the Arabic Countries and in order to induce the western powers to take part ... in Iraq [and] Afghanistan."
Cossiga first expressed his doubts about 9/11 in 2001, and is quoted in Webster Tarpley's book as stating that "The mastermind of the attack must have been a “sophisticated mind, provided with ample means not only to recruit fanatic kamikazes, but also highly specialized personnel. I add one thing: it could not be accomplished without infiltrations in the radar and flight security personnel.”

Coming from a widely respected former head of state, Cossiga's assertion that the 9/11 attacks were an inside job and that this is common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies is highly unlikely to be mentioned by any establishment media outlets, because like the hundreds of other sober ex-government, military, air force professionals, allied to hundreds more professors and intellectuals - he can't be sidelined as a crackpot conspiracy theorist.
Ifreann
06-12-2007, 16:31
Please dont flame or I'll report you.
Who am I flaming? I'm simply suggesting that conspiracy theorists are known for forming a conclusion and then trying to find holes in the official story, then act as though those holes are evidence for their premature conclusion.




<snip>

I'll start reading, you post a source for this copypasta. Deal?
GrandBill II
06-12-2007, 17:01
Global Warming is a socialist conspiracy to bring down capitalism
Gun Manufacturers
06-12-2007, 17:20
So, what do you guys think is the Lamest Conspiracy Theory? For me, it would have to be that 9/11 was an inside job. I mean let's not forget how many people you'd have to keep quiet to pull this off, but the simple fact that these nut case don't even grasp the simple laws of physics is astounding. They actually believe that a 127,520lb aircraft with full tanks of gas slamming into the towers and the Pentagon at 500mph wasn't enough to bring down the towers, or knock the hole in the Pentagon. They needed to use explosive and a cruise missile.

So, what's the lamest Conspiracy Theory you guys ever heard?

As to the 9/11 conspiracy, when people say that it was a controlled demolition, not the planes that brought it down, I get irritated. It has to do with the FACT that the equipment and materials for a controlled demolition WOULD HAVE BEEN NOTICED BY THE PEOPLE THAT WORK THERE!

For evidence that the materials and equipment would have been hard to miss, I present exhibit A: http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/building-implosion-20.jpg

which is part of exhibit B: http://www.howstuffworks.com/building-implosion.htm
Hammurab
06-12-2007, 18:03
Please dont flame or I'll report you.



All Ifrean said was "As opposed to conspiracy theorists, who thoroughly examine all evidence available to them before coming to the conclusion that the offical story is wrong. :rolleyes:"

Whereas you, Vaklavia, had just said:

Do you have a source for your claim? Or did you pull it out your ass like most Conspiracy Deniers do?

How is what he said a flame, when what you JUST SAID is easily more ascerbic?

Besides, the article you posted says the guy himself was in the business of setting up "false flag operations"...isn't it possible he pulled a double-flag on you?
This might be a puppet
06-12-2007, 19:47
*snip*Operation Gladio - a rogue intelligence network under NATO auspices that carried out bombings across Europe in the 60's, 70's and 80's.
'Gladio' was set up under NATO auspices, yes, but there's NO evidence that its bombings had any official sanction from anybody. It was supposed to be the nucleus of a pre-prepared 'resistance' movement in Italy, in case the Russians managed to over-run the country (and any more of western Europe) and apparently -- according to a newspaper report about some members' trial, which I can remember having read at the time -- some of its cell's members simply decided that if they were supposed to fight against the Communists then they might as well launch a pre-emptive strike...
Vaklavia
06-12-2007, 20:16
As to the 9/11 conspiracy, when people say that it was a controlled demolition, not the planes that brought it down, I get irritated. It has to do with the FACT that the equipment and materials for a controlled demolition WOULD HAVE BEEN NOTICED BY THE PEOPLE THAT WORK THERE!

For evidence that the materials and equipment would have been hard to miss, I present exhibit A: http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/building-implosion-20.jpg

which is part of exhibit B: http://www.howstuffworks.com/building-implosion.htm



O RLY


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5amaZeL_2s
Vaklavia
06-12-2007, 20:23
Who am I flaming? I'm simply suggesting that conspiracy theorists are known for forming a conclusion and then trying to find holes in the official story, then act as though those holes are evidence for their premature conclusion.






I'll start reading, you post a source for this copypasta. Deal?

Deal.


http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2007/120407_common_knowledge.htm
Dynamic Revolution
06-12-2007, 20:27
O RLY


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5amaZeL_2s

The women's voice from that video was so annoying...
Dumasha
06-12-2007, 20:47
lamest conspiracy theory? the one that Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold were actually ordered by feds to commit the massacre at Columbine High....
Querinos
06-12-2007, 20:49
Reptilian Humanoids have infiltrated the first worlds governments.

That is the dumbest, stupidest, conspiracy theory -ever.

Well, how else would you explain the thin-lips on conservatives?
Hammurab
06-12-2007, 20:50
lamest conspiracy theory? the one that Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold were actually ordered by feds to commit the massacre at Columbine High....

Hadn't heard that one, but it sounds entertaining.

Is there a site or anything for it?
Gun Manufacturers
06-12-2007, 21:07
O RLY


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5amaZeL_2s

Um, that link proves nothing. They came up with their conclusions based on anecdotal testimony and conjecture. The people they interviewed saw NOTHING that would indicate demolitions or demolitions prep work, and what they did see/hear was probably nothing more than office construction.

http://img367.imageshack.us/img367/78/owlyarly4rd.jpg
Dumasha
06-12-2007, 21:24
Hadn't heard that one, but it sounds entertaining.

Is there a site or anything for it?

no, can't remember where i read it....still the lamest though.
Hammurab
06-12-2007, 21:31
no, can't remember where i read it....still the lamest though.

Of course, we must consider...is the amplitude of lameness subject to the superposition of jackass conspiracy plots?

In other words, can waves of bullshit constructively interfere with one another, resulting in aggregate nutbar theories?

Suppose the feds DID send Klebold and Harris to hit Columbine...because the library at Columbine had a book on herpetology that may have revealed the method by which Lizardmen appear normally to thermal security devices now prominent in various military installations...and the Lizardmen need continued access so they can take inventory of the Zionest capacity to suppress the population...also, one of the Lizardmen is a timecubist!

Is that lamer?
R0cka
06-12-2007, 22:45
http://img367.imageshack.us/img367/78/owlyarly4rd.jpg


http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y53/TheCells/nowai.jpg
New new nebraska
06-12-2007, 23:49
As stated earlier the faked moonlanding theory. That one is the lamest by far.
Gun Manufacturers
07-12-2007, 04:27
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y53/TheCells/nowai.jpg

http://img446.imageshack.us/img446/2341/owlooya0jv.jpg
Vaklavia
07-12-2007, 11:06
Um, that link proves nothing. They came up with their conclusions based on anecdotal testimony and conjecture. The people they interviewed saw NOTHING that would indicate demolitions or demolitions prep work, and what they did see/hear was probably nothing more than office construction.




I see you didnt pay attention to the video. If you had you would have known that the floors in question were supposed to be empty. To wit: noone was supposed to be up there.


Idiot. :rolleyes:
Gun Manufacturers
07-12-2007, 12:45
I see you didnt pay attention to the video. If you had you would have known that the floors in question were supposed to be empty. To wit: noone was supposed to be up there.


Idiot. :rolleyes:

I did pay attention to the video. No tenants were supposed to be up there. But tell me this, were those floors supposed to stay vacant forever? Did those 2 office workers know the intimate workings of the building management, to know if any construction workers were supposed to be up there? The answer to those 2 questions is probably not.

And please don't throw around insults. Especially since you yourself have complained about it to the mods.
Ifreann
07-12-2007, 13:03
O RLY


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5amaZeL_2s
YARLY. Noises from an empty does not equal the placing of explosives, no matter how much you might want it to. And why would they bother to clean the place up afterwards? Why not just lock the fucking doors? And why would they be inside, on the floor which is supposedly full of explosives when the fucking building is on fire? Seriously, nobody is that stupid. A five year old knows that fire and explosives don't mix.
Deal.


http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2007/120407_common_knowledge.htm
Hah, you expect us to take the word of a 'Teh gubbernmint did 9/11' website?
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y53/TheCells/nowai.jpg
http://i134.photobucket.com/albums/q100/TheSteveslols/orly.gif
I see you didnt pay attention to the video. If you had you would have known that the floors in question were supposed to be empty. To wit: noone was supposed to be up there.
They weren't being used as offices. That doesn't mean that nobody could ever use them for anything legitimate.

Idiot. :rolleyes:

Grow up and stop flaming or you'll end up getting banned.
Ardchoille
07-12-2007, 13:59
QUIT WITH THE PICSPAM, WILLYA! Ifreann, if you've busted Mr Barry's forum, you're gonna have to pay for it out of your allowance.

RLY. Wai.

Vaklavia, you're making it difficult to be nice to a newcomer. "Idiot" is milder than your previous efforts, but it's still flaming. Do. Not. Do. That.
Vaklavia
07-12-2007, 15:20
YARLY. Noises from an empty does not equal the placing of explosives, no matter how much you might want it to. And why would they bother to clean the place up afterwards?

To aviod suspicion.

Hah, you expect us to take the word of a 'Teh gubbernmint did 9/11' website?

Ad homin. And people here take their opinions from TEH GUBBERMINT LIED ABOUT IRAQ sites.


http://i134.photobucket.com/albums/q100/TheSteveslols/orly.gif

They weren't being used as offices. That doesn't mean that nobody could ever use them for anything legitimate.

Noone. Was. Supposed. To. Be. Up. There. If anyone was, then they were tresspassing, simple as. If it was anything innocent like building work thene someone would have known about it.



Grow up and stop flaming or you'll end up getting banned.


You first.
Ifreann
07-12-2007, 15:29
QUIT WITH THE PICSPAM, WILLYA! Ifreann, if you've busted Mr Barry's forum, you're gonna have to pay for it out of your allowance.

RLY. Wai.
Ack, sorries.
*polishes forum*
To aviod suspicion.
Nobody is supposed to be there. They can just lock the door and nobody will see anything to be suspicious about. And I see that you didn't try to addres why they would be there during the demolition that they're supposed to be carrying out.

Ad homin.
The word is hominem, and that was not one.
And people here take their opinions from TEH GUBBERMINT LIED ABOUT IRAQ sites.
Is that so? Care to point to some posts that show this?


Noone. Was. Supposed. To. Be. Up. There.
Nobody said that in your precious video.
If anyone was, then they were tresspassing, simple as.
Unless they were allowed to be there
If it was anything innocent like building work thene someone would have known about it.
Yes. Someone probably does know what was happening there. After all, the video you posted shows only two people out of how many survivors? Who's to say that they just couldn't find the person in charge of the construction work there. Or that person died. Two ignorant employees doesn't add a whole lot of credence to your idea.


You first.

I'm not flaming anyone. I'm disagreeing with you.
Vaklavia
07-12-2007, 15:40
Ack, sorries.
*polishes forum*

Nobody is supposed to be there. They can just lock the door and nobody will see anything to be suspicious about. And I see that you didn't try to addres why they would be there during the demolition that they're supposed to be carrying out.

Maybe they were finishing up and got trapped. Why dont you find one of the guys that did it and ask him?


The word is hominem, and that was not one.

Insulting an entire group of people because of what they beleive in? Disragarding a website with a idiotic little non sequitar because you dont agree with it's opinions is an ad hominim.



Is that so? Care to point to some posts that show this?

Use the search function.

Nobody said that in your precious video.

ad hominem.

Unless they were allowed to be there

They went. Noone was.

Yes. Someone probably does know what was happening there. After all, the video you posted shows only two people out of how many survivors? Who's to say that they just couldn't find the person in charge of the construction work there. Or that person died. Two ignorant employees doesn't add a whole lot of credence to your idea.

Another ad hominem. Calling someone ignorant because they disagree with you. :rolleyes: If anyone knew about the 'construction' on those floors we would have heard something by now.




I'm not flaming anyone. I'm disagreeing with you.


And flaming.:sniper:
Ifreann
07-12-2007, 15:47
Maybe they were finishing up and got trapped. Why dont you find one of the guys that did it and ask him?
Or maybe whatever was making that noise had nothing at all to do with the attacks.


Insulting an entire group of people because of what they beleive in? Disragarding a website with a idiotic little non sequitar because you dont agree with it's opinions is an ad hominim.
No, it's not. An ad hominem would be dismissing your arguements because of who you are. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
And I disregarded your website because it's biased.


Use the search function.
If you can't substantiate your claims yourself then don't make them/

ad hominem.
No, it isn't. You shouldn't use terms you don't understand, it makes you look bad.

They went. Noone was.
And you know this how?

Another ad hominem. Calling someone ignorant because they disagree with you.
No, I called them ignorant because they don't know what was the noises they heard were. That's sort of what the word ignorant means. And it's still not an ad hominem.
If anyone knew about the 'construction' on those floors we would have heard something by now.
Abscence of proof isn't proof of abscence.

And flaming.:sniper:

No, just disagreeing. But if you really think I'm flaming then I'm sure you can find the moderation forum.
Walther Realized
07-12-2007, 19:01
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html

Is the thread over yet?
Jocabia
07-12-2007, 19:19
What I love about this conspiracy theory is it requires you not to understand ANYTHING about demolition. If this were really a demolition, they would not have to do anything that would shake floors. That's the biggest problem with the theory is that it requires not only for this to have been a massive conspiracy, but they would have to be intentionally leaving evidence.

The entire relies on ignorance, wild incompetence and confusion. Evidence is presented scientifically. Witnesses are WILDLY unreliable. That's a fact. This selectively chooses witnesses and attempts to weave them together into some kind of a theory.

First of all, if you KNEW the building was about to be destroyed, why would you be in it? Yet, this ignorant theory claims they would be in the building.

Second, why would they leave so much evidence when they could demolish your house without waking you up till the bombs went off. No shaking floors or moving of dumpsters.

Third, people confused the noise of the strain on the building with things they are more familiar with. What does the bending of support beams sound like? You don't know. Nor do I. What does it sound like when so much pressure occurs on one side of a building that cement pops off the outside? Again, you don't know. Relying on witnesses to tell you what is going on is ludicrous. Witnesses also claimed that 20 thousand people died at the time and that there were four planes and various other wild and inaccurate claims. That's what witnesses to wild tragedy do.

It's really sad that people waste their time worrying about this nonsense when there are so many real tragedies going on that we can accuse our government of.
Vaklavia
07-12-2007, 20:40
[url]

Please dont spam the thread. Thank you.

Is the thread over yet?

^
Vaklavia
07-12-2007, 20:59
I thought this was a liberal forum but with the amount of Bush supporters ganging up on me it seems I was wrong. You dont care about America at all.
Greater Trostia
07-12-2007, 21:02
It's really sad that people waste their time worrying about this nonsense when there are so many real tragedies going on that we can accuse our government of.

I agree, but I think I understand their angle (apart from irrationality of conspiracies), since one of my friends is a "believer" if you will. Basically they've always thought that, if you could just show that 9/11 was NOT caused by Islamic terrorists, and/or with the support of the government, then THAT would discredit the whole War on Terror, Afghanistan, and Iraq in one fell swoop. No need for petty bickering about WMDs or in-depth rebuttals of the "reasons" given for Iraq... it's all very convenient and handy.

So I would say it's a case of wishing-it-were-so on their part.

Not that that's an excuse to go believing in silly conspiracies, but for a time there it seemed everyone in the US completely supported every foreign policy disaster we embarked on. The "truthers" were, other than the lone pacifists, amongst the only people for a time who seemed to have a strong opposition to the War On Terror. Of course since then lots of people have changed their minds and so even that minor positive is removed...
Vaklavia
07-12-2007, 21:12
bla blah blah ALL HAIL GEORGE BUSH TEH TWOOF0RZ ARE TEH S00PIZ0RZ!!!11! I ARE SMRT! LOLOLOLOL



Translated.
Skinny87
07-12-2007, 21:37
Translated.

You really are just looking to be banned, aren't you? Then you can whine about being 'oppressed' and such.

If you were serious, you'd not just reply to a single poster but to all the others who have refuted your points. Over, and over, and over again.
Jocabia
07-12-2007, 21:57
I thought this was a liberal forum but with the amount of Bush supporters ganging up on me it seems I was wrong. You dont care about America at all.

Yes, I'm sure you'll find that most of the people disagreeing with you are HUGE Bush supporters. I mean, why look at our history of talking about what a bad president Bush is and use that as evidence? Why use evidence at all? 9/11 CT's don't.

But, hey, I don't care about America at all. I just served her, but hey if I don't ignore all evidence and listen to proven conmen, then I'm an America hater.

Incidentally, what other things MUST I believe to love America?
Jocabia
07-12-2007, 22:01
You really are just looking to be banned, aren't you? Then you can whine about being 'oppressed' and such.

If you were serious, you'd not just reply to a single poster but to all the others who have refuted your points. Over, and over, and over again.

I'm not sure if he's trying to troll or he's just pissed, but either way I think that one goes beyond the pale so I reported it.
Gun Manufacturers
07-12-2007, 23:01
I thought this was a liberal forum but with the amount of Bush supporters ganging up on me it seems I was wrong. You dont care about America at all.

Who said that all of us that disagree with you support Bush? I can't wait until the day he's out of office (as long as Hillary isn't moving in the same day). As far as believing or disbelieving the 9/11 conspiracy, I know how to look at the facts. I can tell hard evidence from conjecture and speculation.
Ardchoille
08-12-2007, 00:36
Vaklavia, forumbanned for 24 hours. Reason: repeated flaming after warnings from me and from HotRodia [Edit: not "and Tsaraine"].

Note that this means you must not post as the banned nation or as any other puppet nation. If you have issues with this, file a Getting Help request.

For details of the posts that led to this, check your thread in the Moderation forum in about half an hour.

FYI, that "translated" post would have been sufficient on its own. Deliberately misrepresenting other players in this fashion is very risky.
Cypresaria
08-12-2007, 15:18
I thought this was a liberal forum but with the amount of Bush supporters ganging up on me it seems I was wrong. You dont care about America at all.

First, Not everyone here a Bush supporter
Next , some of the people here have experience in metallugy, physics, construction, and a very few have demolition experience


Theory:
Aircraft fuel fires burn at 750 degrees C or so, Steel melts at 1400 degrees C , therefore the fire did'nt melt the steel frame and explosives were used to bring the building down.

Annoying fact:

Anyone (like me) who knows about steel, knows that steel loses its strength as it gets hotter, between room temp and 750C it loses 75% of its strength.
So if a WTC steel beam has a strength of 50 tons and its loaded to 25 tons, and then you raise the temp to 750C , its strength drops to 12.5 tons, but its still loaded to 25 tons............

The amazing thing for me is not that it took an aircraft ramming the towers at 450 mph to bring them down, its the fact the towers stood for 55 mins and 90 mins after the aircraft hit

El-Presidente Boris BSc(Hons) + 20 yrs in bashing bits of steel with all sorts of expensive equipment