NationStates Jolt Archive


Internet "Brownouts"?!?!?!?!

Sel Appa
25-11-2007, 07:55
Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo...

Say it ain't so...

In a few years the infrastructure that keeps the internet running could be overloaded in North America....

Link (http://news.yahoo.com/s/cmp/20071121/tc_cmp/204200341)

Booming demand for Internet services combined with insufficient infrastructure investment could leave the Web vulnerable to brown outs within three years, a study released Tuesday predicted.

Nemertes Research said Internet providers need to invest from $42 billion to $55 billion -- or 60% to 70% more than current plans call for -- to stave off interruptions to the digital economy that could happen if the 'Net bogs down. "The next Google, YouTube, or Amazon might not arise" if the situation isn't fixed, Nemertes said.

The problem, the group said, is that bandwidth usage is outpacing infrastructure build outs. While core fiber and switching/routing technology "will scale nicely," Internet access resources could soon be overwhelmed in three to five years, Nemertes said.

The trouble could be particularly acute in North America, the researchers said.

"Rather like osteoporosis, the underinvestment in infrastructure will painlessly and invisibly leach competitiveness out of the economy," said Nemertes.

Nemertes conceded that its study, in many ways, represents a best guess at what's happening with the Web. "The Internet is almost opaque to serious researchers, even those with the necessary technical skills, integrity and desire," said the group.

That's because commercial Internet providers closely guard information about usage and technology roadmaps. "Carriers and content providers refuse to reveal their inner workings," said Nemertes, adding that it's understandable that service providers are reluctant to reveal data that might undermine their competitiveness or compromise user privacy.

Nonetheless, "we conclude by urging content and service providers to cooperate with researchers in sharing data," said the study's authors. Nemertes also said Congress should consider tax credits to spur Internet providers to add more broadband capacity.
Kyronea
25-11-2007, 07:57
OH SHIT!

Well, we know who to target first...*glares at places like 4chan and YTMND*
Posi
25-11-2007, 08:04
OH SHIT!

Well, we know who to target first...*glares at Internet Service Providers*
Posi
25-11-2007, 08:08
NOT MY GLORIOUS /b/!!!!!!1!!11
OH SHIT!!!!

*does a barrel roll*
The South Islands
25-11-2007, 08:08
OH SHIT!

Well, we know who to target first...*glares at places like 4chan and YTMND*

NOT MY GLORIOUS /b/!!!!!!1!!11
Posi
25-11-2007, 08:09
Also, when I thought of Brownouts, I thought of a long visit to the shitter.

Did anyone else think of this, or am I just a coprophile?I was think more along the lines of brownnote. One day the entire internets would shit its pants.
The South Islands
25-11-2007, 08:11
Also, when I thought of Brownouts, I thought of a long visit to the shitter.

Did anyone else think of this, or am I just a coprophile?
Austar Union
25-11-2007, 08:34
Well a solution is quite easy. ;)

We either spend the money on upgrading key infrastructure, or set up the web to handle 'priority' traffic for websites or users more willing to pay higher service fees for their bandwidth use.
Posi
25-11-2007, 08:40
Well a solution is quite easy. ;)

We either spend the money on upgrading key infrastructure, or set up the web to handle 'priority' traffic for websites or users more willing to pay higher service fees for their bandwidth use.So you are saying the choice is between progress and stagnation? Fuck, I am stumped.
UpwardThrust
25-11-2007, 08:40
Well a solution is quite easy. ;)

We either spend the money on upgrading key infrastructure, or set up the web to handle 'priority' traffic for websites or users more willing to pay higher service fees for their bandwidth use.

Yeah cause THAT would be cheap ... Doing that would REQUIRE an infrastructure overhaul in and of itself to implement
Posi
25-11-2007, 08:44
Yeah cause THAT would be cheap ... Doing that would REQUIRE an infrastructure overhaul in and of itself to implementNot to mention seriously pissing off the vast majority of those with the technical know how to implement the overhaul.
Austar Union
25-11-2007, 08:52
lol, don't attack me over the options presented. I said it was either or, (or solutions not presented yet). You could always in the meantime support the expansion of our already existing infrastructure, which I do. Capital could be raised from investors, and companies footing the bill to build such an upgrade could reap the advantages. Else... look to your governments... ;)
Posi
25-11-2007, 08:58
lol, don't attack me over the options presented. I said it was either or, (or solutions not presented yet). You could always in the meantime support the expansion of our already existing infrastructure, which I do. Capital could be raised from investors, and companies footing the bill to build such an upgrade could reap the advantages. Else... look to your governments... ;)Who attacked you?
Austar Union
25-11-2007, 09:04
Nevermind. I probably read too much into the intended tone of UpwardThrust's post. It's irrelevant to the topic of this thread anyhow.
UpwardThrust
25-11-2007, 09:13
lol, don't attack me over the options presented. I said it was either or, (or solutions not presented yet). You could always in the meantime support the expansion of our already existing infrastructure, which I do. Capital could be raised from investors, and companies footing the bill to build such an upgrade could reap the advantages. Else... look to your governments... ;)
Was not meant as an attack I just have seen this proposed before and KNOW my networking and realize how flipping expensive it would be even to start approaching this
Dryks Legacy
25-11-2007, 09:34
OH SHIT!

Well, we know who to target first...*glares at places like 4chan and YTMND*

No you fool! Those places contain the people that visit them, without 4chan the /b/-tards will spread even further to every message board and slowly turn it into a new /b/. You don't want that do you?