NationStates Jolt Archive

These are a list of things you should show all your Aryan super friends

http://www.homestead.com/wysinger/brace_2006.pdf


If this study does nothing analysis does nothing else, it demonstrates the of-repeated European feeling that the Cro-Magnons are "us" is more of a product of anthropological folklore than the result of the metric data available from the skeletal remains.

The interbreeding of the incoming Neolithic people with the in situ foragers diluted the Sub-Saharan traces that may have come with the Neolithic spread so that no discoverable element of that remained. This picture of a mixture between the incoming farmers and the in situ foragers had originally been supported by the archaeological record alone, but this view is now reinforced by the analysis of the skeletal morphology of the people of those areas where prehistoric and recent remains can be metrically compared
(no I didn't understand that article :)

http://www.gosai.com/chaitanya/saranagati/html/vedic-upanisads/aryan-invasion.html



"I have declared again and again that if I say Aryas, I mean neither blood nor bones, nor hair, nor skull; I mean simply those who speak an Aryan language...to me an ethnologist who speaks of Aryan race, Aryan blood, Aryan eyes and hair, is as great a sinner as a linguist who speaks of a dolichocephalic dictionary or a brachycephalic grammar."
(Max Mueller, Biographies of Words and the Home of the Aryas, 1888, pg 120)


http://www.homestead.com/wysinger/iron_in_subsaharan.pdf


Africa south of the Sahara, it now seems, was home to a separated and independent invention of iron metallurgy… To sum it up the available evidence, iron technology across much of sub-Saharan Africa has an African origin dating to before 1000 BCE.

The last one is important because all the racists I've talked to think Arabs (who are half "Aryan") went into Sub-Saharan Africa and "civilized" the stupid negroids

I'll have to read through all of them see if I actually understand any of it

Oddly enough, i give as little creedence to people tossing around the term in the first place. I have to limit my syllables and concepts too often, and i'm not usually armed with enough sock puppets or weapons to communicate.

Wow the Aryan super friends. Wouldn't be calling them in an emergency lol.

OK, those damn articles were like swimming through mud.
Is it absolutely nessecary to use such words like "dolichocephalic dictionary" and expect most of us not to say...."uhh whut?"

But I get it, its shedding a little light on who civilized whom, and when.
All well and good, but irrelevant to an Aryan shithead.

One would think that most people understand that most peoples genetic swimming pools are pretty well mixed, unless you hail from some remote mountainous region in some third world country.

If you dont...chances are you have all sorts of races within your genetic tree.

chances are you have all sorts of races within your genetic tree.

Oh, quite probably :)

OK, those damn articles were like swimming through mud.
Is it absolutely nessecary to use such words like "dolichocephalic dictionary" and expect most of us not to say...."uhh whut?"

But I get it, its shedding a little light on who civilized whom, and when.
All well and good, but irrelevant to an Aryan shithead.

One would think that most people understand that most peoples genetic swimming pools are pretty well mixed, unless you hail from some remote mountainous region in some third world country.

If you dont...chances are you have all sorts of races within your genetic tree.

Nobody "civilized" anybody else. The africans and asians and arabs developed their own civ much sooner than europeans. However when we finally did advance we went somwhere with it, the others did not.

Edit: The chinese had gunpowder before europe but europe turned it into a weapon. The chinese used it as fireworks.

Nobody "civilized" anybody else. The africans and asians and arabs developed their own civ much sooner than europeans. However when we finally did advance we went somwhere with it, the others did not.

Edit: The chinese had gunpowder before europe but europe turned it into a weapon. The chinese used it as fireworks.
That's because Europe had a larger variety of various peoples, tribes, and what have you in a much smaller concentrated area, forcing the need for invention time and again. (Though there is some evidence of the Chinese utilizing ancient precursors to hand grenades.) The Chinese didn't need to use gunpowder as a weapon because they dominated their large region as it was with traditional weaponry, whereas Europeans had to keep fighting for dominance and happily grabbed whatever weaponry they could. That's probably part of why they developed and preserved shock cavalry, because the need to take out enemies quickly and hold your own territory was paramount.

Thankfully we've advanced far beyond such rubbish.

OK, those damn articles were like swimming through mud.
Is it absolutely nessecary to use such words like "dolichocephalic dictionary" and expect most of us not to say...."uhh whut?"

Yes. If the general public can understand it, it's not a good paper :D