NationStates Jolt Archive

I was just feeling left out.

I was just feeling left out.

This is exactly what I meant by being too subtle about it ;)

EDIT: I feel I require a smiley to avoid another nuke.

Isn't there a rule against copycat threads?

...

So... is a moderator moderating themselves sort of... masturbating?

I was just feeling left out.

You don't exist.

There, I hope that makes you feel better. :)

You don't exist.

There, I hope that makes you feel better. :)

*cries*

The big deal about heterosexuality is reproduction*. But it won't stay like that much longer.
*Understood as a capability to produce offspring bearing the genes of two individuals.

You're a lesbian?

Aww, there's goes my big secret crush on you, since you'd never want to be my girlfriend. Well, we can still be friends, right?

The big deal about heterosexuality is reproduction*. But it won't stay like that much longer.
*Understood as a capability to produce offspring bearing the genes of two individuals.
Hate to break it to you, but it's not that way now. A whole lot of people are heterosexual without reproducing. My own heterosexual relationships have never been about reproduction (and hopefully never will be!).

You're a lesbian?

Aww, there's goes my big secret crush on you, since you'd never want to be my girlfriend. Well, we can still be friends, right?

:confused:

Isn't there a rule against copycat threads?

...

So... is a moderator moderating themselves sort of... masturbating?

you win the thread :p

http://img329.imageshack.us/img329/7283/win2520buttonus7.jpg

Hate to break it to you, but it's not that way now. A whole lot of people are heterosexual without reproducing.
Look, English might not be my forte, but I was sure that "what's the big deal" means "what's so special". And heterosexuals have that choice people of other orientations don't – to have the offspring that is related to them. So until we make breakthroughs in cloning and recombination techniques THAT'S what so special about heterosexuality. Oh, that and not being actively persecuted in many countries of the world.

You're a lesbian?

Aww, there's goes my big secret crush on you, since you'd never want to be my girlfriend. Well, we can still be friends, right?

No, I'm not a lesbian. Like I said, feeling left out in all the sexuality threads. Sure, we can be friends!
:fluffle:

Look, English might not be my forte, but I was sure that "what's the big deal" means "what's so special". And heterosexuals have that choice people of other orientations don't – to have the offspring that is related to them. So until we make breakthroughs in cloning and recombination techniques THAT'S what so special about heterosexuality. Oh, that and not being actively persecuted in many countries of the world.

Not true, really -- a lesbian can have a child related to her, and a gay man can also have a child related to him. Neither one is incapable of reproduction.

Well, the "point" of the other thread seems to be whining about people who can't take no for an answer, and that's a problem that even a heterosexual can identify with.

Well, the "point" of the other thread seems to be whining about people who can't take no for an answer, and that's a problem that even a heterosexual can identify with.

True enough.
Can't tell you how often I've been told that I'd be bi or a lesbian if I'd only try it.... and while I was in college, had to go and have a talk with a group of lesbians and bis who wouldn't take no for an answer from some ladies in the club I was running.

But you get assholes who don't take no for an answer and insist they'll "straighten out" your sexual orientation from ALL orientations.

Look, English might not be my forte, but I was sure that "what's the big deal" means "what's so special".

If you want to run with that interpretation, sure. And it's still not true.


And heterosexuals have that choice people of other orientations don't – to have the offspring that is related to them.

1) A great many heterosexuals DON'T have that choice. Ability to produce offspring is not a requirement for heterosexuality.
2) Homosexuals also have that option. Homosexuals can engage in procreative sexual activity, just as heterosexuals can engage in non-procreative sexual activity.


So until we make breakthroughs in cloning and recombination techniques THAT'S what so special about heterosexuality.

Again, I simply don't agree. Heterosexuality is not a requirement for producing biological offspring. Never has been.

Intercourse between a fertile male and fertile female is the long-standing requirement for procreation. The sexual orientation of the parties involved is irrelevant. A fertile homosexual male with a fertile homosexual female have more chance of producing biological offspring together than an infertile heterosexual couple.

Meanwhile, a great many people (like myself) deliberately and intentionally exclude the possibility of procreation from our heterosexual sex lives. Procreation is obviously not what makes hetero sex special to folks like me.


Oh, that and not being actively persecuted in many countries of the world.
Now you may be on to something.

True enough.
Can't tell you how often I've been told that I'd be bi or a lesbian if I'd only try it.... and while I was in college, had to go and have a talk with a group of lesbians and bis who wouldn't take no for an answer from some ladies in the club I was running.

But you get assholes who don't take no for an answer and insist they'll "straighten out" your sexual orientation from ALL orientations.

Ah, and so many people here say I'm lying when I say that numerous gay men have hit on me and won't take no for an answer.

I think, however, that it's far more common for a man to hit on a woman, and no matter how many times she says no, he doesn't get it.

Not true, really -- a lesbian can have a child related to her, and a gay man can also have a child related to him.
I was imprecise, so let me rephrase my statement.
Heterosexual couples have the choice people of other orientations don't: to have offspring related to both partners. Whether it is a big deal or not depends on individual case. But that's pretty much all that is special about heterosexuality in modern societies. And it won't stay for long like that, now that we started to tinker with our genes.

I am confused by this thread. I will leave now.

True enough.
Can't tell you how often I've been told that I'd be bi or a lesbian if I'd only try it.... and while I was in college, had to go and have a talk with a group of lesbians and bis who wouldn't take no for an answer from some ladies in the club I was running.

But you get assholes who don't take no for an answer and insist they'll "straighten out" your sexual orientation from ALL orientations.

Now I'm waiting for the same people who say I'm lying about gay men hitting on me to say that Katganistan is lying.

Hate to break it to you, but it's not that way now. A whole lot of people are heterosexual without reproducing. My own heterosexual relationships have never been about reproduction (and hopefully never will be!).

Do you what the problem with that is. A lot the people who should be reproducing to make the species better are "too smart" (for lack of a better phrase, no offence) enough to do it.

Do you what the problem with that is. A lot the people who should be reproducing to make the species better are "too smart" (for lack of a better phrase, no offence) enough to do it.

More that educated women have fewer children. There are solid correlations between women's education and declining birth rates all across the world, for a number of potential reasons, ranging from having a longer work-week (or a work-week, period) to a simple desire to not procreate and turn that potential energy towards other pursuits.

Hate to break it to you, but it's not that way now. A whole lot of people are heterosexual without reproducing. My own heterosexual relationships have never been about reproduction (and hopefully never will be!).

Not to mention IVF and anonymous donors, which have nothing to do with heterosexuality and can still lead to reproduction.

Not to mention that, apparently, the science exists to fertilize an egg with material from another egg. So lesbian couples can now have children (though only female children) without having to look for a sperm donor.

Do you what the problem with that is. A lot the people who should be reproducing to make the species better are "too smart" (for lack of a better phrase, no offence) enough to do it.

Thing is, long-term homosexual relationships are more likely to be amongst the more affluent, and therefore theoretically smarter, element because of the benefits such don't bring; therefore, opening up reproduction to them can't be bad!

I was just feeling left out.
Come on, encouraging copycatting? Bad mod, bad.


And the answer is: boobies.

Not to mention IVF and anonymous donors, which have nothing to do with heterosexuality and can still lead to reproduction.

Not to mention that, apparently, the science exists to fertilize an egg with material from another egg. So lesbian couples can now have children (though only female children) without having to look for a sperm donor.

Great, The flannel wearing amazons of the 21st century.:p

Do you what the problem with that is. A lot the people who should be reproducing to make the species better are "too smart" (for lack of a better phrase, no offence) enough to do it.
I contribute to society through means other than producing offspring. There are plenty of ways for me to make life better for the human race without pumping out babies.

More that educated women have fewer children. There are solid correlations between women's education and declining birth rates all across the world, for a number of potential reasons, ranging from having a longer work-week (or a work-week, period) to a simple desire to not procreate and turn that potential energy towards other pursuits.
Gasp. But...but...women can only contribute by making babies! Women who waste their time on foolish things like curing disease, combating poverty, improving education, or running governments are actually doing nothing to help improve the human species, because they ain't making new Sons for the Fatherland!

There are plenty of ways for me to make life better for the human race without pumping out babies.

Indeed, not pumping out babies is probably in and of itself better for the human race than pumping out babies is.

I contribute to society through means other than producing offspring. There are plenty of ways for me to make life better for the human race without pumping out babies.

Baking cakes too *nods*

Sorry I couldn't help it. It's like looking at a big red button saying "Don't Touch"

You stole my heading! Thats so mean!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :mad:

Baking cakes too *nods*

Sorry I couldn't help it. It's like looking at a big red button saying "Don't Touch"

I admit, I lol'ed.

Baking cakes too *nods*
Baking babies and pumping out cakes - is that all? What about humping cabbies?

I contribute to society through means other than producing offspring. There are plenty of ways for me to make life better for the human race without pumping out babies.

I never said you didn't. And if I made it sound like I was criticising you I'm sorry. I was making the observation that a lot of the strong, successful members of the species aren't contributing in that manner which I find interesting because it's my understanding that normally it's the weakling who don't contribute. In fact just this morning I made the following post.

One of the wonderful things about humanity is that we don't need to leave a biological legacy. The greatest legacies are the words and works of others.

I was just feeling left out.

So you made a CopyKat thread? Bat Katganistan!

...

I can't believe it took that long to make the joke.

Not to mention that, apparently, the science exists to fertilize an egg with material from another egg. So lesbian couples can now have children (though only female children) without having to look for a sperm donor.

You can do the same thing with male nuclear (mostly DNA) material, you just need a donor egg to house the combined material. The real stickler is how to remethylate to make a female/male sequence register as a male/female sequence.

You can do the same thing with male nuclear (mostly DNA) material, you just need a donor egg to house the combined material. The real stickler is how to remethylate to make a female/male sequence register as a male/female sequence.

*nod* I only know the concept, not really any details about it.

Now I'm waiting for the same people who say I'm lying about gay men hitting on me to say that Katganistan is lying.

WhooooooooooooooooooooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCARES!?!

Heterosexuality is nice because vaginas make my gnards tingle. :)

Heterosexuality is nice because vaginas make my gnards tingle. :)

QF(my personal)T!

I was just feeling left out.

I can't believe YOU started a copycat thread.

Report yourself immediately to Moderation, do not pass go, do not collect $200.

Now the mods are making spam copycat threads

:rolleyes: beam me up scotty :rolleyes:

This is intolerable! Impeach* Kat now!








*and by 'impeach,' i really mean, 'take nekkid pix of'

So you made a CopyKat thread? Bat Katganistan!

...

I can't believe it took that long to make the joke.

*sobs*
I was weak..... I'm a Generalite too, ya know.....

*goes and sits in the corner*

We live in a world that is run by an oligarchy of Jews. Those Jews force out all other sexualities and put heterosexuality in the spotlight. The Jews are why heterosexuality is a big deal.

We live in a world that is run by an oligarchy of Jews. Those Jews force out all other sexualities and put heterosexuality in the spotlight. The Jews are why heterosexuality is a big deal.

They're not really Jews, they're transdimensional reptilian shapeshifters who have a thirst for human DNA. That's why they propagandize heterosexuality, so they can farm us more for their sustenance.

They're not really Jews, they're transdimensional reptilian shapeshifters who have a thirst for human DNA. That's why they propagandize heterosexuality, so they can farm us more for their sustenance.

Are all Jews actually transdimensional reptilian shapeshifters? Because this might be why they are so enthusiastic about circumcision. You know, to sample the product.

No, only the global ruling elites are transdimensional reptilian shapeshifters.

The rest just know fine dining when they see it.

Fine dining?

Are you a Jew?

Are all Jews actually transdimensional reptilian shapeshifters? Because this might be why they are so enthusiastic about circumcision. You know, to sample the product.

No, only the global ruling elites are transdimensional reptilian shapeshifters.

The rest just know fine dining when they see it.

Fine dining?

Are you a Jew?

Yes.

Yes.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!

Get away from me. Get away from me. Get away from me. Get away from me. Get away from me. Get away from me. Get away from me. Get away from me. Get away from me. Get away from me. Get away from me. Get away from me. Get away from me. Get away from me. Get away from me. Get away from me. Get away from me. Get away from me. Get away from me. Get away from me. Get away from me. Get away from me. Get away from me. Get away from me.

http://abakim.fotopages.com/images/smilies/scared.gif

We live in a world that is run by an oligarchy of Jews. Those Jews force out all other sexualities and put heterosexuality in the spotlight. The Jews are why heterosexuality is a big deal.That is only because of their small number. They are always afraid of dying out. All their ridiculous rules about human relationships are aimed at producing more Jew-ish children.

That is only because of their small number. They are always afraid of dying out. All their ridiculous rules about human relationships are aimed at producing more Jew-ish children.

...OK, when me and Il Ruffino do the whole 'anti-semitic paranoid rant' thing, it's funny because it's satire.

...when you do it, it's pathetic because you hate Jews.

*looks up at other recent replies*

Yikes!

On-topic: Hello, I'm straight, and I'm happy with it :)

Now, to stop myself getting arrested, I'd like to inform the Generalite world that I have friends of both genders who are homosexual or bisexual, and they're lovely people, but I don't find myself attracted to other men. I'll shut up now before I say something stupid :D

***are you male or female? or otherwise?

*sobs*
I was weak..... I'm a Generalite too, ya know.....

*goes and sits in the corner*

*consoles*

It's okay, it's in our nature...we all have to do it sometimes, mod or no.

Isn't there a rule against copycat threads?

...

So... is a moderator moderating themselves sort of... masturbating?

Come on, encouraging copycatting? Bad mod, bad.


And the answer is: boobies.

So you made a CopyKat thread? Bat Katganistan!

...

I can't believe it took that long to make the joke.

I can't believe YOU started a copycat thread.

Report yourself immediately to Moderation, do not pass go, do not collect $200.


Ignoring four people pointing out that this is a copycat thread and thus illegal. Nope, no Mod Bias here.:p

Ignoring four people pointing out that this is a copycat thread and thus illegal. Nope, no Mod Bias here.:p

She's presumably ignored them because copycat threads aren't actually against the rules. :p

She's presumably ignored them because copycat threads aren't actually against the rules. :p

Well, Kat did go put herself into a corner, so I suppose everythings alright. The punishment fit the crime, and as she said she's a Generlite too.

*wanders off to copycat every thread on page one* (Just kidding)

*sobs*
I was weak..... I'm a Generalite too, ya know.....

*goes and sits in the corner*

Unlock my thread!

are you male or female? or otherwise?

Male. Is it just me or is there a stigma attatched to a guy having gay male friends?

Male. Is it just me or is there a stigma attatched to a guy having gay male friends?

I wouldn't say so. One of my old room mates at my previous university was bi. Cool fellow. Drank a bit too much.

Heterosexuality greatly increases your carbon imprint because babies are made of carbon.

Therefore I propose a huge tax on giving birth that goes towards alternative energy research.

Well, what I meant was does it seem "less-acceptable" for men to have gay male friends?

Though to be honest, the guy didn't really like me (as a friend) until this past weekend. I'm super right-wing, you see, and he said "I actually like you now, I only ever knew your [political opinions] before".

*and by 'impeach,' i really mean, 'take nekkid pix of'


O horror, horror, horror! Tongue nor heart
Cannot conceive nor name thee!

Well, what I meant was does it seem "less-acceptable" for men to have gay male friends?
Here in Poland (and not only here I think) it largely depends on who does the accepting. In small towns, among less educated and older people it's hard to be gay or to have gay friends. In big cities and among younger, better educated folk it's considered "cool" :rolleyes:. I have yet to meet someone from here who treats the gay people normally ie doesn't give a shit.
OTOH I had to travel to England to lean the "fact" that "Fisherman Friends mints are gay because they make anal sex easier" :eek: :D

Here in Poland (and not only here I think) it largely depends on who does the accepting. In small towns, among less educated and older people it's hard to be gay or to have gay friends. In big cities and among younger, better educated folk it's considered "cool" :rolleyes:. I have yet to meet someone from here who treats the gay people normally ie doesn't give a shit.
OTOH I had to travel to England to lean the "fact" that "Fisherman Friends mints are gay because they make anal sex easier" :eek: :D

Wh-Ho-
So...what? The fisherman's friend is gay?

O horror, horror, horror! Tongue nor heart
Cannot conceive nor name thee!

Actually it sounds like a good idea to me. *shrug*

OTOH I had to travel to England to lean the "fact" that "Fisherman Friends mints are gay because they make anal sex easier" :eek: :D

Fishermans Friends do WHAT?!? I've heard about those popper things they sell in Rainbows...but...fishermans friends?...do the same thing?

Fishermans Friends do WHAT?!? I've heard about those popper things they sell in Rainbows...but...fishermans friends?...do the same thing?

Think about it. Lots of menthol and related substances. Makes me wonder if anyone goes for the two-fer and uses Vick's Vapo-rub (combination of vaselinity and menthol).

Why is it that this fight gets more and more comical by the post? And why are we having such a hard time sticking with the topic? Oh well, such is bound to happen eventually, I suppose. :rolleyes:

Why is it that this fight gets more and more comical by the post? And why are we having such a hard time sticking with the topic?

What topic?

What topic?
lol
Exactly. >.>;;

It all fits snugly. This is the big deal with it ;)

Mod spam... mmmmmmmmm.

Heterosexuality.


Because I like girls.


:p:p:p

Two questions:

1) What on earth is this thread talking about?
2) How did it end up talking about that?

1) What on earth is this thread talking about?


It's a copycat thread.


2) How did it end up talking about that?

:p

Il Ruffino blamed the Jews for heterosexuality he was joking though

It's a copycat thread.

Well, I know that much, which is why I couldn't see the connection between 'I feel left out' and something to do with religion.

Il Ruffino blamed the Jews for heterosexuality he was joking though

Ah, the thread was Ruffied. That explains it.

I don't know why everyone's worried about Jews. It's Canadians that we need to watch out for. My boss from Canada came down last week and we went to dinner and I watched in horror as she asked the waiter if the restaurant served "Filet of Dead Baby" or "Heart of Innocent Virgin."


Fuckin' Canadians! :mad:

I don't know why everyone's worried about Jews. It's Canadians that we need to watch out for. My boss from Canada came down last week and we went to dinner and I watched in horror as she asked the waiter if the restaurant served "Filet of Dead Baby" or "Heart of Innocent Virgin."


Fuckin' Canadians! :mad:

Dude, that's not evil. Innocent virgins deserve to die.

Dude, that's not evil. Innocent virgins deserve to die.

Only if they still haven't given it up by 18. After that, yeah...

Thing is, long-term homosexual relationships are more likely to be amongst the more affluent, and therefore theoretically smarter, element because of the benefits such don't bring; therefore, opening up reproduction to them can't be bad!

I attest that this is your first post. Unless you are Gay Street Militia.

"therefore long-term homosexual relationships are more likely to be amongst the more affluent, and therefore theoretically smarter, element because of the benefits such don't bring; re, opening up reproduction to them can't be bad!"

Couples without dependents are richer, because they have fewer expenses. Mmm, yes.
Therefore, they are smarter. Only if you believe that reproducing isn't smart.
Opening up reproduction to them can't be bad. Right. It might be neutral or it might be good, or even an action in which morality (good / bad) does not apply.

This one has talent. If it has opinions as well, it should be welcomed!

im hetro and that means straight. I dont really undertand this thread.

*and by 'impeach,' i really mean, 'take nekkid pix of'

WooT!

Are all Jews actually transdimensional reptilian shapeshifters? Because this might be why they are so enthusiastic about circumcision. You know, to sample the product.

That is a classic.
One of your finest, Ruffy. :)
*bows*

Heterosexuality greatly increases your carbon imprint because babies are made of carbon.

Therefore I propose a huge tax on giving birth that goes towards alternative energy research.

Winner of thread?

Dude, that's not evil. Innocent virgins deserve to die.
I don't know what happened in between the OP and this post, but I am wholly in support of the brave men and women that made it happen.

I want what you're smoking.

Is that an inference to the OP nature of the thread? :p

I don't know what happened in between the OP and this post, but I am wholly in support of the brave men and women that made it happen.

Fiddleysticks in WHOLE support of Ruffy?
:confused:

Ah well.

I don't know what happened in between the OP and this post, but I am wholly in support of the brave men and women that made it happen.

You missed some of the other stuff that happened. I assume you wouldn't support much of that.

Not only did stuff HAPPEN, but a copycat thread BY A MOD was SPLIT into two threads for posterity. Far out.

Not only did stuff HAPPEN, but a copycat thread BY A MOD was SPLIT into two threads for posterity. Far out.

Only a truly sexy mod could accomplish such a feat. *nods*

Only a truly sexy mod could accomplish such a feat. *nods*

Boy, HOWDY!

*nods emphatically*

Fiddleysticks in WHOLE support of Ruffy?
:confused:

Ah well.
In the words of a very wise Chinese-American confectionery: "Even the lowest worm may have it's role in the birth of the most beautiful rose."

This man speaks much in the way of truth.

I'm sensing a lot of "Katganistan" poll options in the near future.



...what of the spectre of Myrth? What of? :eek:



EDIT: What of, indeed? Invisible hand play havoc with the temporality of post?

Only a truly sexy mod could accomplish such a feat. *nods*

This man speaks much in the way of truth.

In the words of a very wise Chinese-American confectionery: "Even the lowest worm may have it's role in the birth of the most beautiful rose."

(Welcome to CostCo) I love you.

Ignoring four people pointing out that this is a copycat thread and thus illegal. Nope, no Mod Bias here.:p

The subject is sufficiently different to 'asexuality' that it's not really a copycat thread. Or as they will henceforth be known, Copy Kat thread. ;)

The charge of "making a chat thread" would probably stick. Or as THAT will henceforth be known, a Khat Thread.

Honestly, I think it was an experiment to see if the eighteen 'asexuals' would all crowd in and start giving the heteros advice on their sexuality. The point seems to be made ...
Tho, I'm not sure I'm done yet.

Heterosexuality greatly increases your carbon imprint because babies are made of carbon.

Therefore I propose a huge tax on giving birth that goes towards alternative energy research.

Babies should be taxed by birthweight, perhaps ?
And for alternative energy sources, the solution is staring us in the face. Treadmills. For babies.

Think about it. Lots of menthol and related substances. Makes me wonder if anyone goes for the two-fer and uses Vick's Vapo-rub (combination of vaselinity and menthol).

Actually a bad idea. Petroleum derivatives weaken latex, only water-based lube should be used with condoms.
How would I know a thing like that ? Government advertising, back in the days when HIV was a death-sentence.
There are non-latex condoms I guess.

I wouldn't say so. One of my old room mates at my previous university was bi. Cool fellow. Drank a bit too much.

As long as you weren't the one passing out....

Ignoring four people pointing out that this is a copycat thread and thus illegal. Nope, no Mod Bias here.:p

I have been told by at least 3 mods that copycat/parody threads are NOT illegal, but that a trend where you get like 4 or 5 on the first page results in some lockings.

As long as you weren't the one passing out....

Never had any worry of that. Kid was a lightweight.

As long as you weren't the one passing out....

Or as long as his old roommate wasn't a rapist. Either or.

Actually a bad idea. Petroleum derivatives weaken latex, only water-based lube should be used with condoms.
How would I know a thing like that ? Government advertising, back in the days when HIV was a death-sentence.
There are non-latex condoms I guess.

Yeah, I know all that, thanks Dad.

Not everyone needs to use condoms. Married couples/monogamous couples who've been tested. I'm all for stopping the spread of HIV, but let's not use the raincoats if we don't need to.

Yeah, I know all that, thanks Dad.

Not everyone needs to use condoms. Married couples/monogamous couples who've been tested. I'm all for stopping the spread of HIV, but let's not use the raincoats if we don't need to.

I mentioned it because I saw a reckless suggestion which needed qualification. IF using condoms (particularly with someone you don't know well) using Vaporub would be risky.

But while we're on this tangent, isn't a fisherman's friend an anaesthetic mint ? Not really a lubricant? And marriage is no assurance of fidelity (old fashioned word for ya) and monogamy is only that until one partner finds out otherwise. Oh, and HIV isn't the only venereal disease, there's a lag time in tests, and you don't know you "need" a condom until it's too late.

I'll pay the old "like taking a shower in a raincoat" reference though. Condoms are definitely a bore.

Don't let me stop you (use chilli sauce for all I care) but I feel obliged to point out a possible risk in your no-doubt lighthearted speculation.