League or union?
Soviestan
13-07-2007, 22:10
Which Rugby do you like better and why?
Pure Metal
13-07-2007, 22:19
union because of the 6 nations, and the fact i know squat about league...
Forsakia
14-07-2007, 00:24
Union, just has a more natural feel to it.
The blessed Chris
14-07-2007, 00:27
League. Few teams in Union play in a style worth watching, whereas League, due to the absence of Rucks and Mauls, necessitates a more progressive style of rugby.
Extreme Ironing
14-07-2007, 00:36
I dislike the stop-start nature of league, but I guess it's just a thing of what you are used to; I played union at school, never league.
Ferrous Oxide
14-07-2007, 00:36
They're both horrible, horrible sports. But out of the two, union.
Forsakia
14-07-2007, 00:50
League. Few teams in Union play in a style worth watching, whereas League, due to the absence of Rucks and Mauls, necessitates a more progressive style of rugby.
Doesn't really. 9 times out of 10 a league team's tactics are either the half-backs picking and going or having a 'forward' taking a crash ball from the first receiver. The ball doesn't get spread wide anymore than it does in Union.
Sel Appa
14-07-2007, 01:08
theres a difference?...I jest... I don't really know what the difference is
Teutonicaland
14-09-2007, 17:11
Rugby League! Play both but Union is slower and the players arent so skilled with the ball in hand. I also dont like Union that much due to the Union Parasites who think League people are Mungoes or Sub human and make such Bullshit claims that Rugby Union is a global sport-it isnt its played by people in around 10 lands with the sport played elsewhere by Expats mainly. This doesnt make it a global Sport!
Union, by far. League is too start-stop for me.
Granted, it's been 15 years since I saw a league match, so I have no idea if it's changed any...
Soviestan
14-09-2007, 21:04
holy grave dig batman!