NationStates Jolt Archive


Chrysler makes deal with Chinese automaker

Nouvelle Wallonochia
04-07-2007, 18:06
http://detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070704/AUTO02/707040338&theme=Autos-Chrysler-China

Chrysler plays China card, or is it wildcard?

Having Chinese automaker build, export small cars should help U.S. player compete.

The soon-to-be-again Chrysler Corp. has long been Detroit's version of an "early adopter" -- first to get a federal bailout, first to sell out to a foreign rival, first to be dumped by the foreign parent and gobbled up by a private-equity house. Now this:

Chrysler and Chery Automobile Co. of Wuhu, China, late Tuesday finalized a strategic framework that is expected to culminate in Chery building small cars, slapping Dodge and, perhaps, Chrysler badges on them and exporting them to Europe, Latin America and the United States.

The first vehicles to debut under the agreement likely will appear in South American markets by the end of next year, I'm told, with subcompacts developed for the U.S. market to come later -- not soon enough considering the growing American appetite for more fuel-efficient rides.

How you greet this depends on your world view: At the UAW's Solidarity House and union locals across the country (and Canada), this is yet another scary thrust of low-cost Asian players into the heart of the North American industry, evidence the Chinese are winning American auto jobs, whatever the economics.

In executive suites, conference rooms and strategic planning departments from Detroit and Stuttgart to Paris and Japan's Aiichi Prefecture, home to Toyota Motor Corp., this is inevitable in a global economy with vastly variable labor costs.

They're both right -- the union types and the suits.

Chrysler's 'quick-strike' play

The deal with Chery, conceived under Chrysler's German parent but endorsed by its new owner, Cerberus Capital Management, is the most far-reaching effort yet by a major automaker to tap low-cost Chinese manufacturing capability to quickly -- and profitably -- fill a void in its domestic lineup.

"We've got to develop a quick-strike approach," a Chrysler executive tells me. Why? Because an independent Chrysler won't have direct access to the global resources of soon-to-be Daimler AG or the ability of a Toyota or General Motors Corp. to drop billions into exploiting a new market.

In return, Chery gets access to Chrysler's enviable (if bloated) distribution network, Western marketing and communications know-how and, potentially, the benefit of Chrysler's (diminishing) political influence in Lansing and, especially, Washington.

A statement prepared to announce the strategic tie-up hails it as "a win-win" for both companies. Beyond specific technical benefits, Chery effectively will acquire the legitimacy that comes with Chrysler's brands and, more broadly, a window into the world's richest market.

Chrysler CEO Tom LaSorda says he gets the cornerstone for a new business model that should help Chrysler deliver more all-new products faster to North American consumers.

Theory, reality collide

As distasteful as Chrysler's China play (and potential tie-ups with Russians and Indians) may be to traditional sensibilities, union rolls and America-firsters, this may be one of the few ways Detroit's tiniest automaker can go it alone.

For Chrysler, right here and right now, the Chery deal makes sense. But it has "we'll see" written all over it.

Daniel Howes' column runs Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. You can reach him at (313) 222-2106, dchowes@detnews.com or http://info.detnews.com/danielhowesblog.

Bold move for Chrysler or beginning of the end? Given the current prices of fuel I'd imagine there'd be a market for a cheap and fuel efficient car (sadly, a foreign concept in Detroit) but will these rebranded Cherys be quality enough vehicles that people will want to buy them?
Vetalia
04-07-2007, 18:11
Well, they really don't have a choice. They will go bankrupt unless they find a way to return to profitability, and that is simply not possible under their current structure and business conditions; this might fail, but they really don't have much other choice. The company's hemorrhaging cash, jobs, sales and assets and they're running out of time...it might be a last gasp, but it might work and that's the important part.

They need more efficient, more profitable models in order to drive sales. Even if gas were at its 1990's levels, I think they would still be in trouble simply because their products are unattractive; Toyota and Honda are pushing large quantities of trucks and SUVs and are gaining on the Detroit automakers even in that traditionally US field.
Neu Leonstein
04-07-2007, 22:53
I'm not sure what's left of Chrysler's reputation in the US, but this won't be good for it in the short term. The reason is that Chinese car design is still in its infancy. New Chinese models consistently fail EU crash tests and have all sorts of other issues.

It was the same of course for early Japanese cars, and these things will get sorted out eventually. That's when this is really going to start paying off...my question is whether Chrysler is sturdy enough to last that long when people don't buy the Chinese cars.
The Black Forrest
05-07-2007, 00:17
Chrysler cars tend to be meh.

They really lost ground when the Germans bought them even though they did good things.

The Chinese cars will get the same response Japan faced.

Probably worst considering the news over Chinas antics with food, pet food, etc.

It will be "If they are willing to do bad things with food, then the cars probably have all sorts of problems."
LueraFour
05-07-2007, 00:50
At first I thought this might be a good move for Chrysler, then I came across an article about how a Chinese car coming next year to the U.S. failed horribly at a Euro crash test. This may not necessarily be a good move for Chrysler.
imported_Sozy
05-07-2007, 00:53
This is on absolute agreement with Jah. But the men from Bangladesh beg to differ.
Whatwhatia
05-07-2007, 02:13
Chrysler cars tend to be meh.
*coughdodgechallengercough*
Democratic Colonies
05-07-2007, 02:48
I don't think this is a good idea at all.

This is crash test footage of a Chrysler 300 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5MYBY3xHEU) and a Cherry Amulet (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kQGAK550LE). American auto brands already have a bad reputation regarding their reliability - combine that with a reputation with ridiculously unsafe vehicles, and Chrysler might as well dissolve itself now and skip through a few years of pain and suffering.