Think of the Starving Children.
Anti-Social Darwinism
17-06-2007, 09:56
$26 for a dress and someone complains that she should have spent it on starving children - or is my sarcasm radar jammed?
http://news.aol.com/the-cooler-blog/2007/06/14/angelina-jolie-cheap-dress/
The Brevious
17-06-2007, 10:00
Blog?
Is this gonna zoom over to John Edwards in a quicklike fashion?
Andaras Prime
17-06-2007, 10:07
Get.
A.
Blog.
The Brevious
17-06-2007, 10:13
You know, upon looking, there could be a bit more to your complaint that, for some reason, you're not including in your OP.
Thumbless Pete Crabbe
17-06-2007, 10:22
Hm. Okay then. :confused:
Kryozerkia
17-06-2007, 13:05
Please tell me they're being sarcastic... :eek: they're bitching because she paid $26 for a dress??
Clearly some people will bitch no matter what.
And my shoes cost more then Angelina Jolie's dress.
Ashmoria
17-06-2007, 13:59
GirlGoneLeBron: Angelina Jolie wore a $26 dress to the NYC premiere of A Mighty Heart.
GirlGoneGrady: When every designer would kill to have Angie in their dresses for free, how can she justify spending money for an outfit that could be better spent feeding orphans in Zimbabwe?
Clearly, Angelina cares more about finding vintage pieces like this one than starving kids. (Evan Agostini, Getty Images)
when it comes to angelina jolie, what is said is always more than what is said.
On the other hand, Jolie is an objectivist. I'm not sure she'd care about starving kids. :D
My T-shirts cost more than that dress, I go out to eat for dinner for more than that....
Compared to most stars, some of whom do pay for their dresses, that is VERY little.
Compared to the good that Angelina Jolie has done as a Peace Ambassador (I read her book Notes from my Travels, you forget it is her writing it) this is nothing.
Actually overall the woman is a pretty good person, at least from what I have read, but not sure why she went off and married Brad Pitt that was a negative to me. Even though their on equal "status" so to speak.
Whereyouthinkyougoing
17-06-2007, 14:06
or is my sarcasm radar jammed?
Yup.
The_pantless_hero
17-06-2007, 14:24
My T-shirts cost more than that dress, I go out to eat for dinner for more than that....
Compared to most stars, some of whom do pay for their dresses, that is VERY little.
Then you have to consider her heels probably cost more than your house.
Then you have to consider her heels probably cost more than your house.
Yea since I am a student and I rent ;).
Its more likely that her necklace or earrings cost more than my house, or your house.
Ashmoria
17-06-2007, 14:38
On the other hand, Jolie is an objectivist. I'm not sure she'd care about starving kids. :D
yeah
which is why she is UN good will ambassador travelling the world working to help starving children.
because she doesnt care about them.
yeah
which is why she is UN good will ambassador traveling the world working to help starving children.
because she doesnt care about them.
Or wrote Notes from my Travels which talks about how she helped them, and sincerely how she felt the entire time. I felt it was very authentic, did not even seem as if she wrote it.
Though aid workers and others validate she was indeed there, suffering with everyone
yeah
which is why she is UN good will ambassador travelling the world working to help starving children.
because she doesnt care about them.
I was joking.
Yootopia
17-06-2007, 14:50
Christ, the people writing comments in that box below are complete tits mostly.
Err anyway, yes. Starving children bad.
$26 dollar dress... shocking. I mean think what she COULD have done with that $26? Think of the children Angelina! Why won't you think of the starving children? Oh wait... you do don't you?
Carry on.
I spent $100 on each of my ties. I wonder what they'd have to say about that.