NationStates Jolt Archive


Make "Volume 10" Louder? OR Make a "Volume 11"?

Bolol
17-06-2007, 06:08
This is a question I have asked all of my friends, family, acquaintances, and others who were interested: "Is it enough to make 'Volume 10' louder, or do we need a 'Volume 11'?" on stereo systems, handhelds, etc.

The responses I've recieved run the gammut from an emphatic "yes" to a belligerent "no", and the opinions overall are split 50/50.

I've always argued for a "Volume 11" for sheer awesomeness, but it does not stop me from asking others their opinions.

So, I ask you, NS General: All things equal, would you make "Volume 10" louder, or would you make a "Volume 11"?

Yes there are only two options. Yes, I just want you're gut opinion. No, there is no "gray area". No, I will not EVER make a "Myrth" option.
Troglobites
17-06-2007, 06:10
Spinaltap should have bumped up to 12. Wussy brits.
Fassigen
17-06-2007, 06:12
None of my audio type stuff has such rough increments - they all have far more than "10".
Copiosa Scotia
17-06-2007, 06:13
Make Volume 10 louder and then add a Volume 11.
Bolol
17-06-2007, 06:16
Make Volume 10 louder and then add a Volume 11.

Uuuughh...I knew that was going to happen...
Jeruselem
17-06-2007, 06:17
Change to an expodential volume system, make 10 like warp factor 10 in Star Trek. :p
Copiosa Scotia
17-06-2007, 06:19
Uuuughh...I knew that was going to happen...

I just don't feel that Volume 11 would be loud enough if it was only a step above the current Volume 10.
Posi
17-06-2007, 06:23
I prefer Volume 11 to Volume 10 made as loud as Volume 11 would be as it provides you more increments to fine tune the loudness to your needs.
Neo Undelia
17-06-2007, 06:27
Really, i don't know what you're talking about. but I suppose making a louder 10 would suffice.

I actually never really find myself turning my music up past mid-volume, but then Elton John and Celene Dion aren't exactly the kind of artists whose music you do that with.
Das Viertel Reich
17-06-2007, 06:57
Or we could change the volumes to measurings on the Richter scale. Listening to rock music at 11 would be a Earth-shattering experience. *lame joke drumroll*
Thumbless Pete Crabbe
17-06-2007, 07:05
Gotta go with eleven. :p I wonder if any actual commercial amps go to eleven.
SoWiBi
17-06-2007, 10:43
None of my audio type stuff has such rough increments - they all have far more than "10".

iSecond that. My portable MP3 goes till twenty, and my stereo till forty.

But that nonwithstanding, I'd vote for an "11", because I'd want to keep my array of more quiet "steps" at the current number/amount, and not have everything raised a bit like you seem to propose when you say "make a louder 10".
I V Stalin
17-06-2007, 10:44
iSecond that. My portable MP3 goes till twenty, and my stereo till forty.

But that nonwithstanding, I'd vote for an "11", because I'd want to keep my array of more quiet "steps" at the current number/amount, and not have everything raised a bit like you seem to propose when you say "make a louder 10".
Indeed. If you make a louder 10, then assuming 0 is still silence, you have less control over the exact volume of what you're listening to, because of the necessarily larger increments between each step.

11 FTW!
SoWiBi
17-06-2007, 10:57
Indeed. If you make a louder 10, then assuming 0 is still silence, you have less control over the exact volume of what you're listening to, because of the necessarily larger increments between each step.

11 FTW!

Thanks for squashing my doubts about whether I'd have been able to convey the meaning of what I wanted to say. In other words, I thought nobody'd get what I meant. Yay.
Forsakia
17-06-2007, 11:51
Or we could change the volumes to measurings on the Richter scale. Listening to rock music at 11 would be a Earth-shattering experience. *lame joke drumroll*

Disaster Area :)