NationStates Jolt Archive

Recently I read the thread about the consentual felllatio and it got me thinking. My boyfriend is 6 months younger than me, and when I turn 18 what will that be considered then? He will be 17 and what happens when we have sex? I onyl thought of this because as far as I know 18 is considered adult and he would still be considered a minor. I wonder if the poilice could put me in jail for that.

Depends on the state. 17 is old enough in some states.

We don't know where you live; age of consent is 16 in the UK, for instance.

I only know of PA laws.

He could be 16, and you could be 20, and it'd be legal..

If it in Virginia, fellating your bf could result in him being locked up for violation of the sodomy laws.

You're a chick (sorry if I'm making assumptions); there's no such thing as robbing the cradle. If anything, it'll make him look GOOD. After all, he's sleeping with an older woman. ;)

Recently I read the thread about the consentual felllatio and it got me thinking. My boyfriend is 6 months younger than me, and when I turn 18 what will that be considered then? He will be 17 and what happens when we have sex? I onyl thought of this because as far as I know 18 is considered adult and he would still be considered a minor. I wonder if the poilice could put me in jail for that.

Depends on where you two live.

US? Europe? Elsewhere?

Depends on where you two live.

US? Europe? Elsewhere?

I live in Canada. I believe the age of consent here is also 16. Well, I just thought that it was illegal because I would be an adult. Meh, and Kryozerkia I am a girl, assumptions are correct in this instance. :p Makes him look good? HIM LOOK GOOD? I know it does. ;) Yay for Narcisism!

I live in Canada.

Although Canada is a federation, the criminal law (including the definition of the age of consent) is in the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal government, so the age of consent is uniform throughout Canada. The age of consent in Canada is generally 14 (see below).

Where an accused is charged with an offence under s. 151 (Sexual Interference), s. 152 (Invitation to sexual touching), s. 153(1) (Sexual exploitation), s. 160(3) (Bestiality in presence of or by child), or s. 173(2) (Indecent acts), or is charged with an offence under s. 271 (Sexual assault), s. 272 (Sexual assault with a weapon, threats to a third party, or causing bodily harm), or s. 273 (Aggravated sexual assault) in respect of a complainant under the age of fourteen years, it is not a defence that the complainant consented to the activity that forms the subject-matter of the charge. {Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, section 150.1 (1), link continuously updated as Act is amended.}

There exists a close in age exemption in cases where the partners are within two years of age of each other (Section 150.1(2)) or where the person who would be charged is under 14 (Section 150.1(3)).

Section 153 Sexual exploitation mandates an age of consent of 18 years in cases where a person is in a position of trust;

"Every person commits an offence who is in a position of trust or authority towards a young person, who is a person with whom the young person is in a relationship of dependency or who is in a relationship with a young person that is exploitative of the young person..." {Sect153}
Additionally, section 159 of the Criminal Code sets the age of consent for anal intercourse at 18 years, with an exception if the two partners are married.

However, courts in Ontario (1995) and Quebec (1998) have independently declared Section 159 of the Criminal Code of Canada (Anal Intercourse) unconstitutional.

I find your question somewhat silly. ;):p

He will like this news indeed...;)

And I know its a stupid question, now that i think of it...

BTW what the hell 14? I am goign to stimulate arguement with the following sentence:

Thats too young.

I find your question somewhat silly. ;):p

She's just another debator braggin' on her oratory skillz . . .

She's just another debator braggin' on her oratory skillz . . .

HOW DID YOU KNOW?
*Whispers*
Dont tell anyone else, they will ask for favors. ;)

Response: Arbitration based on a model that is incorrect is bad.

You Win. Here have a cookie.
*hands over cookie*

He will like this news indeed...;)

And I know its a stupid question, now that i think of it...

BTW what the hell 14? I am goign to stimulate arguement with the following sentence:

Thats too young.

It wasn't for me. And it was with an older woman (15 actually)

He will like this news indeed...;)

And I know its a stupid question, now that i think of it...

BTW what the hell 14? I am goign to stimulate arguement with the following sentence:

Thats too young.

Response: Arbitration based on a model that is incorrect is bad.

It wasn't for me. And it was with an older woman (15 actually)

You also get a cookie :)
*Hands over another cookie*

You Win. Here have a cookie.
*hands over cookie*

Thank you. *Accepts cookie*

You're a chick (sorry if I'm making assumptions); there's no such thing as robbing the cradle. If anything, it'll make him look GOOD. After all, he's sleeping with an older woman. ;)

If we learned anything from the hot teacher who was banging a sixth grader in her class, it was that the law does not agree with you.