NationStates Jolt Archive


Who should host the 2014 Commonwealth Games?

Ariddia
28-05-2007, 09:20
The decision will be made in a few months. There are only two candidate cities still in the running: Abuja (Nigeria) and Glasgow (Scotland). Which city do you feel should host the Games?

As a Brit, I'm torn between the two. Much as I would like to see the Games go to the UK, they've never been to Africa, let alone specifically Nigeria, so I'd be rather happy if Abuja won, too.
Andaras Prime
28-05-2007, 09:25
Nigeria soooo does not have the economic means, I love have to say Glasgow.
Ariddia
28-05-2007, 09:46
Actually, Nigeria hosted the Pan-African Games a few years ago, which (apparently) required even more means than the Commonwealth Games, and it was a success. Plus they still have the infrastructure. They've proved that they can do it.
Call to power
28-05-2007, 09:48
London 2012-3012 is my suggestion (course the UK hosting two commonwealth games in a row is also good)
Andaras Prime
28-05-2007, 09:53
London hosting any Commonwealth Games would seem too imperialist if you get me.
United Beleriand
28-05-2007, 11:22
Antarctica.
Mesoriya
28-05-2007, 11:25
Anywhere, as long as it isn't Queensland. Shelling out millions so that politicians can indulge their arrogance isn't my idea of a good time.
Rhursbourg
28-05-2007, 11:27
Nukuʻalofa shoud host it
New Maastricht
28-05-2007, 11:36
Nukuʻalofa shoud host it

Haha nice. I would love to see them try. You wouldn't even be able to fit all the competitors there, let alone people wanting to watch. That's not even mentioning the fact that they probably have next to know stadiums.

(yes i know you were joking)
Curious Inquiry
28-05-2007, 11:39
Why isn't Ruffy on the list? At least there'd be plenty of drinks!
Call to power
28-05-2007, 11:45
Why isn't Ruffy on the list? At least there'd be plenty of drinks!

surely Ruffy couldn't take that much riding!?
Alexandrian Ptolemais
28-05-2007, 11:50
I would have to say Abuja; it would certainly give the Africans a show and what is the worst that can happen? Worst case scenario, you give the games to London if the s**t hits the fan.
Lunatic Goofballs
28-05-2007, 11:57
The Moon. :)
Philosopy
28-05-2007, 12:05
The decision will be made in a few months. There are only two candidate cities still in the running: Abuja (Nigeria) and Glasgow (Scotland). Which city do you feel should host the Games?

I think it should go to Abuja. The UK had the games the time before last - it should go somewhere else.
Ariddia
28-05-2007, 12:51
Nukuʻalofa shoud host it

Until recently, they were rebuilding after part of the city burned down during riots. So they may be a little short on funds. ;)

I think it should go to Abuja. The UK had the games the time before last - it should go somewhere else.

The Scots would probably remind you that Scotland isn't England. ;) In the Commonwealth Games, the different countries of the UK are considered fully seperate, each with their own delegation.
Nadkor
28-05-2007, 15:02
London hosting any Commonwealth Games would seem too imperialist if you get me.

Well, it's a good thing that London isn't in the running, then :p
Ifreann
28-05-2007, 15:13
Mt. Kilamanjaro.
Boonytopia
29-05-2007, 06:05
Given the violence & political instability in Nigeria, I'd go for Glasgow.
Westcoast thugs
29-05-2007, 08:29
You commonwealth people are mean, why won't you let us play!?

My theory, and it is correct, is that we win everything so you people need your own competition so Australia can get a lot of gold medals.
UN Protectorates
29-05-2007, 11:59
Speaking as a Scotsman, I think the games should be held in Abuja.

Thier local economy will benefit a lot more, and frankly I would not trust Glasgow council to be able to make a budget that won't go exponentially over the initial estimates.

British endevours such as this always seem doomed to fail. Remember Wembley Stadium? What about the fiasco over the London Olympics budget right now?
UN Protectorates
29-05-2007, 12:03
You commonwealth people are mean, why won't you let us play!?

My theory, and it is correct, is that we win everything so you people need your own competition so Australia can get a lot of gold medals.

We'll let you play once you destroy your constitution, burn down the White House, swear allegiance to Her Majesty the Queen, declare yourselves the British Protectorate of North America, declare yourselves independant again, (and when our navy inevitably fails to intimidate you into submission) then enter into the Commonwealth of Nations.

Or you could allow yourselves to be annexed by Canada.
Philosopy
29-05-2007, 12:06
The Scots would probably remind you that Scotland isn't England. ;) In the Commonwealth Games, the different countries of the UK are considered fully seperate, each with their own delegation.

This is true, but I still think it would be wrong for it to return to one of the UK nations so soon after it was last here.
Aleshia
29-05-2007, 13:45
Or you could allow yourselves to be annexed by Canada.

I like the idea of Canada annexing the USA can we have a vote for that
Ariddia
29-05-2007, 14:00
You commonwealth people are mean, why won't you let us play!?


Join the Commonwealth. ;)

You're entitled to, as a former British colony. There are quite a few republics in the Commonwealth already.
The Infinite Dunes
29-05-2007, 20:33
You commonwealth people are mean, why won't you let us play!?

My theory, and it is correct, is that we win everything so you people need your own competition so Australia can get a lot of gold medals.Pfft, isn't that obvious. Not only are you from the Us, but you're from Boston too. You made your republican democratic bed and you can sleep in it.

I voted for Abuja. The commonwealth games were in Manchester the year before last or something. They should be someplace else before they come back to the UK. There's a reason why the British economy is going better than Europe. It's because we purposefully lose things like the Eurovision song contest and the like.*points at the olympics which has already had its costs doubled or something*