NationStates Jolt Archive

What if the government was taken over by a incredibly perverted dictator and turn the state into a totalitarian one where perversion was mandatory and those who didn't meet quotas of perverted acts were executed or oppressed.
What would you do?

I for one would welcome our new perverted overlords.

Depends on the quotas and what is defined as perversion.

on one end. Participate, but pray to God for forgiveness in the privacy of my own home.

on the other... I know I should have some family in Japan/Okinawa... I guess that would be a great time to look them up. ;)

I for one would welcome our new perverted overlords.

I hear the food is better

I for one would welcome our new perverted overlords.

One thing is certain: there is no stopping them. The perverts will be here soon.

odds are I'm hitting the quotas anyway so no change for me :p

I hear the food is better

will there be chocolate sauce?

Depends what counts as perversion under the new overlord.

One thing is certain: there is no stopping them. The perverts will be here soon.

Barricade yourselves in! Lock up you pets, wife/girlfriend/, family, especially your children and their dolls! For obvious reasons! :eek: And them arm your self and have the gas pipes ready to blow. Better blowed by gas than by them. :eek:

will there be chocolate sauce?

I'm guessing there will be, but since we'd be all perverted, you'd have to pour it all over someone than lick it off...

Depends what counts as perversion under the new overlord.

Ear sechs.

One thing is certain: there is no stopping them. The perverts will be here soon.
Soon? :confused: This is NSG...

Ear sechs.
I lol'd. :p

Ear sechs.

Unless it's pretty small I can't imagine any guys penis fitting in somebody's ear.

Although, my only plane of reference for this is Scary Movie.

What sort of perversion?

I'm guessing there will be, but since we'd be all perverted, you'd have to pour it all over someone than lick it off...

I'm reminded of:

http://badexample.mu.nu/archives/bad%20detergent.jpg

What if the government was taken over by a incredibly perverted dictator and turn the state into a totalitarian one where perversion was mandatory and those who didn't meet quotas of perverted acts were executed or oppressed.
What would you do?

Rejoice. I'd do smashingly.

What sort of perversion?

The evil Rimmer (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mo7oM9hxDWc) off of that "Demons and Angels" episode of Red Dwarf but 10x worse.

The funny thing is...after a while, 'missionary' would be the most perverse act imaginable.

The evil Rimmer (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mo7oM9hxDWc) off of that "Demons and Angels" episode of Red Dwarf but 10x worse.

Hotness.

The funny thing is...after a while, 'missionary' would be the most perverse act imaginable.

I thought it already was.

What sort of perversion?

Oh, and I noticed you were accused of insulting me in the Avatars thread. How amusing:)

I wonder if I'd out-pervert you...

Oh, and I noticed you were accused of insulting me in the Avatars thread. How amusing:)

I had a good laugh at that. Some people just don't seem to get us, do they?

I thought it already was.

MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!

Your heart is impure, you shall be chosen to join the ruling elite!

I had a good laugh at that. Some people just don't seem to get us, do they?

It would be rather boring (and perhaps creepy) if they did...

I wonder if I'd out-pervert you...

It isn't whether you win or lose, it's competing that would be a hoot.

The evil Rimmer (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mo7oM9hxDWc) off of that "Demons and Angels" episode of Red Dwarf but 10x worse.

then i would have to push the red button

MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!

Your heart is impure, you shall be chosen to join the ruling elite!

Aww, another one! I just keep having to turn these invites down. I can only look down my nose at so many people at once.

It would be rather boring (and perhaps creepy) if they did...

I must say that I do enjoy snickering at their misdirected indignation, especially when it's on your behalf. Bitches be so protective of the stronger bitch.

I must say that I do enjoy snickering at their misdirected indignation, especially when it's on your behalf. Bitches be so protective of the stronger bitch.

Oh, stop you flatterer:D

Oh, stop you flatterer:D

Being stronger than those bitches ain't that tough, but soak it up, I suppose... wait, you didn't think I was referring to me?

Honestly, now.

Being stronger than those bitches ain't that tough, but soak it up, I suppose... wait, you didn't think I was referring to me?

Honestly, now.

Na, doesn't make sense in context. I'll take the title of stronger bitch and run with it...literally...see you later!

Na, doesn't make sense in context. I'll take the title of stronger bitch and run with it...literally...see you later!

Time for bed anyway. I shall dream of your fractured innocence.

People should not fear their government. Governments should fear their people. I'd probably rebel.

Hermitage!

You mean we're not already ruled by a perverted dictator? :confused:

People should not fear their government. Governments should fear their people. I'd probably rebel.

Is not the government sometimes the people though? Shouldn't they work together as a unified body working not for a general ideal or philosophy but for the universal happiness and well-being of the people in effective compormise?

And should not the government focus all its services like economy and defense based upon the need and will of the people not following a general outline of how and why like Nationalism, Socialism, Republicanism, etc. etc.

am I talking out my ass?

You mean we're not already ruled by a perverted dictator? :confused:

We're not.

We're not.

Yay for you. What's it like?

Rejoice. I'd do smashingly.

huh, I thought you already were....

Hermitage!
Ehh, if you're going to be forced to do perverted acts, you may as well do them with other people. :p

Is not the government sometimes the people though? Shouldn't they work together as a unified body working not for a general ideal or philosophy but for the universal happiness and well-being of the people in effective compormise?


Duh. Didn't you get what this thread is about?

Yay for you. What's it like?

Oh, like a representative, proportional, parliamentarian, constitutional monarchy.

What if the government was taken over by a incredibly perverted dictator and turn the state into a totalitarian one where perversion was mandatory and those who didn't meet quotas of perverted acts were executed or oppressed.
What would you do?
I don't know where you came up with this, but I'd flee as far as I can...>.>

You mean we're not already ruled by a perverted dictator? :confused:

:headbang::rolleyes:

I don't know where you came up with this, but I'd flee as far as I can...>.>

This hypothetical situation is one of my greatest fears.

Considering I'd likely be the one ruling, I don't see any problems. However, from now on I shall be addressed as Supreme Dictator and President for Life, Field Marshal, Air Marshal and Fleet Admiral, Dr. Dimitri Romanov, Master of the Known Universe, Lord of all Beasts, Fishes, Birds, Plants, Minerals and leader of the Revolution of International Betterment.

Considering I'd likely be the one ruling, I don't see any problems. However, from now on I shall be addressed as Supreme Dictator and President for Life, Field Marshal, Air Marshal and Fleet Admiral, Dr. Dimitri Romanov, Master of the Known Universe, Lord of all Beasts, Fishes, Birds, Plants, Minerals and leader of the Revolution of International Betterment.

:eek:

Duh. Didn't you get what this thread is about?

Yes i was aware, I just wanted to state the point in an all to blatant manner

or perhaps I'm talking out my ass

:fluffle: I love you Zarakon

I read the thread title and thought it said "legal perversions" and I was like :eek:

I think I am going to bed now. LOL

Considering I'd likely be the one ruling, I don't see any problems. However, from now on I shall be addressed as Supreme Dictator and President for Life, Field Marshal, Air Marshal and Fleet Admiral, Dr. Dimitri Romanov, Master of the Known Universe, Lord of all Beasts, Fishes, Birds, Plants, Minerals and leader of the Revolution of International Betterment.

So, the SDPLFMAMFADRDRMKULBFBPMLRI for short?

This hypothetical situation is one of my greatest fears.
:eek:

Strange fears you have. Why would you think about something like this in the first place?

:headbang::rolleyes:

I love it when I make n00bs do that.

So, the SDPLFMAMFADRDRMKULBFBPMLRI for short?
Missed the B. :p

:eek:

Strange fears you have. Why would you think about something like this in the first place?

Dude, where I live non-pervs are rare. :(

Besides, every day my buddies and I come together and make strange hypothetical situations like what it'd be like if humans ate like amoeba and such, many of our ideas our useful for stories, inventions and such, others that are strange are just for laughs. So the idea came from a fear but evolved into an exaggerated hypothetical nation where perversion is enforced. However I do have fear that the US could become like that. Kinda like that bicycle fear that one guy had on the nudist thread.

After stating that Id like to share a strange dream I had where I undergone surgery with a jackhammer as the main surgical tool and witnessed as elves, leprechauns and fairies were pulled out of my gut and left lung by doctorswhich ended up curing me somehow. :D

LONG LIVE THE REVOULUTION!!!! Down with the perverted opressors :p

LONG LIVE THE REVOULUTION!!!! Down with the perverted opressors :p

TO ARMS COMRADE! *buys a hundred AK-47s* :p

TO ARMS COMRADE! *buys a hundred AK-47s* :p

You really don't want to fight against me. Join me and you get torture. Oppose me and you get torture. But less fun torture. Hot dominatrix in pleather vs scummy looking guy, you pick.

LONG LIVE THE REVOULUTION!!!! Down with the perverted opressors :p

Either way you're being oppressed. You might as well be oppressed in a fun way. :D

I'd turn on C-SPAN to watch the Marines take care of this guy.

OK, if he actually succeeded?

My first instinct would be to go partisan, but all I have are brains and a really nasty imagination if I need it. So instead I'd make aliyah and move to Israel.

After acquiring a few mad weapons skillz, preferably including bomb-making, I'd return home, join a Jewish or Muslim resistance group, and start the guerilla war against perversion.

Why Jewish or Muslim? Well, I'm Jewish, so joining a Jewish resistance group makes sense. Jews actually have quite a history of partisan warfare - and legislating perversion would instantly catapult the Orthodox community into open revolt.

And Muslim? If I can't find a decent Jewish group, I'd find the nearest Muslim group, since I would be comfortable around them. Assuming they're willing to tolerate non-Muslims, the conversation would go like this:
Muslim: Are you prepared to serve Allah, and drive these perverts from the land?
Mirkana: I am.
Muslim: Then welcome, brother. You are just in time for prayers.
Mirkana: Actually, I'm Jewish.
Muslim: Huh?
Mirkana: Yeah, I forgot to mention that part. I'm Jewish - hell, I'm ex-IDF - but I respect Muslims. Hey, maybe I could stand watch or something while you pray?
Muslim: I thought you said that you would serve Allah?
Mirkana: Allah=G-d.
Muslim: OK, you're in.

In fact, I realized that "Allahu Akbar" would be a perfectly acceptable battlecry for Jews.

Oh, and you won't be torturing me if I oppose you. Not after I lace all your torture devices with MORPHINE! Hahahaha!

Depends what you consider perverted.

"Chastity: The most unnatural of the sexual perversions."
-Aldous Huxley

What if the government was taken over by a incredibly perverted dictator and turn the state into a totalitarian one where perversion was mandatory and those who didn't meet quotas of perverted acts were executed or oppressed.
What would you do?

Dude, seriously, rebellion would be INEVITABLE. No goverment could enforce that.

I'd probably be elected to high office.

What if the government was taken over by a incredibly perverted dictator and turn the state into a totalitarian one where perversion was mandatory and those who didn't meet quotas of perverted acts were executed or oppressed.
What would you do?

living in today's america, i was under the distinct impression it had been. sometime arround seven years ago. six if you want to only count from when the rather odd way of knocking down a couple of buildings was instigated as a means of getting away popularly with doing so.

of course the whole language of what is and is not perversion and relative degrees of it, has been turned upside down by a proccess going on a lot longer then that, hundreds, perhaps thousands of years, with a certain degree of self-ritousness right in the thick of it.

so what else is there to do, but hunker down, hope and pray for it's foul winds to pass over, and do everything non-confrontational in our power, to avoid supporting it?

=^^=
.../\...

What if the government was taken over by a incredibly perverted dictator and turn the state into a totalitarian one where perversion was mandatory and those who didn't meet quotas of perverted acts were executed or oppressed.
What would you do?

Join up with a right wing Christian milita probably, I think I would be one of millions to do so, along with plenty of military deserters who have found this latest attrocity from the socialists abit too much too ignore.
This latest civil war would probably end up with a pogrom declared on all socialists, millions of gays, feminists etc sadly would be slaughtered, and I do mean that sadly.
As much as I disagree with current gay politics and the ridiculous social engineering bought about by irresponsible feminists and other socialists, the coming fight which will end up with a right wing Christian victory in the United states, will also see a lot of horror and pain inflicted on innocent gay people who can't help being how they are, women who genuinely want to be seen as equals of men, not motivated by any hatred of them, and this could even escualate down to non-whites, as the good that socialism did in the nineteenth too mid tentieth Century, is all unravelled back to the first American civil war(this coming one being the second).
Gay rights, womens rights etc is all part of a long planned scheme to create a revolution in America to set up a new power, which I believe is the Freemasons whos seal is on the back of all your dollar notes, at present the freemasons run America and its interest as a puppeteer would, after this massive social conflict they will step out of the shadows and reveal themselves as the true leaders unashamedly, feminism gay rights etc even believe it or not black rights and other non whites have never had any place in their agenda of coming power.
They started and bankrolled all the revolutions and wars in the modern world soley to create a new world order which they will rule, in the west and middle east anyway. I dont believe Asia is part of their plans as it is too big too contain, but they will confront China especially in a similar situation to the Cold war between the US and Russia back in the 20 Century.
Back to the coming confrontation between the Socialists and Christians, even though the Christians will win the fight, unfortunately they will be sold out by the new world power run by the masons who used them as well.
Meaning the masons backed the socialists to destabilise the western governments from within then manouvered the right wing Christians onto them, pawning them as well to bring about a new world order.
The NWO will bring about peace for a short period, but it won't be run by women as feminists like to envisage, it won't be run by gays, it won't be run by socialists, it won't be run by Muslims, and it certainly won't be run by Christians.
It will be run by the Freemasons in America and the modern day Illuminatii in Europe, together they will run the middle east.
They have been doing this for centurys anyway, only when the NWO is declared as officially in power, they will do so openly.
These guys have all the wealth thanks to centurys of extortion, assassinations and lies and answer only to their own greed.
Everything else no matter how important is secondary.
So gays, socialists, right wing Christians, muslim extremists I'm sorry to say you have all been pwned from the beginning, they have led you by the nose and pandered to your fears, wants and lusts, to establish themselves in official power.
Oh and in case I forgot, the RC church is probably the biggest (and well planned out for over a thousand years) pawn in the worlds history.

Dude, seriously, rebellion would be INEVITABLE. No goverment could enforce that.

They wouldnt need too enforce it, just not do anything about what Christians would see as perversions allowed to take place, such as gang rape on hetrosexuals by homosexuals, child molesters allowed to walk free etc
you would of course get your backlash small at first, but then it would grow as all backlashes do.

What if the government was taken over by a incredibly perverted dictator and turn the state into a totalitarian one where perversion was mandatory and those who didn't meet quotas of perverted acts were executed or oppressed.
What would you do?

Well, I eat meat on Fridays, drink alcohol, like marijuana and tobacco, have sex with someone that isn't my spouse, don't pray... I'd say that I would qualify as a member of the new ruling class.

YAY!

(omissis)

:rolleyes:

Really... you should be able to tell fiction (and lousy fiction, I might add) from history. Or, at least, use less LSD while reading the "Mein Kampf".

:rolleyes:

I kind of like how supporting equal rights makes you a free mason, though this must mean I get special privileges like sanity and the wonders of socialized medicine etc

also being an enemy of America seems to be a great way to sleep with women

:rolleyes:

Really... you should be able to tell fiction (and lousy fiction, I might add) from history. Or, at least, use less LSD while reading the "Mein Kampf".

fiction hahahaha, even the masons like to promote it as fiction, the less the average joe like you knows the better, you believing its fiction is just what they want to hear.
your LSD and mein Kampf comment is predictable leftwing psychobabble you are spouting it faithfully just like a good little socialist should, well done Che.
*pats on head.

I kind of like how supporting equal rights makes you a free mason, though this must mean I get special privileges like sanity and the wonders of socialized medicine etc

also being an enemy of America seems to be a great way to sleep with women

freemasons put the brotherhood over everything else, you murder someone who is a free mason and thats the end of you, but if you murder someone and you are a freemason, you stand a chance of getting off, if the judge sentencing you is not a freemason, the lodge will find someone who is over his/her head who is a free mason and will help you get off, as in a lighter jail sentence, protection for you in jail, easy jail to go too, even get off scotfree if its possible.
They can do it, because they go all the way up to the top, and past.
Also the lower degrees of freemasonary profess a belief in Jesus and what he stands for, however as the member gains trust and rises higher in the freemasons, he is slowly innitiated towards Satan instead, there is I believe a ritual where the member is asked to make a choice, to go to the left or right, some kind of important ceremony, if they go left they are declared as forsaking heaven for hell.
This is the crucial step in the masons to true worldly power, to being a part of it, Im not entirely sure of the actual ritual, but I'm presently doing more research into it, from ex members acounts of this etc
your comment on women isnt far off the mark, sex with alot of desirable women is part and parcel of any cult.

People should not fear their government. Governments should fear their people. I'd probably rebel.

And so would enough people that a regime like this would not be sustainable. In fact, it may be replaced with one that goes in the complete opposite direction. One that makes the Puritans and the taboos of the 1950s look like one giant whorehouse.

I picture it this way - sex ed would be wiped out of schools. All sexual references or suggestiveness would be banned in public and discouraged in private. Women would be required to cover themselves almost completely with only their faces showing, and men would dress very conservatively, almost uniformly. Teenagers would not date, at least not openly, but they would be expected to be married at a young age. College campuses would be full of married students, and those who are not married would be viewed with suspicion.

Parents would not discuss sex with their kids except on the level of "Don't do it. Ever." The expectation would be that unmarried people do not have sex and that married people do not have sex outside of marriage. The romantic notion of losing one's virginity on their wedding night or soon after would be gone as well; the push may be so far that newly-married couples are expected to abstain from sex as well, waiting until they are ready to procreate. Even then, sex for pleasure or marital union would be taboo; it would be done simply for the purpose of procreation and would never be discussed, especially as a matter of enjoyment. It would be a sense of duty, not pleasure or bonding.

All forms of birth control would be outlawed. Anything used as birth control by clever young people would find itself banned as well (plastic wrap, tube socks, and if we wanted to get really painful, coat hangers.) People would serve jail time for public displays of affection. Youth hangouts, no matter how innocuous, would often be raided by police looking for young lovers. Homosexuals would serve lengthy prison terms. People who don't get married would be accused of being homosexual or otherwise deviant; marriage (to a member of the opposite sex) would be a de facto requirement. It would also likely be a taboo to marry someone of whom one's parents did not approve.

Other taboos such as living together before marriage would be back in full force. Divorce would almost certainly be forbidden in all cases, and widowed mothers would probably run the greatest risk of losing their children and their livelihoods. Widows would be viewed with suspicion (widowers as well, but less so) as having done their spouses in, and the choices they make would be seen as unacceptable no matter what. Remarriage would indicate a lack of respect for the initial marriage vows and a lack of sorrow over the loss; failure to remarry would often cast doubts over the widow(er)'s commitment to doing what's best for the children and may cast them as an unwed pervert.

Churches would likely be all-powerful, intruding on every phase of life. Even previous gains may be erased, such as the civil rights movement, and marriage between the races, and perhaps economic classes, could become a cultural taboo once again. With modern technology, it's entirely possible that couples would decide en masse to have babies in labs, with everything from a medical procedure to a pill cocktail of some sort being given to a woman to make her pregnant. The idea is, of course, to continue procreation without all that pesky sex (I think George Orwell called it "artsem" in "1984.")

Frankly, speaking of "1984," someone should write a book about a sexless dystopia of that sort.

Finally! An excuse to go on a shooting spr--err, test out that .22 machine pistol I just finished.

I can't wait for this new perverted administration. I hope that we get to gangbang the president.

It would be like living in a Marquis de Sade novel. How odd.

And so would enough people that a regime like this would not be sustainable. In fact, it may be replaced with one that goes in the complete opposite direction. One that makes the Puritans and the taboos of the 1950s look like one giant whorehouse.
I picture it this way - sex ed would be wiped out of schools. All sexual references or suggestiveness would be banned in public and discouraged in private. Women would be required to cover themselves almost completely with only their faces showing, and men would dress very conservatively, almost uniformly. Teenagers would not date, at least not openly, but they would be expected to be married at a young age. College campuses would be full of married students, and those who are not married would be viewed with suspicion.
Parents would not discuss sex with their kids except on the level of "Don't do it. Ever." The expectation would be that unmarried people do not have sex and that married people do not have sex outside of marriage. The romantic notion of losing one's virginity on their wedding night or soon after would be gone as well; the push may be so far that newly-married couples are expected to abstain from sex as well, waiting until they are ready to procreate. Even then, sex for pleasure or marital union would be taboo; it would be done simply for the purpose of procreation and would never be discussed, especially as a matter of enjoyment. It would be a sense of duty, not pleasure or bonding.
All forms of birth control would be outlawed. Anything used as birth control by clever young people would find itself banned as well (plastic wrap, tube socks, and if we wanted to get really painful, coat hangers.) People would serve jail time for public displays of affection. Youth hangouts, no matter how innocuous, would often be raided by police looking for young lovers. Homosexuals would serve lengthy prison terms. People who don't get married would be accused of being homosexual or otherwise deviant; marriage (to a member of the opposite sex) would be a de facto requirement. It would also likely be a taboo to marry someone of whom one's parents did not approve.
Other taboos such as living together before marriage would be back in full force. Divorce would almost certainly be forbidden in all cases, and widowed mothers would probably run the greatest risk of losing their children and their livelihoods. Widows would be viewed with suspicion (widowers as well, but less so) as having done their spouses in, and the choices they make would be seen as unacceptable no matter what. Remarriage would indicate a lack of respect for the initial marriage vows and a lack of sorrow over the loss; failure to remarry would often cast doubts over the widow(er)'s commitment to doing what's best for the children and may cast them as an unwed pervert.
Churches would likely be all-powerful, intruding on every phase of life. Even previous gains may be erased, such as the civil rights movement, and marriage between the races, and perhaps economic classes, could become a cultural taboo once again. With modern technology, it's entirely possible that couples would decide en masse to have babies in labs, with everything from a medical procedure to a pill cocktail of some sort being given to a woman to make her pregnant. The idea is, of course, to continue procreation without all that pesky sex (I think George Orwell called it "artsem" in "1984.")
Frankly, speaking of "1984," someone should write a book about a sexless dystopia of that sort.

BWAHAHA!! FUNNY!:p

Dibs in the hotties in bondage~

And so would enough people that a regime like this would not be sustainable. In fact, it may be replaced with one that goes in the complete opposite direction. One that makes the Puritans and the taboos of the 1950s look like one giant whorehouse.

I picture it this way - sex ed would be wiped out of schools. All sexual references or suggestiveness would be banned in public and discouraged in private. Women would be required to cover themselves almost completely with only their faces showing, and men would dress very conservatively, almost uniformly. Teenagers would not date, at least not openly, but they would be expected to be married at a young age. College campuses would be full of married students, and those who are not married would be viewed with suspicion.

Parents would not discuss sex with their kids except on the level of "Don't do it. Ever." The expectation would be that unmarried people do not have sex and that married people do not have sex outside of marriage. The romantic notion of losing one's virginity on their wedding night or soon after would be gone as well; the push may be so far that newly-married couples are expected to abstain from sex as well, waiting until they are ready to procreate. Even then, sex for pleasure or marital union would be taboo; it would be done simply for the purpose of procreation and would never be discussed, especially as a matter of enjoyment. It would be a sense of duty, not pleasure or bonding.

All forms of birth control would be outlawed. Anything used as birth control by clever young people would find itself banned as well (plastic wrap, tube socks, and if we wanted to get really painful, coat hangers.) People would serve jail time for public displays of affection. Youth hangouts, no matter how innocuous, would often be raided by police looking for young lovers. Homosexuals would serve lengthy prison terms. People who don't get married would be accused of being homosexual or otherwise deviant; marriage (to a member of the opposite sex) would be a de facto requirement. It would also likely be a taboo to marry someone of whom one's parents did not approve.

Other taboos such as living together before marriage would be back in full force. Divorce would almost certainly be forbidden in all cases, and widowed mothers would probably run the greatest risk of losing their children and their livelihoods. Widows would be viewed with suspicion (widowers as well, but less so) as having done their spouses in, and the choices they make would be seen as unacceptable no matter what. Remarriage would indicate a lack of respect for the initial marriage vows and a lack of sorrow over the loss; failure to remarry would often cast doubts over the widow(er)'s commitment to doing what's best for the children and may cast them as an unwed pervert.

Churches would likely be all-powerful, intruding on every phase of life. Even previous gains may be erased, such as the civil rights movement, and marriage between the races, and perhaps economic classes, could become a cultural taboo once again. With modern technology, it's entirely possible that couples would decide en masse to have babies in labs, with everything from a medical procedure to a pill cocktail of some sort being given to a woman to make her pregnant. The idea is, of course, to continue procreation without all that pesky sex (I think George Orwell called it "artsem" in "1984.")

Frankly, speaking of "1984," someone should write a book about a sexless dystopia of that sort.


Thats what I like to call my Dad.

:D

Seriously... he is way to protective of his "Baby Girl", Yet amongst all this, he still lets my boyfriend sleep with me... In all honesty he prefers me happy and cherry than always depressed and obeying him.

Dibs in the hotties in bondage~

Ill be over with the bag as soon as you tell me where you live. :fluffle:

huh, I thought you already were....

You'd be in the best position to know :D

You'd be in the best position to know :D

......ehh, too easy.

I would fight them.

......ehh, too easy.

I most certainly am not! :D

And the biggest pervert on this forum (that'd be you) clearly has no room to talk BTW.

I most certainly am not! :D

And the biggest pervert on this forum (that'd be you) clearly has no room to talk BTW.

oh I doubt I"m the BIGGEST, perhaps merely the most outspoken about it. I've seen some folks that'd make me down right puritan in comparison

What if the government was taken over by a incredibly perverted dictator and turn the state into a totalitarian one where perversion was mandatory and those who didn't meet quotas of perverted acts were executed or oppressed.
What would you do?

This thread title is a bit interesting

In the title you said "legalize" and in the thread you said make it mandatory those two are not synonymous, you can make something legal without enforcing it.

This thread title is a bit interesting

In the title you said "legalize" and in the thread you said make it mandatory those two are not synonymous, you can make something legal without enforcing it.

In fairness to the OP (I can't believe I'm saying that) he said "legislating" not "legalize". Legislating merely means to pass legislation in regards to it. Legislation can be making it legal, illegal, or mandatory. Legislate does not necessarily mean legalize.

In fairness to the OP (I can't believe I'm saying that) he said "legislating" not "legalize". Legislating merely means to pass legislation in regards to it. Legislation can be making it legal, illegal, or mandatory. Legislate does not necessarily mean legalize.

Misread it my bad :)

snip
I'd rebel in that society as well.

I doubt the quotas will be high enough for my liking so Ill become a terrorirs:mp5:t any way.

I'd rebel in that society as well.

You would. A lot of people would. But a lot of people would prop it up as well. And as grouchy, closed-minded, and asexual as most of America claims to be, I can imagine this sort of society taking hold, at least on the surface. In fact, maybe I ought to write a book about it.

I doubt the quotas will be high enough for my liking

winner.

What if the government was taken over by a incredibly perverted dictator and turn the state into a totalitarian one where perversion was mandatory and those who didn't meet quotas of perverted acts were executed or oppressed.
What would you do?

Define "perversion".

Define "perversion".

for most folks it seems to be "anything other than boy/girl missionary sex"

for most folks it seems to be "anything other than boy/girl missionary sex"

Don't forget "within a holy, Church-sanctioned marriage, with the lights off, with neither party making a sound, for the express purpose of procreation and is not overly enjoyed by either person in the act." Of course, by that definition, everything's a perversion.

I for one would welcome our new perverted overlords.

Lords or Ladies? ;)

Depends what counts as perversion under the new overlord.

Good question. Some of the 'normal' (as in 'heterosexual vanilla') acts can be counted as hideous perversions by some of us... :rolleyes:

will there be chocolate sauce?

Of course! It's not a coup or anything if there's no chocolate... :p

Lords or Ladies? ;)

Yes.

Good question. Some of the 'normal' (as in 'heterosexual vanilla') acts can be counted as hideous perversions by some of us... :rolleyes:

Really? Do go on.

Of course! It's not a coup or anything if there's no chocolate... :p

Well, I could have told you that...I'll bring the boiling caramel. Your choice as to whether we let it cool first.

oh I doubt I"m the BIGGEST, perhaps merely the most outspoken about it. I've seen some folks that'd make me down right puritan in comparison

I'd like their numbers and addresses please, thanks!

Depends on the quotas and what is defined as perversion.

so long as they're not hurting the children or animals, i'm all in ^ ^!

The funny thing is...after a while, 'missionary' would be the most perverse act imaginable.
actually, that would be Abstenance that would become the most perverse act.

"You mean you are denying yourself the pleasures of Flesh?"
"yep."
"Willingly!?"
"Yep."
"AND YOU LIKE IT?!!!?"
"Yep."
"pervert!"

so long as they're not hurting the children or animals, i'm all in ^ ^!

so what if Chilren are redefined as anyone under 10 yrs old and those over 10 are transitional adults?

and if animals are redefined as living creatures that cannot "reconize their name given by their Human companions." thus pets are now redefined not as animals but Domesticated, Non Human Persons...

[QUOTE=JuNii;12681543]so what if Chilren are redefined as anyone under 10 yrs old and those over 10 are transitional adults?
QUOTE]

so your saying any kid over ten is now fairgame for the perverts of the future because they are now 'transtional adults'? did you make this up, or have you heard this term from someone else.
Its just that I know paedophilia will be bought in as acceptable by our lost western society in the future, I was just wondering how they planned to go about it legally, to make it appear so.
The transitional adults will probably just be a short phaze before all barriers are torn down, and the pervs go for everything.

Well, I'd obviously debauch myself for as long as they were in power. The only way to get rid of temptation is to yield it.

so what if Chilren are redefined as anyone under 10 yrs old and those over 10 are transitional adults?


so your saying any kid over ten is now fairgame for the perverts of the future because they are now 'transtional adults'? did you make this up, or have you heard this term from someone else.
Its just that I know paedophilia will be bought in as acceptable by our lost western society in the future, I was just wondering how they planned to go about it legally, to make it appear so.
The transitional adults will probably just be a short phaze before all barriers are torn down, and the pervs go for everything.yes, I did "make it up" but it was baised on the notion of lowering age restrictions for sex, alcohol and others. Plus you add in the "Define human life" that is argued by both sides of the abortion issue.

and as for the animal thing... here's Hiasl (http://news.google.com/news?um=1&tab=wn&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=Hiasl)!

yes, I did "make it up"

be careful then you don't give any of the pervs currently holding senior roles in government and law, any ideas.

What if the government was taken over by a incredibly perverted dictator and turn the state into a totalitarian one where perversion was mandatory and those who didn't meet quotas of perverted acts were executed or oppressed.
What would you do?

Can I choose my own perversions?

is someone trying to say this hasn't already happened in the u.s. and that trying to make everything have to begin and end with little green pieces of paper at the point of a gun isn't the ultimate perversion?

=^^=
.../\...

In soviet Russia, government perves you!

In soviet Russia, government perves you!

http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2006/07/07/putin_wideweb__470x351,0.jpg

No sushi for me for a while...

I'd like their numbers and addresses please, thanks!

Well, you can PM me for mine. ;)