NationStates Jolt Archive


A Challenge to all NSG!

Neo Kervoskia
29-04-2007, 18:11
Anyone who makes an 90% flame-free thread of more than 200 posts will win a prize. What is the prize you may ask?

I will send you an autographed dollar bill or wear a degrading signature of your choosing. I'll also cook you dinner and give you a sensual foot massage.
Greater Trostia
29-04-2007, 18:13
So for creating a 90% flame-free thread the only thing I get is one measly dollar?

Whatever, you commie pinko scum.
Neo Kervoskia
29-04-2007, 18:15
So for creating a 90% flame-free thread the only thing I get is one measly dollar?

Whatever, you commie pinko scum.

It's for charity.
Hydesland
29-04-2007, 18:16
It will take more then a dollar to motivate me into bending the laws of physics.
IL Ruffino
29-04-2007, 18:20
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=513047

Where's my money?
Neo Kervoskia
29-04-2007, 18:21
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=513047

Where's my money?

Do you have PayPal?
IL Ruffino
29-04-2007, 18:24
Do you have PayPal?

No.

I want the autographed dollar bill.
Whereyouthinkyougoing
29-04-2007, 18:26
http://forums1.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=489636

I win the thread.

And I have Paypal.
IL Ruffino
29-04-2007, 18:30
http://forums1.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=489636

I win the thread.

And I have Paypal.

You little fucker!
Fassigen
29-04-2007, 18:32
Spam threads should not be eligible, meaning by extension that threads started by anyone even remotely associated with the Whereyouthinkyougoing-clique's inane escapades should be disqualified.
Whereyouthinkyougoing
29-04-2007, 18:33
Spam threads should not be eligible, meaning by extension that threads started by anyone even remotely associated with the Whereyouthinkyougoing-clique's inane escapades should be disqualified.

Excuse me?
Neo Kervoskia
29-04-2007, 18:35
Spam threads should not be eligible, meaning by extension that threads started by anyone even remotely associated with the Whereyouthinkyougoing-clique's inane escapades should be disqualified.

You just saved me a dollar.
Fassigen
29-04-2007, 18:36
Excuse me?

In this instance no can do, darling.
Imperial isa
29-04-2007, 18:37
Spam threads should not be eligible, meaning by extension that threads started by anyone even remotely associated with the Whereyouthinkyougoing-clique's inane escapades should be disqualified.

oh look it's MR ED
UNITIHU
29-04-2007, 18:38
Spam threads should not be eligible, meaning by extension that threads started by anyone even remotely associated with the Whereyouthinkyougoing-clique's inane escapades should be disqualified.

Exactly. The contest should apply to serious political discussions only.
LOL GOOD LUCK
Fassigen
29-04-2007, 18:41
You just saved me a dollar.

Probably more than one seeing as to how prolific they are. Some of them even post to threads months on end after they've been moved to spam, meaning they would easily reach the 90% quotient. It's quite pathological, really.
Zarakon
29-04-2007, 18:42
I think any thread Fass is even remotely involved in should be considered a flamefest. Even if their isn't one, it's raging beneath the surface.

I almost typed "I think any Fass thread is even remotely involved in..."
Gravlen
29-04-2007, 18:46
Probably more than one seeing as to how prolific they are. Some of them even post to threads months on end after they've been moved to spam, meaning they would easily reach the 90% quotient. It's quite pathological, really.
Kinda like posting on NSG at all, really :)


*Steals clique*
Fassigen
29-04-2007, 18:49
Kinda like posting on NSG at all, really :)

Depends on the aetiology.

*Steals clique*

Huh?
Swilatia
29-04-2007, 18:50
Sorry, that's not enough. I will need €1 000 000 000 in advance if I am to bend the laws of physics for you.
Gravlen
29-04-2007, 18:52
Depends.
What can I say? I always come back...


Huh?
I wanted one too!
Luipaard
29-04-2007, 18:54
Exactly. The contest should apply to serious political discussions only.
LOL GOOD LUCK

Why only political discussions? Why cant we also have serious scientific discussions etc? Most politics is boring and people arnt going to change their opinions of it no matter how good the oposite argument is.

Actually, when i think of an interesting topic i may well start a serious scientific discussion thread.
UNITIHU
29-04-2007, 18:55
Why only political discussions? Why cant we also have serious scientific discussions etc? Most politics is boring and people arnt going to change their opinions of it no matter how good the oposite argument is.

Actually, when i think of an interesting topic i may well start a serious scientific discussion thread.

Exactly.
Lunatic Goofballs
29-04-2007, 18:58
I've done it before and I can do it again. :)
Gravlen
29-04-2007, 18:58
Why only political discussions? Why cant we also have serious scientific discussions etc? Most politics is boring and people arnt going to change their opinions of it no matter how good the oposite argument is.

Actually, when i think of an interesting topic i may well start a serious scientific discussion thread.

Because NSG also manage to make any scientific discussions political?
Swilatia
29-04-2007, 19:00
Exactly. The contest should apply to serious political discussions only.
LOL GOOD LUCK

nah, I'm sure any semi-serious debate will become a flame-war or complete hijacked nonsense by page 7.
Whereyouthinkyougoing
29-04-2007, 19:03
Probably more than one seeing as to how prolific they are. Some of them even post to threads months on end after they've been moved to spam, meaning they would easily reach the 90% quotient. It's quite pathological, really.And I figure into that... how again?
Gravlen
29-04-2007, 19:07
And I figure into that... how again?

I suspect that he just forgot my name... And Ruffys... And Fascist D, who haven't posted in a while, and The Beatuiful Darkness... And Ladamesanmerci... And Tweet Tweet... and *mumble*
Camdenelphia
29-04-2007, 19:08
On this forum? Hah.
Swilatia
29-04-2007, 19:08
I've done it before and I can do it again. :)

http://www.sarc.com/avcenter/graphics/w32.hoots.1.gif
Luipaard
29-04-2007, 19:13
nah, I'm sure any semi-serious debate will become a flame-war or complete hijacked nonsense by page 7.

I think the latter is usually infinately more likely...
Whereyouthinkyougoing
29-04-2007, 19:15
I suspect that he just forgot my name... And Ruffys... And Fascist D, who haven't posted in a while, and The Beatuiful Darkness... And Ladamesanmerci... And Tweet Tweet... and *mumble*
Good people, that.

Ah, good ol' Mumble, how I loved him. *reminisces*
Swilatia
29-04-2007, 19:16
I think the latter is usually infinately more likely...
no. I have seen many threads fall off topic in both ways listed, and that it's 50/50 chance.
Neo Kervoskia
29-04-2007, 19:16
Here are some ground rules.

1) No spam threads count, sorry
2) Serious scientific, religious, political threads only. I will, however judge a thread if you give me a link
3) No necroposting
Dinaverg
29-04-2007, 19:17
I suspect that he just forgot my name... And Ruffys... And Fascist D, who haven't posted in a while, and The Beatuiful Darkness... And Ladamesanmerci... And Tweet Tweet... and *mumble*

*coughdinacough*
Lunatic Goofballs
29-04-2007, 19:18
http://www.sarc.com/avcenter/graphics/w32.hoots.1.gif

http://static.flickr.com/24/56733884_8a9876603c.jpg
Luipaard
29-04-2007, 19:22
http://static.flickr.com/24/56733884_8a9876603c.jpg

You sir, are nasty.
Gravlen
29-04-2007, 19:22
Good people, that.

Ah, good ol' Mumble, how I loved him. *reminisces*
Indeed. And all prominent spammers, I say.

Lived in a hill and always was very polite... He could carry a tune though, unlike Mumble of Happy Feet :)
Here are some ground rules.

1) No spam threads count, sorry
Define "Spam threads".
Vetalia
29-04-2007, 19:24
But There Posting Muddy Dicks!
Gravlen
29-04-2007, 19:26
*coughdinacough*

I can't mention all the spammers, we'd be here all say! ;) :p
Luipaard
29-04-2007, 19:27
But There Posting Muddy Dicks!

?????
Swilatia
29-04-2007, 19:27
http://static.flickr.com/24/56733884_8a9876603c.jpg

http://img480.imageshack.us/img480/4594/nowaiku2.png
Vetalia
29-04-2007, 19:28
?????

Classic 4chan meme.

Correct response is "That's not mud"...I'll let you guess what it actually is.
Neo Kervoskia
29-04-2007, 19:31
Does anyone want to give it a try or shall the contest be crosed?
Swilatia
29-04-2007, 19:31
?????

Sorry, I don't speak the question-mark language.
Luipaard
29-04-2007, 19:34
Classic 4chan meme.

Correct response is "That's not mud"...I'll let you guess what it actually is.

Please, give me a chance and speak in english. Or french, or catalan.
Imperial isa
29-04-2007, 19:34
I suspect that he just forgot my name... And Ruffys... And Fascist D, who haven't posted in a while, and The Beatuiful Darkness... And Ladamesanmerci... And Tweet Tweet... and *mumble*

FD post last week as for TBD same i think
Lunatic Goofballs
29-04-2007, 19:39
You sir, are nasty.

Every time God kills a kitten, I masturbate. :)
Piresa
29-04-2007, 19:50
Every time God kills a kitten, I masturbate. :)

Every time God masturbates, I kill a kitten :)

You know, I've only been the indirect cause of death of one kitten... so in the past twelve years, God has only masturbated once and indirectly so!
Ladamesansmerci
29-04-2007, 20:05
I suspect that he just forgot my name... And Ruffys... And Fascist D, who haven't posted in a while, and The Beatuiful Darkness... And Ladamesanmerci... And Tweet Tweet... and *mumble*
Indeed. I miss the old group. :(
Swilatia
30-04-2007, 00:44
You sir, are nasty.

I've seen that pic posted before.