German Judge Rules In Favor of Islamic Law - Page 3
Corneliu
27-03-2007, 00:18
That or he wants to make Islam look bad.
That as well but I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt for now though that is rapidly deteriorating.
That as well but I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt for now though that is rapidly deteriorating.
What benefit of the doubt? He's either a troll or a Fred Phelps of the Islam. Quite simple.
Corneliu
27-03-2007, 00:26
What benefit of the doubt? He's either a troll or a Fred Phelps of the Islam. Quite simple.
Fred Phelps of Islam. I love that turn of phrase. LOL!!!
Fred Phelps of Islam. I love that turn of phrase. LOL!!!
It's true. You don't like Phelps, muslims don't like people like Soviestan. For the same reasons.
Corneliu
27-03-2007, 00:30
Social law changes, such as the forbidding of chewing khat,[16] and even the prohibition against watching movies and soccer in public,[17] have become recent movements by the ICU to change behaviors and impose strict social morals.
Sovietstan, do you support this?
Eurgrovia
27-03-2007, 00:32
I thought Germany was a secular country, why did this ruling even get through?
I thought Germany was a secular country, why did this ruling even get through?
RTFT.
Corneliu
27-03-2007, 00:39
RTFT.
R ead
T he
F ***ing
T hread
?
Deus Malum
27-03-2007, 00:49
RTFT.
R ead
T he
F ***ing
T hread
?
Play nice guys, don't scare the n00bs.
R ead
T he
F ***ing
T hread
?
Rotate The Front Tomato.
Deus Malum
27-03-2007, 01:24
Rotate The Front Tomato.
Row The Fucking Tugboat.
Row The Fucking Tugboat.
Row, row, row the f*cking boat,
gently down the f*cking stream,
merry, merry, merry, f*cking merry,
life is just a f*cking dream...
United Beleriand
28-03-2007, 11:49
No I disputed your claim that being a follower of an abrahamic faith is not inherently intolerant, which it isn't. I said you don't have to interpret the Bible in the way you do, or even read the Bible at all to be considered a Christian. You then responded with "you have obviously never read the Bible" or whatever, which had nothing to do with what I had just said even if it was true.
Also, even if the Bible did very vaguely claim that those kings were "righteous", it doesn't mean you have to follow their actions as the Bible never advocates anything of the sort. Secondly, if you are going to take the Bible that literally, you have to believe that all those killings committed by the kings etc.. were justified since those people deserved to be killed.only according to jewish and christian standards. and if you don't see the biblical tales as the source of both judaism and christianity then tell me what these ideologies are based upon instead. you need not read the bible to call yourself christian, nevertheless your christianity is rooted in it, no matter whether you realize it or not. and the bible very much advocates the slaughter or other punishment of non-followers. and if you think jesus has no connexion to the old testament bloody zealots (such as Elijah) then explain Mk 9:2-13, Mt 17:1-13, Lk 9:28-36 to me.