NationStates Jolt Archive

http://youtube.com/watch?v=2AE847UXu3Q

Very funny stuff, especially the part where he licks his lips at the end.

Are they all this vain?

Now that's funny.

Was he getting ready to go on camera?

And to answer your question, no. They are all not like that.

John Edwards gets his hair and make up done before going on TV?

Just like almost everyone else who appears on TV?

OMGooses*, stop the presses!


*OMGooses is a registered trademark of Cluichstan Inc.

ZOMG Democrats are girly men!! THIS IS A COMPLETELY NEW BIT OF CRITICAL INFORMATION!!!!

Clearly feeling pretty does not make you pretty.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=2AE847UXu3Q

Very funny stuff, especially the part where he licks his lips at the end.

Are they all this vain?
I still doubt that he's had botox injections, unlike his former colleague John Kerry.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=2AE847UXu3Q

Very funny stuff, especially the part where he licks his lips at the end.

Are they all this vain?

Everyone who appears on T.V. with some rare exceptions, such as on the scene interview clips from witnesses to an event, have their hair and make-up done to make them look as good as possible. It helps ratings.

That said, this is somewhat amusing. Have a sense of humour, overreacters. Just because Eve posted it doesn't make it less amusing.

Everyone who appears on T.V. with some rare exceptions, such as on the scene interview clips from witnesses to an event, have their hair and make-up done to make them look as good as possible. It helps ratings.

That said, this is somewhat amusing. Have a sense of humour, overreacters. Just because Eve posted it doesn't make it less amusing.

Yes, appearance helps. Note the Kennedy-Nixon debates. Aside from whatever they said, Nixon didn't use makeup, and looked like a corpse on TV.

Yes, appearance helps. Note the Kennedy-Nixon debates. Aside from whatever they said, Nixon didn't use makeup, and looked like a corpse on TV.

Tricky Dick looked like a corpse even at the best of times. A bloated corpse.

Tricky Dick looked like a corpse even at the best of times. A bloated corpse.

Even a corpse gets makeup before a funeral. Dick looked rather rotten on TV on those debates (even with the sound turned down).

Even a corpse gets makeup before a funeral. Dick looked rather rotten on TV on those debates (even with the sound turned down).

By choice, DK - by choice.

By choice, DK - by choice.

You love saying DK so much... :rolleyes:

You love saying DK so much... :rolleyes:

Almost as much as you like distancing yourself from it. Go figure.

Almost as much as you like distancing yourself from it. Go figure.
Ok, DK... (or DK's puppet). Whatever.

Just like almost everyone else who appears on TV?

OMGooses*, stop the presses!


*OMGooses is a registered trademark of Cluichstan Inc.

Yes, yes it is. :cool:

That said, this is somewhat amusing. Have a sense of humour, overreacters. Just because Eve posted it doesn't make it less amusing.

It is kinda funny. I kept thinking, "OMGooses! When is she gonna stop hitting him with the hairspray? By the time she's done, it's not gonna be hair anymore; it's gonna be a shell." :D

Yes, appearance helps. Note the Kennedy-Nixon debates. Aside from whatever they said, Nixon didn't use makeup, and looked like a corpse on TV.

Nixon also injured his leg right before taking the podium and was in a lot of pain and sweating profusely.

Ok, DK... (or DK's puppet). Whatever.

...uh, no. Dobbs is no more DK than you are.

Seriously, everyone. I'm really getting tired of him being referred to as DK when he's not.

...uh, no. Dobbs is no more DK than you are.

Seriously, everyone. I'm really getting tired of him being referred to as DK when he's not.

That makes 2 of us.

That makes 2 of us.

Sure thing, Allegheny County 2. Sure thing.

Sure thing, Allegheny County 2. Sure thing.

Err...Dobbsy...in that case they really ARE the same person.

Are they all this vain?
Yes. Even the Republicans. They saw it cost Nixon in 1960.

This has been another installment of short answers to stupid questions.

Err...Dobbsy...in that case they really ARE the same person.

Irony not your strong suit then, I take it Ky?

Can we get back to cracking jokes about the video?

Irony not your strong suit then, I take it Ky?

Nope. Never has been, sadly. Nor words themselves for that matter. I sound horrible in real life. Half the time I can't even put together a decent sentence.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=2AE847UXu3Q

Very funny stuff, especially the part where he licks his lips at the end.

Are they all this vain?

Obviously, he is a fag. :rolleyes:

Obviously, he is a fag. :rolleyes:

Where the hell did that come from? :confused:

Where the hell did that come from? :confused:

Hasnt Ann Coulter called him fag? Or was it someone else?

Can we get back to cracking jokes about the video?
Is it really making jokes about the video or making jokes about Eve Online for his incessant attempts to villainize anyone he doesn't like?

Oh no, John Edwards is getting his hair done and putting on make up before going on TV. Look how vain he is, let's laugh at him, HA HA HA HA HA- wait, what did you say? Everyone gets their hair done and puts on make up before going on tv? Well, shit, I don't care about silly things like reality, so I'm going to keep making fun of Edwards for doing what any normal person going on tv does!

Is it really making jokes about the video or making jokes about Eve Online for his incessant attempts to villainize anyone he doesn't like?

Oh no, John Edwards is getting his hair done and putting on make up before going on TV. Look how vain he is, let's laugh at him, HA HA HA HA HA- wait, what did you say? Everyone gets their hair done and puts on make up before going on tv? Well, shit, I don't care about silly things like reality, so I'm going to keep making fun of Edwards for doing what any normal person going on tv does!

Tho, lip thing is kinda funny.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=2AE847UXu3Q

Very funny stuff, especially the part where he licks his lips at the end.

Are they all this vain?

lol, Edwards is gay. Coulter was on to something.

Obviously, he is a fag. :rolleyes:

No. He was probably getting ready to speak in public. That also explains the licking of the lips.

Where the hell did that come from? :confused:

The Youtube comments list is littered with such ignorant and foolish words, but that's to be expected.

Pantless: Calm down. The thing that makes it funny is the music. It's the absurd juxtoposition of the two. If you don't laugh at it even a little bit, you have no sense of humor.

No. He was probably getting ready to speak in public. That also explains the licking of the lips.

No shit. You are so perceptive.

Oh yes, he is a Democrat, thus the licking of the lips must symbolize some evil intent of being ready to deceive the populace with his evil lies!

This topic qualifies as fucktarded.

No shit. You are so perceptive.

Is it me, or do BOTH the fascist fag-haters and the left-wing people on this forum hate my posts?

Everyone who appears on T.V. with some rare exceptions, such as on the scene interview clips from witnesses to an event, have their hair and make-up done to make them look as good as possible. It helps ratings.

That said, this is somewhat amusing. Have a sense of humour, overreacters. Just because Eve posted it doesn't make it less amusing.


I'm often surprised when people appear on the news talk shows and the light exposes the contrast in skin- almost orange on their face,and neck appears pale.
They must be aware of this. I think its worse than no make-up at all.

Hasnt Ann Coulter called him fag? Or was it someone else?

Ah, right, I'd forgotten about that.

Is it really making jokes about the video or making jokes about Eve Online for his incessant attempts to villainize anyone he doesn't like?

Now that would be a flamefest, wouldn't it? Surely you don't want to get something like that going when it's against the rules of the forum...

Besides, how many on the other side incessantly attempt to villainise those they don't like -- George Bush, Anne Coulter, etc.? It's okay if it's coming from the left, but Eve's to be mocked for it? Nice double-standard that. :rolleyes:

Pantless: Calm down. The thing that makes it funny is the music. It's the absurd juxtoposition of the two. If you don't laugh at it even a little bit, you have no sense of humor.

Exactly.

No shit. You are so perceptive.

NMG, please stop your antagonistic method of posting, or else you might bring down the mods upon yourself. You've done nothing but respond in a trollish manner from day one, and the mods won't put up with it for much longer. Just a heads up.

Carnivorous Lickers: I rarely ever notice that, but that's because I pay attention to the face alone, which is usually the point of the make-up. They probably should take care to avoid such contrast though.

Is it me, or do BOTH the fascist fag-haters and the left-wing people on this forum hate my posts?

Ok, maybe that was hard to figure out online. My fag comment was to mock Coulter. Kinda dry humour. My comment about your perception was sarcastic about you explaining me the quite obvious situation, without understanding the link between Edwards, Coulter and fag and "pretty".

Is it me, or do BOTH the fascist fag-haters and the left-wing people on this forum hate my posts?

I think they found their witch and never stop their efforts to burn you at the stake. No matter what you post, there will be endless personal attacks as well as your entire past history churned up for review,wether accurate or not.

Tolerant lot.

NMG, please stop your antagonistic method of posting, or else you might bring down the mods upon yourself. You've done nothing but respond in a trollish manner from day one, and the mods won't put up with it for much longer. Just a heads up.

Carnivorous Lickers: I rarely ever notice that, but that's because I pay attention to the face alone, which is usually the point of the make-up. They probably should take care to avoid such contrast though.

I have no idea if I've ever seen you b4.

Besides, how many on the other side incessantly attempt to villainise those they don't like -- George Bush, Anne Coulter, etc.? It's okay if it's coming from the left, but Eve's to be mocked for it? Nice double-standard that. :rolleyes:
You don't have to villainize villains. Dick Dastardly is a dick, it isn't a point of contention. Or need I quote anything ever put forth in a public forum by Anne Coulter? I guess you would accuse me of villainizing her for quoting her as opposed to asserting that she is vain because there is a video of her getting ready to appear in public/on tv, like some one would normally do. It barely takes anything harder to show Bush is a villain, but nothing so stretching as a video of him prepping for a public appearance.

It is the difference between apples and strawberries.

Pantless: Calm down. The thing that makes it funny is the music. It's the absurd juxtoposition of the two. If you don't laugh at it even a little bit, you have no sense of humor.
I'm not denying the video was funny. That's classic political comedy right there, I've done it before. But the use of it by people like Ever Online to attack John Edwards isn't remotely funny.

I'm not denying the video was funny. That's classic political comedy right there, I've done it before. But the use of it by people like Ever Online to attack John Edwards isn't remotely funny.
I think you are misreading it. It's not an attack. It's satire, much like our own comments about what have you are satire. So, again, calm down. You're getting far too worked up and you're looking like a hypocrite.

I'm not denying the video was funny. That's classic political comedy right there, I've done it before. But the use of it by people like Ever Online to attack John Edwards isn't remotely funny.

Odd, I wasn't attacking Edwards.

I thought the video was funny.

Are you a mind reader now?

I think you are misreading it. It's not an attack. It's satire, much like our own comments about what have you are satire. So, again, calm down. You're getting far too worked up and you're looking like a hypocrite.

dont try to talk over the shrieking

I think you are misreading it. It's not an attack. It's satire, much like our own comments about what have you are satire. So, again, calm down. You're getting far too worked up and you're looking like a hypocrite.
Sadly, you made me view one of his posts to prove my point.

Very funny stuff, especially the part where he licks his lips at the end.

Are they all this vain?
Right, satire. I'm not going to sit here and pretend coyotes are lurking around the chicken coup because they are OCD.
If you want to take his comments out of context of his character, go ahead, but you, especially you Carnivorous_Lickers, can stop flaming me for not doing it.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=2AE847UXu3Q

Very funny stuff, especially the part where he licks his lips at the end.

Are they all this vain?

By the way- This IS funny. Anyone who doesnt at least chuckle has some problems that need help.


I will admit- He isnt a bad looking guy. I wish his point of view was more in line with mine. It would be nice to have someone that was handsome on your side.

I'll also admit that I'm certain that most people-men or women- that are about to appear in public,on stage, go through some type of preparation like this.

I wonder if the woman whose large ass was on screen so often is self-conscious about it now?

I also wonder why that was being filmed? If I were this public a figure, I would certainly want more control of cameras and microphones so these little things couldnt be created and manipulated. I would want any recording devices to be on only when I was fully prepared.

This was funny even without the music. And this tune made it funnier.

Sadly, you made me view one of his posts to prove my point.

Proves nothing. What's the antecedent of "they" in Eve's comment? Well, shit, there isn't one. I assumed he meant politicians. You, on the other hand, decided to polarise and take it to mean Democrats. It's not all about Dems versus Reps, y'know.

Sadly, you made me view one of his posts to prove my point.


Right, satire. I'm not going to sit here and pretend coyotes are lurking around the chicken coup because they are OCD.
If you want to take his comments out of context of his character, go ahead, but you, especially you Carnivorous_Lickers, can stop flaming me for not doing it.
I wasn't flaming you anywhere, and if what I said appeared to be flaming I do apologize. I was simply attempting to avert a flame war.

In any case, his comment, while somewhat rude, seemed more like an off-hand comment I might make about Ann Coulter more than anything else. In other words, the kind of thing we say all the time. He has every right to do the same.

Sadly, you made me view one of his posts to prove my point.


Right, satire. I'm not going to sit here and pretend coyotes are lurking around the chicken coup because they are OCD.
If you want to take his comments out of context of his character, go ahead, but you, especially you Carnivorous_Lickers, can stop flaming me for not doing it.

Dont take anything I said as flaming. Its your very posts that make it seem like you're yelling and emotional.

Proves nothing. What's the antecedent of "they" in Eve's comment? Well, shit, there isn't one. I assumed he meant politicians. You, on the other hand, decided to polarise and take it to mean Democrats. It's not all about Dems versus Reps, y'know.
Like I said, I'm not going to take comments out of context of his character.

It's not all about Dems versus Reps, y'know.

True- I dont have a Dem or a Repub that I love or trust much. And I'd definately laugh if this same bit had Newt Gingrich or Rudy Giuliani instead of Edwards in it-probably more so,because there isnt enough skill or make-up to make either of them handsome.

Like I said, I'm not going to take comments out of context of his character.

Yes. You also won't bother reading the rest of the comments, either, that show I'm not holding this up as anything except funny.

Hell, I even defended Edwards against a "fag" remark.

No. He was probably getting ready to speak in public. That also explains the licking of the lips.

But don't let that change your skewed world view, ok?

Like I said, I'm not going to take comments out of context of his character.

Yet, you are offended when someone judges your character or makes a comment in context with yours.

Yet, you are offended when someone judges your character or makes a comment in context with yours.
If you intend to make it without looking at my history of posts and while ignoring the history of posts and actions by the person I am stating my opinion of. One thread does not context make.

If you intend to make it without looking at my history of posts and while ignoring the history of posts and actions by the person I am stating my opinion of. One thread does not context make.

I'm not attacking you. Just stating a fact. Its very easy to predict how you will react.

True- I dont have a Dem or a Repub that I love or trust much. And I'd definately laugh if this same bit had Newt Gingrich or Rudy Giuliani instead of Edwards in it-probably more so,because there isnt enough skill or make-up to make either of them handsome.


Giuliani doesn't have enough hair for something like this. Besides, he appeared in drag on Saturday Night Live. A video like this of him would be nothing. :D

Wow this is embarrassingly cowardly. Seriously, it actually embarrasses me for you all. It's pretty obvious that this is the line that going to be run with on Edwards, like that dude who painted Kerry as 'metrosexual,' that's the line that's going to be used on Edwards. Anyone, anyone who appears on the news like that could have had their image being made up grabbed by someone with a satellite dish, but we're expected to think that it was Edwards was just a coincidence. That this isn't part of a pattern. "Oh, it's just funny, it doesn't have anything to do with Democrat or Republican..." I can almost hear you guys trying to whistle nonchalantly.

Well, Republicans have made a core part of their base homophobia, so I guess it makes sense.

Anyone who believes in the 'innocence' of this, you might want to pull the fishhook out of your mouth. Nah, screw that, I'm not prepared to think you are that stupid. Honestly, I wouldn't have said anything about this at all except for all the denial and pretending that it's just innocent. My god, it really is just embarrassing. Just stop, man up to the sad little joke. Even the bully doesn't really think the nerd is hitting himself...

Giuliani doesn't have enough hair for something like this. Besides, he appeared in drag on Saturday Night Live. A video like this of him would be nothing. :D

But he is still homely. At least John Edwards has some good looks going for him. In addition to a mountain of cash.

Wow this is embarrassingly cowardly. Seriously, it actually embarrasses me for you all. It's pretty obvious that this is the line that going to be run with on Edwards, like that dude who painted Kerry as 'metrosexual,' that's the line that's going to be used on Edwards. Anyone, anyone who appears on the news like that could have had their image being made up grabbed by someone with a satellite dish, but we're expected to think that it was Edwards was just a coincidence. That this isn't part of a pattern. "Oh, it's just funny, it doesn't have anything to do with Democrat or Republican..." I can almost hear you guys trying to whistle nonchalantly.

Well, Republicans have made a core part of their base homophobia, so I guess it makes sense.

Anyone who believes in the 'innocence' of this, you might want to pull the fishhook out of your mouth. Nah, screw that, I'm not prepared to think you are that stupid. Honestly, I wouldn't have said anything about this at all except for all the denial and pretending that it's just innocent. My god, it really is just embarrassing. Just stop, man up to the sad little joke. Even the bully doesn't really think the nerd is hitting himself...

you ARE kidding, right?

you ARE kidding, right?

no, actually he's is paranoid... we had better up the thorazine...

But he is still homely.


Homely, sure, but with a great sense of humour.

you ARE kidding, right?
I had been asking myself the same thing about you.
no, actually he's is paranoid... we had better up the thorazine...
same here actually.


Seriously, it's like watching stumbling drunks try and tell you that they're 'just fine.' You'd think you guys would have more self respect.

You'd think you guys would have more self respect.

Well, you're apparently lacking in that department, along with a sense of humour.

Well, you're apparently lacking in that department, along with a sense of humour.

Sure, rummy, sure. Let me call you a cab now, okay?

Sure, rummy, sure. Let me call you a cab now, okay?

Yes, you caught me. I'm actually Donald Rumsfeld. I've got a lot of time on my hands since leaving the DoD, and I now spend it on NSG. :rolleyes:

Seriously, could you come up with nothing better?

I had been asking myself the same thing about you.



Thats not remotely likely if you're of sound mind-I havent been shrieking emotionally about anything.

you ARE kidding, right?
Are you?

A picture of a politician in a get up that made him look like he had Mickey Mouse ears comes to mind...

Yes, you caught me. I'm actually Donald Rumsfeld. I've got a lot of time on my hands since leaving the DoD, and I now spend it on NSG. :rolleyes:

Seriously, could you come up with nothing better?
Wow, maybe you aren't playing dumb. (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=rummy) Just in case, look at number two. It's the number that looks like this:2

Wow, maybe you aren't playing dumb. (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=rummy) Just in case, look at number two. It's the number that looks like this:2

Not a big fan of rum. It's pretty much beer or whiskey for me, thanks.

Thats not remotely likely if you're of sound mind-I havent been shrieking emotionally about anything.

Nor have I. Just shaking my head in disappointment.

Nor have I. Just shaking my head in disappointment.

you're far too good for us. there should be another forum for you.

Proves nothing. What's the antecedent of "they" in Eve's comment? Well, shit, there isn't one. I assumed he meant politicians. You, on the other hand, decided to polarise and take it to mean Democrats. It's not all about Dems versus Reps, y'know.

Given the history of Deep Kim- I mean Eve Online's posts it is reasonable to believe that he meant Democrats.

Given the history of Deep Kim- I mean Eve Online's posts it is reasonable to believe that he meant Democrats.

Thank you, at least some people get it instead of trying to turn this into a "Pantless is an intolerant bastard"-fest.

...uh, no. Dobbs is no more DK than you are.

Seriously, everyone. I'm really getting tired of him being referred to as DK when he's not.

no really, he is.

he posts just like dk. he is a pentacostal just like dk and he lives in the dc area just like dk.

although i must say that this iteration is much less creepy than dk was. pentacostal swinger who offers porn of his wife to underage poster was just too much.

Given the history of Deep Kim- I mean Eve Online's posts it is reasonable to believe that he meant Democrats.

And someone who registered this month is certainly qualified to be talking about forum history... :rolleyes:

And someone who registered this month is certainly qualified to be talking about forum history... :rolleyes:
I could pull up Eve's post record for just this month, hell probably even just his topic posts, and we can see who knows more about some one's history on the forums.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=2AE847UXu3Q

Very funny stuff, especially the part where he licks his lips at the end.

Are they all this vain?

Lolz. At you.

I could pull up Eve's post record for just this month, hell probably even just his topic posts, and we can see who knows more about some one's history on the forums.

That wasn't directed at you, TPH. I know you're a new incarnation of an old member. If you were paying attention, though, you'd have noticed that the post of mine that you quoted was directed at Redwulf25.

That wasn't directed at you, TPH. I know you're a new incarnation of an old member. If you were paying attention, though, you'd have noticed that the post of mine that you quoted was directed at Redwulf25.

That was the whole point of my post.

And someone who registered this month is certainly qualified to be talking about forum history... :rolleyes:

Wow, you really weren't playing. I'm sorry, I overestimated you. I'll adjust my expectations of what you can and cannot understand accordingly.

You see, Cluichstan, it is free to create nations in Nationstates. This means that players can sometimes create more than one nation. They even have the ability to post in all the nations that they create. Sometimes people do this. We call them 'puppets,' as if they where the puppet government of the 'original' nation.

And sometimes nations come and go, for a variety of reasons. Perhaps they stayed away too long and their nation died and they had to create a new one. Or their nation was deleted for a violation. Then that person creates a new nation and rejoins. Now, that new nation isn't going to carry the create date and post history of the previous nation any more than the puppets will carry the information of thier 'masters.' However, the person behind the nation retains all of thier memory and observation from when they posted here before.

Now certainly people who have been here over a year and half and active in the forums would know that. But wonders never cease.

*snipped arrogance*

I'm aware of all of that, smart guy. But if one wants to spew one's knowledge of forum history, one should not snipe from behind a new identity.

*snipped arrogance*

I'm aware of all of that, smart guy. But if one wants to spew one's knowledge of forum history, one should not snipe from behind a new identity.

I'm aware of all of that, smart guy. But if one wants to spew one's knowledge of forum history, one should not snipe from behind a new identity.
You don't have to have been here more than a month to see Eve Online's intentions and character.

I'm aware of all of that, smart guy.
I can only go by what's provided. I kept giving you the benefit of the doubt and you kept falling short.
But if one wants to spew one's knowledge of forum history, one should not snipe from behind a new identity.

This concern does not match your accusation.