NationStates Jolt Archive


Never piss off an engineer

IDF
10-03-2007, 23:10
http://bp0.blogger.com/_POt0U4XC_N4/RdX-F2TmySI/AAAAAAAAAJA/WwIUvHhIOKo/s1600-h/pic26497.jpg
http://bp0.blogger.com/_POt0U4XC_N4/RdX-F2TmySI/AAAAAAAAAJA/WwIUvHhIOKo/s1600-h/pic26497.jpg

I am going to have to do this if I ever get a parking ticket. This is freaking hilarious, AND it's legal tender.
Soviestan
10-03-2007, 23:11
links went all 404 on me.
IDF
10-03-2007, 23:11
links went all 404 on me.

fixed
JuNii
10-03-2007, 23:13
I am going to have to do this if I ever get a parking ticket. This is freaking hilarious, AND it's legal tender.

two points...
One, you might want to blot out the name, or at least the last name.

two, if the bank cannot read the amount then it's not considered paid, so all he did was prolong the agony.
Dinaverg
10-03-2007, 23:13
...it looks negative...
Dinaverg
10-03-2007, 23:15
two points...
One, you might want to blot out the name, or at least the last name.

two, if the bank cannot read the amount then it's not considered paid, so all he did was prolong the agony.

It's definitely readable...
Ifreann
10-03-2007, 23:16
I'm totally doing that some day.
Zarakon
10-03-2007, 23:17
Genius.
Deep World
10-03-2007, 23:19
The only person more dangerous to piss off than an engineer is a retired engineer. They not only have the money, skills, and resources, they also have a lot of spare time on their hands...
Dinaverg
10-03-2007, 23:24
It's just .002, isn't it? Booooooring. At least make it irrational, or complex.
Zarakon
10-03-2007, 23:26
It's just .002, isn't it? Booooooring. At least make it irrational, or complex.

You worked it out? God, you'd be even worse to piss off than the engineer.
JuNii
10-03-2007, 23:28
It's definitely readable...

I want to see IDF try it and try to argue the results. :p
Gauthier
10-03-2007, 23:28
A truly ironic revenge would be the city having someone figure out the equation, then writing him a citation for oweing the remainder in math equations he can understand.
IDF
10-03-2007, 23:33
I think this is a related case of someone trying to explain the meaning of.002 cents vs. .002 dollars. Believe it or not, its with Verizon once again. I think this might actually be the same guy. After listening for 22 minutes, you'll be :headbang:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gp0HyxQv97Q&eurl=
Hydesland
10-03-2007, 23:36
I think this is a related case of someone trying to explain the meaning of.002 cents vs. .002 dollars. Believe it or not, its with Verizon once again. I think this might actually be the same guy. After listening for 22 minutes, you'll be :headbang:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gp0HyxQv97Q&eurl=

lol I love this, I think this was posted on the forums before.
IDF
10-03-2007, 23:37
So, uhm... how much is that exactly? In plain old numbers, please!Someone can check my numbers, but I came up with .002 cents.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gp0HyxQv97Q&eurl=

Listen to this call. I believe this customer service call is what prompted the check.
German Nightmare
10-03-2007, 23:38
So, uhm... how much is that exactly? In plain old numbers, please!
Ifreann
10-03-2007, 23:46
Someone can check my numbers, but I came up with .002 cents.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gp0HyxQv97Q&eurl=

Listen to this call. I believe this customer service call is what prompted the check.

I'm listening. I'm delighted that I have nothing to do with Verizon.
IDF
10-03-2007, 23:46
I'm listening. I'm delighted that I have nothing to do with Verizon.

Does listening make you want to :headbang: ?
Dinaverg
10-03-2007, 23:49
nothing with powers in can be negative, so if you are adding to the power of something and then adding the sum of values 1/something to the power of something it has to be postive as both things you are adding are positive.

Sorry about this, i'm tired and feel like being random and perdantic.

Eh? e^ipi is -1, innit? What do you mean "nothing with powers in"?

At the point I posted that, I hadn't noticed the infinity over the sigma yet, so I figured the sum was less than one, and that, plus negative one, plus .002 was probably negative. Which was why I said it looked negative.

P.S.
edit: ok i just realised e^ipi = -1

:p
Ifreann
10-03-2007, 23:51
Does listening make you want to :headbang: ?

No, I live very very far away from Verizon, their crazy math can't touch me.


God I hope it can't.



I'm scared now.......
Dinaverg
10-03-2007, 23:52
Does listening make you want to :headbang: ?

I bet the words "per cent" (percent) are confusing the guy.
Hydesland
10-03-2007, 23:55
Eh? e^ipi is -1, innit? What do you mean "nothing with powers in"?

At the point I posted that, I hadn't noticed the infinity over the sigma yet, so I figured the sum was less than one, and that, plus negative one, plus .002 was probably negative. Which was why I said it looked negative.

P.S.


:p

forget it i can't think straight right now.
Zarakon
11-03-2007, 00:01
No, I live very very far away from Verizon, their crazy math can't touch me.


God I hope it can't.



I'm scared now.......

Verizon is an object so incredibly dense that no light can escape. If light can't escape, you can't either.
Ifreann
11-03-2007, 00:02
Verizon is an object so incredibly dense that no light can escape. If light can't escape, you can't either.

*cries*
Exomnia
11-03-2007, 00:37
It is indeed .002, but it's not legal, there is no dollar sign.
Whereyouthinkyougoing
11-03-2007, 00:45
It is indeed .002, but it's not legal, there is no dollar sign.
o.O

Maybe because it says "Dollars" right at the end of the line?
Math isn't everything, you know, reading can help, too. ;p
Exomnia
11-03-2007, 00:49
o.O

Maybe because it says "Dollars" right at the end of the line?
Math isn't everything, you know, reading can help, too. ;p

*Takes Foot out of Mouth*
Pah, reading.
Andaluciae
11-03-2007, 01:12
And I've got a date with one of them engineering types of folks tonight...I'll make sure to play nice.
Sel Appa
11-03-2007, 01:24
Har har har!
Ladamesansmerci
11-03-2007, 01:24
You worked it out? God, you'd be even worse to piss off than the engineer.
Of course he worked it out. Pissing off Dina is not a good idea considering how much random trivia information he knows and could possibly use against you. In fact, I'm kind of scared now.

>.>
<.<

*flees*
Ifreann
11-03-2007, 01:24
Of course he worked it out. Pissing off Dina is not a good idea considering how much random trivia information he knows and could possibly use against you. In fact, I'm kind of scared now.

>.>
<.<

*flees*

*chases*
;)
IL Ruffino
11-03-2007, 01:25
Of course he worked it out. Pissing off Dina is not a good idea considering how much random trivia information he knows and could possibly use against you. In fact, I'm kind of scared now.

>.>
<.<

*flees*

ZOMG! A future engineer!

*flees more than La Dame*
Ifreann
11-03-2007, 01:25
And I've got a date with one of them engineering types of folks tonight...I'll make sure to play nice.

Let him/her work out the tip.
Dinaverg
11-03-2007, 01:33
Of course he worked it out. Pissing off Dina is not a good idea considering how much random trivia information he knows and could possibly use against you. In fact, I'm kind of scared now.

>.>
<.<

*flees*

Rawr.


Luckily, I'm not very easily pissed off...not since sixth grade...
Zarakon
11-03-2007, 01:33
Let him/her work out the tip.

And take a video. I've always wanted to see someone mathematically prove that not only do they not owe the waiter a tip, but that the waiter actually owes him money.
German Nightmare
11-03-2007, 01:34
Okay, I've just finished listening to three different recordings on the matter, read the blog, and all I can say is this: Phew!

First of all, how can the customers remain so calm? I'd be going nuts in no time.
Next thought: How can people working in customer service be so... dumb?
[Don't answer, please: I'm still struggling with the German Telecom, T-Com, or how I call them: TerrorCom!]

Gah! Anyway, I'm glad I never had any dealings with Verizon. And now never will, either!
Ladamesansmerci
11-03-2007, 01:35
*chases*
;)
pfft. You don't have the skills to chase me.:p
ZOMG! A future engineer!

*flees more than La Dame*
MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Fear the wrath of my engineer-ness.

Why aren't you running from Ifreann? He's also an engineer. :D
Rawr.


Luckily, I'm not very easily pissed off...not since sixth grade...
What were you like in sixth grade then? How has the world not imploded yet?
Sel Appa
11-03-2007, 01:40
Of course he worked it out. Pissing off Dina is not a good idea considering how much random trivia information he knows and could possibly use against you. In fact, I'm kind of scared now.

>.>
<.<

*flees*

Ladame!

And take a video. I've always wanted to see someone mathematically prove that not only do they not owe the waiter a tip, but that the waiter actually owes him money.

The waiter would probably walk away out of confusion and just waive the entire bill.
Dinaverg
11-03-2007, 01:43
What were you like in sixth grade then? How has the world not imploded yet?

Well, I was in middle school. And middle school, universally, sucks.

Alternatively, the Devil-Emperor. In which cause, I wouldn't want my empire to implode.
Kanabia
11-03-2007, 04:15
Note to self: learn advanced maths.
Dinaverg
11-03-2007, 04:24
Note to self: learn advanced maths.

It's not that advanced. Lotsa people should know e^ipi, and the whole adding halves out to infinity bit shows up pretty early on...
Gravlen
11-03-2007, 04:27
Why does everybody want to be an engineer all of a suddn? I don't get it :confused:

*Imagines The Lady as a chainsaw-wielding hippie engineer*

*Plays poker*




PS: Please insert the thread title somewhere into the Monty Python song "Never be rude to an arab..."
Kanabia
11-03-2007, 04:30
It's not that advanced. Lotsa people should know e^ipi, and the whole adding halves out to infinity bit shows up pretty early on...

Well, I did all that junk back in high school, but because i've never had to use anything like it ever since, that information has been pushed out to make room for other things. *nod*
Deep World
11-03-2007, 04:39
Well, I did all that junk back in high school, but because i've never had to use anything like it ever since, that information has been pushed out to make room for other things. *nod*

I know just what you mean. I took two semesters of calculus last year and I've already forgotten most of it.
IDF
11-03-2007, 06:26
Okay, I've just finished listening to three different recordings on the matter, read the blog, and all I can say is this: Phew!

First of all, how can the customers remain so calm? I'd be going nuts in no time.
Next thought: How can people working in customer service be so... dumb?
[Don't answer, please: I'm still struggling with the German Telecom, T-Com, or how I call them: TerrorCom!]

Gah! Anyway, I'm glad I never had any dealings with Verizon. And now never will, either!

I would never keep my cool that long. I have to admit I died a little inside when I listened to it.
Posi
11-03-2007, 07:28
Why does everybody want to be an engineer all of a suddn? I don't get it :confused:
Because they are fricken sweet, what now?
Siap
11-03-2007, 08:18
What if I were to write a check using the Riemann Hypothesis? Since its unproved, would the check be worth anything?
Bodies Without Organs
11-03-2007, 08:38
This is freaking hilarious, AND it's legal tender.

No, it ain't.
Similization
11-03-2007, 08:52
Someone can check my numbers, but I came up with .002 cents.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gp0HyxQv97Q&eurl=

Listen to this call. I believe this customer service call is what prompted the check.What the...?! Is it really real?
Naturality
11-03-2007, 08:59
I think this is a related case of someone trying to explain the meaning of.002 cents vs. .002 dollars. Believe it or not, its with Verizon once again. I think this might actually be the same guy. After listening for 22 minutes, you'll be :headbang:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gp0HyxQv97Q&eurl=



damn i hate i couldn't rewind the vid/recording by the second.. i wasn't about to keep going back to the beginning to re hear something (although i did a couple of times before the 5 min point).

7179, 35893, .002

I don't own a cell phone and haven't for years.. so don't know what charges.. plans etc are out there now..to know if the dude was just trying to confuse the hell outta people.. or if they just had a communication problem when he got the plan or if it was a billing problem. So he lived in the US? .. the calls were to Canada? I doubt that would come up to 71 cents unless there was a discrepancy.

but .. what the hell does the 35893 kbs mean? connection? certainly not minutes. if he had unlimited minutes this wouldn't be an issue(unless he went over them or he wasn't able to call another country on his freebies). so what the hell are they talking about?

I liked the dudes voices though.. :)
Similization
11-03-2007, 09:20
damn i hate i couldn't rewind the vid/recording by the second.. i wasn't about to keep going back to the beginning to re hear something (although i did a couple of times before the 5 min point).
<snip>
The guy paid a monthly fee for unlimited internet access in the states. Then he relocated to Canada and got a new mobile connection. With the new connection he got charged per Kb, instead of the fixed monthly fee he was used to.

So he probably wasn't trying to screw with anyone.

His problem, if it's not a hoax, is that Verizon sold him a connection saying they'd charge him 0.00002$ per Kb, but billed him 0.002$ per Kb and apparently are either incapable of telling the rather staggering difference, or unwilling to admit they either sold the connection under false pretext, or are overcharging him in a pretty damn massive way.
Naturality
11-03-2007, 09:23
The guy paid a monthly fee for unlimited internet access in the states. Then he relocated to Canada and got a new mobile connection. With the new connection he got charged per Kb, instead of the fixed monthly fee he was used to.

So he probably wasn't trying to screw with anyone.

His problem, if it's not a hoax, is that Verizon sold him a connection saying they'd charge him 0.00002$ per Kb, but billed him 0.002$ per Kb and apparently are either incapable of telling the rather staggering difference, or unwilling to admit they either sold the connection under false pretext, or are overcharging him in a pretty damn massive way.


ahh ok, gotcha. thanks. not sure if it was the verizon check at the beginning or what.. but i was stuck on this is a cell phone matter.
The Infinite Dunes
11-03-2007, 12:24
It's just .002, isn't it? Booooooring. At least make it irrational, or complex.What? I came up with $536.50 rounded up to the nearest cent... :confused:

e^2(PI) ~ 2.7^6.2 = 472.55.....
Dinaverg
11-03-2007, 12:27
What? I came up with $536.50 rounded up to the nearest cent... :confused:

e^2(PI) ~ 2.7^6.2 = 472.55.....

...Where'd you get 2pi?
The Most Glorious Hack
11-03-2007, 12:32
but .. what the hell does the 35893 kbs mean?Kilobits per second. It's a connection speed.
Naturality
11-03-2007, 12:37
Kilobits per second. It's a connection speed.


it sounded like it .. but my mind was stuck on a cell phone .. i was tryin to figure it out. hehe. thank you and Similization.
Vetalia
11-03-2007, 12:40
What if I were to write a check using the Riemann Hypothesis? Since its unproved, would the check be worth anything?

You'd be better off proving the hypothesis, collecting your $1,000,000 from the CMI, winning your Fields Medal, gaining your place as one of the greatest mathematicians of all time, and then write the check.
HC Eredivisie
11-03-2007, 12:56
It's just .002, isn't it? Booooooring. At least make it irrational, or complex.

It's -0.998, isn't it?. e^(i*pi) = -1 so 0.002 + -1 + 0 = -0.998.
The Infinite Dunes
11-03-2007, 12:56
...Where'd you get 2pi?It looks like a 2 in the bit where you're supposed to write the words in. However, since e^ipi = -1, I think you're right.

However, the guy will be in deep shit if the cashier reads the cheque like I did.
Dinaverg
11-03-2007, 12:56
It's -0.998, isn't it?. e^(i*pi) = -1 so 0.002 + -1 + 0 = -0.998.

You missed the sum, the bit with the sigma. e^(i*pi) is negative one, the sum is one, so it's just .002
Dinaverg
11-03-2007, 13:01
No, actually it would be 0.6469...

You have 0.002+e^(π*i), which is negative -0.998 and then you have the function ζ(2), which would sum to π^2/6 or 1.645..., and then subtracting -0.998 from that would produce

The mistake here is that you're using the limit of the function rather than the sum of the infinite series; since that is a variant of the zeta function, when n=2 the function sums to π^2/6.

Que? Isn't the series 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16...? That sums to 1, right? Riiiight? Isn't the limit zero?
HC Eredivisie
11-03-2007, 13:03
You missed the sum, the bit with the sigma. e^(i*pi) is negative one, the sum is one, so it's just .002
I didn't mis the sum, that is zero, isn't it? or a half?:confused:

I do know I fail at calculus and math.:p
Dinaverg
11-03-2007, 13:05
The last part does not sum to 0. It is the Riemann zeta function evaluated at ζ(2) and sums to π^2/6. It would only be zero if you were taking the limit of the function 1/2^x but rather you are taking the infinite summation of that function

Reeeally? Cuz it looks like a series of halves.

It looks a bit different from that Reimann bit.
Dinaverg
11-03-2007, 13:07
You're not taking the limit. It's written in sigma notation, which indicates you are taking the infinite sum of that function, and if you evaluate it out it sums to π^2/6.

It's also important because that function is the Basel problem, which was proved by Euler back in the 18th century.

Nah, see, You've got it flipped, I think. 2 is the base in the denominator, here. If 2 was the exponent in the demoninator, and n the base, then it would sum to pi^2/6. This sums to one.
Dinaverg
11-03-2007, 13:09
I'll go with this.:D

Don't.

Reimann:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/a/c/5/ac5bde9e3e50d54d59b34511921a735b.png

2 is n on the check, not s.
HC Eredivisie
11-03-2007, 13:11
You're not taking the limit. It's written in sigma notation, which indicates you are taking the infinite sum of that function, and if you evaluate it out it sums to π^2/6.

It's also important because that function is the Basel problem, which was proved by Euler back in the 18th century.

I'll go with this.:D
Dinaverg
11-03-2007, 13:11
Yeah, I realized that when I looked at it again...I mixed it up. Ops.

It would've been even cooler if the guy actually used the zeta function in it.

Hehehe, s'okay. :p

Yes, that would be cooler. Like a said before, this was boring. .002, minus one, plus one.
Vetalia
11-03-2007, 13:11
I'll go with this.:D

No, actually, it's wrong. I wasn't paying attention when I was reading and mixed up the fact that the exponent is increasing rather than the base.
HC Eredivisie
11-03-2007, 13:12
No, actually, it's wrong. I wasn't paying attention when I was reading and mixed up the fact that the exponent is increasing rather than the base.

:p

I thought so.:p
Vetalia
11-03-2007, 13:13
Nah, see, You've got it flipped, I think. 2 is the base in the denominator, here. If 2 was the exponent in the demoninator, and n the base, then it would sum to pi^2/6. This sums to one.

Yeah, I realized that when I looked at it again...I mixed it up. Ops.

It would've been even cooler if the guy actually used the zeta function in it.
HC Eredivisie
11-03-2007, 13:15
Don't.

Reimann:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/a/c/5/ac5bde9e3e50d54d59b34511921a735b.png

2 is n on the check, not s.
*looks at it*

Guh...

Okay:p
Naturality
11-03-2007, 13:48
Hehehe, s'okay. :p

Yes, that would be cooler. Like a said before, this was boring. .002, minus one, plus one.

know -it-all

just kidding. :p

was going to give my definition (which you don't fit) of what a know it all is.. maybe another time.
Aryavartha
11-03-2007, 15:47
I think this is a related case of someone trying to explain the meaning of.002 cents vs. .002 dollars. Believe it or not, its with Verizon once again. I think this might actually be the same guy. After listening for 22 minutes, you'll be :headbang:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gp0HyxQv97Q&eurl=

O.M.G.

I nearly popped an artery by just listening to it.

That man is a god.
Ifreann
11-03-2007, 16:05
pfft. You don't have the skills to chase me.:p
Pffft, yes I do. I just won't cantch.

MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Fear the wrath of my engineer-ness.

Why aren't you running from Ifreann? He's also an engineer. :D
Yes, ph34r my engineering skillz.


What if I were to write a check using the Riemann Hypothesis? Since its unproved, would the check be worth anything?

It'd be worth something....about as much as the paper it's printed on.
Zarakon
11-03-2007, 17:57
That man is a god.

Must be a merciful one, at that.
Dinaverg
11-03-2007, 18:24
is not the sum of a geometric series a/(1-r) ?

(1/2)^n

r = 1/2
a = 1

1/0.5 = 2 ?

Err...where'd a and r come from?
New Genoa
11-03-2007, 18:31
Err...where'd a and r come from?

from what I've learned in calculus...geometric series is in the form of ar^n

so... 1(1/2)^n

and the sum of the geometric series is S = a/(1-r)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_progression

maybe because the series starts at n=1?

**edit: just checked online**

the series sums to 1 since n starts at 1 instead of 0. (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GeometricSeries.html)

my mistake
Baratstan
11-03-2007, 19:24
Sorry if I sound like an idiot here, but how does that last bit come out to 1? Is it just 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 + 1/32 etc ? In layman's terms please :)
Daft Viagria
11-03-2007, 19:30
The only person more dangerous to piss off than an engineer is a retired engineer. They not only have the money, skills, and resources, they also have a lot of spare time on their hands...

Wrong. The tech is the guy to look out for. He won't retire until he has peed the retired engineer off :D
New Genoa
11-03-2007, 19:32
Sorry if I sound like an idiot here, but how does that last bit come out to 1? Is it just 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 + 1/32 etc ? In layman's terms please :)

the last bit is a geometric series sum starting at n=1...which according to the link I posted can be found in the formula r/(1-r)

r = 1/2

so 0.5/(1-.5) = 1.
The Infinite Dunes
11-03-2007, 19:32
Sorry if I sound like an idiot here, but how does that last bit come out to 1? Is it just 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 + 1/32 etc ? In layman's terms please :)A layman's explanation might be that when you have 1/2 you are 1/2 away from 1. When you had a half of a half (1/4) you are 1/4 away from 1 and so on. Now if you progress to the infinite term you are 1/infinity away from 1. 1/infinity is considered to equal zero. So the sum of the series from 1 to infinity is 1.

That's the a layman's explanation, but there are some more eloquent mathematical proofs out there if you're looking for them
Baratstan
11-03-2007, 19:48
A layman's explanation might be that when you have 1/2 you are 1/2 away from 1. When you had a half of a half (1/4) you are 1/4 away from 1 and so on. Now if you progress to the infinite term you are 1/infinity away from 1. 1/infinity is considered to equal zero. So the sum of the series from 1 to infinity is 1.

That's the a layman's explanation, but there are some more eloquent mathematical proofs out there if you're looking for them

Thanks, I read you loud and clear.
Dinaverg
11-03-2007, 20:29
the last bit is a geometric series sum starting at n=1...which according to the link I posted can be found in the formula r/(1-r)

r = 1/2

so 0.5/(1-.5) = 1.

That doesn't look very layman to me...:P
New Genoa
11-03-2007, 23:27
That doesn't look very layman to me...:P

yes I know, I'm quite a math elitist for ... a 17 year old. :D