NationStates Jolt Archive

ATTENTION ALL WHO ARE FED UP WITH THE US MEDIA? LET THY VOICES BE HEARD!!!! (http://www.csmonitor.com/specials/tvmov/)

Submit you opinions to CSmonitor and you can have your opinion read by many other CS monitor readers or maybe even have what you've said published in magazines or newspapers. Let your voices be heard!

ATTENTION ALL WHO ARE FED UP WITH THE US MEDIA? LET THY VOICES BE HEARD!!!! (http://www.csmonitor.com/specials/tvmov/)

Submit you opinions to CSmonitor and you can have your opinion read by many other CS monitor readers or maybe even have what you've said published in magazines or newspapers. Let your voices be heard!

yes, because christian groups have never been known to promote false information or censorship.

yes, because christian groups have never been known to promote false information or censorship.

Just because the word "Christian" is in the name of the article doesn't mean that is has much to do with religion, it even disses some Christians sometimes. It is filled with mainly unbiased stuff. What you've posted is irrelevant.

ATTENTION ALL WHO ARE FED UP WITH THE US MEDIA? LET THY VOICES BE HEARD!!!! (http://www.csmonitor.com/specials/tvmov/)

Submit you opinions to CSmonitor and you can have your opinion read by many other CS monitor readers or maybe even have what you've said published in magazines or newspapers. Let your voices be heard!

I can think of a lot of reasons to dislike the media, but I wouldn't say too violent is one of them... and they listed a bunch of excellent movies that they thought were too violent (I didn't actually see any of them except Pan's Labyrinth, but I've heard the rest were good.)

Just because the word "Christian" is in the name of the article doesn't mean that is has much to do with religion, it even disses some Christians sometimes. It is filled with mainly unbiased stuff. What you've posted is irrelevant.

Any expectation that an organization called the "christian science monitor" is without its own bias is just stupid.

Despide how they "diss" "some" christians "some" of the time.

"Lol" at CSM being a Christian magazine. :p

Any expectation that an organization called the "christian science monitor" is without its own bias is just stupid.

Despide how they "diss" "some" christians "some" of the time.

Its equally as stupid to say that if its Christian its automatically bad. Thats like saying that if something has the word "German" in it its automatically nazi!

Violence in TV, the movies or video games is just fine by me. My main beef with "the media" is US American news. Gah, it's pathetic in to omany ways to list.

I can think of a lot of reasons to dislike the media, but I wouldn't say too violent is one of them... and they listed a bunch of excellent movies that they thought were too violent (I didn't actually see any of them except Pan's Labyrinth, but I've heard the rest were good.)


Hell yeah, Pans Labyrinth was awesome!

ATTENTION ALL WHO ARE FED UP WITH THE US MEDIA? LET THY VOICES BE HEARD!!!! (http://www.csmonitor.com/specials/tvmov/)

Submit you opinions to CSmonitor and you can have your opinion read by many other CS monitor readers or maybe even have what you've said published in magazines or newspapers. Let your voices be heard!

I cannot thank you enough.

Its equally as stupid to say that if its Christian its automatically bad. Thats like saying that if something has the word "German" in it its automatically nazi!

bad? no. Biased? Quite possibly.

But fine, you tell me, Why is this particular media any less biased than any other?

Hell yeah, Pans Labyrinth was awesome!

I'm looking forward to getting a chance to see it sometime soon.

bad? no. Biased? Quite possibly.

But fine, you tell me, Why is this particular media any less biased than any other?

Some publishers, writers, ect, are all different people with different opinions so the amount of bias in their work varies.

I can think of a lot of reasons to dislike the media, but I wouldn't say too violent is one of them... and they listed a bunch of excellent movies that they thought were too violent (I didn't actually see any of them except Pan's Labyrinth, but I've heard the rest were good.)
Babel sucked because it wasn't nearly violent enough. Or maybe it sucked because it was a rambling incoherent mess. Or maybe it sucked because the individual stories were bland, clichéd and uncompelling, a fact that the director tried to conceal by mixing them into each other so much that they were also confusing and long.
I don't have anything else to add to this thread, except that Babel was the single vilest movie I've ever seen.

I'm looking forward to getting a chance to see it sometime soon.

Hurry before it's no longer in theaters!

Any expectation that an organization called the "christian science monitor" is without its own bias is just stupid.Have you ever read the Christian Science Monitor? It's as unbiased as they come. An excellent paper on top of it.

I'm looking forward to getting a chance to see it sometime soon.

I highly recommend it, but its not for the queasy. You've probably heard some of the stuff already, so I won't reiterate, it definetly has some moments that'll have the toughest stomachs covering their eyes.