NationStates Jolt Archive

I know it's a difficult decision and you'll need the next year or so to make a final choice, but I think it's important that the debate starts as soon as possible. Democracy depends on it.

I know it's a difficult decision and you'll need the next year or so to make a final decision, but I think it's important that the debate starts as soon as possible. Democracy depends on it.

I love the poll options.

I think it should have been 'enormous douche' actually. I only saw that episode of South Park once.

I think it should have been 'enormous douche' actually. I only saw that episode of South Park once.

How cute. Well come back when you actually have a thread with a bit of significance. :)

Oh, I see. We're all sensible mature adults here are we? FINE. I'll just have another spliff then.

http://www.planearium2.de/downloads/songsus/o-s-808vote.mp3

If you think about the purpose of a douche though, his running platform is OBVIOUSLY gonig to be to clean up this country. And he's got the means to do it...

I know it's a difficult decision and you'll need the next year or so to make a final choice, but I think it's important that the debate starts as soon as possible. Democracy depends on it.

It's not difficult at all. A douche is a cleaning product, and a useful one if not used too often. A turd sandwich is, well, a turd sandwich.

And I have to wonder about the mental ability of a person who considers the two to be similar. Does that mean that such a person feels a woman's vagina is the same as her rectum? That might explain an awful lot about said person's feelings toward women in general.

So tell me--why do you think a comparison between a douche and a turd sandwich is a reasonable one? *gets out notebook*

I'm not sure if everyone's grasped the significance of this debate.
The turd sandwich looks tasty on the outside, but when you get right down to it he's full of sh*t. The douche is the clear choice.
What the US Presidential elections boil down to is working out which candidate is which. Once you know which one the turd sandwich is, you know for whom to vote.
So you see, I was making a very serious point *tokes on joint*.

I see somebody at least has grasped the significance of this debate.
Indeed. The turd sandwich looks tasty on the outside, but when you get right down to it he's full of sh*t. The douche is the clear choice.
What the US Presidential elections boil down to is working out which candidate is which. Once you know which one the turd sandwich is, you know for whom to vote.
So you see, I was making a very serious point (tokes on joint).

And what if they're both turd sandwhiches? One made out of wheat bread, the other made out of rye?

Ah well then you're pretty buggered really. Try changing to a system of proportional representation with a dominant House.

Ah well then you're pretty buggered really. Try changing to a system of proportional representation with a dominant House.

You're suggesting scrapping the entire system because of dead locked politics? We could just start holding politicians to a higher standard, stop listening to the media to figure out what we really believe, and refuse to accept the public apology...which is a big pet peeve of mine...:mp5:

I take the Joe Stalin approach to politics. If there's a problem, don't pussyfoot around it, frag the damn thing. If other problems arise, they can always be fragged too.

I take the Joe Stalin approach to politics. If there's a problem, don't pussyfoot around it, frag the damn thing. If other problems arise, they can always be fragged too.

He did get his name put in the history books...How many people can name his successor?

He did get his name put in the history books...How many people can name his successor?

Nikita Kruschev

Me. Nikita Khrushchev, from 1956 (approx) to 1964, after a short period of collective government by the Politburo.
He was a bit of a sap.


I mean, he killed millions (or at least hundreds of thousands) of people in Ukraine under Stalin and sent tanks into Hungary to slaughter civilians and all that, but he was just a big softy really.

Me. Nikiita Khrushchev, from 1956 (approx) to 1964, after a short period of collective government by the Politburo.
He was a bit of a sap.


I mean, he killed millions (or at least hundreds of thousands) of people in Ukraine under Stalin and sent tanks into Hungary to slaughter civilians and all that, but he was just a big softy really.
Best known for banging his shoe on a table at the UN.

Really? Well, all those nations talking at once is enough to give anybody a headache.

Stalin used to put tomatoes on the seats of fellow Politburo members. He used to love the squelching noise it made, and the expressions on their faces as they fought between irritation and fear of being executed.
Now there was a guy with class.

Really? Well, all those nations talking at once is enough to give anybody a headache.

Stalin used to put tomatoes on the seats of fellow Politburo members. He used to love the squelching noise it made, and the expressions on their faces as they fought between irritation and fear of being executed.
Now there was a guy with class.

Now THAT is abuse of power...

Turd sandwich definitely. Too many surprises with Big Douche. Turd sandwiches have a certain sad "nobody wants me" charm to them. Plus, you can slip it into your adversary's lunch box.

Now THAT is abuse of power...

You can't tell me you wouldn't do something similar were you in his position.

You can't tell me you wouldn't do something similar were you in his position.

That wasn't a critical comment. :D

Turd sandwich all the way. If it fought through a major asshole and is still at the center of things, it's got my vote.

But would America vote for a turd sandwich that isn't on white bread? Are we really ready for that?

Turd sandwich all the way. If it fought through a major asshole and is still at the center of things, it's got my vote.

Don't discount the trials of the douche...

I'd go for the douche, given that it is, after all, a shower.

I'm desperately hoping it doesn't mean something different in Yank dialect.

Don't look at me, I don't know what they mean by a douche, I'm British. I was actually assuming that Parker and Stone were not, in fact, referring to a shower. Which of us is right?

It's not difficult at all. A douche is a cleaning product, and a useful one if not used too often. A turd sandwich is, well, a turd sandwich.

And I have to wonder about the mental ability of a person who considers the two to be similar. Does that mean that such a person feels a woman's vagina is the same as her rectum? That might explain an awful lot about said person's feelings toward women in general.

So tell me--why do you think a comparison between a douche and a turd sandwich is a reasonable one? *gets out notebook*


I hate vaginas even though I am straight. Turd sandwich for me baby!

Don't look at me, I don't know what they mean by a douche, I'm British. I was actually assuming that Parker and Stone were not, in fact, referring to a shower. Which of us is right?

It's a shower on the inside.

It's a shower on the inside.

It is a cleaning device used to flush out the fleshy tunnel that babies tend to crawl out of. Man I hate babies. They are so damn creepy.

Don't look at me, I don't know what they mean by a douche, I'm British. I was actually assuming that Parker and Stone were not, in fact, referring to a shower. Which of us is right? Sadly, probably you.

It is a cleaning device used to flush out the fleshy tunnel that babies tend to crawl out of. Man I hate babies. They are so damn creepy. Cabbage patch or stork? :confused:

It is a cleaning device used to flush out the fleshy tunnel that babies tend to crawl out of. Man I hate babies. They are so damn creepy.
This is creepier.
http://eschenck.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/dogfreak_4.jpg
:D

It is a cleaning device used to flush out the fleshy tunnel that babies tend to crawl out of. Man I hate babies. They are so damn creepy.

That is what I assumed given the context. But it's always nice to be sure.

I'd just like to thank you all for making this my most successful thread ever. Well, not the first poster, they were just mean. But everybody else.

That is what I assumed given the context. But it's always nice to be sure.

I'd just like to thank you all for making this my most successful thread ever. Well, not the first poster, they were just mean. But everybody else.

http://stevedanforth.com/files/0018/Free_Hugs_0600.jpg
These guys will always like you.

Ah, indiscriminate love. The best kind.