NationStates Jolt Archive

Which t shirt should I get? Of all the announced candidates she is the worst. I'm thinking #1 is the one I should get.

http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/square-med-redefeat.gif
http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/square-med-dnr.jpg
http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/rect-lie-bk.jpg

Don't buy any of them.

Make your own semi-witty shirt at Cafe Press.

Communism?

Oh my God. :rolleyes:

Don't buy any of them.

Make your own semi-witty shirt at Cafe Press.

Hey, it doesn't have to be witty to get the point across:

"Hillary Clinton- Screw you, ****"

Buy them all.

Which t shirt should I get? Of all the announced candidates she is the worst. I'm thinking #1 is the one I should get.

http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/square-med-redefeat.gif
http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/square-med-dnr.jpg
http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/rect-lie-bk.jpg
buy all three... That way you can cycle through them.

I say go with 2. Funniest to me.

Hey, it doesn't have to be witty to get the point across:

"Hillary Clinton- Screw you, ****"

I was thinking "Don't vote for her...."

it's simple.

I was thinking "Don't vote for her...."

it's simple.

But it doesn't get the point across, now does it?

You don't want to merely not want to vote for her-You want to not vote for her...WITH A VENGEANCE!

:p

buy all three... That way you can cycle through them.

I guess I could, but I'm a senior citizen. I guess I could though as all six (3 for me and 3 for the wife) would be a lot less expensive than the "Hillary Care" medical plan. :p

But why don't you find a T-shirt design that insinuates that she is really a 'he'?

The point of that being what, exactly?

doesn't american political discourse just bring a tear to your eye?
I've been blinking them away ever since I was old enough to understand the news.

Communism?

Oh my God. :rolleyes:

doesn't american political discourse just bring a tear to your eye?

But it doesn't get the point across, now does it?

You don't want to merely not want to vote for her-You want to not vote for her...WITH A VENGEANCE!

:p

EXACTLY! http://www.nearlygood.com/smilies/pompomr4wr.gif

Clinton is most certainly not a communist, so #1 seems retarded to me.

There is nothing special about lying politicians, so #3 does not say much.

#2 it is.

But why don't you find a T-shirt design that insinuates that she is really a 'he'?

doesn't american political discourse just bring a tear to your eye?

Hey, don't knock capitalism, you commie. :p

But it doesn't get the point across, now does it?

You don't want to merely not want to vote for her-You want to not vote for her...WITH A VENGEANCE!

:p

add this picture?

http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/s/8/hillary_napollary.jpg

i'll take the Black guy over her, but hey not my Nation

The first one would make you look like a shit for brains redneck, the second is marginally witty, and the third is only a hair less dumb than the first.

Sells T-shirts, too.

Somewhere in America there are warehouses still full of anti-Saddam shirts.

The point of that being what, exactly?

It is a character attack. That is always funny.

Sells T-shirts, too.

The point of that being what, exactly?
It serves the same point that is served by people accusing Anne Coulter of being a man, which is a pretty funny coincidence when you consider that bashing Coulter is just as played out and dull as bashing Clinton.

T-Shirts are for pussies though, you should just tattoo your political sentiments across your chest and go shirtless.

Clinton is most certainly not a communist, so #1 seems retarded to me.

There is nothing special about lying politicians, so #3 does not say much.

#2 it is.

But why don't you find a T-shirt design that insinuates that she is really a 'he'?

Like this one? :D
http://logo.cafepress.com/8/356074.2016178.jpg

Which t shirt should I get? Of all the announced candidates she is the worst. I'm thinking #1 is the one I should get.

http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/square-med-redefeat.gif
http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/square-med-dnr.jpg
http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/rect-lie-bk.jpg

I am going to have to vote for # 2

and agree that #3 covers most politicos.

Like this one? :D
http://logo.cafepress.com/8/356074.2016178.jpg

I am very afraid. You scare me with that.

Somewhere in America there are warehouses still full of anti-Saddam shirts.

It's a pity. Those shirts wouldn't have expired so soon if we kept Saddam alive a little longer. That should be a lesson to all of you: buy your T-shirts early and often!

Like this one? :D
http://logo.cafepress.com/8/356074.2016178.jpg
Perfect! :D

She is hardly communist...

*snip*

And people said she won't run in 2008. Goes to show how little they actually know about Politics.

buy all three... That way you can cycle through them.

I agree. I like all 3 of them myself. I think she is wasting her time however.

#2 is kinda clever, I'd say go for that one.

Any, but add "she'll get elected anyways because of conservatives' gross mismanagement and genocide, and all I got was this crappy shirt."

You would probably look good in this one Celt:

http://images.cafepress.com/product/88662584v1_240x240_Front.jpg

:D

Go for the first

Go for the first

or a shirt that says "clinton for president" with the hammer and sickle of the C

She is hardly communist...

Especially given that she was on the Walmart board of directors. Still, I doubt anyone will let reality get in the way of a good smear campaign. :rolleyes:










Although I will admit to giggling at number three. :p

Which t shirt should I get? Of all the announced candidates she is the worst. I'm thinking #1 is the one I should get.

http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/square-med-redefeat.gif
http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/square-med-dnr.jpg
http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/rect-lie-bk.jpg

I believe they've replaced all that now, with these little bits of paper you make a mark on.

It hasn't caught on yet, but I have hopes it will.

That says alot about you because it is the fucking stupidest of the bunch.

:rolleyes:

witty and mature, TPH

Which t shirt should I get? Of all the announced candidates she is the worst. I'm thinking #1 is the one I should get.

That says alot about you because it is the fucking stupidest of the bunch.

1st one doesn't make sense. I don't know where people get these dumb ideas.

3rd one applies to politics in general (unfortunatly).

While I like Hillary in general (except for the video game part, just like everybody else here), go with the second one!

Even as a democrat, I can appreciate the humor of that one.

:rolleyes:

witty and mature, TPH

As opposed to wearing a shirt saying Hillary threatens to bring back communism?

Communism?

Oh my God. :rolleyes:

You'd never seen that one?

When someone is so incredibly ignorant that they don't know what communism means, it's very easy to use that ignorance for propaganda and fearmongering.

Those t-shirts come from the people who also bring us these delightfully pleasant and rational ones. :roll:

http://www.thoseshirts.com/forecast.html

http://www.thoseshirts.com/coulter.html

http://www.thoseshirts.com/rope.html

(If you can't see them, go here (http://www.thoseshirts.com/forecast.html), here (http://www.thoseshirts.com/coulter.html) and here (http://www.thoseshirts.com/rope.html)).

Perhaps the reason they're so full of incoherent hate is because they lack a full braincell between them.

Either that, or they know there are a lot of ignorant, hateful and downright stupid people out there who will buy this stuff, and they're just hoping to make a tidy profit.

Or you could be mature about it, and just not vote for the bitch. Nah, this is politics. Maturity has no place there. :rolleyes:

Which t shirt should I get? Of all the announced candidates she is the worst. I'm thinking #1 is the one I should get.

I'm thinking you could save your money and buy an education instead. Or just take a course to learn what communism is and send the rest of the money to the ones who thought up nr. 1. :)

Personally I don't like smearing and disinformation.

Like how I'd never wear this one (http://gfx.dagbladet.no/pub/artikkel/4/48/489/489647/bush_sak_1169484216.jpg) either...

Which t shirt should I get? Of all the announced candidates she is the worst. I'm thinking #1 is the one I should get.


I'm looking for one that explains the lost Rose law firm billing records "...aren't my fault."

I'm looking for one that explains the lost Rose law firm billing records "...aren't my fault."

Because, compared to the pointless deaths of our boys overseas, and a blatant disregard for the Constitution over here... fiscal anomolies are the really important stuff.

Democrat, Republican, independent... tree - any change of the current (mis)management has to be an improvement.

Because, compared to the pointless deaths of our boys overseas, and a blatant disregard for the Constitution over here... fiscal anomolies are the really important stuff.

Democrat, Republican, independent... tree - any change of the current (mis)management has to be an improvement.

Not when it comes to a Clinton Administration. After all, her husband's follies are going to be on display prominently as well as his violations of the Constitution. Face it. Anyone in the Presidency is going to violate the Constitution whether we like it or not.

Oh and Bush hasn't violated the Constitution any more than past presidents so if you are going to hang him, hang all the others.

You'd never seen that one?

When someone is so incredibly ignorant that they don't know what communism means, it's very easy to use that ignorance for propaganda and fearmongering.

Those t-shirts come from the people who also bring us these delightfully pleasant and rational ones. :roll:

http://www.thoseshirts.com/forecast.html

http://www.thoseshirts.com/coulter.html

http://www.thoseshirts.com/rope.html

(If you can't see them, go here (http://www.thoseshirts.com/forecast.html), here (http://www.thoseshirts.com/coulter.html) and here (http://www.thoseshirts.com/rope.html)).

Perhaps the reason they're so full of incoherent hate is because they lack a full braincell between them.

Either that, or they know there are a lot of ignorant, hateful and downright stupid people out there who will buy this stuff, and they're just hoping to make a tidy profit.

Oh Good Gravy. Please tell me those t shirts are just badly done sarcasm. The mecca one in particular, i mean ...... what?

Oh Good Gravy. Please tell me those t shirts are just badly done sarcasm. The mecca one in particular, i mean ...... what?

Sadly, I don't think it's sarcasm. And as you can see, they do find idiots willing to buy their stuff.

The sheer nasty ignorance of those t-shirts (and especially the Mecca one, yes) is mind-boggling.

Sadly, I don't think it's sarcasm. And as you can see, they do find idiots willing to buy their stuff.

The sheer nasty ignorance of those t-shirts (and especially the Mecca one, yes) is mind-boggling.

Yeah, I didnt think they were, I was just holding out a small sliver of hope.

I think if I wore any of those t shirts (with the possible exception of the journalist one) outside the house I'd be lynched before I took 3 steps. Not that I'd want to wear them though.

Go for #1. It seems to have annoyed all of the commies in the thread, and anything that annoys communists can't be a bad thing.

Because if we claim that Hillary isn't a communist we MUST be communists? What are you, McCarthy when he was 7?

Go for #1. It seems to have annoyed all of the commies in the thread, and anything that annoys communists can't be a bad thing.

Go for #1. It seems to have annoyed all of the commies in the thread, and anything that annoys communists can't be a bad thing.

*sigh*

Because if we claim that Hillary isn't a communist we MUST be communists? What are you, McCarthy when he was 7?

It stands to reason that at least some of the people crying "You don't even know what communism is. Ignorance!" are communists. Anybody else who has been irritated is merely collateral damage.

It stands to reason that at least some of the people crying "You don't even know what communism is. Ignorance!" are communists. Anybody else who has been irritated is merely collateral damage.

*sigh*

Because, compared to the pointless deaths of our boys overseas, and a blatant disregard for the Constitution over here... fiscal anomolies are the really important stuff.

Democrat, Republican, independent... tree - any change of the current (mis)management has to be an improvement.
You're right. We shouldn't even consider it a crime to lie about anything that prevents another from having their day in court. Especially not if the one doing the lying is a Democrat.

My point is that if a "leader", and I'm not convinced she could be one, can't do the small things right, they'll never get the big stuff right. GWB is a great case in point.

What's up with the first one? What has she got to do with communism and why does everybody hate her so much? I don't know much about her, just wondering.

Bush prove to be more of a liar than Clinton and the outcome of his lies are more severe than Clinton's lies. Clinton's problem was he couldn't control his dick, Bush's problem is that he can't also control his Dick :D.

It stands to reason that at least some of the people crying "You don't even know what communism is. Ignorance!" are communists.

And, to quote Cleese in the Cheese Shop Sketch, what leads you to that conclusion?

Anybody else who has been irritated is merely collateral damage.

Using the term "collateral damage" gives everyone else the right to apply that term to YOU.

You're right. We shouldn't even consider it a crime to lie about anything that prevents another from having their day in court. Especially not if the one doing the lying is a Democrat.

My point is that if a "leader", and I'm not convinced she could be one, can't do the small things right, they'll never get the big stuff right. GWB is a great case in point.

Let's see.

Clinton cheated on his wife, but DIDN'T commit genocide in Iraq for no reason. He lied to get out of the cheating issue.

Bush did NOT cheat on his wife, and DID commit genocide in Iraq for no reason. He lied to get the US INTO a bloodbath.

As far as I'm concerned, I'd take Clinton even if he had cheated on his wife with a cat!

Let's see.

Clinton cheated on his wife, but DIDN'T commit genocide in Iraq for no reason. He lied to get out of the cheating issue.

Bush did NOT cheat on his wife, and DID commit genocide in Iraq for no reason. He lied to get the US INTO a bloodbath.

As far as I'm concerned, I'd take Clinton even if he had cheated on his wife with a cat!

Who's talking about Bill? Hillary has plenty of her own baggage.

snip

None of them are very good

Does it involve needless slaughter of thousands of innocents?

Kind of a single issue voter, aren't you? There's more to being President than Iraq. Character is a big part.

Who's talking about Bill? Hillary has plenty of her own baggage.

Does it involve needless slaughter of thousands of innocents?

Kind of a single issue voter, aren't you? There's more to being President than Iraq. Character is a big part.

He fails at that worse then iraq ... I think they were being nice to him only focusing on iraq :p

Kind of a single issue voter, aren't you? There's more to being President than Iraq. Character is a big part.

Character: He lied to the American public to get the US into the war.

More: He drove your debt through the roof, he made a mockery of every principle the US held sacred, he is against most civil rights and he wants to mix religion and state.

You're right, there IS more.

Kind of a single issue voter, aren't you? There's more to being President than Iraq. Character is a big part.
I guess I'm a "single-issue voter" too, then, because if I find out that a candidate likes to murder prostitutes in his free time I will refuse to vote for him even if he's got phenomenal "character."

If I find out that a candidate supports human slavery, it won't matter how much "character" she's got...she ain't getting my vote. I guess I should just get over my "single-issue" hang-up.

If a candidate is unqualified for the position, no amount of "character" is going to help them with me.

Frankly, I think the appeal to "character" is a last resort for people who know they've got nothing else.

And to answer the OP: I don't think any of those t-shirts are worth paying for, and I strongly dislike sHillary. I'm nauseated at the thought of having yet another election where the Democrats run a candidate who is only slightly less pathetic than the Republican candidate.

Perhaps the reason they're so full of incoherent hate is because they lack a full braincell between them.



I don't know, I think #1 is funny, #2 could be interpreted as either anti-coulter or pro-coulter, and #3 could nicely be applied to Fox news.

It stands to reason that at least some of the people crying "You don't even know what communism is. Ignorance!" are communists. Anybody else who has been irritated is merely collateral damage.

I know this may be difficult for you to understand, so I'll use simple words.

Some of us dislike ignorance because ignorance is unpleasant to witness, and because someone who is that ignorant can easily be manipulated to believe almost anything.

I can break that down into words of one syllable if it helps.

I guess I'm a "single-issue voter" too, then, because if I find out that a candidate likes to murder prostitutes in his free time I will refuse to vote for him even if he's got phenomenal "character."

If I find out that a candidate supports human slavery, it won't matter how much "character" she's got...she ain't getting my vote. I guess I should just get over my "single-issue" hang-up.

If a candidate is unqualified for the position, no amount of "character" is going to help them with me.

Frankly, I think the appeal to "character" is a last resort for people who know they've got nothing else.
Character is what makes the person do the right thing to begin with. As I said, and several of you have carefully ignored, GWB is a wonderful example of how a '...leader ... can't do the small things right, they'll never get the big stuff right.' But that's okay, I forgive you. And Heiko.

I know this may be difficult for you to understand, so I'll use simple words.

Some of us dislike ignorance because ignorance is unpleasant to witness, and because someone who is that ignorant can easily be manipulated to believe almost anything.

I can break that down into words of one syllable if it helps.

Far more likely that some of us find ignorance of certain things to be more unpleasant to witness than that of others; thus one's sense of humour flounders and we become stuck up gits. As such, I would reason that the two groups most likely to get their knickers in a twist in this scenario are Clintonites and communists.

Founder of the NS General United Democratic [B]Communist Party

A coincidence? It's possible, but that would leave somewhat of a gaping hole in my argument.

Far more likely that some of us find ignorance of certain things to be more unpleasant to witness than that of others; thus one's sense of humour flounders and we become stuck up gits.

I prefer that to being mind-blowingly ignorant. Watching people bask in their own ignorance is mildly amusing, but it's also a little... I don't know, uncomfortable. Like seeing someone walk out of a room naked without realising there's someone else there. When I see idiots making fools of themselves because of extreme ignorance, I can't help but feel a little sorry for them.


A coincidence?

Yes. See above.

If you're going to criticise communism, do it right. Don't paint yourself as an idiot in the process and miss the mark by a mile.

Oh Good Gravy.
Yes?

...

Oh, you didn't mean me. Sorry, I thought you said... Nevermind. Carry on :)

It stands to reason that at least some of the people crying "You don't even know what communism is. Ignorance!" are communists.
Stands to reason? Where? In the Harold Lloyd Carter School for unreasonable reason?

So if you claim you're a vegetarian because you've got black hair and big shoes, and I say that you don't know what vegetarianism is if you claim that having black hair and big shoes is a requirement for being a vegetarian, it would stand to reason that I'm a vegetarian?

Sweetheart, ask Celtlund if he can't share with you the money he saved by not purchasing the t-shirts... It might come in handy :)

Hillary in the white house? NEVER AGAIN

I prefer that to being mind-blowingly ignorant. Watching people bask in their own ignorance is mildly amusing, but it's also a little... I don't know, uncomfortable. Like seeing someone walk out of a room naked without realising there's someone else there. When I see idiots making fools of themselves because of extreme ignorance, I can't help but feel a little sorry for them.

So everybody kicked up a fuss on humanitarian grounds? I don't buy that for a second. The shirt is obviously intended to be sarcastic and not a statement of fact; we've all seen protesters waving about images of Bush with Hitler's face super-imposed on top, are you seriously going to walk over to a chap who is waving one of those things about, and say in a sober voice, "Actually, there are several striking differences between Hitler's regime and Bush's presidency." I would assume not; however, if somebody was to do such a thing it would very likely be a Bush supporter or a neo-nazi.


If you're going to criticise communism, do it right. Don't paint yourself as an idiot in the process and miss the mark by a mile.

Clearly you seem to be the one missing the mark. I'm not criticising communism, obviously I've made it clear that I'm opposed to it, but I haven't criticised it here. What I have done is point out that communists (and Clintonites) are more likely to be among the group whinging about the finer points of communism in relation to Hilary Clinton than anybody else for obvious reasons.

Stands to reason? Where? In the Harold Lloyd Carter School for unreasonable reason?

So if you claim you're a vegetarian because you've got black hair and big shoes, and I say that you don't know what vegetarianism is if you claim that having black hair and big shoes is a requirement for being a vegetarian, it would stand to reason that I'm a vegetarian?

The fellow claiming to be a vegetarian is doing so as a statement of fact, rather than a light hearted jibe (such as a t-shirt poking fun at how left wing Hilary Clinton is). Now, if the bloke had made a little joke about vegetarianism I wouldn't be totally surprised if some incensed vegetarian started having a hissy fit.

You're right. We shouldn't even consider it a crime to lie about anything that prevents another from having their day in court. Especially not if the one doing the lying is a Democrat.

My point is that if a "leader", and I'm not convinced she could be one, can't do the small things right, they'll never get the big stuff right. GWB is a great case in point.

Having their day in court?

Is this a reference to the fact that Bush's regime has continued those illegal detentions without trial?

Or the fact that, despite their being an easy and efficient warranting procedure (turnaround, usually way under 24 hours... almost always granted), this regime chose to introduce a number of illegal monitoring techniques?

You may be whining about the actions of a Democrat, or a Republican. But - unless they are President, there is just no comparison, don't you think?