NationStates Jolt Archive


what is your BMI

Diarrhea land
21-12-2006, 19:18
http://www.nhlbisupport.com/bmi/bmicalc.htm
just curious as to what the BMI of the good people of NSG is.

(dont do this if you are going to be overly catious about your weight)

im 23.1
Diarrhea land
23-12-2006, 06:27
this thread never even had a chance
Pyotr
23-12-2006, 06:28
137.6
Andaluciae
23-12-2006, 06:29
29.0

Watch out for university life and beer. That's what did me in. And a busted knee that made it near impossible for me to exercise.

At 6'1 and 220 some pounds.
Maraque
23-12-2006, 06:40
29.3... :confused:

I don't look that fat at all, I'm serious. O.o

5'1", 155lbs.
Wallonochia
23-12-2006, 06:41
23.1 I''m 6'4" and 190 lbs. 193cm and 86kg for those who are metrically inclined.
Free Soviets
23-12-2006, 06:42
ah, bmi calculators. such fun. the only way i know for a guy with 12% body fat, like myself, to be called "overweight".
New Xero Seven
23-12-2006, 06:42
5'3" at around 175 lbs.
Which gives me 31.0 BMI.
I'm obese?! :eek:

It must be the mass of my muscles... :p ;)
West Spartiala
23-12-2006, 06:43
21.5, although I haven't weighed or measured myself in a while, so it might not be completely accurate. If it is accurate, it means I can gain a good 20 to 25 pounds and still not be considered overweight. Christmas turkey? Bring it on!
Andaluciae
23-12-2006, 06:48
Yeah, this measure of BMI is weird. To get anything near an accurate reading of this sort of stuff you'd need to know bone structure, percentage body fat and loads of other things.
Mikeswill
23-12-2006, 06:49
Normal weight = 18.5-24.9
Mikeswill = 22.7

Up 30 pounds from the BMI of 18.4 of a few years ago
Hetgharia
23-12-2006, 06:53
23.1
Free Soviets
23-12-2006, 06:55
Yeah, this measure of BMI is weird. To get anything near an accurate reading of this sort of stuff you'd need to know bone structure, percentage body fat and loads of other things.

we can all run off and calculate body fat % too, just for kicks. according to this one (http://www.healthcentral.com/cholesterol/home-body-fat-test-2774-143.html) i'm actually down to 10 or 11% body fat now.
Terrorist Cakes
23-12-2006, 06:58
Mine is about 19 right now. I'm trying to maintain, or lose a few pounds (I have small bones...)
Wallonochia
23-12-2006, 07:02
Yeah, this measure of BMI is weird. To get anything near an accurate reading of this sort of stuff you'd need to know bone structure, percentage body fat and loads of other things.

In the Army we used tape tests, but even those weren't all that accurate. I've heard the Air Force uses a swimming pool setup that measures your density or somesuch and it's supposed to be much more accurate.
Akai Oni
23-12-2006, 07:03
17.4

I'm 173 cm and 52 kg.

I'm skinny.
Kanabia
23-12-2006, 07:43
181cm, 62kg, 18.9 BMI.
Sarkhaan
23-12-2006, 08:36
Yeah, this measure of BMI is weird. To get anything near an accurate reading of this sort of stuff you'd need to know bone structure, percentage body fat and loads of other things.

It really only takes a little common sense. If you're solid muscle and read 31 on it, you clearly are not obese. If you are a solid mass of fat, you are. BMI is meant to be a guideline, not a rule.

as for myself, 21.8, working on getting that up. Last time I did mine, I was 19.3.
MrMopar
23-12-2006, 08:54
Whoops, clicked 18.5-2whatever unAmerican... damn it. Why do you care where we're from anyway?!
Wallonochia
23-12-2006, 09:27
Why do you care where we're from anyway?!

Probably due to the stereotype of "OMG teh Amerikinz is teh fat!11!"
Teneur
23-12-2006, 09:57
5 foot 6, 105 pounds, BMI of 16.9
Soviet Haaregrad
23-12-2006, 10:02
21.6
5'11" and 155lbs.
Romanar
23-12-2006, 10:09
27.7, overweight, but not obese.

6'1" 210 pounds.
Knowyourright
23-12-2006, 10:42
17.4

I'm 173 cm and 52 kg.

I'm skinny.

You're practically anorexic.
Knowyourright
23-12-2006, 10:45
I accidently clicked the American one, but I'm Australian.

My BMI is slightly over 25, but if i'm overweight, that's absolute bull. I went into a few shops today and despite the fact that the average Australian woman is a size 14, most stock only went up to a 10 or 12. When I tried on the 12, it didn't even fit me! It's so unfair that so many retailers only provide to small girls. They are encouraging a negative body image.
Pure Metal
23-12-2006, 11:01
5'3" at around 175 lbs.
Which gives me 31.0 BMI.
I'm obese?! :eek:

It must be the mass of my muscles... :p ;)

i'm 5'11 and 220lbs... makes me about 31 too iirc

but i don't think i *look* obese (just fat :p)
Isidoor
23-12-2006, 11:35
19
Divine Imaginary Fluff
23-12-2006, 11:50
Heh. ~16.9

My weight is ~53kg, and my height is somewhere between 175-180cm.

I figure my metabolism must be pretty good, seeing as I eat plenty with no regard whatsoever to a so-called "healthy" (in the overused, ill-defined weight-related sense) diet, detesting all kinds of "light/diet" stuff. I also drink soda often, and eat candy and other tasty stuff whenever it's avaliable.
Akai Oni
23-12-2006, 11:51
You're practically anorexic.

Yeah, and i eat like a pig. its great.
Luporum
23-12-2006, 11:54
25.8?!

Staggering, considering that my body fat percentage is 10.3%.
Divine Imaginary Fluff
23-12-2006, 11:59
Yeah, and i eat like a pig. its great.Another one. Interesting; seems to be pretty rare. Though seemingly significantly less so among nerds, for some reason. Though in most cases it doesn't seem to last long into adulthood, so I don't know how long it will remain so for me.
Akai Oni
23-12-2006, 12:02
I accidently clicked the American one, but I'm Australian.

My BMI is slightly over 25, but if i'm overweight, that's absolute bull. I went into a few shops today and despite the fact that the average Australian woman is a size 14, most stock only went up to a 10 or 12. When I tried on the 12, it didn't even fit me! It's so unfair that so many retailers only provide to small girls. They are encouraging a negative body image.

Um, I have trouble finding extra smalls ever. I mean, in Supre or Ice i fit the clothes, but in real stores, I've been told to shop in the kids section, or go to a kids clothing store to find clothes. Also, no shop I've ever been in doesn't stock above a 12.

I think it's ridiculous that we have shops that cater specifically to obese or unhealthily fat women, such as 16-26. Imagine the uproar if someone opened a 4-14 clothing chain.

Just because the average Aussie woman is a 14 does not mean that it's a healthy size for her to be. It just means she doesn't eat properly or exercise.
Akai Oni
23-12-2006, 12:03
Another one. Interesting; seems to be pretty rare. Though seemingly significantly less so among nerds, for some reason. Though in most cases it doesn't seem to last long into adulthood, so I don't know how long it will remain so for me.

I'm 23 and I've just recently gotten up to 52. I was 47 all through high school and most of uni. I want to get back down to that, but alas, alcohol beckons.
Nobel Hobos
23-12-2006, 12:09
21.9

Did I mention that I'm hot ?
And 42 years old?

EDIT: I'm not judging you, but was there a button for "girly" on myspace? Did you maybe click it twice?
Nobel Hobos
23-12-2006, 12:16
Another one. Interesting; seems to be pretty rare. Though seemingly significantly less so among nerds, for some reason. Though in most cases it doesn't seem to last long into adulthood, so I don't know how long it will remain so for me.

Nerds use their brain a lot. The brain uses a lot of glucose. It's quite simple really. Also, nerds rolled more sixes in the genetic lottery.

{since no-one ever debates me, here's a point someone could take up: "how come nerds are so often short-sighted, then?"}
PedroTheDonkey
23-12-2006, 12:24
21.9

Did I mention that I'm hot ?
And 42 years old?

And a hobo.;)
Potarius
23-12-2006, 12:24
5'10", 140 pounds. Says my BMI is 20.1.
Knowyourright
23-12-2006, 12:26
Um, I have trouble finding extra smalls ever. I mean, in Supre or Ice i fit the clothes, but in real stores, I've been told to shop in the kids section, or go to a kids clothing store to find clothes. Also, no shop I've ever been in doesn't stock above a 12.

I think it's ridiculous that we have shops that cater specifically to obese or unhealthily fat women, such as 16-26. Imagine the uproar if someone opened a 4-14 clothing chain.

Just because the average Aussie woman is a 14 does not mean that it's a healthy size for her to be. It just means she doesn't eat properly or exercise.

Well, considering that I work in the fashion industry, I can tell you that you're quite wrong.

Supre and Ice cater for the "tween" market, which generally means children or young teenagers, so obviously they have to have small sizes.
If you look around, Bettina Liano, Sass&Bide and many other designers make an extra small (which is equivalent to that size "0" that is being banned in Madrid, or an Aus size 4). Also, sizing is not monitored, so any designer can make an Aus size 10 and call it a Aus size 6. I am a size 10-12 and I tried on a pair of shorts in the boutique I work in that were labelled a 14 and they fit, but were very snug. In an American brand, Contony, I am a size 8-10 in their pencil skirts, but a size 14 in their white pants.

I just researched the average size, and it's actually apparently a 16, but if I consider most girls I believe to be healthy, I'd say the average (for a young woman) is a 12. However, the 12 at Sass&Bide will probably not fit them, because they are truly incorrectly sized.

I eat less than I should and I exercise daily, and I'm a healthy weight and size. And if you believe the "healthy" size for a woman should be much lower than an Aus 14, you have to consider the repocussions. It is known that those with an underweight bmi actually have more health problems than those in the average or overweight bracket.
Branin
23-12-2006, 12:27
http://www.nhlbisupport.com/bmi/bmicalc.htm
just curious as to what the BMI of the good people of NSG is.

(dont do this if you are going to be overly catious about your weight)

im 23.1

29.8

And I'm okay with that. I have a very large frame, that carries a lot of muscle as well as its fat. My Body fat percentage has always been normal, and the one time I dropped below 200 pounds I looked rather sickly. Yay for fat me! I love fat me!
New Zealandium
23-12-2006, 12:28
BMI of 18 (On the dot) and a fat% of 13%

Pretty freakin good, although I am slightly athletic, so I don't know what that would do.
PedroTheDonkey
23-12-2006, 12:29
I'm fairly sure it fails to take into acount the fact that I 'm a quadraped and longer than I am tall. Also, hoofs wiegh more than feet.
New Zealandium
23-12-2006, 12:32
I'm fairly sure it fails to take into acount the fact that I 'm a quadraped and longer than I am tall. Also, hoofs wiegh more than feet.

Sad that you will never find out your BMI. Or...

Get someone to measure out your length (+Length of rear legs) nad if possible minus the weight of the hooves. That would leave with with a rough BMI. Of course, I simply suggest you see a vet and ask them if you're a healthy weight or not. If you're lean, a few pairs of the frontmost ribs should be visible, if more are, you're skinny, if none are, you're bulky. :)
Demented Hamsters
23-12-2006, 12:32
yay!
At 30.8 (6'2", 240lbs) I'm obese!

*does a jiggly dance*


incidently, I have a 34" waist and a 48" chest.
Yootopia
23-12-2006, 12:36
22.4 : Not bad at all!
Akai Oni
23-12-2006, 12:52
Well, considering that I work in the fashion industry, I can tell you that you're quite wrong.

Supre and Ice cater for the "tween" market, which generally means children or young teenagers, so obviously they have to have small sizes.
If you look around, Bettina Liano, Sass&Bide and many other designers make an extra small (which is equivalent to that size "0" that is being banned in Madrid, or an Aus size 4). Also, sizing is not monitored, so any designer can make an Aus size 10 and call it a Aus size 6. I am a size 10-12 and I tried on a pair of shorts in the boutique I work in that were labelled a 14 and they fit, but were very snug. In an American brand, Contony, I am a size 8-10 in their pencil skirts, but a size 14 in their white pants.

I just researched the average size, and it's actually apparently a 16, but if I consider most girls I believe to be healthy, I'd say the average (for a young woman) is a 12. However, the 12 at Sass&Bide will probably not fit them, because they are truly incorrectly sized.

I eat less than I should and I exercise daily, and I'm a healthy weight and size. And if you believe the "healthy" size for a woman should be much lower than an Aus 14, you have to consider the repocussions. It is known that those with an underweight bmi actually have more health problems than those in the average or overweight bracket.

And some of us lowly types can't afford $200+ for a pair of jeans or a top from Sass&Bide.

Again I will say, average =/= healthy. Just because the average is a size 16 doesn't mean it's healthy.
Knowyourright
23-12-2006, 12:55
And some of us lowly types can't afford $200+ for a pair of jeans or a top from Sass&Bide.

Again I will say, average =/= healthy. Just because the average is a size 16 doesn't mean it's healthy.

Well, perhaps you should be out making money instead of sitting on your computer. If you want nice jeans that fit, you have to pay for them. Unless you "lowly types" like to shoplift.

I don't even like Sass&Bide.


And anyway, size 6 isn't healthy either.
Nobel Hobos
23-12-2006, 12:59
5'10", 140 pounds. Says my BMI is 20.1.

Looking for a job as a body double, kid?
Don't bother sending a photo, we can sort the cosmetic stuff.
Mogtaria
23-12-2006, 13:02
Well, perhaps you should be out making money instead of sitting on your computer. If you want nice jeans that fit, you have to pay for them. Unless you "lowly types" like to shoplift.

I don't even like Sass&Bide.


And anyway, size 6 isn't healthy either.

Depends on your height I guess. I know a lovely young lady who's about that size. She's just 93 pounds.. But she's 5 foot tall exactly (Japanese)


Me personally I'm 5'11 124 pounds and my BMI is 17.5 I'm physically fit and excercise regularly. I eat a balanced diet. I'm borderline underweight according to medical charts on the under side of the border. But I've always been like this and though I've tried to put on weight I can't. I once stopped excersising and started eating loads. I just got unfit and constipated :D.

Seriously though I wish I did have a little more "meat" (read fat) on my bones. I'm highly temperature sensitive to both heat and cold. I prefer summer to winter because I find it easier to keep cool (because I lose heat fast) than to keep warm, if its cold I'm affected by every random draught and gap in clothing.
Akai Oni
23-12-2006, 13:02
Well, perhaps you should be out making money instead of sitting on your computer. If you want nice jeans that fit, you have to pay for them. Unless you "lowly types" like to shoplift.

I don't even like Sass&Bide.


And anyway, size 6 isn't healthy either.

Uh, you know nothing about me. So don't go making assumptions about my life choices or the reasons behind why I haven't got money to burn.

I have plenty of friends who are size 6 and very healthy. I have plenty of friends who are size 16 and very healthy. Size and weight have nothing whatsoever to do with whether someone is healthy.
Knowyourright
23-12-2006, 13:05
Uh, you know nothing about me. So don't go making assumptions about my life choices or the reasons behind why I haven't got money to burn.

I have plenty of friends who are size 6 and very healthy. I have plenty of friends who are size 16 and very healthy. Size and weight have nothing whatsoever to do with whether someone is healthy.

Considering that earlier you were saying that the average size does not equate to a healthy size, you're really going back on your words.

And it's your own fault that you used the lowest form of debate: sarcasm.
Akai Oni
23-12-2006, 13:09
Considering that earlier you were saying that the average size does not equate to a healthy size, you're really going back on your words.

And it's your own fault that you used the lowest form of debate: sarcasm.

I am saying that size is arbitrary. Someone can be a size 26 and be healthy, if their diet and exercise are appropriate. I don't consider myself particularly healthy. I drink too much, I eat virtually no vegetables, I don't eat fruit (I don't like the taste of either). I survive on fried food for breakfast, lunch and dinner. And I resent the implication that because I was fortunate enough to have good genes, I somehow have an eating disorder, or am a bad role model for the students I teach.
Potarius
23-12-2006, 13:10
Looking for a job as a body double, kid?
Don't bother sending a photo, we can sort the cosmetic stuff.

Not gonna happen. Pot doesn't do the whole body double / stunt double thing. :p
Nobel Hobos
23-12-2006, 13:14
Not gonna happen. Pot doesn't do the whole body double / stunt double thing. :p

Yeah, that's what I said. Then they started talking dollars ... :p
Knowyourright
23-12-2006, 13:17
Depends on your height I guess. I know a lovely young lady who's about that size. She's just 93 pounds.. But she's 5 foot tall exactly (Japanese)


Me personally I'm 5'11 124 pounds and my BMI is 17.5 I'm physically fit and excercise regularly. I eat a balanced diet. I'm borderline underweight according to medical charts on the under side of the border. But I've always been like this and though I've tried to put on weight I can't. I once stopped excersising and started eating loads. I just got unfit and constipated :D.

Seriously though I wish I did have a little more "meat" (read fat) on my bones. I'm highly temperature sensitive to both heat and cold. I prefer summer to winter because I find it easier to keep cool (because I lose heat fast) than to keep warm, if its cold I'm affected by every random draught and gap in clothing.


It's good that you want to put on weight. My fiance has a very high metabolism and a very low bmi, like yourself. Perhaps if you really want to put on weight for health reasons, see a doctor.

Because your friend is very short and comes from a racial group that naturally have smaller bones & smaller bodies, it makes sense that she is that size. Obviously, the average woman isn't that height, so, speaking in general terms, a size 6 isn't heathy for an average woman.
Knowyourright
23-12-2006, 13:20
I am saying that size is arbitrary. Someone can be a size 26 and be healthy, if their diet and exercise are appropriate. I don't consider myself particularly healthy. I drink too much, I eat virtually no vegetables, I don't eat fruit (I don't like the taste of either). I survive on fried food for breakfast, lunch and dinner. And I resent the implication that because I was fortunate enough to have good genes, I somehow have an eating disorder, or am a bad role model for the students I teach.

Someone can't be a size 26 and be healthy. That size would generally mean that they are obsese and at risk of developing diabetes, heart problems and various other medical conditions.

I never implied that you had an eating disorder, but you definitely have an unhealthy diet from the looks of it, but at least you eat enough calories. You're obviously just one of the people who don't fit the "average".

Well, if you "drink too much" perhaps you are a bad role model, but I never mentioned "role models" earlier, so I'm not quite sure why you are bringing it up.
Akai Oni
23-12-2006, 13:27
It's good that you want to put on weight. My fiance has a very high metabolism and a very low bmi, like yourself. Perhaps if you really want to put on weight for health reasons, see a doctor.

Because your friend is very short and comes from a racial group that naturally have smaller bones & smaller bodies, it makes sense that she is that size. Obviously, the average woman isn't that height, so, speaking in general terms, a size 6 isn't heathy for an average woman.

Nice example of ethnocentrism there. I think you mean average, white, anglo-saxon woman with certain genetic traits.
Nobel Hobos
23-12-2006, 13:29
I am saying that size is arbitrary. Someone can be a size 26 and be healthy, if their diet and exercise are appropriate.
Big 'if.'
I don't consider myself particularly healthy. I drink too much, I eat virtually no vegetables, I don't eat fruit (I don't like the taste of either).
Google the word "curry." Not all curries are hot. Curry is the answer to "what's good for you doesn't taste good." You could curry a Dalek and it would taste good. Something to do with Ph, and the alkaloids in the spices.
I survive on fried food for breakfast, lunch and dinner. And I resent the implication that because I was fortunate enough to have good genes, I somehow have an eating disorder, or am a bad role model for the students I teach.
Bugger all that. You're eating it, it's your business. But ... 'survive on'? Is that all that food means to you?
Akai Oni
23-12-2006, 13:31
Someone can't be a size 26 and be healthy. That size would generally mean that they are obsese and at risk of developing diabetes, heart problems and various other medical conditions.

I never implied that you had an eating disorder, but you definitely have an unhealthy diet from the looks of it, but at least you eat enough calories. You're obviously just one of the people who don't fit the "average".

Well, if you "drink too much" perhaps you are a bad role model, but I never mentioned "role models" earlier, so I'm not quite sure why you are bringing it up.

I know several Samoan girls who are size 20+ and are very healthy.

Several times you have mentioned or implied that people who are too thin are unhealthy and represent a distorted image of beauty or health. In the other topic, you have constantly stated that people below a certain size or weight are bad images for young girls and guys. Therefore, the logical conclusion is that I represent a bad role model of health for my students, simply because of my size.

And my drinking has absolutely nothing to do with what I teach in the classroom, or my effectiveness as an educator.
Akai Oni
23-12-2006, 13:34
Bugger all that. You're eating it, it's your business. But ... 'survive on'? Is that all that food means to you?

I just don't enjoy eating like some people do. I eat because I get hungry. And I hate the hungry feeling.
Knowyourright
23-12-2006, 13:35
Nice example of ethnocentrism there. I think you mean average, white, anglo-saxon woman with certain genetic traits.

No, I mean average according to the statistics in Australia, which is culturally diverse.
Knowyourright
23-12-2006, 13:37
I know several Samoan girls who are size 20+ and are very healthy.

Several times you have mentioned or implied that people who are too thin are unhealthy and represent a distorted image of beauty or health. In the other topic, you have constantly stated that people below a certain size or weight are bad images for young girls and guys. Therefore, the logical conclusion is that I represent a bad role model of health for my students, simply because of my size.

And my drinking has absolutely nothing to do with what I teach in the classroom, or my effectiveness as an educator.

Medically speaking, according to most information, they have the potential to become very unhealthy.

And people who are too thin ARE unhealthy. That's what the "too" in "too thin" means.

You shouldn't have brought your drinking into it then, should have you?
Luporum
23-12-2006, 13:38
This system is bunk I say! BUNK!!

I am not overweight (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v723/Luporum/dan1.jpg) *sob*
Akai Oni
23-12-2006, 13:39
No, I mean average according to the statistics in Australia, which is culturally diverse.

Well, then you should be more specific.
Imperial isa
23-12-2006, 13:39
Bmi 18.2
Knowyourright
23-12-2006, 13:39
This system is bunk I say! BUNK!!

I am not overweight (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v723/Luporum/danny.jpg) *sob*

I tend to agree. I think that bmi is not always the best indicator. I have a bmi of just over 25, which means I'm overweight, but I'm not!
Mogtaria
23-12-2006, 13:41
It's good that you want to put on weight. My fiance has a very high metabolism and a very low bmi, like yourself. Perhaps if you really want to put on weight for health reasons, see a doctor.

Because your friend is very short and comes from a racial group that naturally have smaller bones & smaller bodies, it makes sense that she is that size. Obviously, the average woman isn't that height, so, speaking in general terms, a size 6 isn't heathy for an average woman.

Heh, it's ok, I'm not concerned about my weight. It stays pretty steady, fluctuating at most by a pound or two. I'm told I could gain mass by regular gym work to build muscle mass but I'm never going to increase my fat reserves by a significant ammount because my body just doesn't work that way. The "wishing" was just wistfullness out of my intolerance for temperature change/difference :)
Fair Progress
23-12-2006, 13:44
Don't take the BMI as a strict indicator for being fat, if you have a muscled body your BMI will be higher than regular people because you'll be heavier, not fat. I'm 1.80m (5.9ft) tall and according to the BMI I'd have to wheigh 65kg (143 pounds) to be have a BMI of 20.1, which is quite normal. But anyone with my height that wheighs 65kg is simply skinny, I've never gone under 73kg since I've reached adult age...But you should be concerned if your BMI is above 25 and you don't workout...
Akai Oni
23-12-2006, 13:47
Medically speaking, according to most information, they have the potential to become very unhealthy.

I never said they couldn't. Of course it's possible. Quite probable even. But, they are not unhealthy now.

And people who are too thin ARE unhealthy. That's what the "too" in "too thin" means.

Define "too thin". Objectively. Without an arbitrary measure like BMI, clothing size or weight.

You shouldn't have brought your drinking into it then, should have you?

I used it as an example of my unhealthy lifestyle. You're the one who made a values judgement about it.
Xeniph
23-12-2006, 13:50
Woot! 6'6 137lb 15.8BMI Male from Australia. But i'd prefer lower. :mad:
Knowyourright
23-12-2006, 13:51
Well, then you should be more specific.

Considering that I have actually mentioned that I was talking about Australian sizing, even a genius like yourself should have worked that out.
Knowyourright
23-12-2006, 13:52
Woot! 6'6 137lb 15.8BMI Male from Australia. But i'd prefer lower. :mad:

:( :( :( :( :(
Akai Oni
23-12-2006, 13:55
Considering that I have actually mentioned that I was talking about Australian sizing, even a genius like yourself should have worked that out.

I thought sarcasm was the lowest form of debate a little while ago?

And why should I have worked that out when we were discussing Japanese women and their size?
Mogtaria
23-12-2006, 13:56
Don't take the BMI as a strict indicator for being fat, if you have a muscled body your BMI will be higher than regular people because you'll be heavier, not fat. I'm 1.80m (5.9ft) tall and according to the BMI I'd have to wheigh 65kg (143 pounds) to be have a BMI of 20.1, which is quite normal. But anyone with my height that wheighs 65kg is simply skinny, I've never gone under 73kg since I've reached adult age...But you should be concerned if your BMI is above 25 and you don't workout...

Quite, it's also possible to have an acceptable BMI but have enough fat around the abdomen and in the chest cavity to be life threatening.

BMI is at best a poor guide and at worst a dangerous toy.
Imperial isa
23-12-2006, 13:56
Woot! 6'6 137lb 15.8BMI Male from Australia. But i'd prefer lower. :mad:

i did get lower i was 18.17 an now i'm 18.2
Xeniph
23-12-2006, 14:00
:( :( :( :( :(

Heh I had it wrong at first i'm fine with it now. I had my conversions wrong I calculated using 6'0 and 124lb not 6'6 and 137lb (cause I converted from metric) So it came out as 16.8 not 15.8. Which means i'm officially underweight. I'm happy now. :)
UnHoly Smite
23-12-2006, 14:03
None of your biznatch! :mad:
Darknovae
23-12-2006, 14:04
17.2

I'm wayyy too skinny. :(
Knowyourright
23-12-2006, 14:04
I thought sarcasm was the lowest form of debate a little while ago?

And why should I have worked that out when we were discussing Japanese women and their size?

Oh honey, you're meant to read in chronological order!
Knowyourright
23-12-2006, 14:05
Heh I had it wrong at first i'm fine with it now. I had my conversions wrong I calculated using 6'0 and 124lb not 6'6 and 137lb (cause I converted from metric) So it came out as 16.8 not 15.8. Which means i'm officially underweight. I'm happy now. :)

Why do you want to be underweight?
Xeniph
23-12-2006, 14:13
Why do you want to be underweight?

I like this physique that's why, also then I can laugh at people when they call me anorexic, 'cause I have a high metabolism.
Knowyourright
23-12-2006, 14:16
I like this physique that's why, also then I can laugh at people when they call me anorexic, 'cause I have a high metabolism.

You do realise that you've got a problem...right?
Imperial isa
23-12-2006, 14:17
17.2

I'm wayyy too skinny. :(

here :fluffle:
Chandelier
23-12-2006, 14:19
16.9, because I'm 5'6" and I weigh 105 pounds. I wouldn't mind gaining a little bit of weight, but I'm happy with my size for now.
Xeniph
23-12-2006, 14:20
You do realise that you've got a problem...right?

Ah well y'know what they say "No pain no gain.".
Funky Beat Mk2
23-12-2006, 14:36
23? Sounds good, if fanciful.
Darknovae
23-12-2006, 14:51
here :fluffle:

:) :fluffle:
Imperial isa
23-12-2006, 15:10
:) :fluffle:

that's better
Xeniph
23-12-2006, 15:13
You do realise that you've got a problem...right?

What do you mean I have a problem???
Knowyourright
23-12-2006, 15:18
What do you mean I have a problem???

It's just unhealthy, mentally and physically, to want to lose weight when you're already underweight.
Xeniph
23-12-2006, 16:15
It's just unhealthy, mentally and physically, to want to lose weight when you're already underweight.

Meh.
Rasselas
23-12-2006, 16:43
20.3
Wallonochia
23-12-2006, 17:52
I think this thread desperately needs this image.

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a353/tuebor/I-beat-anorexia.jpg
Ilie
23-12-2006, 17:55
Mine is 19.6. There ya go.
Rave Shentavo
23-12-2006, 18:10
18.9 Russian-American.
I V Stalin
23-12-2006, 20:06
23.2. I don't care what my BMI is, to be honest. So long as I weigh between 135 and 145 pounds, I'm happy.
Knowyourright
24-12-2006, 10:05
I never said they couldn't. Of course it's possible. Quite probable even. But, they are not unhealthy now.



Define "too thin". Objectively. Without an arbitrary measure like BMI, clothing size or weight.



I used it as an example of my unhealthy lifestyle. You're the one who made a values judgement about it.

.... "Too thin" is when someone is underweight to the point where their health is affected. "Too thin" is emaciation, and "too thin", for many people with naturally medium to large bodies, can simply mean that their bones are jutting out.
Akai Oni
24-12-2006, 10:46
.... "Too thin" is when someone is underweight to the point where their health is affected. "Too thin" is emaciation, and "too thin", for many people with naturally medium to large bodies, can simply mean that their bones are jutting out.

well I think everyone can agree on that.
Knowyourright
24-12-2006, 12:03
well I think everyone can agree on that.

Thank god!
Chandelier
24-12-2006, 15:10
.... "Too thin" is when someone is underweight to the point where their health is affected. "Too thin" is emaciation, and "too thin", for many people with naturally medium to large bodies, can simply mean that their bones are jutting out.

Is it all right for bones to be jutting out for people with naturally small bodies?:(
The Metal Horde
24-12-2006, 15:16
Whoo! 32.3! Doesn't really mean anything to me. I suppose that makes me sound huge, but I'm not all that big. Labelling me as obese, on the other hand, is stupid.
Knowyourright
25-12-2006, 00:51
Is it all right for bones to be jutting out for people with naturally small bodies?:(

Not to me, no. I don't like seeing bones at all, but very rarely, I will admit, that some people are naturally slender. I don't think, however, that bones are ever healthy. I think that both sexes should at least have enough flesh to cover their spine. However, I was an Aus size 8-10 a few years ago, and despite the fact that I looked healthy, I was starving myself, and my collarbones jutted out.
Arrkendommer
25-12-2006, 00:57
17.2
Yea-uh! Thanks Concerta!
Chandelier
25-12-2006, 01:10
Not to me, no. I don't like seeing bones at all, but very rarely, I will admit, that some people are naturally slender. I don't think, however, that bones are ever healthy. I think that both sexes should at least have enough flesh to cover their spine. However, I was an Aus size 8-10 a few years ago, and despite the fact that I looked healthy, I was starving myself, and my collarbones jutted out.

Hmm... I don't know, my bones have pretty much always been jutting out. My collarbones, ribs, and hipbones, at least, and I guess the bones in my wrists and fingers are, too. I don't know about my spine, but it might be jutting out, too. I am underweight, though. (16.9 BMI, I think)
Knowyourright
25-12-2006, 01:16
I think this thread desperately needs this image.

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a353/tuebor/I-beat-anorexia.jpg

...I find that really offensive!
Knowyourright
25-12-2006, 01:18
Hmm... I don't know, my bones have pretty much always been jutting out. My collarbones, ribs, and hipbones, at least, and I guess the bones in my wrists and fingers are, too. I don't know about my spine, but it might be jutting out, too. I am underweight, though. (16.9 BMI, I think)

See, that's the thing: everybody (and every body) is different, and what's important is that they eat enough to sustain their health. BMI is often very incorrect. I think that a fitness test, dietery analysis, body fat check and genetic predispositions should all be taken into account when considering whether someone is a healthy weight or not.
KarbienNaexun
25-12-2006, 01:26
Last time I checked, I was between 11 and 14, and that wasn't too long ago. Also, it was probably more accurate because It was tested with an actual handheld BMI machine thing that (i think) sent a small shock through your body and timed how long it took to get back.
Chandelier
25-12-2006, 01:53
See, that's the thing: everybody (and every body) is different, and what's important is that they eat enough to sustain their health. BMI is often very incorrect. I think that a fitness test, dietery analysis, body fat check and genetic predispositions should all be taken into account when considering whether someone is a healthy weight or not.

I agree. I've never been good at fitness; I had to have physical therapy as a child and it only ended because it was taking away from my class time. However, I feel that I eat well enough and enough to sustain my health. I have no idea how much body fat I have, though.
Terrorist Cakes
25-12-2006, 02:38
Not to me, no. I don't like seeing bones at all, but very rarely, I will admit, that some people are naturally slender. I don't think, however, that bones are ever healthy. I think that both sexes should at least have enough flesh to cover their spine. However, I was an Aus size 8-10 a few years ago, and despite the fact that I looked healthy, I was starving myself, and my collarbones jutted out.

Aren't collar bones supposed to stick out? Mine definately do, and I'm pretty far from starving to death. It's hard to tell, but here's mine... (http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i80/TerroristCakes/pickies098-1.jpg)
Knowyourright
25-12-2006, 11:48
Aren't collar bones supposed to stick out? Mine definately do, and I'm pretty far from starving to death. It's hard to tell, but here's mine... (http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i80/TerroristCakes/pickies098-1.jpg)

Oh, mine stuck out to the end of my shoulders, and on MY body that isn't healthy for me.