Homosexual "rights"
The Redemption Army
30-11-2006, 20:50
The homosexuals are always trying to have "rights" declared for them. Let me ask you, when was the last time you saw someone awarded "Drunk rights", "thief rights", or "sexual deviant's rights." homosexuals are sexual deviants, no more. They are not one of God's races, they are not a religion, they are more akin to an organization, one that exposes our society to disease and recruits our children into their horrible deathstyle.
The homosexuals don't deserve any "rights"
Andaluciae
30-11-2006, 20:51
Really. Who's puppet are you? I want to know.
Purple Android
30-11-2006, 20:51
The homosexuals are always trying to have "rights" declared for them. Let me ask you, when was the last time you saw someone awarded "Drunk rights", "thief rights", or "sexual deviant's rights." homosexuals are sexual deviants, no more. They are not one of God's races, they are not a religion, they are more akin to an organization, one that exposes our society to disease and recruits our children into their horrible deathstyle.
The homosexuals don't deserve any "rights"
You do know that you are about to get attacked by alot of people?
The homosexuals are always trying to have "rights" declared for them. Let me ask you, when was the last time you saw someone awarded "Drunk rights", "thief rights", or "sexual deviant's rights." homosexuals are sexual deviants, no more. They are not one of God's races, they are not a religion, they are more akin to an organization, one that exposes our society to disease and recruits our children into their horrible deathstyle.
The homosexuals don't deserve any "rights"
LOLLERCOPTER
trolls... :rolleyes:
Andaluciae
30-11-2006, 20:52
TRA, send me a telegram, telling me who you are. I swear I won't tell anyone else!
If frothing, lunatic, religious zealots can be afforded rights, I see no problem with men who love men, or women who love women, having rights.
However, in no way would I compare homosexuals to frothing, lunatic, relgious zealots. Homosexuals contribute to humanity after all.
Smunkeeville
30-11-2006, 20:52
sexual deviants? :confused:
Unabashed Greed
30-11-2006, 20:53
Honestly. You REALLY suck at this. You should move on, and leave this to the people who know what they're doing.
Grave_n_idle
30-11-2006, 20:53
The homosexuals are always trying to have "rights" declared for them. Let me ask you, when was the last time you saw someone awarded "Drunk rights", "thief rights", or "sexual deviant's rights." homosexuals are sexual deviants, no more. They are not one of God's races, they are not a religion, they are more akin to an organization, one that exposes our society to disease and recruits our children into their horrible deathstyle.
The homosexuals don't deserve any "rights"
Sexual orientation doesn't make you any less human. Homosexuals should have access to the same 'rights' as everyone else... as should all humans.
Such fundamentals need to be protected, even where one might not like the actions of the individual.
So - for example, a person might be a vitriolic troll that consistently flamebaits and spams a forum with pointless threads.. but I would still protect their right to express themselves.
And I do.
Carry on.
Grave_n_idle
30-11-2006, 20:54
sexual deviants? :confused:
Yes, please! :)
Homosexuality is a characteristic like red hair or dark skin and as such, can't really be called immoral because it's not an action. To my knowledge, there is no campaign to recruit children to homosexuality anymore than there is to "recruit" them to African ancestry or red hair.
Terrorist Cakes
30-11-2006, 20:55
More trollery? What's up with NSG as of late?
Smunkeeville
30-11-2006, 20:55
Yes, please! :)
no.......I don't understand, what is a sexual deviant?
Farnhamia
30-11-2006, 20:55
Really. Who's puppet are you? I want to know.
So do I and all my fellow "sexual deviants." (Can't be MTAE, he knows the basic rules of punctuation.)
I move we ignore this one.
New Burmesia
30-11-2006, 20:56
The homosexuals are always trying to have "rights" declared for them. Let me ask you, when was the last time you saw someone awarded "Drunk rights", "thief rights", or "sexual deviant's rights." homosexuals are sexual deviants, no more. They are not one of God's races, they are not a religion, they are more akin to an organization, one that exposes our society to disease and recruits our children into their horrible deathstyle.
The homosexuals don't deserve any "rights"
No. No. No. You are NOT going to be the next MeansToAnEnd. Period.
Unless, you've got the same puppeteer. In which case, I apologise.
Arthais101
30-11-2006, 20:56
sexual deviants? :confused:
I'll have you know that as a sexual deviant I am deeply offended by the OPs post
Ice Hockey Players
30-11-2006, 20:57
The homosexuals are always trying to have "rights" declared for them.
No, you think? heaven forbid a group wouldn't want to be without rights. Next thing you know, women will want to vote.
Let me ask you, when was the last time you saw someone awarded "Drunk rights", "thief rights", or "sexual deviant's rights."
Hmmm...I don't know, about the time we crafted the Constitution and decided that people, no matter what they did, had rights on some level. Drunks have the right to be drunk as long as they don't drive, operate machinery, or hurt anyone; even if they do, they have the right to their day in court. Thieves have the right to their day in court. And sexual deviants...if you have time to get this worked up about what people do in the privacy of their own home with other consenting adults, you need a hobby. May I suggest competitive mah jongg?
homosexuals are sexual deviants, no more. They are not one of God's races, they are not a religion, they are more akin to an organization, one that exposes our society to disease and recruits our children into their horrible deathstyle.
The homosexuals don't deserve any "rights"
Lots of people are sexual deviants. Last time I checked, a chunk of them weren't hurting anybody. They're not a race or a religion either. Yes, I know that you seem to have sipped the Kool-Aid that makes you believe that only marital, missionary-position, opposite-sex, same-race intercourse that results in pregnancy and is done for no other reason than procreation and is not enjoyed in any way by either party is the only acceptable intercourse and anything else should warrant a horrible death, but frankly the rest of us will stay away from that foul-smelling Kool-Aid and stick with Jack and Coke. Now run along; you bother me.
New Burmesia
30-11-2006, 20:57
I'll have you know that as a sexual deviant I am deeply offended by the OPs post
Don't take the trolls seriously, folks!
Greyenivol Colony
30-11-2006, 20:57
deathstyle
That's a great word...
Soviestan
30-11-2006, 20:57
The homosexuals are always trying to have "rights" declared for them. Let me ask you, when was the last time you saw someone awarded "Drunk rights", "thief rights", or "sexual deviant's rights." homosexuals are sexual deviants, no more. They are not one of God's races, they are not a religion, they are more akin to an organization, one that exposes our society to disease and recruits our children into their horrible deathstyle.
The homosexuals don't deserve any "rights"
I agree with you to a point. I don't think they should have their pride parades or movies like brokeback mountian. I think it pushes wrong things on society. So they shouldn't get special rights, but they should have at least most of the rights as others so long as they don't push their lifestyle.
And to be fair I don't agree with straight people pushing deviancy on society either such as nude beaches or free love nonsense.
Edwardis
30-11-2006, 20:58
To the OP:
Did you read the telegram I sent you? I suggest you do if you haven't. Be all the controversial you want, but please be civil.
Morganatron
30-11-2006, 20:58
So do I and all my fellow "sexual deviants." (Can't be MTAE, he knows the basic rules of punctuation.)
I move we ignore this one.
Seconded, since TRA hasn't made an appearance since the OP.
Ice Hockey Players
30-11-2006, 20:58
Homosexuality is a characteristic like red hair or dark skin and as such, can't really be called immoral because it's not an action. To my knowledge, there is no campaign to recruit children to homosexuality anymore than there is to "recruit" them to African ancestry or red hair.
No, but there is a campaign to recruit people into religious fundamentalism. Maybe a bigger deal needs to be made out of that.
Congo--Kinshasa
30-11-2006, 20:58
No, you think? heaven forbid a group wouldn't want to be without rights. Next thing you know, women will want to vote.
Women, voting!? Say it ain't so! :eek:
We must prevent this at all costs!
[/facetious]
New Burmesia
30-11-2006, 20:59
The homosexuals are always trying to have "rights" declared for them. Let me ask you, when was the last time you saw someone awarded "Drunk rights", "thief rights", or "sexual deviant's rights." homosexuals are sexual deviants, no more. They are not one of God's races, they are not a religion, they are more akin to an organization, one that exposes our society to disease and recruits our children into their horrible deathstyle.
The homosexuals don't deserve any "rights"
I agree with you to a point. I don't think they should have their pride parades or movies like brokeback mountian. I think it pushes wrong things on society. So they shouldn't get special rights, but they should have at least most of the rights as others so long as they don't push their lifestyle.
And to be fair I don't agree with straight people pushing deviancy on society either such as nude beaches or free love nonsense.
http://www.genesbmx.com/trolls.jpg
Trotskylvania
30-11-2006, 20:59
The homosexuals are always trying to have "rights" declared for them. Let me ask you, when was the last time you saw someone awarded "Drunk rights", "thief rights", or "sexual deviant's rights." homosexuals are sexual deviants, no more. They are not one of God's races, they are not a religion, they are more akin to an organization, one that exposes our society to disease and recruits our children into their horrible deathstyle.
The homosexuals don't deserve any "rights"
Then neither do you.
Arthais101
30-11-2006, 20:59
Don't take the trolls seriously, folks!
oh I don't.
Besides, I'm not gay. I'm just pretty fucking deviant :p
Grave_n_idle
30-11-2006, 21:00
no.......I don't understand, what is a sexual deviant?
I believe the usual interpretation is "anyone for whom sex is more than a matter of ritual, in which missionary position is 'performed' and sex culminates in the all-important male orgasm"
Any other position, interest, or that weird stuff where girls get to come too... sexual deviancy, the lot of it.
Like I said... yes, please. :)
In all fairness to TRA, homosexuality is condemned by the bible, so for truly devout Christians, that would be the dogma that they would follow.
I, on the otherhand, came across such things as that, and other logical discrepancies, in the bible, and ceased to be christian.
To think that another group of your own race is less deserving of life is demeaning only to yourself. Put down the bible. Learn to think for yourself.
Congo--Kinshasa
30-11-2006, 21:00
Homosexuality is a characteristic like red hair or dark skin and as such, can't really be called immoral because it's not an action. To my knowledge, there is no campaign to recruit children to homosexuality anymore than there is to "recruit" them to African ancestry or red hair.
Lies. Those evil homos run scores of underground facilities, where their diabolical agents work day and night to convert innocent children to their evil cause!
[/joking]
:D
Purple Android
30-11-2006, 21:00
Women, voting!? Say it ain't so! :eek:
We must prevent this at all costs!
[/facetious]
People can vote? :eek:
Grave_n_idle
30-11-2006, 21:01
In all fairness to TRA, homosexuality is condemned by the bible, so for truly devout Christians, that would be the dogma that they would follow.
I, on the otherhand, came across such things as that, and other logical discrepancies, in the bible, and ceased to be christian.
To think that another group of your own race is less deserving of life is demeaning only to yourself. Put down the bible. Learn to think for yourself.
Show me the verse where it says homosexuals should be given less rights?
Congo--Kinshasa
30-11-2006, 21:01
http://www.genesbmx.com/trolls.jpg
But trolls amuse me so! :p
Smunkeeville
30-11-2006, 21:01
I believe the usual interpretation is "anyone for whom sex is more than a matter of ritual, in which missionary position is 'performed' and sex culminates in the all-important male orgasm"
Any other position, interest, or that weird stuff where girls get to come too... sexual deviancy, the lot of it.
Like I said... yes, please. :)
Ima deviant?! :eek: :( :( :(
To my knowledge, there is no campaign to recruit children to homosexuality anymore than there is to "recruit" them to African ancestry or red hair.
*adresses local chapter of The Homosexual Conversion Recruitment Center*
Okay, folks, now who was responsible for that Letila person?
Farnhamia
30-11-2006, 21:02
oh I don't.
Besides, I'm not gay. I'm just pretty fucking deviant :p
Yeah, you're a lawyer. :D
Frisbeeteria
30-11-2006, 21:02
The Redemption Army, 100% of the threads you've started have been locked for trolling. Consider this your Official Warning for trolling.
If you keep it up, forumbans and/or deletions will be next. Knock it off. NOW.