NationStates Jolt Archive

Acording some white rulers in the US and other nations, Law enforcement should start racially profiling Muslims and Arabs because the vast majority of terroists are that. Well, fine, if you want to do this, then I also have a great new way of getting rid of Pedophiles, and child molesters.

Profile and discriminate agaisnt ALL white males, ages 30-70, esspecailly of the Christain faith. Why the faith? because the faith has explicably been involved in such acts, esspecaily of the Catholic sector. Enact all racail and religious tention on them as possible to cleanse this vermon of the human race.

As far as I know everyone gets extensive backround checks before they get employment that has anything to do with contact with children. Anyone seen hanging around a school will be questioned.

Besides you really can't examine someone having naughty thoughts about childeren but you can check someones person for weapons to kill people. The fact that Arabs/Muslims are profiled is wrong of course but the two scenarios are completely different.

Acording some white rulers in the US and other nations, Law enforcement should start racially profiling Muslims and Arabs because the vast majority of terroists are that. Well, fine, if you want to do this, then I also have a great new way of getting rid of Pedophiles, and child molesters.

Profile and discriminate agaisnt ALL white males, ages 30-70, esspecailly of the Christain faith. Why the faith? because the faith has explicably been involved in such acts, esspecaily of the Catholic sector. Enact all racail and religious tention on them as possible to cleanse this vermon of the human race.

Why whites? I thought all races had kid touchers in them.

As far as I know everyone gets extensive backround checks before they get employment that has anything to do with contact with children. Anyone seen hanging around a school will be questioned.

Besides you really can't examine someone having naughty thoughts about childeren but you can check someones person for weapons to kill people. The fact that Arabs/Muslims are profiled is wrong of course but the two scenarios are completely different.

well I did read this thing about brain scanners awhile back...someone is gonna try it someday...

Why whites? I thought all races had kid touchers in them.

yes, but if we give in to the biast steriotypes and generalizations we can assume the most of them a older white christain males.

Don't they do this already? Like, there's a serial killer going around, police assume they're looking for [insert serial killer profile], if there's a bunch of terrorist attacks, police look for [insert terrorist profile].

Acording some white rulers in the US and other nations, Law enforcement should start racially profiling Muslims and Arabs because the vast majority of terroists are that. Well, fine, if you want to do this, then I also have a great new way of getting rid of Pedophiles, and child molesters.

Profile and discriminate agaisnt ALL white males, ages 30-70, esspecailly of the Christain faith. Why the faith? because the faith has explicably been involved in such acts, esspecaily of the Catholic sector. Enact all racail and religious tention on them as possible to cleanse this vermon of the human race.

I think you slipped a cog here. Young, Arab, male is the description that fits a vast majority of terrorists. Middle-aged, Christian, male doesn't carry the same kind of correlation to pedophiles.

Profiling is wrong. Period.

And why does it have to be white males 30-70? Males between the age of 18-29 have shown they are just as capable of being as sexually perverted as their older counterparts when it comes to paedophilia. Also, what does faith and race have to do with anything?

Background checks for certain jobs requiring security clearance are permissible. Why? You're entering a position where you need to have a clean record. Anyone entering it does; there is no discrimination because all people get the same background check.

Just as there are white terrorists (IRA, for example), there are paedophiles who are of other races too...

As far as I know everyone gets extensive backround checks before they get employment that has anything to do with contact with children. Anyone seen hanging around a school will be questioned.

Besides you really can't examine someone having naughty thoughts about childeren but you can check someones person for weapons to kill people. The fact that Arabs/Muslims are profiled is wrong of course but the two scenarios are completely different.

You can check actually. I remember reading about an experiment where they wired up a bunch of guys' penises to a machine and showed them gay porn. A greater percentage of the most homophobic guys' started to fill up just enough for the machine to detect arousal.

Just run the test with pictures of kids instead of gay porn and you can find out who's a likely kid-toucher.

I think you slipped a cog here. Young, Arab, male is the description that fits a vast majority of terrorists. Middle-aged, Christian, male doesn't carry the same kind of correlation to pedophiles.

well think about it though, when people think "terrorist" they think Arab-muslim male, when people think pedopille, generally they're all going to think of an older out of shape white guy, possibly catholic.

yes, but if we give in to the biast steriotypes and generalizations we can assume the most of them a older white christain males.

white christian males are largely responsible for building this society and its systems.
You dont really hope that would work?

You're really just trying to piss us off....

I think you slipped a cog here. Young, Arab, male is the description that fits a vast majority of terrorists.

This is a great windfall for all the Irish, or communist terrorists out there :D

You can check actually. I remember reading about an experiment where they wired up a bunch of guys' penises to a machine and showed them gay porn. A greater percentage of the most homophobic guys' started to fill up just enough for the machine to detect arousal.

Just run the test with pictures of kids instead of gay porn and you can find out who's a likely kid-toucher.

now thats kinda creepy.....

white christian males are largely responsible for building this society and its systems.
You dont really hope that would work?

You're really just trying to piss us off....

No, I'm trying to save young children from being molested.

Acording some white rulers in the US and other nations, Law enforcement should start racially profiling Muslims and Arabs because the vast majority of terroists are that. Well, fine, if you want to do this, then I also have a great new way of getting rid of Pedophiles, and child molesters.

Profile and discriminate agaisnt ALL white males, ages 30-70, esspecailly of the Christain faith. Why the faith? because the faith has explicably been involved in such acts, esspecaily of the Catholic sector. Enact all racail and religious tention on them as possible to cleanse this vermon of the human race.

We do racially profile white people. When there's a serial killer on the loose the profile almost always says "middle aged white male" long before they have a suspect - and I have no problem with that. The vast majority of serial killers are middle aged white males. The vast majority of gang killings are by young hispanic or black males. The vast majority of terrorist activity, at least in modern times, is by young Muslim males.

white christian males are largely responsible for building this society and its systems.
You dont really hope that would work?

You're really just trying to piss us off.... So you're saying, because white Christian males by far outnumber young Arab males in the US, this kind of profiling just wouldn't work?

Profiling is only effective when there are a reduced number of people to profile.

Considering that young arab males are NOT overwhelmingly, on a global scale, responsible for the bulk of terrorist activities is a moot point to the much more feel-good act of targeting them in nations where they are minorities.

Why whites? I thought all races had kid touchers in them.

Yeah! Just look at Michael Jackson!!

Black Or White Michael Jackson lyrics
Artist: Michael Jackson
Album: The Essential - Disc 2
Year: 2005
Title: Black Or White


I took my baby
On a Saturday bang

If you're thinkin'
About my baby
It don't matter if you're
Black or white

This is a great windfall for all the Irish, or communist terrorists out there :D

Especially because it's true! :)

This is a great windfall for all the Irish, or communist terrorists out there :D

There just aren't that many. There are exceptions, but not a significant number. Last terrorist act committed by an Irishman or communist in the U.S. was when? Anywhere else -- when?

profile.

Considering that young arab males are NOT overwhelmingly, on a global scale, responsible for the bulk of terrorist activities

Yes they are. ;)

yes, but if we give in to the biast steriotypes and generalizations we can assume the most of them a older white christain males.

Really? You can marry a nine year old girl in Iran. 12 in Saudi Arabia. Teachers in Pakistani Madrassas are as rapey as Catholic priests. I'd say Muslims are a strong contender for pedo profiling. I suspect, however, that pedophillia is equally common among all races and religions. Hell, in Japan they had schoolgirl panty vending machines and I'm told one can buy comic books with schoolgirls engaging in sexual activity with tentacled monsters in them. I think it appears among all groups of people.

There just aren't that many. There are exceptions, but not a significant number. Last terrorist act committed by an Irishman or communist in the U.S. was when? Anywhere else -- when?

If you tally up all the 'terrorist acts' attributed to Irishmen or communists in days of yore, I have no doubt they would not exceed by much the terrorist acts of muslim men in present days.

It's all relative to the time you live in. For a while in Canada, it was the dirty Quebec separatists, putting bombs all over the place.

You can check actually. I remember reading about an experiment where they wired up a bunch of guys' penises to a machine and showed them gay porn. A greater percentage of the most homophobic guys' started to fill up just enough for the machine to detect arousal.

Just run the test with pictures of kids instead of gay porn and you can find out who's a likely kid-toucher.

I'd have to wonder if this would become standard practice anytime soon. Must be a costly test. Not to mention the, ah, embarassment of having your member hooked up to something. Uncomfortable at the very least. ;)

Really? You can marry a nine year old girl in Iran. 12 in Saudi Arabia. Teachers in Pakistani Madrassas are as rapey as Catholic priests. I'd say Muslims are a strong contender for pedo profiling. I suspect, however, that pedophillia is equally common among all races and religions. Hell, in Japan they had schoolgirl panty vending machines and I'm told one can buy comic books with schoolgirls engaging in sexual activity with tentacled monsters in them. I think it appears among all groups of people.

Yes, that is incredably discusting. but, think of a child molester. What do you see?




Exactly.

So you're saying, because white Christian males by far outnumber young Arab males in the US, this kind of profiling just wouldn't work?

Profiling is only effective when there are a reduced number of people to profile.

Considering that young arab males are NOT overwhelmingly, on a global scale, responsible for the bulk of terrorist activities is a moot point to the much more feel-good act of targeting them in nations where they are minorities.


Dont start your "So you're saying" jive with me.

I'm saying since us white christian males still outnumber everyone, the rules are largely made by us and enforced by us.


And yeah- young-arab-males are the majority responsible for most terrorist activities on a global scale.
Yes-they are.

I'm not into 'feel good' BS-target them here or there.

If you tally up all the 'terrorist acts' attributed to Irishmen or communists in days of yore, I have no doubt they would not exceed by much the terrorist acts of muslim men in present days.

It's all relative to the time you live in. For a while in Canada, it was the dirty Quebec separatists, putting bombs all over the place.

Let's keep to a contemporary view. Now, how do all those terrorist acts by Irishmen and communist Canadians stack up to the young, Arab, males?

Yes they are. ;)

Arab males?

Or do you mean Muslims?

Arab males?

Or do you mean Muslims?

I mean Muslims. Of course, the vast majority of Arabs are Muslim...

Dont start your "So you're saying" jive with me. But I know you love it so...

I'm saying since us white christian males still outnumber everyone, the rules are largely made by us and enforced by us. Not for long, my soon to be assimilated by my mestizo brothers of the south....MUAHAHAHAHHAAHAHHAAAA!


And yeah- young-arab-males are the majority responsible for most terrorist activities on a global scale.
Yes-they are.

I'm not into 'feel good' BS-target them here or there. Arab males? Man, they get all the flack. Somalian muslims blowing shit up, Indonesian Muslims blowing things up...what, chopped liver?

If you tally up all the 'terrorist acts' attributed to Irishmen or communists in days of yore, I have no doubt they would not exceed by much the terrorist acts of muslim men in present days.

It's all relative to the time you live in. For a while in Canada, it was the dirty Quebec separatists, putting bombs all over the place.

Yep. You said it. We live now, by the way. just wanted to make sure you realize that we don't live in the days of yore. ;)

Dont start your "So you're saying" jive with me.

I'm saying since us white christian males still outnumber everyone, the rules are largely made by us and enforced by us.


And yeah- young-arab-males are the majority responsible for most terrorist activities on a global scale.
Yes-they are.

I'm not into 'feel good' BS-target them here or there.



Thank you for proving my point. Since the Majority of people in the US are white christain males, the majority of child molesters will indeed be them. So in turn, if we profile them, we will cath many many more of them. Wether they really are the majority of molesters or not.

I mean Muslims. Of course, the vast majority of Arabs are Muslim...

But the reverse is not true.

Just run the test with pictures of kids instead of gay porn and you can find out who's a likely kid-toucher.
But what if I zone out during the test and start thinking about something completely different? Like Pita Bread? Mm, pita bread, so warm . . . pocket . . .

I don't think you can profile for a group that comprises the majority, though. If you take any random event, it will already happen to more Whites than it does to any other group.

Let's keep to a contemporary view. Now, how do all those terrorist acts by Irishmen and communist Canadians stack up to the young, Arab, males?

Well, I certainly don't recall any 9/11 scale Irish attacks. :p

Hardly comes to an excuse to target Muslim men however. Profiling of any kind can't be allowed, if not for any moral reason then the fact that it gets you sloppy so that you don't look for dangers elsewhere.

Acording some white rulers in the US and other nations, Law enforcement should start racially profiling Muslims and Arabs because the vast majority of terroists are that. Well, fine, if you want to do this, then I also have a great new way of getting rid of Pedophiles, and child molesters.

Profile and discriminate agaisnt ALL white males, ages 30-70, esspecailly of the Christain faith. Why the faith? because the faith has explicably been involved in such acts, esspecaily of the Catholic sector. Enact all racail and religious tention on them as possible to cleanse this vermon of the human race.

Oddly enough, the percentage of pedophile priests in the Catholic church exactly mirrors that same percentage in any population of people.

I'm not refuting the fact that these crimes happened, they just didn't happen any more often than any where else in the world.

Now, if you want to talk about cover ups, that's fine.

The true crime there was the failure of the church to act on these fightings.

The second true crime?

The parents who accepted hush money.

But the reverse is not true.

No, though I would venture that a sizeable chunk of them are. That's imaterial, though. Just as I said I have no problem with the FBI looking at middle aged white males when going after the latest guy who likes to chop the heads off of drifters and have sex with their corpses, just as I said I have no problem with cops out here in LA going after Hispanic or Black teenagers after the latest gang related shooting, I have no problem with airport security taking a harder look at people from minority groups with obvious religious leanings before they get on a plane or the FBI from taking a look at mosques and people who attend them when doing their terrorism investigations. I'm not saying they should be able to jail people without cause, the don't do that to suspects in gang shootings or serial killings, I'm not saying that they should be able to trample people's civil rights. I'm saying don't waste your time with the ten year old white girl at the strip search counter at the airport during a high terrorism alert.

But I know you love it so...

Not for long, my soon to be assimilated by my mestizo brothers of the south....MUAHAHAHAHHAAHAHHAAAA!



Hey-I went to a poetry reading last night, so dont F with me.

You and I will be long gone before that little scenario occurs. And the system as you know it will completely collapse. Its not like some other group will just move in and steer the ship.

Well, I certainly don't recall any 9/11 scale Irish attacks. :p No laughing matter. While the death toll of any one attack does not match the 911 attacks, the terror level was much more sustained.


By the way, this is an interesting list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorist_attacks

Hey-I went to a poetry reading last night, so dont F with me.

You and I will be long gone before that little scenario occurs. And the system as you know it will completely collapse. Its not like some other group will just move in and steer the ship.

Riiiiiight...because only white Christian males are capable of that:rolleyes:

If you mean collapse as in change, I certainly hope so. If you mean 'decend into anarchy and chaos', then you really need to get over yourself.

Hahahaha.a...how was the poetry?

But what if I zone out during the test and start thinking about something completely different? Like Pita Bread? Mm, pita bread, so warm . . . pocket . . .

I don't think you can profile for a group that comprises the majority, though. If you take any random event, it will already happen to more Whites than it does to any other group.

If you start to stiffen up at the thought of Pita bread you deserve to be locked up. Who knows what kind of mayonaise you're leaving behind in people's sandwiches.

No laughing matter. While the death toll of any one attack does not match the 911 attacks, the terror level was much more sustained.

The idea of comparing the two seems ridiculous to me. Pure numbers is what people look like and the attacks that day would certainly qualify. I suppose that having continious small bombings has their own effects but I feel that one large attack would have to at least be comparable.

Besides they at least had the good sense to cut that shit out. I seriously doubt any kind of peace is going to occur with our breed of terrorists.

The idea of comparing the two seems ridiculous to me. Pure numbers is what people look like and the attacks that day would certainly qualify. I suppose that having continious small bombings has their own effects but I feel that one large attack would have to at least be comparable. Do you really think so? I guess it's relative...coffee shop bombings, bombs left in cars, in buildings, mortar attacks on police stations...that kind of total randomness would have me much more skittish than one large scale attack, for sure.

Besides they at least had the good sense to cut that shit out. I seriously doubt any kind of peace is going to occur with our breed of terrorists.
What, cut it out after, thirty...forty years? That's a sizeable chunk of time.

Riiiiiight...because only white Christian males are capable of that:rolleyes:

If you mean collapse as in change, I certainly hope so. If you mean 'decend into anarchy and chaos', then you really need to get over yourself.

Hahahaha.a...how was the poetry?



No-I mean collapse as in COLLAPSE. Anarchy and strife. You dont have to want to believe it, but its true. And there are little examples all around.


The poetry-my friend's stuff was good-I love her, so I want to love her work. Its funny and darkly humorous.

The other stuff- irritating. Anything is poetry it seems. This post could qualify after what I sat through last night.

No, who we really need to racially profile more are the (east) Asians. They're making way more than any other racial group, so they have to be doing something illegal. We just don't suspect them cause they're all short and quiet.

Get them Asians!!

No-I mean collapse as in COLLAPSE. Anarchy and strife. You dont have to want to believe it, but its true. And there are little examples all around. Yeah, like Chile, Argentina, Parguay, Uruguay....oh wait...hmmm....no collapse, no anarchy and strife...not run or populated by a majority of white Christian males...but perhaps somehow the 'brown people' will transform into CHAOS-BOTS once the cross into the US...

Bah, you don't have to glorify white Christian males beyond reason just to defend them from attack.

No laughing matter. While the death toll of any one attack does not match the 911 attacks, the terror level was much more sustained.


By the way, this is an interesting list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorist_attacks

Why would you post that wikipedia link? It completely refutes your position. Look at the list of attacks in modern times and the number of attacks by Muslims, especially Arab Muslims, far outnumber the terrorist attacks by all other groups combined. :confused:

Relax people. We're all Mexicans anyway. http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=507468

Yeah, like Chile, Argentina, Parguay, Uruguay....oh wait...hmmm....no collapse, no anarchy and strife...not run or populated by a majority of white Christian males...but perhaps somehow the 'brown people' will transform into CHAOS-BOTS once the cross into the US...

Bah, you don't have to glorify white Christian males beyond reason just to defend them from attack.

He's not saying things are going to collapse because they are not being run by white males, though you could have come up with better examples. All those countries are toilets. He's saying that in teh face of climate change, peak oil, population pressures, the worst foriegn affairs blunder in the history of the US at the worst possible time, the future doesn't look so bright.

Why would you post that wikipedia link? It completely refutes your position. Look at the list of attacks in modern times and the number of attacks by Muslims, especially Arab Muslims, far outnumber the terrorist attacks by all other groups combined. :confused:

I posted it for interest...to look at the 'evolution of terror'...right now, in modern times, Muslims seem to be the largest perpetrators of terrorist attacks, but they aren't the only ones...and I'm sure another hateful group will replace them in the future.

As for total amount of attacks committed by ARABs compared to other groups, muslim or otherwise...I'm not about to count them up via this link, there's got to be another source.

And my intent is to prove nothing, just interject to piss of Carn.

He's not saying things are going to collapse because they are not being run by white males, though you could have come up with better examples. All those countries are toilets. You suck! Have you ever even been to one of these countries?

He's saying that in teh face of climate change, peak oil, population pressures, the worst foriegn affairs blunder in the history of the US at the worst possible time, the future doesn't look so bright.
Thanks for clarifying his intentions but I rather suspect he was not saying this, but rather that "things are going to collapse because they are not being run by white males". I'll wait for him to tell us.

Do you really think so? I guess it's relative...coffee shop bombings, bombs left in cars, in buildings, mortar attacks on police stations...that kind of total randomness would have me much more skittish than one large scale attack, for sure.


What, cut it out after, thirty...forty years? That's a sizeable chunk of time.

In pure effectiveness? With one blow the terrorists managed to totally screw with our heads so even today people nervously look at our Muslim neighbors wondering if they are going to kill them. Despite the constant attacks of the Irish I just don't see that same effectiveness. Then again maybe Americans are just a bunch of babies.

There is that...the attacks going on for years and years on end. I'm scared of the fact that most likely if Muslim terrorists did constant small scale attacks such as that in the U.S. our democracy would be destroyed in a couple of years as we would cancel all of our rights to acheive "safety". :(

Yeah, like Chile, Argentina, Parguay, Uruguay....oh wait...hmmm....no collapse, no anarchy and strife...not run or populated by a majority of white Christian males...but perhaps somehow the 'brown people' will transform into CHAOS-BOTS once the cross into the US...

Bah, you don't have to glorify white Christian males beyond reason just to defend them from attack.


Yes- the examples you gave are all virtual paradises. You could really see yourself flourish their. You kids too. Get a great job, buy a nice house. Yeah...

holy shit.

Im not glorifying anyone-just reminding you that its just how it is. We dont need defending,we're still doing fine.

Yes- the examples you gave are all virtual paradises. You could really see yourself flourish their. You kids too. Get a great job, buy a nice house. Yeah... Um yes...you would have that opportunity. The obstacles in your path would be similar to what poor people in the US face, but nonetheless not insurmountable. No one said 'virtual paradise', and I certainly hope you don't imply that your nation should be labelled as such.

I posted it for interest...to look at the 'evolution of terror'...right now, in modern times, Muslims seem to be the largest perpetrators of terrorist attacks, but they aren't the only ones...and I'm sure another hateful group will replace them in the future.

As for total amount of attacks committed by ARABs compared to other groups, muslim or otherwise...I'm not about to count them up via this link, there's got to be another source.

And my intent is to prove nothing, just interject to piss of Carn.

Yeah-just blab a little til someone calls you on it.

You cant piss me off. I'm too big and comfortably secure for that. Etrenched in my system that serves me.

If you were really pissing me off, I'd just have some winter blankets sent to you as a gift, a peace offering.

You suck! Have you ever even been to one of these countries? No, but a tertiary glance at their infant mortality rates, the availability of health care, deforestation rates, etc... and you can see that there is something worng with the way these countries are being run in such a resource rich part of the world. Take a look at Japan. Second largest ecenomy in the world, huge middle class, social safety nets... the whole works and almost no national resources to speak of except fish. Not run by white males but obviously run very well.


Thanks for clarifying his intentions but I rather suspect he was not saying this, but rather that "things are going to collapse because they are not being run by white males". I'll wait for him to tell us.
Well, I've been here for a while and i know him so I know what he meant. At least I know he didn't mean what you accuse him of meaning unless he is just trying to rile you up.

In pure effectiveness? With one blow the terrorists managed to totally screw with our heads so even today people nervously look at our Muslim neighbors wondering if they are going to kill them. Despite the constant attacks of the Irish I just don't see that same effectiveness. Then again maybe Americans are just a bunch of babies.

There is that...the attacks going on for years and years on end. I'm scared of the fact that most likely if Muslim terrorists did constant small scale attacks such as that in the U.S. our democracy would be destroyed in a couple of years as we would cancel all of our rights to acheive "safety". :(

This is essentially my point. I think smaller-scale, but more frequent (puzzling, hard to stop, hard to expect, hard to deal with) attacks would be much more damaging overall than a few big attacks. A carbomb here, a random massacre here, in the name of whatever relgious or political agenda...I don't think it's about being babies or not, but I can imagine life going on for the majority of US citizens post 911, despite all the turmoil that attack caused...whereas a more low-level but sustained barrage would likely cause people to support the most draconian measures (yes, beyond what now exists) in the name of safety.

Um yes...you would have that opportunity. The obstacles in your path would be similar to what poor people in the US face, but nonetheless not insurmountable. No one said 'virtual paradise', and I certainly hope you don't imply that your nation should be labelled as such.

you struggle in vain to sprinkle powdered sugar on a piece of shit.

My nation is pretty damn good in general, fantastic in many ways, and crappy in some. Crappy features aint affecting me though. I'm the all powerful white man.

Yeah-just blab a little til someone calls you on it.

You cant piss me off. I'm too big and comfortably secure for that. Etrenched in my system that serves me.

If you were really pissing me off, I'd just have some winter blankets sent to you as a gift, a peace offering.
ooooooooh :D
And yes I can piss you off, I've done it repeatedly, and you've admitted to it repeatedly...trouble is, my heart's just not in it today...I think I'm too sexually satisfied :D

Well, I've been here for a while and i know him so I know what he meant. At least I know he didn't mean what you accuse him of meaning unless he is just trying to rile you up.Hate to break it to you, but I've been here longer :P

you struggle in vain to sprinkle powdered sugar on a piece of shit.

My nation is pretty damn good in general, fantastic in many ways, and crappy in some. Crappy features aint affecting me though. I'm the all powerful white man.
It's all good for you because you are the all powerful white man.

Just like it's all good for the rich and middle-class folks in the nations I mentioned.

Point of view is everything. Anywhere can be a paradise, and anywhere can be a hell. Being white or not has nothing to do with whether overall a place will be more to one side or another.

Hate to break it to you, but I've been here longer :P

I bet I still have a bigger penis. ;)

I bet I still have a bigger penis. ;)

I'll give you that, so you don't get too sad:D

ooooooooh :D
And yes I can piss you off, I've done it repeatedly, and you've admitted to it repeatedly...trouble is, my heart's just not in it today...I think I'm too sexually satisfied :D

I'd never give you that. Maybe a little frustration when I had expected better from you, but I have no recollection of a "pissed off".

I'm feeling good too...We have company coming this weekend so my wife was scrubbing the whole house.

I went up for lunch and decided to "bang the cleaining lady" instead.

She had rubber gloves on and man, did she need them.

Profile and discriminate agaisnt ALL white males, ages 30-70, esspecailly of the Christain faith. Why the faith? because the faith has explicably been involved in such acts, esspecaily of the Catholic sector. Enact all racail and religious tention on them as possible to cleanse this vermon of the human race.

Black males are actually more prone to rape of all kind.

It's all good for you because you are the all powerful white man.

Just like it's all good for the rich and middle-class folks in the nations I mentioned.

Point of view is everything. Anywhere can be a paradise, and anywhere can be a hell. Being white or not has nothing to do with whether overall a place will be more to one side or another.

Neesika- when we are no longer the majority here, it will be intolerable for you. You wont be able to comprehend it.
Thats all I've got for now.

I bet I still have a bigger penis. ;)

I see. It has come to this already...

I see. It has come to this already...

In teh end, everything comes down to my penis.

I bet I still have a bigger penis. ;)

This kind of thinking is exactly whats wrong. Since everybody knows asians have small cocks, we always overlook them. Meanwhile they're stealing all of the highpaying jobs. They're teh evil, and nobody even pays attention.


It's ok for me to say it since I'm Asian. :/

This kind of thinking is exactly whats wrong. Since everybody knows asians have small cocks, we always overlook them. Meanwhile they're stealing all of the highpaying jobs. They're teh evil, and nobody even pays attention.


It's ok for me to say it since I'm Asian. :/

Well, "everyone" knows that teh blacks have the biggest and yet they are all in jail. Perhaps size can have a negative effect on you...

I'm not black but I'm going to say it anyway. :p

Acording some white rulers in the US and other nations, Law enforcement should start racially profiling Muslims and Arabs because the vast majority of terroists are that. Well, fine, if you want to do this, then I also have a great new way of getting rid of Pedophiles, and child molesters.

Profile and discriminate agaisnt ALL white males, ages 30-70, esspecailly of the Christain faith. Why the faith? because the faith has explicably been involved in such acts, esspecaily of the Catholic sector. Enact all racail and religious tention on them as possible to cleanse this vermon of the human race.

Racial profiling deals with airport and border security, neither of which white Catholic pedophiles have had any widespread negative effect upon ever. And, as much as I would love to say that there is no justification for racial profiling, it's a plain fact that Muslim extremists are a major cause of terrorist activity in recent times. It only makes sense that people who fit the description of an Arabic and/or Muslim man would be profiled more closely than a little old white grandmother.

Well, "everyone" knows that teh blacks have the biggest and yet they are all in jail. Perhaps size can have a negative effect on you...

I'm not black but I'm going to say it anyway. :p

Being Italian, I'm an exeption to that stereotype.

So-I have a big penis and I've been here a while.

Damn-I'm a white man too.

Life is good.

Racial profiling deals with airport and border security, neither of which white Catholic pedophiles have had any widespread negative effect upon ever. And, as much as I would love to say that there is no justification for racial profiling, it's a plain fact that Muslim extremists are a major cause of terrorist activity in recent times. It only makes sense that people who fit the description of an Arabic and/or Muslim man would be profiled more closely than a little old white grandmother.

Argh, the old white lady meme again. Hate to break it to you, but airline customers are not split into "old white ladies" and arab guys wearing Keffiyahs and long white robes. There are jihadists in Indonesia, India, Russia(south, chechnya), Brunei, Malaysia, and throughout africa. All these people would have a much easier time getting through a security system that relies on racial profiling.

Being Italian, I'm an exeption to that stereotype.

So-I have a big penis and I've been here a while.

Damn-I'm a white man too.

Life is good.

Just wait, a chinaman is going to get promoted above you, and then fire you...

This is a great windfall for all the Irish, or communist terrorists out there :D

All part of our master plan, mwahahaha

Argh, the old white lady meme again. Hate to break it to you, but airline customers are not split into "old white ladies" and arab guys wearing Keffiyahs and long white robes. There are jihadists in Indonesia, India, Russia(south, chechnya), Brunei, Malaysia, and throughout africa. All these people would have a much easier time getting through a security system that relies on racial profiling.

And yet the majority of jihadists are Arabic men, so it only makes sense to pay attention to them more closely than the average person.

And yet the majority of jihadists are Arabic men, so it only makes sense to pay attention to them more closely than the average person.

We are already doing that. It might not be an official federal policy, but it exists.

A security system that looks for a certain profile will be easier to defeat by people who do not match that profile. Everyone should be checked, period.

Black males are actually more prone to rape of all kind.

So, do you even know what the word "Reich" means?
Second of all, did you know that the "Reichs" weren't holy in any way shape or form?
Does the world have to come together to whoop your ass for a 4th time?
Foolish Fool.

And no, your wrong, and your ideals based on race are simply even more foolish than your name, you need to read Guns, Germs and Steel.

Black males are actually more prone to rape of all kind.

Ah. Got the shotgun ready to kill any black scoundrels coming for your precious white women?

Ah. Got the shotgun ready to kill any black scoundrels coming for your precious white women?

clicky (http://wilstar.com/midi/whitewomen.wav)

clicky (http://wilstar.com/midi/whitewomen.wav)

:D

Damn, that is so familiar...

Acording some white rulers in the US and other nations, Law enforcement should start racially profiling Muslims and Arabs because the vast majority of terroists are that. Well, fine, if you want to do this, then I also have a great new way of getting rid of Pedophiles, and child molesters.

But that's not a threat to national security. In the US the government doesn't necessarily owe protection to any individual, only to the public.

But that's not a threat to national security. In the US the government doesn't necessarily owe protection to any individual, only to the public.

I'm much more afraid of sexual predators then terrorists. I know where my priorities would lie.

I'm much more afraid of sexual predators then terrorists. I know where my priorities would lie.

After what George Bush has done you may want to reconsider that. We now have a lot less friends and a lot more enemies in the world than we did six years ago.

the Majority of people in the US are white christain males

talk about being completely out of touch with reality. Don't you know the white christain males are terrified because the brown people are outnumbering them? :rolleyes:

talk about being completely out of touch with reality. Don't you know the white christain males are terrified because the brown people are outnumbering them? :rolleyes:

That's because the white boy club is becoming a relic of history.

Acording some white rulers in the US and other nations, Law enforcement should start racially profiling Muslims and Arabs because the vast majority of terroists are that. Well, fine, if you want to do this, then I also have a great new way of getting rid of Pedophiles, and child molesters.

Profile and discriminate agaisnt ALL white males, ages 30-70, esspecailly of the Christain faith. Why the faith? because the faith has explicably been involved in such acts, esspecaily of the Catholic sector. Enact all racail and religious tention on them as possible to cleanse this vermon of the human race.

Ok. But if only we can profile immigrants here for all crimes, including rape...

talk about being completely out of touch with reality. Don't you know the white christain males are terrified because the brown people are outnumbering them? :rolleyes:

Are????? You mean DID....Something like 70% of USA is white. Half of them male. Less than that are christians. And...future:


Of U.S. Children Under 5, Nearly Half Are Minorities
Hispanic Growth Fuels Rise, Census Says

By D'Vera Cohn and Tara Bahrampour
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, May 10, 2006; Page A01

Nearly half of the nation's children under 5 are racial or ethnic minorities, and the percentage is increasing mainly because the Hispanic population is growing so rapidly, according to a census report released today.

Hispanics are the nation's largest and fastest-growing minority group. They accounted for 49 percent of the country's growth from 2004 to 2005, the report shows. And the increase in young children is largely a Hispanic story, driving 70 percent of the growth in children younger than 5. Forty-five percent of U.S. children younger than 5 are minorities.
...........

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/09/AR2006050901841.html

We are already doing that. It might not be an official federal policy, but it exists.

A security system that looks for a certain profile will be easier to defeat by people who do not match that profile. Everyone should be checked, period.

Of course everyone should be checked. I used the words "more closely" for a reason.

Acording some white rulers in the US and other nations, Law enforcement should start racially profiling Muslims and Arabs because the vast majority of terroists are that. Well, fine, if you want to do this, then I also have a great new way of getting rid of Pedophiles, and child molesters.

Profile and discriminate agaisnt ALL white males, ages 30-70, esspecailly of the Christain faith. Why the faith? because the faith has explicably been involved in such acts, esspecaily of the Catholic sector. Enact all racail and religious tention on them as possible to cleanse this vermon of the human race.

You kinda make sense, but not quite. The faith has been portrayed in negative light by the media every time such a case pops up, but it wouldn't make news to keep mentioning all the times a person was NOT molested by someone claiming to be part of the Christian faith. Thus, your theory kinda sucks.

yes, but if we give in to the biast steriotypes and generalizations we can assume the most of them a older white christain males.
How many acts of paedophilia are committed while flying or on other public transport?

Profile and discriminate agaisnt ALL white males, ages 30-70, esspecailly of the Christain faith. Why the faith? because the faith has explicably been involved in such acts, esspecaily of the Catholic sector. Enact all racail and religious tention on them as possible to cleanse this vermon of the human race.

actually, there are more cases of child abuse in state insitutions than church ran ones. its just that the church have tried to cover them up. also chiuld abuse is way higher in africa, than the white world.

You can check actually. I remember reading about an experiment where they wired up a bunch of guys' penises to a machine and showed them gay porn. A greater percentage of the most homophobic guys' started to fill up just enough for the machine to detect arousal.

Just run the test with pictures of kids instead of gay porn and you can find out who's a likely kid-toucher.

i hate it when be people bring that study to claim "homophobes are gay".

firstlt, the test is completely inacurate cause in only had a small number of people taking it, you need a large number of people to prove anything. i think they only had 54 people.

the rule is, if a social study is done in a america, it was probably wrong. especially if it was state funded.

secondly, anyone who is actually homophobic, wouldnt submit them selves to doing a test were they are watching gay porn, let alone have metal things tuck to thier penis.

thirdly, random erections cause the test to be flawed.

well think about it though, when people think "terrorist" they think Arab-muslim male, when people think pedopille, generally they're all going to think of an older out of shape white guy, possibly catholic.

its not that most pedos are cathlic. but priesthood is attractive to pedos. not catholicism.

i hate it when be people bring that study to claim "homophobes are gay".

firstlt, the test is completely inacurate cause in only had a small number of people taking it, you need a large number of people to prove anything. i think they only had 54 people.

the rule is, if a social study is done in a america, it was probably wrong. especially if it was state funded.

secondly, anyone who is actually homophobic, wouldnt submit them selves to doing a test were they are watching gay porn, let alone have metal things tuck to thier penis.

thirdly, random erections cause the test to be flawed.

Are you just saying that because you're in denial about your sexual orientation?

This is a great windfall for all the Irish, or communist terrorists out there :D

funny story.
my friend was stoped at birmingham(spelling?) airport, questioned and searched cause of his name was doyle.
the other funny thing about it was, even though they didnt know that his uncle was apart of the birmingham bombing.

There just aren't that many. There are exceptions, but not a significant number. Last terrorist act committed by an Irishman or communist in the U.S. was when? Anywhere else -- when?

not aware of irish terror attacks in the us. doesnt make sense. why would the ira bomb one of thier major funders?
last irish terror attack was last week. there are terror attacks more often than you think, but nowadays the death tolls are very low.

actually, there are more cases of child abuse in state insitutions than church ran ones. its just that the church have tried to cover them up. also chiuld abuse is way higher in africa, than the white world.

That would appear to be unfortunately true, especially considering Mugabe's torutre camps for kids which he tried (or tries? did anyone stop him?) to pass off as youth training camps

Are you just saying that because you're in denial about your sexual orientation?

no.
i'm just very skeptical about social studies.
arachniphobes arent spiders.

After what George Bush has done you may want to reconsider that. We now have a lot less friends and a lot more enemies in the world than we did six years ago.

It is certainly true that we are in more danger today then we were 5 years ago but the odds of a terrorist attack are still very low and the chances of actually dying in one even lower then that. The odds of a child being a victim of a pedophile now... the chances are higher then I am comfortable thinking about.