NationStates Jolt Archive


Reflections on an Election

Myrmidonisia
10-11-2006, 15:37
We've had the last couple races deciding our Congressional majority end gracefully, much to my surprise. Both of the incumbent Republican Senators in Montana and Virginia have conceeded defeat without the need for recounts and litigation. That's good.

It seems that politicians on both sides are much more likable in defeat. It's almost as if they feel that an apology is needed after a bitter campaign. The victors owe us an apology, as well, but we don't seem to see it as often. I suppose that the losers must realize that nothing they say is going to hurt them anymore. Some even realize that what they have been engaged in has not been merely an election, but a part of a great nation's life. They discovered that they loved America.

Rep. Harold Ford of Tennessee, who lost his Senate race, said he'd wanted to be in government since he was 4 years old, that people had taken a risk on him, that he was grateful. "I love my country," he said. "Don't lose faith in this great thing called America."

Sen. Lincoln Chafee up in Rhode Island said America is divided; "common ground is becoming scarce." He'd miss those in the Senate "who take their responsibility to govern more seriously than their personal ambitions."

From Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania, a demonstration of patriotic civility. He praised his opponent as a human being--"a fine man, he'll do a fine job for the state."

Sen. George Allen, gentleman of Virginia, said, "We are placed here on earth to do something well." He vowed to do all he could to help Jim Webb come in and serve in the U.S. Capitol.

What's next for the winners? We've read the "100 hour" plan and that's fine. Get your house in order before you start doing the Nation's business. But don't forget that it is the Nation that you are governing. The last majority did. Learn a lesson in humility from the losers. Good Luck, and God Bless all of you.
Dragontide
10-11-2006, 15:41
Very enlightning! And God bless all of those that did not let the bitter mudslinging keep them away from the polls!
Myrmidonisia
10-11-2006, 15:43
I'm an optimistic guy at heart. I really want the political system to work and I really want the new Congress to be remembered as more than a couple bad years before the 2008 elections. Reading some of the losers concessions made me remember that.
Myrmidonisia
10-11-2006, 22:21
This sure sank to the bottom in a hurry. Guess I need to add some gasoline before we can get a good discussion going, huh?
Darkesia
10-11-2006, 22:23
Here... let me help.

Republicans are stinky.

This is a great commentary and therefore doesn't stand a chance here. I'm glad you found a place to renew your hope in a battered system.
Yootopia
10-11-2006, 22:24
Here's my reflection on it -

*does a tremendously happy dance*
Laerod
10-11-2006, 22:30
We've had the last couple races deciding our Congressional majority end gracefully, much to my surprise. Both of the incumbent Republican Senators in Montana and Virginia have conceeded defeat without the need for recounts and litigation. That's good.Don't want to be nitpicky, but if I'm not much mistaken, the margin in Montana was too big for a recount to be called, so there isn't really any "need" for a recount.
Kyronea
10-11-2006, 22:42
Frankly, I think the only reason Allen didn't call for a recount was the likelihood of sheer amounts of outcry over Republican hypocrisy. "Well, now that THEY need a recount, they're all for it!" It would have gone nowhere, wasted money, and in the end Webb would have won anyway.
Laerod
10-11-2006, 22:52
Frankly, I think the only reason Allen didn't call for a recount was the likelihood of sheer amounts of outcry over Republican hypocrisy. "Well, now that THEY need a recount, they're all for it!" It would have gone nowhere, wasted money, and in the end Webb would have won anyway.According to some people I've talked to active in Virginia politics, saving his carreer from the bad publicity of a recount is why he didn't do it. Still, got to give him a hand for that. He did have the right to a recount.
Fleckenstein
10-11-2006, 22:59
Frankly, I think the only reason Allen didn't call for a recount was the likelihood of sheer amounts of outcry over Republican hypocrisy. "Well, now that THEY need a recount, they're all for it!" It would have gone nowhere, wasted money, and in the end Webb would have won anyway.

Yeah, but then they claim he was a Saint for not calling for a recount!

God I hate politics sometimes.
Kyronea
10-11-2006, 23:11
According to some people I've talked to active in Virginia politics, saving his carreer from the bad publicity of a recount is why he didn't do it. Still, got to give him a hand for that. He did have the right to a recount.

Exactly my point. Bad press would have been a no-no. Allen may yet try for 2008 Presidential, though I hope he doesn't. Macaca doesn't deserve to be elected chairman of the "Let's clean the janitor's closet!" group, let alone anything else.
Myrmidonisia
11-11-2006, 00:05
Yeah, but then they claim he was a Saint for not calling for a recount!

God I hate politics sometimes.

Actually I called him a gentleman, not a Saint. There's a difference. And it is certainly much more relaxing to have the winners and losers sort this out between themselves, rather than order recounts and litigate those results. I would like to think that Webb would have done the same, had the tables been turned.