NationStates Jolt Archive


Huh? Conspiracy thread

Ostroeuropa
08-11-2006, 16:46
If the majority of people are liberal towards sexual freedom, why hasnt it happened?

because of the corporations eveel totalitarianism.

Feel free to debunk my conspiracy and post your own.
Kanabia
08-11-2006, 16:47
If the majority of people are liberal towards sexual freedom, why hasnt it happened?


Are they, though?
Ostroeuropa
08-11-2006, 16:48
Are they, though?

Yes :p
If they arent, they arent people
Cabra West
08-11-2006, 16:48
If the majority of people are liberal towards sexual freedom, why hasnt it happened?



It hasn't? I thought it had :confused:
Ostroeuropa
08-11-2006, 16:49
It hasn't? I thought it had :confused:

Gay rights and the abolishment of the Under 16 thing happened?!
WOOO im not going to jail for dating my girlfriend!
Ifreann
08-11-2006, 16:50
It hasn't? I thought it had :confused:

It's only people who aren't getting any who don't notice :(
The Waaaagh
08-11-2006, 16:52
Desu, the die-hard daring and destitute, do they dare determine the dread which drags drearily in the ditches? Does a dream drown out what Death doth see? Downfall is the detriment of the delirious, dripping dross from a drooling desiccated drum. Developing discord in Desu does not determine if you are a drone, but delineates discussion disregarding destruction. Desu is the destruction of the determination and the determination of destruction, dropping distinct drabs of dementia directly but discreetly. Disturbing and disgusting as this you may descry, it is the defenders of desu that drew forth the distinct and drastic derision drowning debate, yet which drew forth drawings dedicated solely to desu.
Determination, destruction, dementia and death, this distilled essence that draws forth desu, dedicating a drain on the direct descendant of a Duke, but ducks sometimes divert their destruction drawing desu downwards. If you must distinguish my deepest dawning of desu, know that death will definitely defeat those that disregard the detrimental disunion of desu, for discussion of desu dressed as a donkey does not depress a determined foe. Doth desu dream? Or is it merely the delusions of a determined but dreadfully dumb dullard? It is not for me to say.
Disregarding further desu, I may drag such discussions on to my detriment, let me simply say that it is my distinct honor to meet you, and you may call me Desu.

/b/ is in my brain!
Ostroeuropa
08-11-2006, 16:53
Desu, the die-hard daring and destitute, do they dare determine the dread which drags drearily in the ditches? Does a dream drown out what Death doth see? Downfall is the detriment of the delirious, dripping dross from a drooling desiccated drum. Developing discord in Desu does not determine if you are a drone, but delineates discussion disregarding destruction. Desu is the destruction of the determination and the determination of destruction, dropping distinct drabs of dementia directly but discreetly. Disturbing and disgusting as this you may descry, it is the defenders of desu that drew forth the distinct and drastic derision drowning debate, yet which drew forth drawings dedicated solely to desu.
Determination, destruction, dementia and death, this distilled essence that draws forth desu, dedicating a drain on the direct descendant of a Duke, but ducks sometimes divert their destruction drawing desu downwards. If you must distinguish my deepest dawning of desu, know that death will definitely defeat those that disregard the detrimental disunion of desu, for discussion of desu dressed as a donkey does not depress a determined foe. Doth desu dream? Or is it merely the delusions of a determined but dreadfully dumb dullard? It is not for me to say.
Disregarding further desu, I may drag such discussions on to my detriment, let me simply say that it is my distinct honor to meet you, and you may call me Desu.

/b/ is in my brain!


*(gets to line 2 and gives up)*
Arthais101
08-11-2006, 16:55
If the majority of people are liberal towards sexual freedom, why hasnt it happened?



It hasn't? Griswald v. Connecticut, Lawrence v. Texas and Planned Parenthood v. Casey would seem to disagree.
Ostroeuropa
08-11-2006, 16:56
It hasn't? Griswald v. Connecticut, Lawrence v. Texas and Planned Parenthood v. Casey would seem to disagree.

Lies :p
The Waaaagh
08-11-2006, 16:56
*(gets to line 2 and gives up)*

Good, because its not supposed to make sense :P
Ifreann
08-11-2006, 16:57
Desu, the die-hard daring and destitute, do they dare determine the dread which drags drearily in the ditches? Does a dream drown out what Death doth see? Downfall is the detriment of the delirious, dripping dross from a drooling desiccated drum. Developing discord in Desu does not determine if you are a drone, but delineates discussion disregarding destruction. Desu is the destruction of the determination and the determination of destruction, dropping distinct drabs of dementia directly but discreetly. Disturbing and disgusting as this you may descry, it is the defenders of desu that drew forth the distinct and drastic derision drowning debate, yet which drew forth drawings dedicated solely to desu.
Determination, destruction, dementia and death, this distilled essence that draws forth desu, dedicating a drain on the direct descendant of a Duke, but ducks sometimes divert their destruction drawing desu downwards. If you must distinguish my deepest dawning of desu, know that death will definitely defeat those that disregard the detrimental disunion of desu, for discussion of desu dressed as a donkey does not depress a determined foe. Doth desu dream? Or is it merely the delusions of a determined but dreadfully dumb dullard? It is not for me to say.
Disregarding further desu, I may drag such discussions on to my detriment, let me simply say that it is my distinct honor to meet you, and you may call me Desu.

/b/ is in my brain!

You used the word descry, I like.


Also, I've never seen V for Vendetta and I know that's a rip off.
Andaluciae
08-11-2006, 16:59
If the majority of people are liberal towards sexual freedom, why hasnt it happened?

because of the corporations eveel totalitarianism.

Feel free to debunk my conspiracy and post your own.

Aye, but in Ohio in 2004 corporations opposed the gay marriage ban, on the basis that it would invalidate their pension and benefits systems, which were designed around allowing for same sex couples to receive benefits as such.
The Waaaagh
08-11-2006, 17:00
You used the word descry, I like.


Also, I've never seen V for Vendetta and I know that's a rip off.

I was running out of 'D' words. Once you start something like this you realize there really arent that many.

Its not V for Vendetta though, its D for Desu ;)